My main question here is… Does getting married legally compel a man to financially compensate for the financial hole he left in your life if you must get him out of it? (Under 10y marriage, middle class income)

Please let’s discuss how this works WITHOUT children involved. Many of us are child free (CF) here and I want to know if marriage is even a good idea for us. I know there is a HUGE difference when children are involved, financially, when considering divorce compensation.

Marriage is a financial contract with emotional undertones. I am quickly realizing that being married to someone does not help women in the way that I thought it did when divorced.

———————

I’m a 36yo woman. When I’ve been in a LTR relationship (5 or 10 + years) that is 50/50🤡… my lifestyle is double the comfort. Housing/savings/vacations/everything. Everything is more and better than if I were in it alone. I know it’s the same for the scrotes who benefit from the 50/50.

Only, I was always the one to do all emotional labor, pet care, bill paying, outside labor organizing and general life management.

The male paid 50% of bills and did nothing to upkeep daily life as an adult within our unit. Plus received constant sex with a stunning woman. That was a constant with every man. My bad pickme picking at the time obviously.

Never again, but the question still applies. Does it make financial sense to marry when CF?

I have friends (no kids) who have divorced before the 10 year mark, from men who make over 1m yearly. They did not receive any spousal support or alimony. With kids I’m sure this would have been very different.

Marriage seemed like a good idea, because if it ended (because the person was so horrible I just couldn’t go on) at least the man would have to chip in financially where he forced the hole in my life I’d hoped to be building with him. I couldn’t imagine trusting, saving, buying property, giving, and the court deciding he wouldn’t have to fill the financial hole he forced upon me.

Well, that’s exactly what happens to a lot of women now. Getting married doesn’t (anymore?) mean that he will have to fill the financial hole he left.

The courts currently don’t consider cheating in the way they did before. They also do not consider prenuptial agreements that have cheating clauses and other emotional regulations.

——————

All those bad decisions aside. When does marriage become a good idea financially, for a woman who is not going to have children?

Things have changed. I know millionaires in their 70s who have to give the ex 50%. I also know millionaires in their 40s who are required to give nothing because no kids and they fd it up before the 10 year mark. Or! The woman actually works and makes her own money. Is marriage only protected for women if they don’t work? Only if they have kids?

I just don’t understand well enough to make an informed decision. If you know, please help.

Currently, it seems most women will be financially left in the dust, even if they do have kids with someone.

Why marry?