There is no 10 scale -- nobody is a 9/10 or a 3/10 or anything else

burner09887655443221 · 2021-01-27T05:12:03+00:00

see: smash or pass

Knoxfrosty · 2021-01-27T08:22:33+00:00

Problem is when its 0.5

letsgetrandy · 2021-01-27T07:47:04+00:00

[permanently deleted]

2021-01-27T10:57:13+00:00

[permanently deleted]

2021-01-27T09:18:16+00:00

[permanently deleted]

kuavi · 2021-01-27T13:42:51+00:00

In that case, self improvement wouldnt exist if nobody was worse or better than everyone else.

I wouldnt say people are as simple as a 1 to 10 scale but as much as I would like to agree with you, no. There are varying levels of objective attractiveness, all affected by genes, grooming, social calibration, achievements, fitness, etc.

Now everyone has their own personal priorities of which values matter more than others which can tip the scales quite dramatically but I'm sure you can think of people in your life that have an objectively better mix of attributes that they have/worked on than others.

2021-01-27T06:57:49+00:00

[permanently deleted]

2021-01-27T09:39:54+00:00

[permanently deleted]

Alchemist_XP · 2021-01-27T03:21:48+00:00

I agree with you, but my super asshole side of me wants to say, the Fibonacci sequence, used as a reference scale for the human body is suppose to give a perfect body scale. Michelangelo used this to carve the statue of david, and is suppose to represent the “ideal” human form that matches the 1.618 ratio.

boss-mannn · 2021-01-27T13:24:56+00:00

good

Monjark360 · 2021-01-28T04:37:36+00:00

Straight facts

2021-01-27T09:45:01+00:00

[permanently deleted]

letsgetrandy · 2021-01-27T12:59:11+00:00

I don't think anything wrong with this rating system.

It helps you judge the Women and tell if she is good enough for you
It helps have a good conversation among the Bois

recyclablebanthas · 2021-01-27T13:13:44+00:00

[permanently deleted]

GrimmMD · 2021-01-27T18:11:59+00:00

It's odd that I saw this, just as I was thinking the same darn thing. It doesn't matter what 99.99♾️% of people think about you, it only matters to you, and your mate. Definitely, a 0 or a 1, it's binary code.🤪 In the extreme example, a person who is "never happy" might find their "perfect 10" in someone else who's also constantly negative. To anyone else, neither one is a yes, or 1.

2021-01-27T03:39:23+00:00

[permanently deleted]

VDKay · 2021-01-27T13:55:59+00:00

I guess your point is that a 9/10 for one person is a 6/10 for another. Which is true. Or that a person one night is a 9 and another night is a 6. Which is also true. Ratings can change, as well as binary choices (0 or 1). They are all subjective if that's what you mean and I agree.

However, a scale that is not subjective is, for example, the ratio of the general population that they are 1 or 0 for a given person. E.g. take 100 people as random as possible and ask them to say "0" or "1" for a given person X. Then, if, for example, 60 people said "1", that would make that X person, say, a 6/10. We, as humans are both hard-wired and also socially adapted/experienced to be able to tell with relative ease, given a person X, what we think his/her 10-scale rating could be. I can guess that if I get a bunch of guys in a group, most of us will pretty much agree that, say, Alexis Ren, a popular instagram model is more likely to be on the upper level of this scale, whereas, say, Oprah, would be far lower. There might be outliers, but the consensus will be strikingly obvious.

This is far easier for men as we are hard-wired to be more attracted to physical characteristics and we can tell really fast if a girl is a 1 or a 0 for us. But this applies to women as well of course. Hence, for many women, a virgin guy is far less attractive than the same exact guy if he is known to have past satisfied lovers under his belt (called pre-selection).

That scale only exists for people who are posturing their accomplishments against each other, in which case they're not actually making their choices for themselves.

That's a pretty biased way to put it. I'd see it more as a motivation for self-improvement. Should it hinder you or skew your choices? No. Could it be used to better communicate? I guess. Is it an indication for self-improvement? If statistically significant, probably yes.

Enlightened_Ghost · 2021-01-27T11:17:21+00:00

Nah....seen this silly concept making waves lately. The concept of the 1-10 scale is simply used as a tool to indicate how much you like someone. As you say; either you like someone...or you don’t, however, if you have two girls that you like, surely, you may like one slightly more than the other (for a myriad of reasons, all subjective). This is natural, everyone experiences this...even you I’m sure. Though you may like both, the 1-10 scale simply helps you establish a way to differentiate which one you like more, which is simply not possible using your 0 or 1 scale.

18cmOfGreatness · 2021-01-27T12:29:17+00:00

[permanently deleted]

Ensifror · 2021-01-27T11:46:54+00:00

I'd say it's more of a trinary. Some people are repulsive, some people are attractive, and some people are neither.

Bo0mh3adsh0t · 2021-01-27T12:26:58+00:00

I would say due to insecurities there are 3 scales; 0 - would not date 1 - would date and 2 - out of my league. The trick is to improve yourself and your confidence so that you start to see the 2’s as 1’s and then go out there a find all the 1’s who think your a 1 or better yet a 2.

PianoOwl · 2021-01-27T14:20:26+00:00

While this may not be entirely correct solely on the basis that even amongst attractive girls, there will always be some who are more/ less attractive than the others, while still technically both being “1s”, I like the simple mindset and understand your point.

redpill_scientist92 · 2021-01-27T19:15:05+00:00

I’ve always seen the 10 scale as relative to an area-a 10/10 in Wisconsin is a 6/10 in Cali

X-Centric · 2021-01-28T04:44:52+00:00

I thought this post was going to tackle how people objectify others by ranking them in a numeral system, but then it went back to the same premise. I agree with just taking the decision of either be interested in someone and going for it or not. I'm not so into qualifying people on a numeral scale of looks/quality of dating (even when sometimes I do this too).

18cmOfGreatness · 2021-01-28T15:48:19+00:00

Why is this bullshit upvoted? Obviously attraction isn't binary. Moreover, there are both social and biological aspects to beauty standards. Attractiveness is subjective only for about 20%, everything else is objective and there are even AI networks which rate it rather accurately.

Juevon_ · 2021-02-10T07:31:46+00:00

This sounds like something an ugly person would say 😂

recyclablebanthas · 2021-01-27T06:58:43+00:00

[permanently deleted]

WalidfromMorocco · 2021-01-27T13:38:36+00:00

There's definitely a scale, but obviously it's not absolute. What is a 7 for me might be a 6 or 5 for someone else. Always try to better yourself. Dont try to reason yourself into a false reality.

letsgetrandy · 2021-01-27T19:43:36+00:00

Yeah, it's made by misinformed society. Some boys/guys use that until they grow up. Real men don't as it's demeaning, objectifying of the individual or individuals being given a number superficially. Media, entertainment, enabling by society reinforces such bad practice. Attraction is more than just physical looks. It requires being compatible, compromise and having common personality/character, mindsets, routines, habits, lifestyle, etc. There are more to all stages and types of relationships than looks and perceptions alone. Physique eventually disappears while inner traits last.

Title	There is no 10 scale -- nobody is a 9/10 or a 3/10 or anything else
Author	letsgetrandy
Upvotes	213
Comments	84
Date	January 27, 2021 3:10 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/seduction
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/l5uxky/there_is_no_10_scale_nobody_is_a_910_or_a_310_or/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/seduction/there-is-no-10-scale-nobody-is-a-910-or-a-310-or.1508984 https://theredarchive.com/post/1508984

Comments