TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

"Sandra Bullock 'to lead new all-female Ocean's Eleven movie'" Yet another example of "Men make it, feminists steal it."

ThePigmanAgain

October 30, 2015
93 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/30/sandra-bullock-to-lead-new-all-female-oceans-eleven-movie
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title "Sandra Bullock 'to lead new all-female Ocean's Eleven movie'" Yet another example of "Men make it, feminists steal it."
Author

ThePigmanAgain

Upvotes 93
Comments 101
Date October 30, 2015 8:58 PM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3qw0af/sandra_bullock_to_lead_new_allfemale_oceans/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/sandra-bullock-to-lead-new-all-female-oceans.968269
https://theredarchive.com/post/968269
Red Pill terms in post
feminist
Top posts by ThePigmanAgain

Clever cartoon on what can happen when a man DOES talk about his feelings.

4092 upvotes
October 19, 2019
/r/MensRights

Man is found NOT guilty of rape, but the cops keep telling his prospective employers that he "might" have done it anyway. Another reason why false allegations are so evil.

4018 upvotes
August 6, 2018
/r/MensRights

"First Alaska woman charged with possessing child pornography gets no jail time." Well, of course she doesn't...

3985 upvotes
July 5, 2017
/r/MensRights

"Homeless father of five can't find shelter that takes men with children." Ah, that sweet, sweet male privilege!

3680 upvotes
September 5, 2019
/r/MensRights

Feminist Uses NZ Terrorist Attack Which Killed Mostly Males To...er...Vilify Males

3545 upvotes
March 16, 2019
/r/MensRights

Psycho woman claims she killed her BF in self-defence, footage emerges showing she is the aggressor. Pussy pass about to be revoked, methinks.

3333 upvotes
August 11, 2022
/r/PussyPassDenied

Sad but true. Society doesn't REALLY want men to be "vulnerable."

3074 upvotes
April 19, 2020
/r/MensRights

Male feminist reacts to vile scumbag who murdered his kids by telling ALL men to, you know, stop killing women and kids...

2658 upvotes
February 22, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Banana_Chippies 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

In regards to she-thor - I haven't read any of the comics but my opinion is they really should have either made a new female character or elevated an existing female character's status.

With all female Ghostbusters - I'm sick of reboots in general tbh. Though, if its made well (think Mad Max quality) I'll watch it and enjoy it. All female cast wouldn't stop me watching a good movie.

An oceans 11 style movie made with all females could be good. But also could be bad lol. Make it a similar styled heist movie, don't make a remake... Hollywood is so lazy.

Edit: Especially lazy if the only reason they're doing it is cause "Feminism" and not "hey there's some really funny comedic actresses lets make a movie with them all in it!"

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ugly_duck 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

the recent one had Julia Roberts and the original had Angie Dickinson.

Neither were part of Ocean's 11.

[–]MrFlesh 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Julia roberts was part of 12 and 13

[–]Banana_Chippies 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, sorry, my edit was more about the Ghostbusters remake not Sandra Bullock. I'm saying that if they make a movie similar to Ghostbusters but have the 4 characters female I won't mind if its funny and good quality and not just laziness hidden behind feminism.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Halafax 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It just doesn't make much sense, story wise. There have been better story arcs with other characters wielding the hammer, and they didn't get called Thor.

Comics don't make much money, but they generate valuable intellectual property. Disney/Marvel makes billions, most comics can't hold an audience without continual reboots.

Disney is steering the ship now, lining up stories for eventual movies to penetrate new demographics. As a long term strategy, I don't hate it. It's good to see comics thinking ahead for once.

But... They're making a couple of grievous mistakes. Number one, arbitrarily replacing characters weakens the brand. Number two, marvel movie/TV is quickly reaching saturation. The setup they are going through will lead nowhere if people don't recognize the characters and everyone is sick of superheroes.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Halafax 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do I think Disney would like to make a female Thor movie? Absolutely. That lets them change actors with minimal fuss, pay less for a new actor, and sell to a different audience. Do I think it will happen? I dunno.

Disney is being pretty crafty. The are throwing a bunch of popular characters into the change-o-matic at once. That lets them gauge what is and isn't sticking, and creates a shell game dynamic. Falcon America, Korean Hulk, fem-Thor, fem-Wolverine, Latino Spidey, and the wacky find/replace X-men for the (far less popular but fully licensed) Inhumans. I've even forgotten a few, it's pretty ridiculous.

Some of this won't take hold, but some will. They can hedge their bets and create tension that might drive some interest. They prolly can't back away from all of it, that would damage the brand, they've got to deliver something for all this churn.

Comic canon is a live-by-the-sword-die-by-sword dynamic. Shared universes create a lot of interest, but cause clutter that eventually makes characters un-writable. This isn't the first reboot, but it's the weirdest for Marvel.

[–]MrFlesh 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The only recasting that doesnt seem contrived is jason whats his face as aquaman. That is a good spin on a character that really needed it. The new characters in marvel suck....new avengers is so diverse its reached captain planet levels of hammyness......but it doesnt have a choice comics are bleeding white male buyers, most media is, and the new biggest growing demographics are not white. Its a money call. And if it doesnt succeed bringing back the old characters would be no worse than any other shit plot device comics use.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the movie does well: "See the ladies can do it too!"

If it does poorly: "Well that's because of sexism in the market!"

Just make a crime caper movie with a female cast, or I don't know have a mixed cast becauz muh equality, like the Italian Job or The Seven Thieves.

[–]TheBrownWelsh 47 points48 points49 points 10 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link

I guess I don't see the problem?

It's a spin off, not a gender-swapped remake. They're using the same trope of a heist movie, but instead of men they're using women. That's it. The movie could still be good or bad, but I don't think gender has anything to do with that.

They already made two sequels to a remake, so any misgivings I have about this are related to the quality of the story. I'm actually kind of interested to see how they handle women playing roles that have been usually geared towards male actors/characters.

[–]Kiwi150 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I don't see a real problem here other than it probably being lower quality, but hey, maybe I'm wrong and it'll be a good movie.

I don't see the point in making this out to be "evil feminists trying to steal movies".

[–]Snowfox2ne1 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

My only issue is that it lacks a sense of creativity and faith that an all woman film needs to rely on a previous film to succeed. Also it create a "problematic" trend, that I don't understand how people don't see straight through. Women aren't getting their own content, and their own characters, they are just exchanging genders and calling it good. Why can't they just have a heist movie with women in it? Why does it need the tag Ocean's Eleven? It's going to start feeling like all those "Scary Movie", "Epic Movie", etc level of parody if this trend continues.

[–]TheBrownWelsh 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I'd much prefer it if was an all-female heist movie in the style of Oceans without relying on the franchise to sell it. But for me that's a gripe with movie trends in general, not gender politics.

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I vote for Feminist Movie.

[–]MalibuStayZ 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I guess I don't see the problem?

As a believer in capitalism and free market, neither do I.

If there is an audience for such a movie, willing to pay to see it, I say more power to them.

Especially since an under-representation of women in movies and literature is pretty much the only thing where I would agree with feminists.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

Especially since an under-representation of women in movies

the problem isn't that women are underrepresented, but rather that audiences aren't as willing to pay. movies are a business, not a charity.

there's a reason that there is more porn of two women fucking than two dudes. because that's what the audience wants. now I can go and bitch and moan how dick is underrepresented, but that doesn't change the fact that movie makers have to be profitable or else they go out of business.

[–]halfadash6 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Kill Bill, Alien, Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, Bridesmaids, Gravity, The Hunger Games...People will pay to see female leads.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I've never knowingly paid for a single movie theater ticket that had a female lead. Not saying women aren't great actors, but if I'm paying 30$ for a couple of overpriced tickets, there had better be a good reason for me to not wait for the DVD, such as great special effects and lots of action, which comprises of movies that generally don't have female leads.

And while you mentioned just a few female leading movies, that number pales in comparison to the number of highly successful movies with male leads. Now imagine you're a producer with a budget of 100 million and you're given a choice of making movies between two demographics. Only 10% of movies of the first demographic are profitable vs 70% of movies in the second. A wise choice will triple your money, a wrong one will bankrupt you. Which one are you going to choose?

[–]halfadash6 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'd like to see a source on, all other things equal (budget, good director, screenplay, etc.) what percentage of female led vs male led films are profitable.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Do you really believe they choose male leads "just because?" As in they said, "we need a lead for mission impossible. The character has to go around fighting all the time and kicking big dudes' assets and taking all kinds of crazy stupid risks just for the fuck of it! But I don't want be a woman, because I hate women! I want it to be a man!"

[–]halfadash6 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. I don't see why we should just accept your opinion that more movies have male leads because it's more profitable, when there are clear examples that well-made movies with female leads are also profitable.

To invert it, this would be like saying there are less men working in childcare and gynecology because women are naturally more suited for that role/people will always choose a female over a male for those jobs, and we should never challenge that status quo.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

To invert it, this would be like saying there are less men working in childcare and gynecology because women are naturally more suited

You're not "inverting" it correctly. A "proper" inversion (I believe metaphor would be a better word) would be to say that we shouldn't allow women to select the gyno that they feel comfortable working with because giving her that choice means that male gynos may not be as successful.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Especially since an under-representation of women in movies and literature is pretty much the only thing where I would agree with feminists.

Really. Why is that a problem? Most people making movies are male, if women want more representation they should come up with more movies. Yet almost everyone who goes out on a limb and makes something like Blair Witch or Evil Dead is male. Put your money where your mouth is, and create something worthwhile starring women, don't come along and steal what men have created. Oh, and speaking of Evil Dead, they remade that with some pussy of a girl and it sucked ass.

[–]MalibuStayZ -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Most people making movies are male, if women want more representation they should come up with more movies.

But that's exactly what they are doing here.

Put your money where your mouth is, and create something worthwhile starring women, don't come along and steal what men have created.

Since it's such a big production I assume that they are not literally stealing but have the proper licenses. And if you consider all re-makes as "stealing" than how was the Ocean's Eleven from 2001 not stealing too? It was a re-make of Ocean's Eleven from 1960.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No, they are not coming up with more movies, they are merely remaking an old one. And the stealing is not literal, it is a matter of one sex appropriating the work of another -- like me going off and making an MRA version of some Jane Austin thing or other. Pretty sure the feminists would be outraged about that.

You are clearly as intelligent as your namesake. But probably not as pretty.

[–]Sanguifer -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, they are not coming up with more movies, they are merely remaking an old one.

Nihil novum sub sole.

Besides, You really shouldn't look to feminists and sjws as role models. Let them bitch about 'appropriating cultures' and be outraged over nothing. Why emulate them?

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, Latin! You must be soooo clever!

PS

I am being sarcastic.

[–]Kiwi150 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a problem because they're under-represented, it's that simple..

There aren't as many good movies with female leads, it's not a huge problem but that's the problem. Even if most people making movies are male, they could put in strong female leads easily without sacrificing anything.

It just kind of sends an improperly skewed message, which again, isn't a huge problem, but it is a problem.

[+]ThePigmanAgain[S] -7 points-6 points-5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, please...

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The problem I see with it is that it seems they are specifically and intentionally excluding men. If so, that makes it discrimination.

[–]TheBrownWelsh 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I see it as they're specifically and intentionally just hiring women. Were the other oceans movies discriminatory just because they were all-male leads? No, the story just happened to be about that.

Personally, my main gripe is that they're using the franchise to sell it. They should make an all-women heist film in the style of Oceans without using the name to market it.

[–]MakingItWorthit 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I wonder what the reception and box office numbers are going to be.

They can do all female, though if it goes poorly, they'll probably just blame the patriarchy.

[–]stopyourBull 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this is exactly whats going to happen to guilt men into paying for shit they don't want. you know to support womenz and all at a cost to themselves.

[–]Kiwi150 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean you could look at certain movies and say the opposite, yeah? I think it's fair.

[–]xNOM 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a spin off, not a gender-swapped remake.

Wasn't the "original" also a remake?

[–]TheBrownWelsh 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, mentioned that lower in my comment.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Now, how does this comment get to the top? Brigading, would be my guess.

[–]TheBrownWelsh 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ha! That's hilarious. I've been a mostly quiet participant of this sub for almost a year, no idea what you're on about. Half the shit I say gets downvoted a bunch.

[+]ThePigmanAgain[S] -6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL

[–]HotSauciness 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

brigading

God you're paranoid. Maybe a lot MRAs aren't as pigheaded as you thought they were. Even if you disagree with this movie it seems like a very petty thing to whine about in a forum about men's rights. Is this really an important men's issue that needs to be discussed, women being in a movie?

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think it takes more than suspecting vote brigading to justify an accusation of paranoia. If you were an intelligent person, you would know that. As for the issue not needing to be discussed, the post now stands at 87 points and has 90 comments. For something that doesn't need to be discussed it seems to have been discussed quite a lot. I will say it again, for the hard of hearing, this is a case of women appropriating male work in order to further a feminist agenda, and if men had any balls left they would not put up with it.

[–]HotSauciness 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

women appropriating male work

BUT MUH CULTURAL APPROPRIATION

go cry about it on your tumblr blog

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

RFLMAO!

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I, for one, will simply refuse to watch any of these movies and am hoping that they crash and burn. It's not so much the sex reversal as the feminist nature of it and the cultural appropriation aspect. If we didn't live in such a feminist age and this was being done out of creative rather than political reasons, i would feel differently.

[–]Lethn 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I couldn't give a fuck if the characters actually fitted the story and were original creations. However this is actually something I complained about awhile back and it fits an analogy had of imagining Han Solo as a mexican.

These people aren't being creative, they aren't trying to make a good story, they're just fulfilling quotas to try and make themselves feel good and as if they're making holywood more diverse. That's why instead of taking the time to make their own good movie they're just ripping off another.

I doubt they even think it's going to be a success, I bet it's just a PR exercise to keep whining feminists happy.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't knock Juan Solo, it's a good pun.

[–]DaedeM 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This makes me want to see Machete in space...

[–]Phrodo_00 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As if it existimg wouldn't make you want to see it... that trailer was amazing.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

We need a male version of Charlie's Angels!

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In the current climate, they would be portrayed as a bunch of incompetents who only ever succeed through the intervention of a female Bosley.

[–]chocoboat 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That sounds like the basis for a decent comedy movie actually.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Horrible Bosses X Charlies Angels

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For me it's the fact that I'm watching something that has been altered for political reasons. I just won't go near it if I get the slightest sense of an outside influence.

[–]soalone34 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

See the only issue I have with this is that the reaction would be far more negative if the movie was originally an all female cast having a new version with all men.

[–]scanspeak 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Guaranteed to crash and burn.

[–]ketebwoy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't worry, it will absolutely suck

[–]Nion_zaNari 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just like with the Ghostbusters remake, I predict this will fail mainly because the original relies on a cast of rather flawed characters, and I've yet to see any female character in any media be flawed in the same way and be portrayed in the same way.

For example, a lot of female characters are flawed in my eyes, but the script/acting/directing doesn't seem to view it that way. "It's funny that she failed because she was arrogant and overconfident" and such doesn't really happen the way it does with male characters.

[–]Alkomb[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Just like "American Psycho", there just had to be a "Feminist Remake" of it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I wouldn't call American Psycho 2 a feminist remake. The killer was an ambitious sociopath like Bateman and made no attempt to blame society or a mystical patriarchy for her actions.

Mila Kunis portrayed the killer as sweet and feminine. A feminist film would have someone fat and obnoxious in the role. It would have been written so the audience felt sympathy for the killer, despite her being awful on all levels.

[–]Alkomb[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't call it a "Feminist Remake", either, but. Of course there had to be a "Powerful Woman", though.

[–]Sarge-Pepper 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ITT: Red Piller gets upset over moderate views and rational thought.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]xxvtcxx 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://streamable.com/y9pw

[–]Walter_ORielly 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wtf does this have to do with men's rights? Good or bad, Hollywood came out with another sequel/prequel/reboot, but took a creative twist with genders. The original with Sinatra, et. al wasn't sexist, because of the all-male cast selection (maybe perhaps because of the specific casting selections). Neither was the first reboot (or the other two shitty sequels) nor is this one sexist.

Fuck. You're just as bad as some of the radical feminists reading into everything

[–]Omnipraetor 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Nothing to do with mra. Please don't turn this subreddit to an anti-feminist subreddit. It's not what it's for

[+]MrProblematicMan -7 points-6 points-5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's cultural robbery.

[–]Omnipraetor 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bullshit! It's business pandering to women. Nothing else.

[–]MrProblematicMan -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it's replacement of males with females in a movie series where the males previously had the lead roles.

Kind of like the push for a black James Bond. Diversity is replacement of whites with nonwhites.

[–]Faryshta 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Meh.

Remember the cat woman movie? The only chance this has to be successful would be if WE give them enough publicity

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Faryshta -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't think catwoman was was ruined by a female lead, it was ruined by being an all round horrible movie.

it was advertised as that. a superhero movie with a female cast. just like this one

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Faryshta -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

and its advertised as female only isn't it?

[–]192873982 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Changing essential parts of a story show lack of respect to the original. If the original source describes the people in a book/movie, then the people should be potrayed as close to that as possible.

If harry potter suddenly was a blonde lesbian girl or gandalf suddenly was afro-american, that would just be wrong. Not wrong on it's own, but wrong in relation to the original.

And if you make a movie without respecting the source at all, I don't think the movie will be nice.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure how well it will go as an all out comedy...

[–]Vandredd 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I fail to see the issue here. If you dont like it, don't watch it. This has zero impact on you, me or anyone else here.

[–]Frittern 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Their trying to replicate the Male cinema consumer in a female demographic. I think it's a fundamental misunderstanding of how gender affects stimuli response.

Take music a sensory stimuli where males and females process and respond to in similar manner. You see this similarity reflected in the market where male vs female concert attendances are similar though their preferences in performers and categories diverge.

Men and women are more different in how they respond to and process visual stimuli. So while action the cacophony of visuals that tend to excite men it doesn't have the same effect on most women, many of whom like older audiences simply get confused by to much going on visually. More men get a kinda High from watching action that kind action that's also found in sports. Movies tailored toward female audiance tend to be less visually stimulating relying on more dialogue to trigger a desired emotional response. I don't think Ideologues of any kind have a place in marketing a branch of business where they literally have what people respond to down to a science.

[–]chronomagnus -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

I still don't see the problem. Oceans 11 with Clooney and the gang was a re-imagining of an old Rat Pack movie, so it wasn't that original to begin with. Sandra Bullock is a fine actress, there's not a whole lot more to do with the current Oceans dynamic, time for a refresh.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If it makes bank they'll make more. If not they won't. Not a big deal to me either.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

Appropriation of the work and representation of one sex by the other, that is the problem. If women want representation they should work for it like everyone else does it, not remake the work of men in their own image.

[–]chocoboat 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

I don't want to be on the side that whines about "appropriation".

I'm completely fine with the existence of this movie, and with the all female Ghostbusters. It sounds like a disaster in the making if the only planning going into this movie is "let's remake an entire movie, changing nothing but the genitals of the characters" but I hope and expect they've got a little more planned than that.

They have the freedom to make what they want to make. If it's good it'll succeed, if it's terrible it'll fail and lose money. I don't see how men are supposed to be a victim of anything in this situation.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, yeah, appropriation of another group's creative products is fine according to you. I guess you have no problem with the way whites stole rock from the blacks, huh?

[–]ugly_duck 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Is it really appropriation when the creative group behind Ocean's Eleven is also behind this new film?

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Yes. If the same studio that owns Sweet Sweetback's Badass Song remade it with a bunch of white people in the lead roles, would that not be appropriation? Yes, it would. If someone who owns the rights remade Porgy and Bess with an all white cast, would that not be appropriation? Yes, it would. Same thing here. Hell, throw in a white Charlie Chan, while you're at it.

[–]ugly_duck 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

How is it the same thing? This new Ocean's Eleven movie seems to be a spin-off approved not only by the studio, but by the director, producer (now dead), and star of the trilogy. I mean, were you mad that Ocean's Eleven had an extra black guy and an Asian guy?

[+]ThePigmanAgain[S] -8 points-7 points-6 points 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Stop wasting my time with your idiocy about the studio etc. As for Asians and blacks in the Clooney movies, i have no problem with that. Partly because one or two guys is one thing and replacing the entire fucking leading cast is another, and partly because blacks are a disadvantaged group while women are one of the most privileged groups in Amerika.

[–]ugly_duck 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Stop wasting my time with your idiocy about the studio etc.

I'm just presenting facts by pointing out that no one is really appropriating anything. The main creative force of the Ocean's Trilogy seems to be backing this new project.

Also, this isn't a remake, it's a spin-off of sorts. Nobody is getting replaced. Clooney might even make a cameo as Danny Ocean.

[+]ThePigmanAgain[S] -6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Bitch. Please.

[–]chocoboat 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I have no problem at all with any people of any color playing music of any style. There's nothing wrong with a white rapper, a black country music singer, an Arab playing a Japanese harp, or anything in between.

If it was wrong for white people to play rock music then by that logic it's wrong today for black people to be a part of nerd culture, and that whites and Asians should get to complain about having their identity appropriated by black people. Maybe some kind of alternate universe Tumblr would make that claim, but I think it's a load of crap.

But I definitely do have a problem with the racism of the 1950s where the public refused to buy music from a black artist, and where music companies discriminated against black musicians and only ever offered them shitty deals or else they'd never get their music distributed.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

See, nobody said it was wrong for whites to play rock. You're just talking shit, which is what i have come to expect from you.

[–]chocoboat 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, what exactly is a female Oceans Eleven doing to the movie industry? Is it forcing most men out of the industry and giving them all unfair treatment on the rare occasion they can get a deal? Or is it just the equivalent of a white guy trying to become a rapper?

I think it's like the second one. Comparing it to what white people did to black musicians back there is a poor comparison.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The comparison is apt as this is not an isolated case. Ghostbusters, Ocean's Eleven, feminist Thor, it's all part of a trend where male representations are replaced with female ones, where male creations are appropriated by women and their allies. Being one of the enemy, you will not admit to any of that, but i am not writing this for your eyes.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Calling someone delusional is not an argument.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL

[–]MisterDamage -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The sad thing is, this could be a fun movie if they decided to get creative and have a writer do a plot for a new movie with new characters et al. As is, it's just pointless drivel.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter