TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

USA Georgia man who spent two decades in prison for double murder has charges dropped after DNA proves him innocent. He was convicted largely on the testimony of his ex-girlfriend’s mother.

furchfur

July 21, 2021
1795 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/man-spent-two-decades-prison-000040416.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title USA Georgia man who spent two decades in prison for double murder has charges dropped after DNA proves him innocent. He was convicted largely on the testimony of his ex-girlfriend’s mother.
Author

furchfur

Upvotes 1795
Comments 102
Date July 21, 2021 8:43 AM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ooltj7/usa_georgia_man_who_spent_two_decades_in_prison/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/usa-georgia-man-who-spent-two-decades-in-prison.823923
https://theredarchive.com/post/823923
Top posts by furchfur

UK: Innocent student wrongly accused of rape calls for anonymity for sex assault defendants until they are found guilty.

17408 upvotes
December 18, 2017
/r/MensRights

Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother.

4746 upvotes
January 13, 2019
/r/MensRights

Male rape survivors tell of their battle to have their voices heard after being told ‘men are the attackers, women are the victims’

4394 upvotes
April 14, 2017
/r/MensRights

16yo female 'prodigy' developer's app was actually written by a male programmer.

4210 upvotes
February 6, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Mother-of-two, 40, falsely branded a neighbour a sex offender because he 'made too much noise building a guinea pig hutch in his garden'. It seems for many women if they do not get their way they make a false sex allegation knowing a man is not protected by the law.

3937 upvotes
March 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Female British YouTube vlogger accuses Dublin hotel of bullying her after it refused her request to stay there for free and posted their scathing response saying she 'lacked dignity' online

3871 upvotes
January 18, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Nearly 500 men and boys are freed from 'house of torture' Islamic boarding school where they were chained up, raped by staff and starved 'in the name of teaching them the Koran' in Nigeria. OP: We will see how much media coverage this gets.

3825 upvotes
September 27, 2019
/r/MensRights

Teenager, 18, who lied that ex-boyfriend drugged and raped her after he refused to rekindle their romance is convicted of wasting police time

3747 upvotes
May 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]dishwatersupper 359 points360 points361 points 5 years ago* (70 children) | Copy Link

The guy has lost his life. That's technically 2 people who have gotten away with murder: the original perpetrator and the mother in law. If she's still alive, put her away for the few remaining years. I doubt she is though. Let her family feel her shame.

$50,000 a year. Not far off an average, regular paying job. His family, and their children's children, should never go hungry again from a government payout. $50,000 a year should be additional and added from the mother in law's estate.

[–]person_redditting 154 points155 points156 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

totally agree. The punishment for false accusations should be the same as the damage they are trying to and can cause. If someone can go to jail for decades, the same should be said for anyone knowing committing perjury.

[–]techieguyjames 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agree. And her family needs to find a way to pay back the reward money, or at least give it to this guy so he can try to restart his life, if he can.

[–]conspirized 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Fuck that, you don't pin the sins of a father on his children. That's wrong on so many levels. The state is responsible for his prosecution, the state can pay for the damages.

[–]nate__blackbird 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Critical race theory intensifies. Lol.

[–]dishwatersupper 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I actually agree with you. The comment was written in haste but I stand by it as an exaggerated statement of exasperation, sympathy for the accused and frustration.

The initial part about his repayment amount being beyond unacceptable still stands too. They owe that man and his family a lot more than a meager payout. They also owe a lot more to the murdered couple and their family. They've let their deaths go unpunished. There should be major repercussions for the ineptitude of the law.

[–]jadedlonewolf89 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And yet here we are in a world where men do actually pay for the sins of their fathers and it can even be legally binding in a way where a man can be forced to pay off his fathers debt they even tried in my case to make me pay my uncles debt.

[+]ThisIsTheEnd6 -103 points-102 points-101 points 5 years ago* (63 children) | Copy Link

There's no evidence that she lied in her testimony. Why would you want to put her in jail? Did you read the article?

Innocent until proven guilty is an important part of the justice system. You can't throw someone in jail for perjury without any evidence of perjury.

Edit: A man was put in jail WITHOUT evidence. And people would rather blame a woman that MIGHT have lied. Instead of a justice system that imprisoned a man on testimony alone.

If you want equality for men, you blame the justice system.

If you just want to attack a woman that may have done nothing more than tell the truth, then by all means, keep attacking the woman. But don't be surprised when people say mens rights groups aren't about justice but by blaming women.

[+]KeepSwedenSwedish82 points 5 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

Did you read the article? Innocent until proven guilty

Did you?

You can't throw someone in jail for perjury without any evidence of perjury.

Well they already did, as seen in the article.

[+]ThisIsTheEnd6 -78 points-77 points-76 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Right. They jailed him when he was innocent. Thats unacceptable. Which is why I don't see why people want to take that chance jailing this lady when there is no evidence she lied.

[–][deleted] 38 points39 points40 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Their is evidence, if you feel their isn't sufficient evidence, that's fine... but don't lie and say their is none

[+]ThisIsTheEnd6 -45 points-44 points-43 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What evidence is there that she lied? I read the article and there was none.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree their is no evidence listed in the article, but their is a difference between saying

"their is no evidence listed in the article"

and

"their is no evidence"

[–]unjustexistence 50 points51 points52 points 5 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

"He was convicted largely on the testimony of his ex-girlfriend’s mother, who said Mr Perry had told her he planned to kill Harold Swain."

She testified that this person said he was going to kill Harold Swain. And it turns out he didn't kill Harold Swain. So obviously she lied and he never said he was going to kill him. She needs to be put in jail.

How are you not getting this?

[–]mikesteane 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not necessarily. A similar plot happens in the Brothers Karamazov when one of the brothers is going round saying he is going to kill the old man. A third person takes advantage of the situation leaving the loudmouth to get convicted on the basis of the empty threats he had made.

[+]ThisIsTheEnd6 -20 points-19 points-18 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Seems like anything outside of 'woman liar bad' and any attempt at reason...gets downvoted.

[–]xsplizzle 29 points30 points31 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

bad got 20 years based on what she said, i would say 'woman bad' fits in this situation, just like 'you are a fucking moron' also fits

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Even if what she said was the truth? If he really did say he was going to kill this guy and she reported that to the police...you think she was wrong to do that?

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

There is no evidence that he didn't say that though. People threaten to kill people all the time in anger.

It's not nearly enough to put a man in jail for it.

But it doesn't mean she lied. She may have told the gods honest truth and he did say he was going to kill this guy. He just didn't end up actually killing this guy.

[–]Greedy_Sherbet1729 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

I mean of course it's more likely that the innocent man who lost years of his life due to a bold faced lie is a pathological liar and bad person...I mean come on he's a man. Why's he walking around with a penis if he doesn't want to go to prison.

And we all know women most definitely never lie about anything at all. As women are infallible beings who grace men with their presence out of pity for a lower life form.

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand your point. There's no proof either of them did anything wrong.

We should base actions on proof. Not feelings on gender.

[–]Greedy_Sherbet1729 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

You don't practice what you preach though.

You base literally everything you do on this sub on your feelings about gender.

The problem is your bias leads you to trivialize and explain away every mistake or malicious act a woman is party to.

You literally argued with me yesterday about the feminist boogeyman the patriarchy for 2 hours when you yourself admitted your only research was opening a dictionary.

You have no room to talk about proof.

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand your point. I don't know what patriarchy is so therefore this woman is a liar?

What evidence do you have to support this woman made a malicious act? Do you not need proof because it's a woman?

I'm not picking sides here. You are. I'm the one requiring proof before picking sides.

[–]Greedy_Sherbet1729 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

You are literally blind to your profoundly pro feminist bias.

EVERY post you make on this sub is against whatever man happens to be the subject of the topic.

You have picked your side long ago at least be honest for once in your life.

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Everything i say is neutral, pragmatic, and fair. If you think that is pro-women, it may be you that has biases.

[–]BoabHonker 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is called the fallacy of the excluded middle. It's entirely possible that he said he was going to kill him, even though he wasn't the one who actually did it.

I've sure heard a lot more threats of death than I've seen murders. Why do you jump straight to her being a liar?

[+][deleted] 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]BoabHonker 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Hmm. This seems like bait, but if you're serious then it doesn't help the cause of men's rights by posting silly arguments like above. If you make your point badly, it just means the other side can dismiss you without considering it.

[+][deleted] 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]BoabHonker 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah it's really disappointing

[–]crossoverfan96 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Smart.Personally i just post hentai for the upvotes but hey different strokes for different folks and whatever works for you

[–]dishwatersupper 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I did read the article before but you are right, I read it with a reactionary slant and made the assumption that he never said that. IF that was all she told the police and HE did actually say that to her then my comments were preemptive and unfair.

But the fact remains that her comments were largely to blame for his wrongful incarceration. So who is to blame? Surely you can't blame him for simply making comments when no actions were taken from those comments. IF she only reported what she heard without pushing the narrative any further then maybe she isn't to blame either. Is the justice system to blame? My opinion is probably yes. But again that isn't provable with the limited information we have. Allowing for assumptions though I can't help but feel the justice system would have been quick to throw the first man they could into jail without care for the truth and without investigating as thoroughly as the man deserved.

I will add however that if she in fact did lie or coerce my original statement still fully stands

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

100 percent the justice system is to blame.

Putting people in jail for life because they said they were going to kill someone is not NEARLY enough proof.

A terrible miscarriage of justice.

[–]Werwet10 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

True... But do you also think that if it had been the woman who was the accused...would she be treated in the same manner as this man?

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the commenters here were on the jury...yeah. people are all saying she lied and deserves to be in jail.

But if normal people were on the jury. No. No chance she goes to prison. The justice system doesn't usually screw women like that.

[–]Smitty1017 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What do you mean? She was paid 12 grand to say that he said he was going to do it.

[+]ThisIsTheEnd6 -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She would have been paid 12 grand if she was telling the truth. Thats how rewards for tips work. So that doesn't really prove one way or the other.

[–]dishwatersupper 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I'd also like to add, in case there is any confusion, that this has nothing to do with her being a woman (unless you maybe think they are more likely to listen to a woman which is a possibility). I would make the same comments about anyone if they had wrongfully contributed to someone's long term incarceration.

The justice system is to blame the most for not doing their job thoroughly and for handing out sentencing without any evidence. However we mustn't forget that without her testimony I'm guessing he wouldn't have gone to jail. It happens all too often that men are given unreasonable sentences without a decent investigation and trial. It would be something if this was a one off but we hear stories like this time and time again. My heart goes out to this man. His life has been stolen by an incompetent and corrupt system.

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Seems most people disagree though. Most people blame the woman and they've made that pretty clear.

I appreciate you saying there is a possibility that this wasn't her fault but that clarity and neutrality seems rare.

The justice system has been horrible for men. And continues to be. But it seems many care more about blaming a woman than actually critiquing the justice system that caused this.

[–]dishwatersupper 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I forgot about the fact she was paid $12,000 for her testimony.... that is an additional factor that adds significant doubt and blame to everyone on the opposing side. No one should be offering, or accepting, money to put people away. This isn't the wild west. Why exactly did they feel the need to pay her? What were they trying to buy?

This does push me towards even more significant suspicion. All very dodgy.

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Crimestoppers often offers people money in exchange for tips to solve crimes. Which is a fine system but not if you are jailing people on that evidence alone.

[–]dishwatersupper 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not a good system in my opinion. Offering money to people, who lack a conscience, to speak up when they otherwise wouldn't is not an equation for a fair outcome.

If you ask someone for evidence and they won't give it to you without a payout, it shouldn't be admissible.

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The point is to get tips, and use those tips to collect hard evidence. If they got this tip from this woman, got a warrant for DNA and his DNA matched. She basically solved the crime and deserves a reward.

But you need to use the tips to get REAL evidence. Otherwise it's a disaster.

[–]dishwatersupper 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But why would she not have given evidence anyway without financial reward? It's a dodgy character who would only give tips and answers for money. It all seems very wrong.

[–]power_forward87 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

which is completely anonymous, however. Also, crimestoppers only offers the bounty if the info leads to a conviction, not for the info. Massive day and night difference.

[–]dishwatersupper 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'll admit I haven't read through all the comments but I don't think people are particularly blaming her as a woman. But as someone that has purposely contributed to his life being ruined.

There may be an element of incredulity regarding the reaction to a woman's statement over a man's. Whilst that again would be speculation in this case, it is something I believe we see regularly. The law sides with women more than men from what I have read and experienced.

That aside, I don't think this is about gender blaming against women. It is about someone who has helped to incarcerate an innocent man and a reminder of the harsh world men have to live in especially when facing a corrupt system. (Not to say that women don't get wrongly imprisoned and unjustly treated but I fear the law is much harsher on men).

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She may have done nothing more than tell the truth and she gets a plethora of abuse. A justice system locked a man up without evidence and few are commenting on the disgusting nature of the justice system.

People are picking the wrong enemy.

[–]dishwatersupper 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

There should be more if a focus on the justice system yes. But from the limited information we are given all we know is that her testimony led to his wrongful incarceration.

The comments I've read have seemed mostly valid but they should come with the proviso that they are only valid IF she purposefully or immorally led things to this situation. I'd say the same about the individual law enforcers that no doubt pushed and twisted the truth to fit a convenient narrative.

I agree however that there definitely should be more focus on the law over her. The fact that the hairs that exonerated him were found at the crime scene in a pair of glasses but simply not added to the evidence shows the manipulative way the law forced a wrongful conviction.

Addition: Looking back you could argue that the article is actually quite manipulative itself by mentioning her but barely anything about the failure of the system that put him there. More details are needed to truly know who is mostly to blame but I suspect a line will be drawn through the case now and all the true criminals will go without repercussion.

[–]f4z3ultr1x 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

He was proved innocent. The woman accused him. So she lied

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

It didn't say she accused him anywhere. The state accused him since its a murder charge. She just testified that he said he was going to kill the man. Something that may or may not have been true. We don't know.

[–]Greedy_Sherbet1729 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

If someone says that you were going to kill another party they have made an....ACCUSATION against you.

Stop the idiocy.

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

If someone told me they were going to kill someone, and then that person ended up dead...

I'd go to the police and tell them.

And if I later found out he was innocent, that makes me a false accuser? For telling the truth?

[–]Greedy_Sherbet1729 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

But that's not what happened at all....you're making up a hypothetical situation in an attempt to win an argument.

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Right. We don't know what happened. Which means saying she is evil or belongs in jail is not okay. Because innocent until proven guilty is still a thing.

[–]Greedy_Sherbet1729 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It wasn't for the guy in prison....but he was only a man.

[–]ThisIsTheEnd6 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

And a horrible thing that happened to him. A travesty of justice that shouldn't happen to anyone.

But his time in prison doesn't make this woman any more or less guilty of any crimes.

Innocent until proven guilty. She shouldn't be locked up when there is no proof she lied at all.

[–]UltimaterializerX 147 points148 points149 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But I’m told women never lie and false allegations don’t exist!

[–]southerncraftgurl 22 points23 points24 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

all that matters is their truth

[–]Electronic-Will-5472 71 points72 points73 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So when does she get sentenced? 😇

[–]AyoubZahyo 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Remove the s and they might be

[–]Tychodragon 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

remember in court you have to prove your side of the story women just have to say it

[–]reddut_gang 26 points27 points28 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

two decades. two fucking decades.

[–]brokedown 52 points53 points54 points 5 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

I recently changed my Amazon Smile charity from the EFF to the Innocence Project. I've always been a fan of that organization but the EFF's disinformation campaign nonsense regarding Richard Stallman was enough for me to no longer support them even in passive ways.

The Innocence Project is a non-profit organization with a track record that should scare the shit out of any reasonable person. If you'd like to change your Amazon Smile recipient as well, the charity to choose is Innocence Project, Inc. Location: New York, NY | Year Founded: 1992. Once you select it as the recipient, any shopping you do at smile.amazon.com will throw a percentage to the charity you have chosen at no additional cost to you.

[–]evil_banana 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't know they were one of those. Thank you, I'll be doing the same.

[–]mountainclimbers 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for sharing

[–]csgardner 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Can you point me to a rundown on the EFF vs RMS dust-up? I vaguely remember that when RMS resigned the accusation sounded like BS to me. I see that he was re-elected to a "leadership position at FSF" which seems good to me. I'm just curious about the full details.

[–]brokedown 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I won't claim this site is unbiased but it seems to touch on the relevant topics

[–]csgardner 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks, I assume that at least covers all the accusations. They are all dumb.

I mean, Stallman was always a weird dude. I've been using free software since 1994, and there have always been stories of Stallman being off-putting in one way or another. But so what? Only a weird dude would dedicate his life to a pursuit as avant garde as "Free Software." Weirdos and their weird ideas is how progress is made.

I guess I'm not supporting the EFF anymore either.

[–]brokedown 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There was an entire decade of people mocking him for chewing a toenail, people just love to dislike the guy. I'm just sad that so many organizations and projects I previously supported joined in the witch hunt.

[–]ShitTalkingAlt980 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Basically he said that a 17 year old Epstein girl was merely a prostitute on a MIT forum. A student countered she was 17. He countered that doesn't change the fact that it isn't rape as most people think of. Also there are a bunch of accusations ranging from he had a mattress in his office (whatever) to being basically a sad boy while asking a student out (unethical).

[–]brokedown 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What he actually said:

We can imagine many scenarios, but the most plausible scenario is that she presented herself to him as entirely willing. Assuming she was being coerced by Epstein, he would have had every reason to tell her to conceal that from most of his associates.

He also said:

“Giuffre says she was directed to have sex with Minsky.” Given the circumstances, that implies she was coerced by Epstein into doing so.

We know that Giuffre was being coerced into sex—by Epstein. She was being harmed.

And,

(Now) Labor Secretary Acosta's plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein was not only extremely lenient, it was so lenient that it was illegal.

I wonder whether this makes it possible to resentence him to a longer prison term.

By contrast, calling him a “sex offender” tends to minimize his crimes, [...] I think the right term for a person such as Epstein is “serial rapist”.

[–]conspirized 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hard to say without the full context, but I've adopted a similar stance in similar discussions where people refer to sex with an underage person as "rape." There's a pretty big difference between the statutory rape of a 16 year-old in a relationship that is otherwise completely consensual and diddling a 12 year-old who barely understands the concept of sex, if they understand it at all.

I don't condone statutory rape, obviously, but if you're speaking about it in such a way as to try and frame having sex with a teenager as equally horrible to forced, violent rape then you're being a bit dishonest.

[–]deusdeorum 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Only 77% of expenditures being program related at the Innocence Project according to the 2019 financials is disappointing but what they do is needed.

[–]hehimCA 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I think that’s not the best metric to go on. Depending on the nature of any org, the program % may be lower due to necessary costs. However the more important question is are they achieving their mission? I think Innocence Project is, and I don’t think 77% is too bad.

[–]deusdeorum 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I think it's one of the best metrics, it shows how effective the org is at utilizing their resources and what their priorities are.

Non profit organizations should be close to 90% IMO

Are they achieving their mission is incredibly subjective - how does one measure that?

Is the Innocence Project making a difference? I think they are but could they do it better? Accomplish more with their resources? I think the answer to that is yes based on these metrics.

[–]geniice 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Non profit organizations should be close to 90% IMO

Eh the reality is anyone manging that percentage is either very poorly managed, underpaying their staff to the extent it will cause problems or gaming the system.

[–]deusdeorum 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Nah, nonprofits who have high nonprogram expenditures have a bloated structure with nonessential overhead and typically have excessive spend on advertising, fundraising, etc all which takes away from it's purpose.

[–]geniice 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

90% is into the level where you are looking at very poorly managed, underpaying their staff to the extent it will cause problems or gaming the system. Sure it might be staffed by true belivers who will put up with being underpaid but realisticaly that situation results in a lack of oversight and sooner or latter a lot of hands in the till.

Of course if they are gaming the system (and a lot of charities do these days) then 90% can be fine but its not a meaninful figure at that point.

[–]deusdeorum 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

How is that? What in the world are you basing that off of?

You somehow think that an org with a lower program expense ratio ISN'T gaming the system and one with a high ratio IS?

Do you understand what program expenses are and what that encompasses?

[–]geniice 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

How is that? What in the world are you basing that off of?

Mostly looking at general business practices, looking at conversations within the third sector about this matter and watching the various ways the scores are gamed.

Also looking into cases where charities have gone wrong.

Ultimately though its just Goodhart's law.

You somehow think that an org with a lower program expense ratio ISN'T gaming the system and one with a high ratio IS?

I think an organisation that isn't gaming the system is going to have worse numbers than equiverlent organisation that is.

Very good numbers tend to either indicate that there is a problem or system gaming. Less good numbers tell you very little although it does leave open the possibility that the organisation is well run, honest and open.

Terrible numbers fairly obviously indicate that not only is there a problem but the people running the thing don't care.

Do you understand what program expenses are and what that encompasses?

Yes although I've seen some rather imaginative aproaches to the matter.

[–]deusdeorum 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't believe Goodhart's law applies here as there is no designated target.

Very good numbers tend to either indicate that there is a problem or system gaming.

How? What's your basis? "General business practices" doesn't support this

Less good numbers tell you very little although it does leave open the possibility that the organisation is well run, honest and open.

This in part contracts your earlier sentence and again, I see little supporting this. Your thought process here would be more likely in a for profit business with performance targets than it would be in a nonprofit.

Terrible numbers fairly obviously indicate that not only is there a problem but the people running the thing don't care.

This contradicts what you said above.

[–]Algoresball 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People who work at non profits have bills to pay. You can’t get the job done if you can’t afford to keep good talent.

[–]kaliwraith 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

77% is pretty high. That's impressive actually.

[–]deusdeorum 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's pretty low to me, there's a decent number of organizations that have over 90% and plenty over 80%.

[–]Okymyo 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not awful but it's not that great either. I donate to the Cure Alzheimer's Fund and the ALS Therapy Development Institute and their expenditures are over 92% and 86% on programs respectively.

[–]geniice 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah those figures are system gaming. The Cure Alzheimer's Fund is the most obvious. They use the old trick of hiding their running costs behind a separate donation stream. Worse still they seem to regarding grants as 100% money spent of programs. In reality organisations that receive grants (universities hospitals) tend to have pretty heavy overheads of their own (you can easily find academic researchers complaining about the percentage the university takes).

[–]hendrixski 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good idea.

Off topic, but do they also support National Parents Organization? Good charity for fathers rights.

[–]brandinho5 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

This is why good defense attorneys are so important.

Too many people have it in their mind that defense attorneys are shitty people trying to get criminals off the hook. Their job is to make the prosecution prove their case.

God knows how they convicted this man without physical evidence.

[–]Brian-Goldwin 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He was convicted because the woman said he did a bad thing. Judges are unfairly baised towards favouring women in court ; A prime reason why women win the mass majority of full custody cases in divorce court.

But, of course, female privilege doesn't exist.

[–]SonOfHibernia 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, not accepting shit from yahoo to read this article. Anyone have a copy they can paste?

[–]bodak_red 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Send his ex and her mother to death row!

[–]GlenODonnell 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Prefer the chopping block. Lol

[+]DaddyChunguss_ -8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

that's way too fucking far...

[–]bodak_red 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I think a life sentence with possibility for parole after 20 years should be the minimum sentence. He was given 20 years, she should do 20 at least.

[+]DaddyChunguss_ -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

i agree with that, it's reasonable and fair, but fucking death row is way too far lmfao

[–]AyoubZahyo -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For me death penalty is a wrong punishment to anyone and everyone

[–]DaddyChunguss_ -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah i agree with that too lol, death is just a drastic punishment for anything

[–]macrotransactions 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

20 years wouldn't really be fair. Life is more valuable the younger you are, you can do more and experience time slower. It would have to be more.

[–]Tasty-Friendship9034 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They should lock up the ex girlfriend mother for the same amount of time the innocent guy served

[+][deleted] 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Tomgirl17 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is not true in the slightest. You don't know and thats why it should always be innocent until proven guilty. While ill admit men suffer more from the guilty until proven innocent your comment is sexist towardw women.

[–]OriginalFinnah 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That dude better sue and win a bunch of money

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter