After watching the short Andrew tate clip on Piers Morgan it once again reminded me how women are valued by their sexual history above anything else you can value someone by when it comes to this community. I'm a grown man over 30 so this obsession/ fascination with 18 year olds doesn't make sense to me as I considered myself a child at that age . Frontal lobe wasn't even complete and didn't even know myself. This obsession with the youngest age possible over a woman in their 20s is something I've only heard in this community. People typically mate with someone around their age within 5 years . This notion of 30 year old men or 25 year old men engaging with 18 year olds is not reality . Most people are within the same age so this seems unique to this community ( or perhaps certain middle eastern countries where child marriage is legal though we can agree that's wrong ) in how it seeks out and considers 18 year olds as the most valuable women simply because they are more likely to have sex or easier to manipulate.

I remember hearing discussions about whether transwoman should tell the man they are a biological male . This is a no brainer to me, obviously yes ,at the risk of their safety and he would immediately end the relationship anyway. Now many men have told me here they would immediately end the relationship if they found out their significant other was promiscuous In the past . Why do this ? Why not tell her from the outset ? How can you tell transwoman to tell men they are trans because it's literally dependent on the relationship but yet won't ask a woman if she's been promiscuous if its dependent on the relationship. It comes off incredibly dishonest as if you know most women may not engage if they are hounded even subtly with a question like that but don't you think they deserve to know ?

How does this community reconcile this ? And to be clear , you can't ultimately discern whether a woman is promiscuous by the way she carries herself and even if you could she deserves to know .