BBC impartiality..

_Tono · 2017-01-15T02:47:56+00:00

Patriarchy makes women wear dresses ? xD

BuddhaB · 2017-01-15T05:19:04+00:00

actor "there are no rules, i choose to do what i want." BBC "Good on you for breaking the rules."

Great journalism BBC. Is there really nothing else for you to be reporting?

CuriousBlueAbra · 2017-01-15T04:38:18+00:00

Rosie the riveter wore fucking pants, what are you talking about? Do you literally always have to be the oppressed victim standing up against some imagined overwhelming enemy?

ewoods3 · 2017-01-15T06:02:50+00:00

Some people are so stupid these days...

theprodigy_1 · 2017-01-15T05:17:46+00:00

But women benefits from the so called 'patriarchy'.

that_nagger_guy · 2017-01-15T09:51:59+00:00

What an absolute madwoman. Such a rebel. Never seen anything like it.

hoponthathighhorse · 2017-01-15T14:53:11+00:00

It's been about 100 years since woman wearing trousers was edgy.

chambertlo · 2017-01-15T09:54:00+00:00

BBC panders to the lowest hanging fruit. Why are you shocked?

Leinadro · 2017-01-15T05:58:50+00:00

Funny. Janelle Monae (black female rapper) has been wearing suits in public for at least the last 5 years and no one says shit but let a white chick put one on and its hailed as the dawn of a new era.

FOH.

Proteus_Marius · 2017-01-15T05:17:45+00:00

Is Ms Wood saying that the self is worth more than a dress, or than a requirement to wear a dress?

Would a kilt work?

Western_Ways · 2017-01-15T07:03:31+00:00

These fuckers just can't stop tilting at windmills.

thost02 · 2017-01-15T14:45:54+00:00

I don't understand why feminists (who hate men) try to dress like men? I cannot piece that together.

BigAl265 · 2017-01-15T07:08:46+00:00

Tackling the real issues here, Evan. So brave. Too bad you're such a smug idiot, I really like westworld. Guess I won't need to renew that HBO subscription now.

Ayyylookatme · 2017-01-15T13:13:13+00:00

Look at that smug look on her retarded face.

Elvick · 2017-01-15T20:03:58+00:00

I feel it's disingenuous whenever someone points out that they're "being themselves".

What's the context of this quote? If they are answering a direct question, I'd understand that. Otherwise... nope.

edit; also, we're still not over women wearing suits and shit? This is not new at all. No one cares. All the more reason this comes off as a "look at me!" moment, unless asked directly about it. [and if it was, the interviewer needs a slap]

wiffleplop · 2017-01-15T13:26:36+00:00

The Beeb are a bunch of left wing pinko commie/liberals and think us proles are thick as fuck.

2017-01-15T16:16:25+00:00

When I saw what she was wearing I laughed. It didn't do anything for "feminism". I dont think people put a gun to herhead and made her wear a dress.

dejour · 2017-01-15T17:40:12+00:00

Yeah I agree, that the BBC isn't always impartial, but I don't have a huge issue with that tweet.

Women should be able to wear dresses or pants as they please.

Imnotmrabut · 2017-01-15T18:22:56+00:00

Oh how the Biased Broadcasting Corporation just keep on getting it wrong.

I was hoping that Cassie Jaye's "The Red Pill" would end up on BBC's Storyville .... but it turns out to be far too high quality, of commercial viability and whilst it did receive subsidy Cassie failed to sit on her arse and assuming people would just accept her output without question.

Poor Auntie just aint what she used to be.

BaronBilgewater · 2017-01-15T07:45:01+00:00

OP is a cop, you idiot!

nuesuh · 2017-01-15T14:04:44+00:00

public "service"

fryelosopher · 2017-01-15T15:13:48+00:00

This is an issue at the heart of journalism today. Some think journalism is at its best when it is rooting out corruption or advocating for one thing or another. Some think journalism is at its best when it only supplies the closest approximation to truth, or 'here, this shit happened and here is what we know.'

These two goals do not mix well.

So here we have an organization which officially pursues truth journalism, but reaching out with feminism-based advocacy journalism when it sees fit.

Organizations can do both, it just needs to be clearly separated and marked.

Anti-Marxist- · 2017-01-15T16:13:35+00:00

While I agree with the sentiment, HEqual needs TiVo change their catchphrase. "Real discrimination" implies other forms of besides misandry discrimination doesn't exist.

JohnGTrump · 2017-01-16T04:21:19+00:00

Why do all of the women that hate men so much do everything they can to look and act like a man?

Ontrus · 2017-01-16T10:55:32+00:00

BBC is as "impartial" as Fox is "fair and balanced". It's nice to have standards, but also follow them.

RobDog101 · 2017-01-16T15:59:44+00:00

Wow what an edgy message...for the mid-19th century maybe. Thanks for that, George Sand. Guess we can look forward to a riveting piece on the need to reform coverture laws next.

Feminism: beating horses that died before feminism was even a thing.

tones2013 · 2017-01-15T10:59:39+00:00

tbf a tweet is not news so it doesnt have anything to do with bias.

steeze97 · 2017-01-15T15:12:03+00:00

Garbage. Great way to confuse kids too.

tothecatmobile · 2017-01-15T13:05:50+00:00

There is absolutely nothing unimpartial about that tweet.

Sometimes we're as bad as SJWs.

_peb · 2017-01-15T07:52:43+00:00

Everyone one this sub is so sensitive, nothing about this post is sexist against dudes. Stop whining anytime a woman is mentioned anywhere.

Azwethinkweizm7 · 2017-01-15T12:58:08+00:00

Every time I read I encounter this subReddit: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iHf0PLdQA08

Title	BBC impartiality..
Author	JohnKimble111
Upvotes	939
Comments	97
Date	January 15, 2017 2:00 AM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5o1cp8/bbc_impartiality/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/bbc-impartiality.934016 https://theredarchive.com/post/934016

Comments