Regarding this group, Sian Norris has published an unfavorable and, in my view, misleading, essay in the Guardian, here:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/31/white-supremacy-trad-wives-far-right-feminist-politics

Her essay is misleading because members of this group have articulated the group viewpoint in terms that are reasonable and defensible. In doing so, some members essentially have drawn upon the position of the nineteenth-century, British political theorist Edmund Burke. Burke argued that a society draws its collective strength from the strength of its subgroups, such as families. Groups (and subgroups) are strong when their individual members are prepared to sacrifice for the good of the collective whole. This argument can be traced back through Plato, Aristotle, and a long line of influential thinkers.

Other members accounted for this group by way of its distinction from the contemporary school of self-serving individualism-- another strong position.

Prior to reading the Guardian article, I was unaware of this group. When I followed the article's link to this forum, I found something different from the strawman (or woman) that was being abused. Though I know that they will never see the light of day, I sent these words to the Guardian editor:

Sian Norris' is misleading in her essay on "Frilly dresses and white supremacy". A reader who follows her reference to the Reddit group Red-Pill Women finds that its members account for their traditional marital views in terms of informed and reasonable arguments regarding the benefits of collectivist social values in contrast with self-serving individualism. Their classical position is drawn, not from racist ideology, but from the original conservative argument advanced by Edmund Burke, British MP and nineteenth century political theorist. Agree or disagree, no knowledgeable political observer would overlook the strengths of this argument.