Full story here.

So a woman on a train gets attacked by mentally unstable stranger (his race isn't clear, notice that), yet she doesn't blame the attacker... He is probably mentally ill, sure, but she turn around and blames "two white men" (hence the race appears - men and also WHITE) for not helping her.

Q4ALL: Are women entitled to be defended from harm/attacks?

Personal opinion:

It seems to me females in this current world want to have it both ways, they want to control men and say what they can and can not do, they want to put them in little boxes and be used for later and then when men adapt to the situation, suddenly they are to blame because they did not give her the cake and let her eat it too. Which translates to, they did not want to be harmed themselves, either by attacker or the law which protects minorities and criminals (more often than not, look at politics) and they withdraw themselves from the situation. Yet they are still to blame somehow, on top of that they are shamed and named cowards. Go figure. Discuss.

Since some people here seem to love shit talk about middle eastern men how I noticed from other threads (and we can guess the attacker was probably a muslim or similar minority in London), let's see their opinion on this case. Who are "the bad guys" and who are "the good guys" then?