TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

My university is advertising jobs which are 'female only' positions, this blows my mind

dsfafaggh

November 2, 2017
563 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://jobs.anu.edu.au/cw/en/job/518306/msi-fellows-2-positions-hanna-neumann-msi-fellow-1-female-only-identified-position
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title My university is advertising jobs which are 'female only' positions, this blows my mind
Author

dsfafaggh

Upvotes 563
Comments 95
Date November 2, 2017 7:39 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7aa0q7/my_university_is_advertising_jobs_which_are/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/my-university-is-advertising-jobs-which-are-female.911966
https://theredarchive.com/post/911966

Comments

[–]number4ty7 226 points227 points228 points 8 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

'As part of this initiative, the Institute is taking a proactive action towards this goal by opening the Hanna Neumann MSI Fellowship to female applicants only. This is an equal employment opportunity measure.'

The irony.

[–]dsfafaggh[S] 82 points83 points84 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Equal opportunity, unless you are male then you are not allowed to apply.

There's some interesting stuff on their policies page too. They even use the word 'discrimination'

"Identified Position is a position advertised where there is an essential personal requirement and where it is lawful to discriminate on the basis of that personal requirement as part of a special measure. Special Measure is a positive action or actions taken to assist or protect specifically identified disadvantaged groups to achieve substantive equality."

It's also interesting how 'disadvantaged groups' include women and anyone that isn't white. So basically everyone except white men.

Also this

"members of the target group will be included in selection panels"

https://policies.anu.edu.au/ppl/document/ANUP_001250

[–]andejoh 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's not all "disadvantaged" groups as non-white men aren't included, etc. It's not even STEM as women are over represented in certain sciences like psychology. It's only certain STEM fields that are targeted.

I don't know where the university is, but if it's in the U.S. (I'd guess U.K. because oif the wording. I know they have a positive discrimination clause, but still it might be considered discriminatory as only certain STEM fields and only certain fields are targeted. No positive discrimination in fields and the over all student body that are over represented by women.) In the U.S. there is something called disparate impact. Rules put in to target one group because members of that group are significantly more likely to be affected is illegal discrimination.

You also can';t create groups as a pretext to discriminate. For example, a company puts all the white call center operators on the third floor and all the black operators on the fourth floor. They then decide to give all third floor employees 3 additional weeks of vacation. The floor they work on has nothing to do with their positions at the company, but working on the fourth floor is not a protected class so that's their rationale for making it legal. Something like that would be discrimination because they made up a class, what floor you work on, as a pretext for discrimination.

[–]BlindGardener 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What if the floors were mixed race, and they decided to give the third floor additional vacation and not the 4th floor? What if the 3rd floor won some sort of contest?

[–]andejoh 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My work held contests with prizes and that was (in theory) legal. One contest was a walking contest and we had an employee who could bot walk so in theory he could have filed a discrimination complaint based on disability. He chose not to ruin the fun for everyone else for a $25 gift card. The weight loss contest though should be able to pass muster because it was based on percentages and body weight is not a protected class (yet).

To the rest of the question, it's complicated. If the diversity is exact, then there probably isn't a legal issue. A more realistic scenario would be a company having two call centers that they'll merge into 1. Which call center would they get rid of? I've heard of issues in the past, but didn't really follow them. If memory serves, no company has been "convicted" of this. The most recent thing was certain (I believe) Walmart stores closing supposedly to punish employees for unionizing or complaining to the department of labor. If memory serves, Walmart claimed to be renovating those stores or some such thing.

Companies (unlike it seems sometimes college students) are not barred from mounting a defense. Nothing in life is guaranteed, but that doesn't me you can't try and in trying, you might just change something.

There was an issue with Quasar in the 1980s. White managers were laid off and Japanese managers were retained. The white managers sued. The white managers originally won based on racial discrimination. The ruling was overturned because Quasar argued that they discriminated based on citizenship status, which was illegal in the U.S., but a quirk in the treaty the U.S. signed with Japan allowed Japanese owned companies to discriminate based on citizenship. So a trade agreement over rode civil rights law.

That's how complicated it sometimes is.

[–]cld8 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There would be nothing illegal about that.

[–]KingRobotPrince 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's also interesting how 'disadvantaged groups' include women and anyone that isn't white. So basically everyone except white men.

Clearly if any white men applied and they were more experienced and better qualified it would only be because of their white male privilege. /s

[–]Starcitsoon 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

O think you could win this case, they would have to prove the majority(women) are at a disadvantage.

[–]Koschei5000 32 points33 points34 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So she would have to be lesser candidate if she can't get the job on merit

[–]NebulousASK 23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Correct. This sort of affirmative action only makes sense if you think women are worse at their jobs.

[–]FreshNothingBurger 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is exactly what those quotas do.

There's three dimensions of authority - charisma/personal, seniority/proficiency and hierarchy.

Getting hired for a quota job destroys 2 of these right away (your proficiency, because who'd sign up for a quota job if they could make it anyways - and your personal authority, because 'that lazy bitch just settled for an easy gig while we get to do the additional work'). Good luck getting accepted in that kind of work environment.

[–]Macheako 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Words.....mean......nothing.......anymore....................

[–]number4ty7 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

It's getting Orwellian to be sure.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

its called fascism.

[–]number4ty7 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Watching the parliamentary supremacy play currently in action here in the UK. Yes, it is starting to look quite serious now. There is a real power play going on.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]number4ty7 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is different. They are throwing some very personal sticky mud.

[–]Macheako 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

it's called "goofy women in power that shouldn't be there but weak, dick-driven men gave them power for pussy and interrupted the ENTIRE BALANCE OF OUR SYSTEM".

But yea, if you wanna be "polite" to these white knight faggots and TRP meatheads that literally do NOTHING but live to "get pussy", we can call it something else :)

tldr; I've never met a loser who didn't constantly think about losing, or a winner that didn't only think about winning, so what the fuck does that make men who only think about pussy....

[–]Funcuz 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, I think about money all the time and I'm still not rich. Explain that.

[–]Macheako 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You probably think about not having it more than you do about actually getting it

How would I know?

You're goddamn question is "why don't I have money" and not "how do I get more" lol get off your azz ya lazy bum :p

[–]BlindGardener 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I have ADHD and don't constantly think about ANYTHING, what does that make me? Well rounded?

[–]Macheako -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

a waste of my fuckin time

[–]mwobuddy 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

'As part of this initiative, the Institute is taking a proactive action towards this goal by opening the Hanna Neumann MSI Fellowship to female applicants only. This is an equal employment opportunity measure.'

Equal opportunity measure.

Only hiring one gender and because of their gender rather than ability.

[–]dsfafaggh[S] 85 points86 points87 points 8 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

This doesn't even seem like it would be legal.

[–]NebulousASK 49 points50 points51 points 8 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Apparently in Australia it is. There are particular regulations allowing it for people that "experience disadvantage;" all women are considered such people.

[–]skallyd 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Wow. There it is.

Are there similar laws in Canada?

This is mind boggling. They've managed to create a system where it's illegal to discriminate against everyone except white males. Rich white males don't seem to give a shit since nepotism, inheritance and other (actual) privileges will ensure they stay comfortable. But it's open season on middle and lower class white males. Eventually (it's happening already) white males will insist on their own protected identity groups. People who would otherwise be supportive of traditional leftist values like equality, peace and civil liberties will be drawn to the far right.

From the perspective of the billionaires this is ideal: there will be a Hobbesian "war of all against all" based on race, sex and other forms of identity -- everything except class. The population will be divided and conquered.

[–]NebulousASK 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I haven't found an equivalent law in Canada. There are "employment equity" laws to encourage hiring minorities, but no provision for advertising a position just to a minority.

[–]skallyd 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There are "employment equity" laws to encourage hiring minorities

So basically the same thing, they're just not allowed to explicitly say "no white males allowed"?

[–]NebulousASK 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right. Instead they say "women and visible minorities are encouraged to apply."

[–]knock_off_yank 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Eventually (it's happening already) white males will insist on their own protected identity groups. People who would otherwise be supportive of traditional leftist values like equality, peace and civil liberties will be drawn to the far right.

I'm pretty much a typical "lefty" politically (perhaps more extreme than what your typical American seems to associate with the term) and tend to be involved in the kind of activism and political discussion you'd expect, and I have been saying this for YEARS with nothing but dismissal or derision in return. If you make politics about nothing BUT ethnic / sex / whatever antagonism (which is what "the left" in the west has been doing since the cultural turn in the 60s) that this what you'd get. You make politics about nothing but identity and eventually something is going to change and the identities who have more or less been acceding to the demands that they effectively stay out of politics are going to start getting political out of necessity to deal with the immiseration in their lives. And when there are no tools available but identity, that's what they'll use and it'll get ugly (as it has). The man with the proverbial hammer seeing nothing but nails and all that.

The sense of vindication is tempered somewhat by the fact that, inevitably, white identity politics has resulted in openly, unironic nazis and their sympathisers who would string me up along with the jews and blacks and all the other deviants.

[–]Funcuz 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've never seen a neo-Nazi. Never seen their literature or come across their shit in the real world. I can find them on the internet I guess but why would I do that? That being said, it's not neo-Nazis I'm worried about: It's the SJWs who act exactly the same way but hate me for being a white male (as opposed to a Jewish male) If they happen to be on board with the whole Israel/Palestine thing then I guess they can hate me for that too but the future is being clearly written on the wall and it's saying that white males need to be exterminated.

This is no call to arms because I don't like the idea of replacing one extreme with another but it sure looks like that's the way things are headed. I'm starting to think that a race war is inevitable and it's the SJWs who are going to plunge us into it.

[–]Sawses 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is why I can't live abroad. For all the problems the US has, every time I look at other countries I decide I'd rather have my current problems than theirs.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]chamaelleon 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I got banned from r/science for daring to suggest that women sometimes use sex to manipulate men.

They're already here.

[–]Dancing_Anatolia 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At least, don't move to Australia. Unless you happen to be allergic to video games and good internet, then you should be fine.

[–]Funcuz 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Uh...then you're not paying attention. Most of the world gets ideas like these from the US.

[–]Sawses 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It might just be a matter of perspective, then. Things I value as essential might be undesirable to them, and vice versa. Despite a similar looking culture, Europe's mindset is shaped by WW2 and the subsequent destruction they had to overcome.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why am I not surprised?

[–]CyberBlaed 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

How the fuck does that even work since for over the last 20 years men have been the minority in this country?

What bullshit.

[–]NebulousASK 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They still do the majority of the actual work. Women don't want to change that, but they do want to be compensated like men while working less.

[–]CyberBlaed 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is right up there with the women in STEM interview on the noon news on ABC here in melb. They bitched about the education system and parents pushing stereo types like not taking a girl to science works and such, i mean as i am in school just ask any of the girls in class and they flat out hate maths and science and are so bored of it.

It just infuriated me. I couldn’t do anything about it but just hearing the abc spit such garbage out.. :/

I love my country but god, its so fucking stupid.

[–]Funcuz 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, we've been hearing that canard for years. "Everybody hates girls! Nobody gives girls a chance! We always push girls into careers that are stereotypical. It's society, man!!!"

I've never once in my life seen this stuff despite how ostensibly ubiquitous and mainstream it is but I've seen a mountain of the opposite. Up is down, black is white and all that.

[–]Lethn 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It definitely isn't.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Unless you're in Germany where that is the law now

[–]MartyMcSpy13 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes. I work at a university in Germany where for every position it says "for equality reasons female applicants with the same qualities as a male competitor are preferred". I still got the job, but in my field only about 10 percent of the students are female.

Whether or not they followed the 'law' in my case; I think it is discriminating both males and females. Looks and gender shouldn't be taken into consideration for (scientific) positions. Of course there are exceptions (modeling, elderly care and whatnot).

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a case where it was ruled men can't be diversity officers... forget the name atm

[–]L3tum 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, there is this which is about state controlled stuff, but it still says that there cannot be any offers only for men or women. The text still mentions a lot of "women especially" but regarding the actual law it's unlawful to only allow one gender unless strictly and absolutely required.

Gonna try to find one for the general public now, IHK is probably best for that

[–]ORP7 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

elderly care

Might as well add kindergarten teachers and daycare providers to that list.

[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aw fuck :(

[–]_Mellex_ 62 points63 points64 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"It's okay to be a man", anyone? πŸ€”

[–]number4ty7 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Was thinking the same thing earlier.

[–]ravtastic94 30 points31 points32 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I suggest you send them an email condemning this. Doesn't this count as discrimination?

[–]Lethn 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Anybody who says it isn't, is delusional, this isn't just some feminist commenting on twitter and being a deranged lunatic, they wrote it down on an application form.

[–]somefinfishy 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Seen it many times before, look at jobs for science posts, or tech jobs. Chinese restaurants are allowed to advertise for oriental looking staff, try putting that ad in a McDonalds for white guys..

[–]Lethn 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well I guess for that kind of thing it's all about appearance, but if we're talking purely skill based for when they don't have to interact with the public on so on that would be the main factor for me.

I mean, for a ridiculous example, it would be like hiring a dwarf to play the mountain in game of thrones for the sake of diversity, it would just be completely ridiculous. What we're looking at here though is purely skill based, they're academic positions, the universities can't use this excuse at all so it's blatant discrimination.

[–]somefinfishy 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Totally agree but unfortunately it seems discrimination only applies if it favours men or in reality straight white men, you do know we're the evil patriarchy after all..

[–]mikesteane 48 points49 points50 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My email to this university: Whether this is legal or conforms to your identified position policy, offering female only positions is a disgrace. It is prejudicial against men, already under-represented at university and insulting to women because it says they need special help. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

[–]Brettles67 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I studied at this university. It is such an awful place. I had to get legal advice to be able to sit an exam late after I was diagnosed with a tumor and had to have emergency surgery. They then offered me a scribe for a math exam... Then offered me to do it digitally. Took a while before I got a fair chance.

[–]Factushima 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

File a complaint with the state civil rights comission.

[–]mike_666 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is disgusting sexism-racism act.

[–]didyousaythunderfury 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A woman in an engineering field is almost guarantee employment equal opportunity my ass

[–]mwobuddy 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Social Womengineering.

[–]Swiggy 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. "Why aren't more men feminists? We just want equal opportunity."

[–]Mr_MRAnarchist 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So go apply and tell them that you identify as a woman.

[–]mrwhibbley 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lawsuit.

[–]NightMgr 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Call them up and ask for where they list the male only positions.

[–]-manatease 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They've signed up to Athena Swan...

https://www.ecu.ac.uk/equality-charters/athena-swan/

... which means they need to proactively give jobs and opportunities to females.

Here's the things though, the majority of teaching staff at universities is already female. It's just the most senior roles in some areas they are looking at, blaming the discrepancy on everything other than women not being as interested in the subject in the same numbers or making career choices that suit them, whilst remaining near-silent on the overall majority or absolute female dominance in some subject areas.

[–]rooolng 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So by that logic do they offer male only positions outside of STEM? Huge female dominance in university for every other study.

[+]papa_blesss 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're only hiring a female for the role because they can get in trouble for having too many males in their workforce. Jb hifi was ridiculed for that a couple of years ago

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the state of the fucking universities

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just apply and identify as a woman

[–]DavidByron2 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does Australia have no anti-sex discrimination law?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All Australians also reading this, please report this to the Fair Work Ombusman, and continue to do so in the future. What a fucking joke.

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/how-we-will-help/templates-and-guides/fact-sheets/rights-and-obligations/workplace-discrimination#what is unlawful discrimination

Says it right there.

I'm reporting 100% of these now

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That is illegal under Australian law. Notify the authorities.

Guess I'm wrong. Im shocked.

[–]davisto 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Once again we have another example of so called positive discrimination, this has to be the most contradictory word in our great language.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

go for it- worked out great for Equifax.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just say you identify as female... They can't argue with that, that would be transphobic right?

[–]Squidnigiri 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"This is an equal employment opportunity measure aiming to increase representation of women within the field of mathematical sciences and other science disciplines." Hypocrisy in one sentence. It's like saying "I don't mean to be a dick but..."

[–]fluidlogicly 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s the future if you a white guy your screwed. I guess you will have to start an online business and set up your mom as the owner to make a living.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also just posted a google review, after all, who would want to hire a lawyer that got their degree from an institution doesn't even understand basic discrimination laws

[–]Akesgeroth 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not sure about the law in Australia, but that would be illegal in Canada.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Australia is about as cucked as the UK.

[–]goat_nebula 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's illegal.

[–]Mythandros 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Time to report them for the sexism they are spreading.

[–]superzepto 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey! Another Canberran!

[–]Draggonzz 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

female applicants only

This is an equal employment opportunity

pick one

[–]Excalbian042 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But what is female? The university must see that it has no particular gender.

[–]Badgerz92 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is this not illegal in Australia?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh it is, but no one gives a fuck it seems. Even the premier of Victoria made it a state requirement that every government board must be at least 50% female. Not 50% male 50% female. Everyone is fucking doing it and its insane

[–]DirtySheetsOCE 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"The University actively encourages applications from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. For more information on employment opportunities, contact our Indigenous Employment Consultant on [email protected]"

Why not make it an Aborignal only position, I'm sure that'd go down well. /s

[–]WolfeBane84 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Say you self identify as female, then when they reject you for being male sue them.

[–]KingRobotPrince 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

More or less admitting that if it was judged on merit men would get the job. What does that say about the quality of female applicants?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh my god dude. Just saw the crest while browsing this sub.

ANU is absolute cancer. I left after 1 year of Law/Commerce because it was so frustrating. Burgmann College was even worse: a hell within a hell.

They had signs on the front of all the toilets that said "If you think someone's gender doesn't match this bathroom, BE QUIET, they know more about it than you do!" So I did what any normal person would do and used the female bathrooms because they were cleaner, and immediately was punished by the college.

I never looked back, doing much better at a more reasonable uni, and I don't even regret leaving the ANU scholarship behind, the place is a hive of scum and villainy.

[–]mwobuddy -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You should post some stick figures of sex positions right under the job listing.

[–]terfyradfem 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's the position? Because some positions do need to be female-only if the job requires the individual to be in private, female-only spaces. Or if the job requires intimate interaction with other females (such as a female TSA worker patting down a female passenger) I'd assume the same for males & 'male-only' job postings as well.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

Β© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter