Please help us in not spreading Big Red's personal info. - AVFM shows its capable of drawing the line

SharkSpider · 2013-04-14T02:08:13+00:00

Honestly, I'm surprised in this. Previously I had thought that AVFM would be all about spreading this person's information. I'm glad they distinguish between freedom of speech and other actions.

However, I still have one question. How is what this person did any different from the other protest in Toronto during the Warren Farrell lecture? In that example the woman called the guy attending the lecture scum and a potential rapist. In this example the woman was screaming "fuck" every few seconds. Both occurred in a public place. But only with one of them did AVFM call for action against.

Am I missing anything between the two events?

dademurphie · 2013-04-14T19:46:49+00:00

This is her back in the summer yelling at Christians

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npvWGCPv2j0

Rab_Legend · 2013-04-14T10:39:26+00:00

I can see this backfiring if she finds out, it'll somehow be patriarchy to protect her privacy

deciple87 · 2013-04-14T14:16:43+00:00

I know her identity, I saw a few comments in people requesting that information. I thought about it for a second, and though I detest this woman, she's a biggoted idiot but she doesn't deserve the wrath of anonymous or some people to come down on her for it and personally attack her. She doesn't deserve that, and we're better than that.

CosmicKeys · 2013-04-14T04:09:05+00:00

I totally agree with this.

In terms of where the line draws, I feel it is contingent on where and in what capacity someone chooses to engage others about a cause.

Reddit is an anonymous platform. If you choose you can post personal information, but otherwise that's where the line stops.

When you go out into the public and protest, you are choosing to put your face up as part of the cause. So spreading your face is where the line stops.

If you choose to run a website with your name on it and promote yourself as a public figure for the cause, then that's where the line stops. She clearly hasn't.

ClickclickClever · 2013-04-14T04:58:59+00:00

Yeah this is most likely the right thing to do. But. Fuck this person right? I love freedom of expression and it is important to protect but man this person seems like a giant hateful cunt. Obviously doxxing people is wrong and it's important not to censor people and because of that I think it's important for me to throw in that ignorant bigoted sexists deserve to have their put forth like everyone else, and shown how wrong and horrible they are and how wrong and horrible the person most likely is.

Crimson_D82 · 2013-04-14T08:05:47+00:00

I agree with this, I mean why should we do to them what they've been doing to us for years? We should we destroy their careers, families and steal their children? Why make them taste their own medicine, after all it isn't fair to them to be treated as they have treated others....

/semi-sarcastic

chevalier_d_eon · 2013-04-14T09:56:49+00:00

Freedom of speech - means freedom of speech. Whether it FU or intelligent debate. Let us not ruin a woman's life because we don't like what she's saying, otherwise we've just validated her opinion of the MRM.

Don't be short sighted on this one!

Collective82 · 2013-04-14T20:01:29+00:00

I think the difference is big re was trying to get people to listen to her just very rudely where as scum girl was getting in people's faces personally attacking them and participating in preventing people from getting into a lecture.

JamesRyder · 2013-04-14T13:53:26+00:00

I still want to know what this girl's story is. She must be the daughter of a politician or academic or something to have enough free time to be present at lots of different protests.

Nineteen-EightyFour · 2013-04-14T21:35:02+00:00

I completely disagree with this. She made the decision to go out in public in front of video caremas and act like that. She should have no expectation of privacy.

letmypeople · 2013-04-14T21:39:58+00:00

Pretty clear to me this is just re-branding. The heat for all their doxxing and harassment of women got to be too much, so they had a backroom meeting and decided to re-brand themselves as "MRHM" in doublespeak. Then they decided to disavow some of their past harassment and cyberbullying and are laughably letting this particular pathetic loser off the hookas a political gesture. She was totally ineffective anyway and not a threat. It's like they have hired a PR lady and it's all about the donations. I call bullshit.

JesusSaidSo · 2013-04-14T02:13:40+00:00

Almost makes me suspect she's an AVfM plant because frankly she was a little bit too perfect. Naturally they'd want to keep a lid on that.

Title	Please help us in not spreading Big Red's personal info. - AVFM shows its capable of drawing the line
Author	MrStonedOne
Upvotes	61
Comments	62
Date	April 14, 2013 1:33 AM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/mensrights/comments/1caw6d/please-help-us-in-not-spreading-big-reds-personal-/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/please-help-us-in-not-spreading-big-reds-personal.1610501 https://theredarchive.com/post/1610501

Comments