I mean if you really want to, then fine, but the second image is just...

Suspicious-Break1247 · 2024-09-27T19:35:23+00:00

The man who sued didn't even complain the lounge existed,he just complained that some of the the BEST artworks were locked in the lounge(keep in mind men and women pay the same 35$ fee,but men are the ones that can't see artwork cause of their gender)

New-Distribution6033 · 2024-09-27T19:18:43+00:00

Australia needs some freedom. Y'all got any oil? We trade freedom for oil, over here.

Lolocraft1 · 2024-09-27T20:26:47+00:00

It’s easy to say women are better than men at art when you exclude men from the exhibit

SkyImaginationLight · 2024-09-27T21:11:28+00:00

Rather than allow the exhibit to be seen by both sexes equally so that both can learn and understand the purpose of the exhibit, the artist would rather perpetuate their own form of discrimination that the exhibit exists to criticize?

You don't solve the problem of discrimination with legalized discrimination. If it's going to be illegal to discriminate for one sex, then it should also be the same for the other, no exceptions. While there are some parts of society that allow one to cater exclusively to one sex, they can't exist solely for the purpose of discriminating against patrons of the other. sex.

Wonderful_Working315 · 2024-09-27T20:56:38+00:00

I doubt anyone will go see it. Maybe a few feminist. If you need exclusionary policy like that, it's because they can't compete in an open market. It's got to be shitty "art".

yogaflame1337 · 2024-09-27T21:33:58+00:00

It says you can get in if you identity as female. Boom there ya go fellas... I mean ladies...or fellas, or them?

CompetitiveOffer5339 · 2024-09-27T21:08:58+00:00

I’m a woman, and even I say, in what world?

Also these feminists realize men are stronger and are most world leaders? So if they wanted to they could oppress them, but there not.

liberationofmen · 2024-09-27T22:38:56+00:00

But still, the first image is quite sexist as a women has a no men sign

iChavDec · 2024-09-27T20:06:17+00:00

Mhm okay Janet, keep dreaming pet 👍

average_texas_guy · 2024-09-27T23:17:31+00:00

Try making the same thing but excluding literally any other group and see how that works out. Can you imagine a no women allowed scenario? No people of color, only straight people allowed, no christians, no Jews, anything and you would be destroyed. As you should be btw. But somehow, as long as you exclude men, you're a hero.

NarcBaiter · 2024-09-27T19:21:40+00:00

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvglvy6gn54o

randyoftheinternet · 2024-09-27T20:42:58+00:00

Lol, better at tricking the system sure

JustNefariousness625 · 2024-09-27T22:29:09+00:00

The second slide is low tier rage bait point blank. I’m black and I’ve noticed this when women entered the hip-hop space. they don’t have long-term sustainability for 2 reasons. 1 they mostly sell sex and once that tires out men stop watching and listening. 2 Women don’t really support other women artist like that. If they could get support from other women they wouldn’t have to sell sex first place. I say all this to say she’ll get her initial push from femcels and trolls but after a while the push will die down and she’ll whimper out of the public’s eye.

AllGearedUp · 2024-09-27T23:33:52+00:00

Wait what county is this in? How can it be legal to exclude one sex from something but not a race?

IGottaKnowGuys1 · 2024-09-27T20:25:00+00:00

I love blatantly sexism. One day we need to remind them that we're larger and stronger and could oppress them at any moment. They are free by our whims.

Imaqtusername · 2024-09-27T22:25:28+00:00

I dont care because I know that is a lie 😎

frackingfaxer · 2024-09-28T03:54:37+00:00

This artist is a troll, and this whole thing is a performance. It's hard to say how much of this stuff she believes, but it was clearly designed to be as outrageous as possible to get a rise out of people, namely men. She may very well believe that women are superior to men, but to say this verdict proves that is such a non sequitur, it's clearly trolling. The best way to deal with this is to ignore her. Don't feed the troll.

Now far more interesting are the legal implications of this verdict, assuming it stands. There are some interesting discussions over at r/auslaw. It's suggested that this could allow anyone to discriminate against anyone, since nearly everyone can be shown to possess some structural disadvantage. As long as you claim it is to correct for your particular disadvantage, you'd be good.

xxTheMagicBulleT · 2024-09-28T06:36:02+00:00

Women only space = ok

Men only spaces = exclusion and sexism and is not ok.

Dubble standers like always. Why people care less and less about women's issues. Cause they can't give the same respect to anyone else

Eden_Company · 2024-09-28T02:17:35+00:00

If the exhibit was free it would make sense, but if you have to pay to enter and can't see the art, that's a scam. You can make private clubs for only a particular group, but once you start having paid clients you can't deny them the service they're paying for.

Alternative-Oil-6288 · 2024-09-27T22:06:15+00:00

Separate but unequal type shit

BlueThespian · 2024-09-28T01:54:16+00:00

Because most men like that “Judge” are dumbfcking simps and don’t realize what their actions did.

KingPeverell · 2024-09-28T05:30:00+00:00

I suppose da Vinci, Rembrandt, Picasso, Van Gogh, and Monet were complete failures then 🤣

samMannyDesigns · 2024-09-28T07:47:25+00:00

that reggae hit of countries as women comes to mind 😂😂😂

Training_Pause_9256 · 2024-09-28T11:28:21+00:00

Many things in history were wrong, like slavery. The solution isn't to allow black people to own white slaves now is it?

Emotional-Self-8387 · 2024-09-28T12:39:59+00:00

Lmao of course they’re white women

AntiFeminismAU · 2024-09-28T16:40:53+00:00

Once again, Australia proves to be the country with the most feminism and misandry.

Competitive_Ebb_6381 · 2024-09-28T01:36:55+00:00

Got it!

RealStarkey · 2024-09-28T03:40:34+00:00

Yay, we win losers. No go back to work in crappy jobs while we finger paint.

Foxtrot_niv · 2024-09-28T05:37:04+00:00

Women taking credit for something they had no decision in.

RunInRunOn · 2024-09-28T08:08:14+00:00

I'd be fine with this if it was something the women had to pay for separately

LCGiftingWisdom · 2024-10-01T02:21:14+00:00

Women are different, not better. They are just as disgusting and evil, it just expresses differently. Lookup “dominance heirarchy in mate selection”. There’s a lot to explaining women’s evil, and men, all of which is mostly insecurity based.

EvelynsLair · 2024-09-27T19:38:34+00:00

Wow, cryptic much? Is the second image like one of those modern art pieces? Totally feel your pain.

Title	I mean if you really want to, then fine, but the second image is just...
Author	Yourmumisahedgehog
Upvotes	538
Comments	78
Date	September 27, 2024 6:41 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1fquvis/i_mean_if_you_really_want_to_then_fine_but_the/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/i-mean-if-you-really-want-to-then-fine-but-the.1531647 https://theredarchive.com/post/1531647

Comments