Q4RP: If you apply a moralistic lens to TRP, would you agree that TBP has a point?

One of the biggest reasons for contention between TRP and TBP is that a lot of the time, TBP insists on having a debate on ethics, when TRP claims that they are amoral. A simplified conversation would look something like this:

BP: You can't treat women like that! That's manipulative and cruel. You're immoral for employing dishonest tactics to sleep with women.

RP: The only important thing that you've said is that I sleep with women. It works; whether its right or wrong is besides the point.

99% of the time, TRP ends up dismissing TBP's accusations under grounds of irrelevancy.

Now, I understand that when TRP asserts itself to be amoral, the audience is encouraged to employ a more academic approach to the information - we've simply been given the intel, what we do with it is entirely up to us.

However, in the context of this thread, I'm going to ask that TRP make morality a concern when advancing the conversation. Do you guys personally believe that some of the things on TRP (like Dread Game, DT, operant conditioning), admittedly, crosses a moral line for even you?