A woman is not just an individual - a big chunk of her is actually the herd itself.

TL:DR - At a collective level, men are more influenced vertically. Women horizontally. A woman is actually "women". Individual quirks and differences are usually inborn qualities. The cultivated part has no solidity, and it can change relatively instantly compared to the time scale on which men operate.

One of the top rated posts here went like - "Stop wondering what women's frames are, they don't exist". Read it if you can. More specifically I observe that women's frames follow their emotions and are like water. They can change totally if enough of emotion is created.

We also know women are herd animals - but let's look at it in a bit more detail. Observing the behavior of women closely for a while has made me realize that collective consciousness in women functions a bit differently from men. Men are more influenced vertically - i.e. a group of men can be made to follow the vision, mission and values of a leader who is at the top of the pyramid. Women on the other hand, are highly influenced laterally -- by the overall direction of the herd - what the herd of women overall feels or reacts or thinks or believes, that influences who she becomes.

When a particular frame or narrative becomes established beyond a critical mass, your individual woman will change to reflect this, even unconsciously without external prompting. A woman is not an individual nearly to the same extent as man. To make man into a herd animal, we literally need to put them through the military grind where order is established after a lot of training, and rules and consequences, and even these men can be very individual in their frames outside of the call of duty. Men essentially are what they are because of creatures of habits.

A woman on the other hand operates as a collective creature by default. A woman is not so much of an individual - a significant part of her is actually a collective woman herd consciousness.

When the herd was religious and god fearing and sex could cause pregnancy, most women were one way, believed and felt strongly in that direction. When it was the collective principle that women ought to become mothers and children, we had women marrying early and a childless woman was treated as bad luck (by other women no less). They reacted with utter horror at the idea of infidelity or premarital sex and pregnancy. This is despite the fact that their sexual instincts were just the same then as they are now.

Now. I come from a place where I'm seeing just how much people can change in 2 generations. When society is what it is now, you see them trying to identify themselves as feminist, or even bisexual or lesbian even if that is not who they are. Today when society tries to call the family as a burden, you see even otherwise normal women wanting careers and postponing or abandoning motherhood, much to the surprise of the previous generation, who are a different herd of women. Now you'll see women reacting in the same horrified way at the mere mention of anything against pre-marital sex.

This is an example of 2 herds with 2 different frames and how different women behave in either, because the herd narrative is different. The same woman can totally change when shifted from one to another. All it takes is critical mass.

The herd body of women is not just a mental or a pretentious thing. This really affects them at a deep level, down to even basic emotional responses - it's visceral in nature. You can make them revere a tradition or react with disgust to it just based on which way the herd goes, not on any other objective criteria - you do not have to condition them deliberately. You can totally get them to believe and say anything as dictated set by social media narrative. You can make them start and drop a habit when it reaches critical mass in the herd - to make a man change a habit you need to literally rewire the cells in his body.

In places where everyone seems depressed or having some kind of mental issue, your woman would probably turn into a case in short order (even if she isn't normally that way). You could change just about everything in their mind by just the herd momentum. That's how weak their frames are.

It is a very noted phenomenon that a lot of women brought up in very conservative religious families from the east or even the Middle East, once they get into the herd mentality of the modern west, they like change in about the time it takes to go to a barbershop and get a makeover. You have all these "good girls" turning into some pretty wild creatures overnight once they migrate to a more liberal feminine primary society. And that isn't only because of sudden freedom - it is the impact of that herd energy on a fresh mind.

You'd think all that conservative upbringing had made any difference - but it doesn't, not beyond the moment. It if did make a permanent mark, it can end up breaking a woman into dysfunction - while we may be angered at the fickleness of women, women who are unable to adapt and unable to have flexible frames are often too damaged at some level.

Men on the other hand, are a completely different animal. Compare the girl who changes between a visit to the parlor and a few days in a new culture to just how many years of effort a man has to put in to transform from BP to RP, or from boy to a wise man. The herd thing just hardly works on a man, he needs to be melted down and re-moulded, forced to change.

One may argue that so many men subscribing to BP beliefs is similar to a herd of women. It isn't. These boys have been raised by women to be more like women through many years of vertical conditioning by female authorities and a feminine centric society and kept betaized from ever maturing fully. And even then it's still a group of individual males believing the same illusions. Break the illusion and the man will go on to break out and follow his understanding of truth. It may also be the declining T levels to blame for men showing effeminate characteristics these says. But show him the truth, and when he can swallow it and follow it, the real man will soon emerge.

Although women keep claiming "social conditioning", the fact is that very little of their conditioning is any kind of deliberate attempt to alter their personality. It's almost all herd consciousness.

What doesn't change is the body. That hasn't really changed at all, therefore at least in matters of sexual attraction, women have not really changed, although it can lead to some real cognitive dissonance in them - the more the mind and body go in two different directions, the greater is this pain of confusion. But if you can get them out of their head for a while, you'll see that hasn't changed. If anything it's reemerging in it's original form now.

But what about some unique personality traits? Obviously personalities, temperament, likes and dislikes and quirks are different - and often very different even amongst sisters raised under one roof. I have a lot of women in my extended family and their social circles and every one of them has their own personality (but that doesn't make any one of them men in any way - they're all women).

Well, after observing the personalities of so many hundreds of women in my circles, I have come to the conclusion that individual differences between them are mostly due to inborn characteristics - you can't explain that aspect due to outward conditioning. Some of these characteristics I can trace back to childhood and even infancy. The next biggest part of women beyond the herd is inborn. It's wired into their genes. It's in the body, that's why it stays that way. And that part usually never changes throughout their life.

I was listening to families and friends sharing so many stories about how the women were as children, and they're still just the same even now. My mum, my aunts, the relatives, the neighborhood, school and college mates, women at work, their "quirks of personality" have never changed and have been that way right from the beginning. These quirks remain no matter who they become. Some quirks just show up under different environments, but they were always there just waiting for the opportunity.

Nevertheless individuality is just that - a quirk of body and personality. You only notice it when a woman is isolated from the herd, mostly at home or one on one. Beyond that the influence of the herd mind dictates her frame at a macroscopic level and is the dominant part of who she is. Especially in today's internet and social media age, the herd mind has never been more powerful.

So understand women, one must study everything and everyone around them in addition to who they are. Your woman is actually more of "all women in her range of her awareness" than one person. She is shaped by whichever herd succeeds in making the maximum impact on her consciousness. The rest of her individual personality is mostly inborn and wired in.

What about the cultivated part of a woman? Actually that's only temporary and fragile. It has no solidity, and it's actually far more due to what environment she's in. There is very little of a woman's nature that is really due to conscious cultivation, and that part can be changed very quickly and very easily by herd influence. That's why when her family tries to tell you that they've raised her like this and like that, and she tries to convince you she's a "good girl", I now smile, and have to stop myself from laughing.

They think, and want us to think they've moulded her solid and that's how she'll always be. But that's actually the most fluid part of her - it's a paper tiger before her hind-brain and the herd. It only works because of external pressure in the first place. Change that and her own parents would wonder who their daughter is.

Well, this is actually normal. If it isn't fluid, I must suspect she's a broken bird in some way or another. Such women do exist in ultra conservative cultures where they simply can't enjoy sex for e.g.

Men on the other hand, definitely change solidly, so much that even now I can't comprehend the scale of physical and mental transformation that the boy goes through and becomes a man at the other end - seeing yourself before and after is astonishing. Even the BP-RP thing, it's startling how much you change along the way, until you need not even try to act different. Your very thought process has fundamentally changed. And the change is way more solid and permanent compared to anything a woman does. A woman won't know what this experience feels like. Men are like the climate, women the weather.

Side note : I have concluded that there's no specific thing called a red pilled woman - all women are both red pilled and blue pilled at once (or should I say, yellow pilled at once) at once - the collective consciousness makes it impossible for a woman to act that exceptional for too long, and in any case their body wiring is the same as ever. Most women never go through anything where they've realized just how much their personality has changed from what it was before. It's only in men where the BP-RP divide is this stark and so solidly different that we can even categorize it as such. Women, are just women.