Whenever male issues of any sort come up in society, whether it's media or politics or even just regular people speaking, it seems that everyone feels compelled to relate the issue to something other than the wellbeing of the men in question.

Male deaths are most commonly related to the wives and children they leave behind. Male health issues are frequently connected to loss of economic output or, otherwise, or some other utility provided by the affected men. False accusations damaging men are so frequently and brazenly connected to "discrediting real victims" that it'd be almost hilarious if it wasn't sickening. There is practically never an open, direct, frank recognition of the inherent value of male lives.

Part of it is certainly male disposability. Society views male death and suffering as a natural price to pay to obtain certain advantages. But there is actual hesitation, almost a fear, of saying "men are as value, this problem that affects them is bad because it affects them and that is sufficient for us to worry and act on it".

I recognize it even in myself, if I imagine speaking of male issues to others, I would feel hesitant to just speak in terms of inherent male worth, and very tempted to try to connect them to some other negative consequence. Yet I can't quite put my finger on why.

Why do you think this happens?