TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

The Guardian: If a Woman Consents to Sex with a Man, It’s Likely Still Rape

DarthOvious

April 23, 2015
129 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://thepunditpress.com/2015/04/23/the-guardian-even-if-a-woman-consents-to-sex-with-a-man-its-likely-still-rape/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The Guardian: If a Woman Consents to Sex with a Man, It’s Likely Still Rape
Author

DarthOvious

Upvotes 129
Comments 57
Date April 23, 2015 9:06 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/33n0df/the_guardian_if_a_woman_consents_to_sex_with_a/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/the-guardian-if-a-woman-consents-to-sex-with-a-man.981996
https://theredarchive.com/post/981996
Top posts by DarthOvious

Replacing "Cis/het/white/male" with "Jew" in SJW posts

1258 upvotes
March 26, 2015
/r/MensRights

Feminism is simply the equality between men and women?

290 upvotes
March 30, 2015
/r/MensRights

A woman cannot be a domestic abuser.

108 upvotes
April 18, 2016
/r/MensRights

For a mens health magazine they don't seem to care about men.

26 upvotes
August 1, 2012
/r/MensRights

Rekt Feminist Videos has been taken down off YouTube.

25 upvotes
June 7, 2016
/r/MensRights

Gemma Barker jailed: Victims of girl who dressed as boy to date them speak

21 upvotes
March 6, 2012
/r/MensRights

Sign at gay pride parade in Manchester.

19 upvotes
August 25, 2012
/r/MensRights

Family 'exploited homeless' on Green Acres site

16 upvotes
April 18, 2012
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]SCROTAL-SACK 62 points63 points64 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

So in short women are basically children now, and demand to be treated as such. This is getting pathetic and embarrassing.

[–]RockFourFour 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is how it's been for a while. I'm convinced at this point that mainstream modern feminism is a secret cabal of misogynists who are working their asses off to paint women as stupid, whiny children.

[–]VicariousExp 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They actually do want to be children. Children are a protected class of society with few responsibilities, people who will love them regardless of what they do, and get paid an allowance for breathing.

[–]blueoak9 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They actually do want to be children.

Indeed. Try asking one her actual age. The horrified, furious look will tell you all you need to know.

[–]VicariousExp -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stereotypical, but funny. NAWALT, haha.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But with adult rights and privileges.

[–]BeyondTheLight 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jazz hands to not trigger their so called "anxiety", so called "safe zones" to play with play-doh, no responsibility for being drunk or being in a crappy area for that matter, quota's for women in college and scholarships, more women in STEM, Reddit with their fixed salary, because women aren't capable of negotiating, share no responsibility for having sex, especially when you consider the fact that it is their body and a shorter sentence for the same crime committed as men. Children? Sounds about damn right.

[–]jb_trp 33 points34 points35 points 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Teach men not to rape. Teach women to say no.

Seriously. Some people just aren't enthusiastic. Some women don't want to be enthusiastic during sex because they're afraid you'll think they're a slut. Women aren't children and we need to stop treating them so. They should say "yes" when they want sex and "no" when they don't--men can't hear what women don't say. Don't give consent and then call it rape because of a lack of "enthusiasm."

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

First of all, we need as a society to come up with a way to differentiate between types of rape (like we do with Murder). It doesn't help anyone to conflate "we were hooking up and consent wasn't mutually understood correctly" with "a stranger grabbed me on the street and pulled me into an alley". The problem is, the two types of rape have vastly different ways our society can combat them, and by conflating the two, we ignore half of the solutions. For Example:

Stranger/First Degree Rape (assuming the perpetrator is a man):

Men: The only way to combat this as a society is laws and police. You don't teach rapists not to do this by showing them it's wrong. They know it's wrong, and they do it anyway.

Women: Self defence, taking precautions, not accepting drinks from strangers, etc. All the stuff many feminist groups rail against (for some reason).

Date Rape/"Misunderstanding" rape:

Men: Teach men about consent, about ensuring their partner is an active participant. "No means no", etc.

Women: Teach women about consent. Teach women to SAY NO when they MEAN NO. Teach women to ensure their opinions are abundantly clear.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The second type treats sex like some sort of special commodity that has to be handled with kid gloves. I've said this on 2X, but we have abundant examples of all sorts of coercion being used in the sales or promotion of other products, WELL beyond what would be acceptable under today's climate for sexual activity.

My wife was invited to a corporate recruiting event where the IT recruiter gave everyone 3 free drinks, free food, played all sorts of games to enhance the team atmosphere, and everyone in there knew it was all to try and lubricate the possibility of getting the attendees to sign on the dotted line with their company. It was clear and visible coercion, on all sorts of levels.

If a company can do this, legally, and she's bound by any contract she signs as long as she's not absolutely smashed, then how can we treat sexual consent any differently? We assume she's an adult with that business contract and it's her responsibility to limit her intake, recognize the coercion and take it into account, and be responsible for any decisions she makes, but we assume she's a child and needs to be protected with sex. We treat those recruiters as if coercing you is just part of what they do to solicit business, but we treat males who use these same techniques as sexual predators.

[–]baskandpurr[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The second category is not a type of rape. Feel free to think of a name for it and debate wether it should be a crime but its not sex without consent. Whether the women is enthusiastic or active or not doesn't change the consent aspect. Criminality must never be based on interpretation of someones intent, people should never be able to decide that someone else commited a crime on a whim.

[–]webpage_down_bot 28 points29 points30 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Mirror

[–]Niles-Rogoff 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hoist the bot!

[–]SweetiePieJonas 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Put your backs into it!

[–]yelirbear 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I should go turn myself in.

[–]jb_trp 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Shouldn't we all?

[–]ekaceerf 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No :-(

[–]koc77 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What if she enthusiastically says "no"? I'm so confused.

What if she says yes, but then yawns? Do I have to kick her out of my bed?

[–]Throwawayingaccount 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This flies in the face of "Noone asks to be raped."

[–]victorymonk 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Every sex is rape. It's not even the third wave feminism, it's the second wave.

[–]balhbelcher 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you, sex between a man and women is seen as a man raping a woman no matter WHAT according to feminist theory.

[–]IcyTy 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This lie is still not as bad as this actual truth:

Even if a man consents to procreate with a woman, it's always rape, because of men living in a legally coercive environment which does not respect his right to procreative control.

[–]rdesktop7 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It looks like the page has been taken down.

I am getting a 404.

[–]TacoNinjaSkills 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Me too.

[–]Deansdale 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Google cached version since the page has gone missing:

Even if a woman consents to have sex with another adult, according to Guardian author Gaby Hinsliff, it’s still likely rape.

In an article titled “Consent is not enough: if you want a sexual partner, look for enthusiasm,” Ms. Hinsliff argues that, even if a woman says she would like to have sex with you, if she does not do it enthusiastically, you are a rapist.

Hinsliff’s subtitle reads, “The furore over rape prosecution guidance from the CPS shows we need a new understanding of sexual relationships.”

The article goes on to argue that men are still rapists even if their sexual partner explicitly consented to sex with them. Ms. Hinsliff argues that if the woman agreed to sex, but did not do so “enthusiastically,” her sexual partner raped them.

In other words, even if a woman specifically says that she wants to have sex with you, it is still rape if she did not do it “enthusiastically.” This includes women who change their mind before, but also women who actually want to have sex with you, and not only don’t say “no,” but actually tell you in no uncertain terms that they consent.

“Don’t look for consent in a sexual partner,” Ms. Hinsliff explains, “because that’s too low a bar. Look for enthusiasm.”

“What women find hard to understand about the sort of rapists who claim they’re not rapists really,” she continues, “just normal men who misjudged things in the heat of the moment, is precisely this glaring indifference to enthusiasm: what kind of normal man wants to have sex with someone who doesn’t want to have it with them?”

She then writes specifically to men: “If you genuinely can’t tell whether they are interested or not,” even if the woman specifically told you she wants to have sex with you, “well, maybe they’re not nearly interested enough to take the risk.”

[–]McFeely_Smackup 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

This is utterly ridiculous.

The Pundit Press headline "The Guardian: If a Woman Consents to Sex with a Man, It’s Likely Still Rape" is basically fabricated from no where and is completely unsupported by the referenced article.

They were in such a rush to publish a sensational, and false, headline that they didn't even bother to address the stuff she ACTUALLY wrote that was outrageous.

Some will say, of course, that women just don’t understand men’s fear of being falsely accused – vanishingly rare as those cases are – or of what seemed to be an ordinary, if drunken, hookup coming back to haunt them

She casually states that false accusations are "vanishingly rare" as if we're not supposed to have any recollection of all the actual false accusations that have been widely publicized, and she's the one calling drunken hookups rape, but only men are to blame, so yeah. that's an issue.

Thankfully all this is many years away yet for mine; but watching friends with teenage sons worry over what to say about girls – how to counter the warped ideas about female sexuality conveyed by porn as well as the age-old playground myths

How about we try to counter HER warped ideas about male sexuality that she's apparently learned from porn. Most of the rest of us understand the difference between movies and real life, she apparently does not.

[–]alcockell 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Wrong. This is what Catherine MacKinnon actually believed and promoted.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Whether it's what she believes and promotes or not it's not supported in the referenced article at all

[–]alcockell 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Regardless of that - this is the message that's filtered down... or where the upstream doctrine comes from.

This might cover some of the origins from the 80s.

https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27zv8z/mackinnon_female_agency_and_enthusiastic_consent/

I lived through the "All men are rapists - that means you" period in 1984.

[–]limewire360 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Why wouldn't you link the actual Guardian article, instead of linking an article that exaggerates the Guardian article? Linking the original article would allow people to make up there own minds rather than eventually getting to the article with a huge bias in their mind due to how its been framed.

[–]DarthOvious[S] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your right, I linked this article because this is the one I came across but I'll keep in mind in future that I can always link the source if needed instead.

[–]wanderer779 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I for one appreciate any effort made to keep the Guardian out of view. It's on my permanent boycott list.

[–]Grailums 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Because anyone can see that the article in question links the Guardian article in the first sentence?

[–]Unconfidence -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Actually nobody can see that because the article is gone. If limewire is in my boat, he read the article from the imgur screencap. I would very much like to read the original article, myself, as I'm skeptical about the criticism.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Then do a web search. I see no reason to support a shit-stain like the Guardian.

[–]Unconfidence 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Archive links, yo.

[–]Grailums 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh wow. Then the guardian pulled that article quick because I swear it was up yesterday.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why would anyone link to the Guardian? It's the Daily Mirror of the left at this point -- making up BS headlines to get leftists worked up, rather than making any real attempt to illuminate.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I personally think the punditpress article misrepresents the Guardian article..

I think the author of the original guardian article is trying to say.. Listen lads.. If you don't want any confusion of sexual consent.. Then make sure your partner is enthusiastic rather than semi conscious, frozen, drunk, dry, inactive, half asleep<< these aren't her words. Check her article for yourself.. There's link to it in the above article..

She doesn't say "if a woman consents to sex with a man it's likely still rape".

[–]blueoak9 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Listen lads.. If you don't want any confusion of sexual consent.. Then make sure your partner is enthusiastic rather than semi conscious, frozen, drunk

Lads? It's women who need to hear and inwardly digest all that because so many of them honestly believe nothing they do to a man can be classified as rape.

"She doesn't say "if a woman consents to sex with a man it's likely still rape".

Guess what. 2+4=6 and 3+3=6.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I know plenty women act entitled to dick, overbearing and without responsibility.. Keep in mind I was just saying the guardian articles author is being misrepresented. I wasn't saying her view is the most important thing on the planet or a definitive view on sexual conduct between the men and women..

I didn't understand the latter part of your reply

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Her: Fuck me..Fuck me hard

Him: So...you want to have sex with me

Her: Yes...now...fuck me

Him: K, just so I know you really want to, could you do 25 push ups...

Her: what! fine....

Her: Now fuck me

Him: I just want to be sure, so could you do 25 sit ups?

Her: Are you crazy? ffs

Her: OK NOW FUCK ME PLLEEEAAASSSEEE

Him: I need to know for sure that you really really want to have

SLAM!!!

And the earth died. The End/

[–]LittleLilka 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What in the actual fuck. God, I hate stupid double standards like this. Even as a goddamn woman, it angers me to no end that we somehow need to be specifically protected by and from certain things for simply being a woman. It's unnecessary, and if anything just furthers the divide that makes inequality happen.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Apply this to any other contract a woman might sign during the course of her life. This is the only activity where we seem to have a higher standard of consent that seems to need visible signs of motive instead of just a signature on a dotted line. You don't need to be enthusiastic to get legally married, but you need to be enthusiastic to get laid.

[–]scar1009 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the thinking of a modern feminist.

[–]balhbelcher 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is why all men need to just accept the fact that the female dominate society they live in exists to continue to extract their labor, wealth and life blood to further the feminine agenda. Only by abstaining from engaging in this and using the options available to them can men bring the society back into balance.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell me again, liberals of this site, how The Daily Mirror is an absolute piece of shit and the Guardian is a trusted news source.

[–]under_score16 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This is misogynistic.

[–]Unconfidence 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Dunno why this is being downvoted, it's true. If a woman says she wants to have sex, people should respect that she knows what the fuck she's talking about. There is indeed rampant misandry throughout this idea, but there is also misogyny inherent in the notion.

[–]Zosimasie -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Welcome to /mensrights, where women calling men rapists is misogyny.
GTFO of here with your misogyny bullshit.

[–]Unconfidence 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dude, you're just being a dick. Like everywhere. Did you not eat your Wheaties this morning or something? Smoke a bowl and calm the fuck down, man. Are you just perpetually offended?

[–]BlackMRA-edtastic -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The link isn't working.

[–]misandrysandy -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yes? Is there anything wrong with this article. I think it was very spot on. Most women don't want submissive sex with men. Women being tops and dominating men is the only (mostly) safe sex possible.

Of course, even when the woman is being dominant, rape is still possible. I work as a dominatrix in Chicago and I was raped one time by a client, even while he was restrained! Luckily, I booted him out and reported him to the police. He won't be coming around my dungeon anymore.

But I digress. It is very possible for women to be raped by men even when women are the dominant ones, and especially when they aren't.

[–]blueoak9 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I work as a dominatrix in Chicago and I was raped one time by a client, even while he was restrained!

Restrained? That makes you the rapist, honey.

[–]misandrysandy -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm not a rapist! And I don't think you get it. He was restrained consensually, you know, we had a safe word set up and everything, including one for me (although sometimes I ignore safe-words, but that's not important here). While he was restrained I put his erect prick into my cunt and he started thrusting before I gave him permission to! He even came inside of me without pulling out. How is that not rape?

[–]blueoak9 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not a rapist!

Whatever you say, lady. Denial is alright if you get over it, and it can be a coping mechanism. Just don't let it go too long.

"And I don't think you get it. He was restrained consensually,"

Oh, I get it alright. You raped him.

"... you know, we had a safe word set up and everything, including one for me (although sometimes I ignore safe-words, but that's not important here). While he was restrained I put his erect prick into my cunt"

This is the part where you became a rapist.

"and he started thrusting before I gave him permission to!"

Had you withdrawn consent? Because your actions conveyed consent, very clearly.

"How is that not rape?"

How typical of female rapists it is to try to portray their victims as perpetrators. Standard practice.

[–]misandrysandy 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't explicitly say that I consented when I put my cunt on his cock. And I told him to tell me when he's going to cum but he didn't! And another thing: it doesn't matter if I used a safe word or not, all my clients enjoyed their time with me, and their bodies certainly said yes the whole time!

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter