Is there any correlation between someone's MBTI type and whether they're likely to be feminists/MRAs/red pillers/incels/blue pillers etc?

LivelyChartreuse · 2018-07-19T01:08:55+00:00

Real answer:

Agreeableness (specifically politeness) is correlated positively with political correctness.

Agreeableness (specifically compassion) is correlated positively with being left leaning, or in favor of lifting up the dispossessed.

Conscientiousness (specifically industriousness) is correlated positively with being right leaning, or in favor of maintaining competence hierarchies.

Conscientiousness (specifically orderliness) is correlated positively with being conservative (this is different from right leaning), or in favor of maintaining boundaries.

Neuroticism overall is correlated with being left leaning, or in favor of protecting that which is considered infantile.

Openness (specifically openness to experience) is correlated positively with liberalism (which is different from left leaning), or in favor of as few borders as possible.

Roughly speaking, that translates to ENFPs being most likely to be left leaning liberals, and ISTJs most likely to be right leaning conservatives. You do this by considering what mbti types correlate with big 5 metrics, because mbti is not scientifically valid and big 5 is. All other types fall somewhere in the middle.

In other news, water is wet.

Atlas_B_Shruggin · 2018-07-19T02:15:21+00:00

you can tell certain TRP-o-types by theyre writing style

the Joe Faux-gan mystic terp is an ENTP. they also have a tendency to write unedited gibberish and to sign their posts

the coach who liks to start his posts with "listen up, faggots" is an ESTJ, he will often end his post with an order as well

ENTJs are harder to spot because they can say listen up faggots, and write gibberish if they smoked weed AND sign their posts, if they dotn smoke weed theyr elike smart estjs or entps who actually make sense

the ISTJs are the sad sad tradcons, lamenting the end of the world and dreaming of Marriage 1.0 and the golden era of morality and patriarchy

the INTPs ask questions, they dont write screeds. they are incels

the intjs write coherent theory in the comments sections. often incels til 30s

the ISFJs are creepy incel moralizers

the ENFPs are party boys and the ENFJs are charismatics and concerned most with social dynamics on the sub

Workaholico · 2018-07-19T00:18:14+00:00

Yes there may be correlation. But I would not try to check. The regressions and factors of the MBTI scale are always wonky to say the least, there is a lot (and a mean a lot) of error. Try the 5 big personality factors, a way better scale in that regard.

Artpop_ · 2018-07-19T00:33:44+00:00

There’s going to be, but MBTI is almost useless.

It’s pretty common knowledge that your politics and your personality are correlated, so it’s going to dictate your pill color, or if you’re a feminist or activist or have incel beliefs.

Scatre · 2018-07-19T00:50:48+00:00

Isn't MBTI a pseudo-science? Might as well ask what astrological sign everyone is.

PPD-Angel · 2018-07-19T00:24:12+00:00

There was a survey done here a while ago. Here are the results. You can see any correlations there if you are interested.

YetAnotherCommenter · 2018-07-19T01:21:00+00:00

I absolutely think there is a correlation in the way you suggest... more xNTx type men are likely to not be socially typical, more likely to be Aspie or have similar traits, and I think this predisposes them to be more likely to end up in the manosphere or as a participant in gender debates more broadly.

Atlas_B_Shruggin · 2018-07-19T00:52:53+00:00

Yea definitely

planejane · 2018-07-19T02:34:00+00:00

ESTP, there's not many of us around these parts, will confirm.

I'm more interested in the practical application than big sweeping generalizations on other peoples' motivations. It's why some comments ascribing mentalities behind AWALT/AMALT drive me crazy-they're usually wrong, for one, and for another, the reasons aren't usually as relevant as the actions anyways.

I strongly suspect my type (or really XSTP in general) is what people on TRP recognize as natural Alphas, or at least would've before the great Immigrant-Incel Invasion of the last few years (when "being Alpha" now means getting a degree in STEM and being a good little worker bee). ESTPs are stereotypically naturally charismatic bad boys with an adrenaline streak. Owning your shit from MRP, maintaining frame, natural escalation, and Agree and Amplify is just innate to the type.

When it comes to TRP, I could open up a goddamn school instructing men on how to act more attractive. The practicalities of it, the learning how to adapt within the SMP. I can't do shit with their mental games (especially with heavy Ne types) cause I find the psuedoscience and cult-like belief system to be overanalytical and self-indulgent.

There's some weird love of self-solipsism with many XNXX individuals on both ends that, as an XSXX, I can't relate to. They believe their intuitions to be invincible and unfalsifiable with nothing other than their own gut to justify it, and use every opportunity to select only the information that confirms their beliefs.

I'm not much of a RP historian, but I imagine there was originally two schools of thought-the practical, developed by XSXP and possibly some ENTJs, and the political/theoretical, which came about due to INTJs, ENTPs and their ISXJ followers. The two merged at some point but there's still some evidence-the former camp being regulated to lurking now as the subreddit has devolved into a trashfire of woe-is-me and women-suck-ism from introverts and autists who lack instruction on how to be a fun and interesting guy from the ENTJ and XSTP naturals who've fallen mostly silent, other than the odd sarcastic comment or well-deserved tongue lashing on maintaining frame and owning shit.

As far as BP goes, probably a good chunk of XSXPs who've always done alright enough without having to think about it too much, alongside hardcore XNFX idealists who forget that humans are shit and have always been shit.

That's not to say Red NTs are correct because LOGIC or Blue NFs are wrong because FEELS. As a purple SP, it's more like, be practical and just do what fucking works, you weirdos. Half the time NTs rationalize their feels and NFs process their thoughts anyways, it's all part of the "gut righteousness" of intuitive types. An S would tell you that practicality is essential and taking feelings into account and weighing them is a very practical thing to do. NTs are too likely to tell you feels don't matter (except theirs, of course, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT FEELS, THEY'RE MAH LOGIC). NFs are too likely to say it feels unjust or wrong (even though it may be the most realistic and useful way to go about it).

AutoModerator · 2018-07-19T00:00:12+00:00

Attention!

You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

reaper555 · 2018-07-19T00:07:54+00:00

I am an ENFP male and I am completely anti feminist.

gunbusterxl · 2018-07-19T02:06:00+00:00

I'm INFP and definitely not a feminist. I'm no red piller either though, mainly because I'm not interested in sleeping around. However, I do like RP advice on self improvement, and taking women off the pedestal.

flamingoinghome · 2018-07-19T13:19:05+00:00

There's a strong correlation between knowing your MBTI and ending up having intense conversations on internet forums, is all I know.

Tedesche · 2018-07-19T21:49:54+00:00

Doesn’t matter; Myers-Briggs is garbage.

circlingldn · 2018-07-20T19:07:02+00:00

Introverts are much much more likely to be incels than extroverts...common sense really

hematomatoed · 2018-07-19T00:37:07+00:00

My personal guess would be that:

SJs tend to be bluepills who are not particularly feminist. In other words, they're just "traditional": however it was for them in high school is the natural way of things forever.

SPs are usually more interested in the personal than the political. They're likely to be redpills if make and feminists if female - but unlikely to spend time on Reddit talking about it.

NFs tend to incline toward feminism: it seems right and just to them.

NTs have carefully constructed worldviews and will debate those worldviews until their fingers fall off. They're likely to be very redpill or very feminist - but they're also likely to have a highly personalized philosophy and get in fights even with their allies.

Title	Is there any correlation between someone's MBTI type and whether they're likely to be feminists/MRAs/red pillers/incels/blue pillers etc?
Author	aretheyaliens
Upvotes	4
Comments	59
Date	July 19, 2018 12:00 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/900sch/is_there_any_correlation_between_someones_mbti/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/is-there-any-correlation-between-someones-mbti.261472 https://theredarchive.com/post/261472

Comments