I posted this on TheBluePill, but it didn't meet the criteria so I am posting this here

I'm not really red pill, but I used to follow them a lot because I noticed some hypocrisy (ironically against men) within mainstream and blue pill ideology.

So let me get started :

  • About 60-80% of women have engaged in "Hook Up Culture" (Link 1)

  • We all know women are extremely picky about one night stands (Link 2)

  • If you read the second link you find that 50% of women accepted going home with an exceptionally attractive man while 2% said yes for a moderately unattractive man

  • This kind of proves the 80/20 rule thing where the most attractive men get the most hook ups, and slightly below average guys get 25 times as less hookups

  • This wouldn't mean much at all if it weren't for the fact that 60-80% of women in college have hookups (although some studies put the rate of sexual intercourse as low as 30%)

  • When it comes to hookups 60-80% (30% low ball) of women are fucking the most attractive men, and very rarely the less attractive ones

I understand that women have the right to be picky, and its easier for them to be picky because of supply and demand, since men are more open to ONS, which leads to an oversupply of men.

When it comes to long term relationships college men are less likely to commit, due to that, and skewed gender ratio's there is an oversupply of women, which means its easier for men to be picky.

  • However whenever a man decides to be picky (for long term relationships) he gets called out especially by subs like this

  • If a woman has the right the reject men as attractive as her (due to not being attractive enough) for one night stands (Which all women certainly have the right to do!), why is it wrong for a man to be extremely picky for long term relationships (where the ratio is in his favor)?

Why is it wrong for a man to only go after women much more attractive then him, and only want to date women have little or no sexual experience even if he is very experienced sexually and not very attractive?

TL;DR

Why is it considered hypocritical for men (who are average and have sexual experience) to use the ratio in their favor and only consider dating women who are above average and have no sexual experience, while women get to use the ratio in their favor for one night stands?

Few more things

  • Don't says its because women get slut shammed so they have to be picky, men also get shammed for dating sluts, so if women can be picky for ONS due to slut shaming, men can be picky about not dating sluts due to slut-dating shamming even if they are slutty themselves.

  • Don't say LTR are above love so its different, I don't want to hear any Disney movie references

  • Don't say because for LTR personality matters more so its wrong to care about looks or sexual experience, because that would imply hotter women and less experienced women have worse personalities

  • Don't say its about safety, if it where about safety women would fuck the weak unattractive guy who can't do any damage

  • Don't say sexual experience doesn't matter. We are shallow creatures, and if its okay to care about things like physical appearance its okay to care about sexual experience

http://www.apa.org/monitor/2013/02/ce-corner.aspx

http://jezebel.com/5336025/women-more-picky-than-men-about-one-night-stands

Quick Closing

I'm not here to argue about why I should stop caring about a woman's past or appearance for LTR, that's another issue for a another day, lets stay on topic and discuss the matter at hand.

I also don't want to debate about whether I have anything against promiscuous men and women, I don't but again lets stay on topic.

The Attractive men where attractive based on looks only, so I am not referring to "Alpha or Douche bag-like Behavior"