TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Hey men. Regardless of career. Let's just say you have your dream job. If you have lots of random sex with super hot chicks would it make you happy forever?

downunderit

January 8, 2016
4 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Hey men. Regardless of career. Let's just say you have your dream job. If you have lots of random sex with super hot chicks would it make you happy forever?
Author

downunderit

Upvotes 4
Comments 49
Date January 8, 2016 1:52 PM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/4015ki/hey_men_regardless_of_career_lets_just_say_you/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/hey-men-regardless-of-career-lets-just-say-you.277127
https://theredarchive.com/post/277127
Top posts by downunderit

Q4BP - What contradictions do you see in RP? RP feel free to answer underneath BP

5 upvotes
May 10, 2016
/r/PurplePillDebate

Ladies, who would you rather sleep with. Alpha Donald Trump or Feminist Niceguy Joseph Gordon Levitt?

1 upvotes
September 3, 2015
/r/PurplePillDebate

Comments

[–]betterdeadthanbetaHeartless cynical bastard24 points25 points26 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Yes it would

[–]downunderitNon-Red Pill Feeeemale[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

its weird all your upvotes and yet the majority of commentors seem to disagree with you. I wonder if its all lurkers

[–]betterdeadthanbetaHeartless cynical bastard3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like to call them the silent manwhority.

[–]mrcs84usnFatty Fat Neck Beard7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Look at a lot of celebrities: Your rock stars, athletes, actors, etc. For all intents and purposes, they have their dream jobs and are very capable of having lots of hot wild monkey sex with SMV 9s and 10s. Yet some of them still are super depressed, turn to drugs, kill themselves and whathaveyou. Men aren't so mindless that we can be completely satiated by working and fucking. Once a certain desire becomes more of a commonplace, we find other things to chase after.

[–]thefisherman1961Red Pill Man2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just look at The Beatles. They got bored with being the most famous celebrities of all time pretty fast. That's why they started experimenting with psychedelic drugs, writing crazier music, and went to India in search of more enlightenment. All the money, fame, and pussy they could ever want just wasn't giving them the dopamine rush like it used to.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No. I want to stay with my girlfriend. That would make me happy forever. Money would definitely help though.

[–]alreadyredschoolRational egoism < Toxic idealism5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Im in the same boat.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

No. My dream job is my mission. Because of that mission and job, I am able to construct the life I want, live how I want, where I want, with whom I want. This makes me happy.

From this there are two conclusions I can reach.

1) Super hot chicks having random sex with me adds to my happiness. But the sex does not in and of itself, without the other things, make me happy.

2) Being able to attract super hot chicks for random sex is a side effect of my happiness. It is an effect, not a cause, of my happiness.

EDIT: I have just summarized 95% of The Red Pill subreddit for you, in four paragraphs. You're welcome.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

I know. This is why reading the majority of the sidebar at RP is very unnecessary. You guys aren't talking rocket science over there.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, the sidebar is necessary for these guys. They need it broken down, because they've spent their formative years getting fucked up shitty advice like "Just Be Nice" and "Just Be Yourself" from well-meaning but horribly misguided people.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

From reading your posts, you should really read the sidebar. You have a long history of fucking up red pill theory.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I have read the sidebar.

And if by fucking up RP theory you mean "disagreeing with the theory on a fundamental level", then yes you are correct. If not I'd love to hear the parts I misinterpreted.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

No, the two are very different.

The great philosopher Dan Dennett said that someone earns the right to criticize a position only after restating it so well that an actual defender would so "I wish I thought to put it like that."

You don't even state the theory in a way that I wouldn't hit the report button for.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Dennett is overrated. Derrida actually changed philosophy (brought it to an end), Dennett is not on that level. Interesting stuff, but not world-breaking.

I am critiquing the short-comings, failings, and unproven presuppositions of RP. I am not interested in getting permission from you or Dr. Dennett by spending a bunch of time restating positions.

Who would even want to read all that anyways?

The only time I could ever see that being of use is during an old time dialectical method exchange. PPD doesn't really function that way.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Dennett is overrated. Derrida actually changed philosophy

Unlike Derrida, Dennett is actually taught in well ranked philosophy schools. You need to go to the english department or something to hear Derrida.

(brought it to an end)

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, omg dude, good one. Not only does philosophy get published every day, conclusive evidence that philosophy never ended, but Derrida is again, not well respected enough to even be covered in most philosophy departments outside of Germany and France.

The only time I could ever see that being of use is during an old time dialectical method exchange. PPD doesn't really function that way.

Philosophers writing on dialectic are not proposing new methods for discourse. They're theorizing about how all discourse works all the time. If you think PPD doesn't work that way, then you're simply not a Derridean, which is rather ironic.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Derrida not well respected? Wow do you not know what you are talking about. The simple fact that he demonstrated a lot of the structural flaws within the discipline which led him to move to literature was groundbreaking stuff.

Are you honestly claiming he is not read in American universities? You are lying or ignorant. I don't know which is worse.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm not ignorant at all. I have a degree in philosophy and did very well. Derrida is read almost exclusively in the English department by literary critics. People in the philosophy department don't talk about him at all and it's very possible to get a PhD in philosophy without ever coming across a citation tobhis work. In fact, that's actually probable.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Hello fellow philosophy undergrad.

You read no continentals? Let me guess you stuck to the Rationalists and Absolutists with a smattering of Nietzche for the edginess.

My fav has always been Heidegger.

[–]GaiusScaevolusMod TRP/AskTRP/BaM2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

would it make you happy forever?

No. But it'd be like having a nice car or a lifetime supply of pizza, wouldn't solve all my problems, but it'd still be nicer than not.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, it wouldn't bring me misery

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes it would.

[–]thefisherman1961Red Pill Man2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not necessarily. Clinical depression is a bitch

[–]Xemnas812 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this. hugs bro

[–]Xemnas812 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. It's more frustrated that I haven't experience a life milestone which most of my peers have taken for granted, It's like being the kid trying to reach up to the jar of cookies but being too short to get there. And no there are no chairs available.

I would tire of the novelty eventually. I am here because I like cracking puzzles. And women are one of the toughest puzzles I have ever encountered. (With the exception of the 3D Titanic, holy shit was that difficult

[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No. Emotional bonds with the woman I'm having sex with make me happy, not sex with lots of women.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Out of curiosity, have you ever actually tried having lots of sex with various women?

[–]Rufus_Reddit2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's highly unlikely - the hedonic treadmill is real.

[–]diFFzee1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At this point in my life, yes, no commitment + focus on my career is how I choose to live, and I 'm happy. Forever, I don't have a clue, I doubt I 'll be on Tinder at 55 or whatever swiping chicks and arranging hookups.

[–]wub12341 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I already have my dream job. I can't see any way that I'm going to have lots of random sex with super hot chicks, this doesn't seem remotely achievable. If I could have one attractive and intelligent girlfriend then I'd take that all day long.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

you should do rape

[–]wub12345 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am quite confident I will have consensual sex again in the future, but thanks for the advice.

[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol...

[–]LUClENSociology of Sex &Courtship1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No but I'm quite certain I'm an outlier

[–]downunderitNon-Red Pill Feeeemale[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I actually just woke up and I was surprised to see you weren't the outlier

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope. I have no desire for sex with random hotties. One woman is plenty.

[–]HighlyOffensiveUserPurple Pill1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. The money would be nice but I would like to have kids, and it is immoral to have kids and not give them as good as an upbringing as possible. This just wouldn't be possible in a world where the parents only have a sexual relationship.

[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No.

Sucker for traditional family. Not interested in a bunch of random sex.

[–]GoldPisseR1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Forever?Like casual sex forever?

Never

I'd prefer to be with just one girl

[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Such a hypothetical I can't my even wrap my head around it.

I was pretty happy having a job that gave me moments of real accomplishment and satisfaction occasionally and being married to a woman whom I thought was the most beautiful woman in the world. Also had sex with random hotties as part of all that, which certainly kept my life more interesting. You can always look for things to make you more happy, but that worked well for me for as long as it worked.

Having now been introduced to my son, though, I don't know that I'd want to go through life without having him in it, so there's that. Not having him would be a huge missing for me.

[–]gasparddelanuit0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There’s more to happiness than just having your dream job and random sex with super hot chicks, but the answer does NOT lie in a committed relationship. Things like good health and a good sense of perspective are critical to the robustness of a person’s happiness. So, assuming all the essentials for happiness are taken care of, then a dream job and plenty of sex with random hot chicks will only enhance that happiness.

[–]ReginleiferOnly Zombies want female brains0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For me, outside stresses have always been the problem. I don't understand the rich and miserable, my mood is elevated with just a bit of cash and having the free time to pursue my goals. So yes I'd imagine that situation would make me perfectly happy.

[–]stats1350 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

NO. If I never torture you and give you water on tap are you happy? No. Because they are basic requirements for happiness to occur, but do not bring happiness by themselves. Having a dream job does not bring me happiness, but working in misery, being tortured by the stress of work, from 8-5 (or whatever shift) definitely makes me unhappy. The same goes for sex. Having hot chicks fulfill my physiological need of sex is like having water on tap fulfilling my need for hydration. Having it won't make me happy, but being thirsty for pussy and water definitely will make me unhappy.

Basically, we are back with Maslow's hierarchy. Air, food, water, sex, sleep are the very basic physiological needs. Security of body, employment, and resources on top of that. So your scenario basically only covers the bottom two fundamental needs.

[–]Transmigratory0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hell yes, well even LTRs don't respect you much if you made peanuts compared to a version of you who could make a lot of money.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nothing can truly make you happy forever.

[–]darksoldierkPurple Pill0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not Happy, but it would make my life tolerable vs not having a relationships/sex at all.

I believe that relationships are too risky for men. Too much to lose. But my life, as a man, would be intolerable without, at the very least, the sex part of a relationship. I would like a full blown relationship, but only if my risk is about as much risk as a woman's, but in our society that isn't the case. So, I can settle for sex and no relationships.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, I want an emotionally stable, warm, affectionate qt to have lots of sex and babies with and grow old and live happily ever after with. I know its unrealistic but I can't quite kill the dream.

[–]Archwinger0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. However the one thing that's missing from this equation is not a committed life-partner. It's kids.

Assuming a guy doesn't want/need kids, and assuming that we can extend this hypothetical to mean you can have random sex with super hot chicks forever, even when old, then the answer is yes. I think the core question implied by this is, "Assuming everything else in your life is just fine -- job, money, and sex -- do you need the commitment of a woman in your life to be happy?"

The answer is no. A relationship with a committed partner is not valuable, because it's really just friendship that you've made official through a series of agreements, and a legal contract if you're married. You can have all kinds of deep and meaningful friendships with whoever you want, guy or girl, all kinds of hobbies, all kinds of spare time to develop skills and interests, and spend all of your career money on you. Plus have lots of sex with super hot chicks. You're not missing anything by not having one woman continuously present as some kind of committed partner. If anything, being accountable and having obligations to a committed partner holds you back.

[–]Leinadro0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No it wouldn't make me happy forever. For a while id be happy but eventually i would want to settle down with the one.

[–]Apexk9-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. I'm already tired of it.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter