Misandry wiki page image

Snoo82945 · 2024-08-19T07:02:15+00:00

Bruh wtf are those suggested queries

WEZIACZEQ · 2024-08-19T08:57:52+00:00

It's an example of misandry

Main-Tiger8593 · 2024-08-19T07:15:50+00:00

highlight the people who did write this entry!

probably pointless to try to adjust it as the people there are 24/7 ready to copy&paste the old entry

DrummerElectronic733 · 2024-08-19T07:25:33+00:00

Considering search results are often paid promotions from governments, corporations and media outlets it’s pathetic that the suggested results are misandrist af. Unbelievable double standard.

PhulHouze · 2024-08-19T12:02:36+00:00

Wikipedia is now a reliable source on only the most objective matters - names, dates, places. Anything that’s even the slightest bit controversial reads like a a Grievance Studies submission

WhenYoung333 · 2024-08-19T07:37:13+00:00

Wikipedia is really good for things like "When X battle happened" or "When Y king killed by his opponent" if you take is as literal source you are a fool.

Especially in historical articles ( the ones I'm more interested into ) are seemed by far to be written again by some green haired feminists.

redditsucksFJB · 2024-08-19T07:04:42+00:00

What do you except to Shitkipedia? When i add "Offensive" tag to slurs for men, One of it's mods removed it and literally told me to "Explain how those slurs are offensive".

PeonSupremeReturns · 2024-08-19T12:14:24+00:00

Thank you for reminding me never to give Wikipedia a dime.

AttackOnPunchMan · 2024-08-19T07:56:55+00:00

The irony

HonestlyKindaOverIt · 2024-08-19T07:49:11+00:00

You know what, to be fair, since one could argue that image is an example of misandry, it kind of applies. It also gives the general public who wouldn’t otherwise know something to latch onto and view as misandrist behaviours online. This could be a spectacular own-goal.

Dapper_Assistance_83 · 2024-08-19T10:56:39+00:00

Isn't male tears another way to say cum?

DoctorFitLord · 2024-08-19T16:20:14+00:00

I remember that "boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" book. My sister had it, it was marketed at very young girls as this cute and innocent thing but it was honestly awful. Not only was it full of casual misandry aimed at very young girls, but it had a lot of strange sexual undertones, some of which seemed to be the author's own grievances about her exes being projected onto little boys.

Anyway, chill, in the actual article that book is brought up as an example of misandry.

normal2131213123 · 2024-08-19T11:43:02+00:00

This is some bullshit. We gotta nuke this thing or something I swear.

monsimons · 2024-08-19T12:28:28+00:00

This is sickening. Women in Western society are more and more openly misandrist. They are overcompensating hard, (un?)knowingly becoming what they've fought against.

Overcompensation from (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/overcompensation):

excessive reaction to a feeling of inferiority, guilt, or inadequacy leading to an exaggerated attempt to overcome the feeling

Cambridge (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/overcompensation) captures it even better:

the act of trying too hard to correct a problem and therefore creating a new problem

All this "strong independent woman" bullshit is a massive sociatal-level cope, a massive group hallucination.

They get offended when you tell them they lack self-awareness and are hypocritical.

There are smart, intelligent and true women out there but they too are silenced by the group hate.

Jack-mclaughlin89 · 2024-08-19T09:45:03+00:00

Well two can play at that game

Neveah_Hope_Dreams · 2024-08-19T22:59:25+00:00

I mean, that is an example of misandry. This belittles men for showing any emotion and is just another variation of 'Boys Don't Cry'. And it completely demeans men who try to speak out about rape, abuse, false accusations, parental rights, and mental health issues. It's absolutely disgusting and heartless to shut men up about these serious issues by laughing at their face and telling them to go away and cry about it. The opposite of that is if a woman gets angry or upset about being mistreated, people dismiss her as being crazy or being on her period.

Hannibal-019 · 2024-08-20T01:38:21+00:00

It says in the page “However, in virtually all societies, misandry lacks institutional and systemic support comparable to misogyny, the hatred of women.” This itself is misandrist.

some_random_guy_007 · 2024-08-19T18:18:47+00:00

Now do the same with the mysogyny page

MegaLAG · 2024-08-19T10:42:34+00:00

It's an image used in the "Feminism" section with the following description: "Entrepreneurs on Etsy sold embroidery parodying the concept of misandry".

I don't think there is a malignant goal there. The issue might be resolved by adding another picture in an earlier section in the article.

Edit: The picture was added by a Feminist. Perhaps they did in fact have a malignant goal in mind, after all.

CatacombsRave · 2024-08-19T11:09:15+00:00

I figured it was being used as an example of misandry.

Fourstrokeperro · 2024-08-19T15:00:18+00:00

Eh? The image clearly depicts an instance of misandry.

gaedikus · 2024-08-19T17:17:56+00:00

it's wild that our society is so quick to dehumanize and demonize men, then point fingers at those men who take their own lives and lash out against anyone and everyone. like, you can only suffer prejudice so long until you break. if someone treats you like a monster long enough, it's very likely you'll start to believe it.

BlueThespian · 2024-08-20T11:12:21+00:00

Funny how they hate masculinity, but as soon as some problem arises they chastise men for not being manly enough. I live for those moments since omission actually brings out tears as well.

Jakutsk · 2024-08-19T10:24:04+00:00

Is that imagine not a misandrist image? It makes complete sense for that image to be used on a wikipedia page for misandry. What's the problem here?

TheDolphin_4237 · 2024-08-19T13:55:09+00:00

How is the image bad though? It is literally an example of misandry. It's the same as if you put an image of the KKK on a page about racism

QH96 · 2024-08-19T23:16:01+00:00

Those suggested questions are insane

Witty_Attitude4412 · 2024-08-19T08:46:49+00:00

Brilliant.

juuglaww · 2024-08-21T01:24:33+00:00

With the male tears thing, its as if they want to gaslight misandry as being mere words that hurt mens feelings.

When in reality the underlying sentiment behind it is apathy that scales up to disposability.

CreativeNameIKnow · 2024-08-19T09:04:41+00:00

I don't see the problem??? it's literally documenting an example of misandry? that's the point of a wikipedia article. I guess a lot of people in this thread must be unfamiliar with the whole 'male tears' mockery thing. it was a trend that originated from Tumblr a while back as part of radical feminist movements, though its usage seems to have subsided over time. it's pretty ridiculous, and violently spiteful, but it used to be really common from what I hear. so with that in mind, it's great that it's being documented as a valid form misandry.

Upper-Ad9228 · 2024-08-19T15:47:07+00:00

also that image is just to show what feminists think of them, i wouldn't call exposing/showing one sides haterd for the other as misandry (what would be like saying the reddit post you just made is misandry because it shows an exsample of misandry)

Pomper-26 · 2024-08-20T06:08:21+00:00

I was there and saw the moderator's asshole indoctrinated with men feminists, I summed it up because I just saw how I deleted someone's material who was educating and adding something to this Misandry on the example of the media, double standards, etc. and wrote that he deleted it because it has nothing to do with the basic definition of Misandry, so I edited to describe his behavior! And see Misgonia, apart from the definition, is a historical report on the whole page in the feminist style of rewriting history from the Jasinists of sexism and the slander of Socrates, patriarchal oppression and exclusion of women from power and hellish life at the hands of sexist men, violence, rape and lack of voting rights, mentioning the frowned upon privilege of men!

saintgabriel1 · 2024-08-23T07:46:25+00:00

I mean…the image does technically count as misandrist

IronSnorky69 · 2024-08-27T20:44:31+00:00

They spelled modern feminism wrong

3gm22 · 2024-08-20T03:03:00+00:00

What do you guys expect?

Institutionalized misandry like abortion and child support and various other social programs which favor the woman, are the means in which Marxist societies control the men.

With an absence of Truth in God, power hungry ideologies fill the vacuum.

In the UK we now have Islam and atheism competing for that power.

But because atheism naturally makes the indigenous men weaklings, The Muslims will walk all over them and then the women would be prisoners for hundreds of years.

That is the cost of weak men.

First, they allow women to hold the power over them, And then they invite their own conquerors, and destruction.

Proof_Option1386 · 2024-08-19T17:45:52+00:00

Um...if you actually look at the misandry wikipedia page, you'll find that graphic is captioned

"Entrepreneurs on Etsy sold embroidery parodying the concept of misandry.^\22])"

You'll also find that it's in a subsection of the misandry wiki entry describing the relationship between feminism and misandry.

I'm not sure how you arrived at this presentation, but it's not what showed up in the google search for me, and it's certainly not representative of what's in the actual wikipedia entry.

Given how easy this was to find, my guess is that if you are triggered it's because it was your goal to be triggered (and to trigger others)

Title	Misandry wiki page image
Author	BusEffective9572
Upvotes	1211
Comments	82
Date	August 19, 2024 6:55 AM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1evvbox/misandry_wiki_page_image/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/misandry-wiki-page-image.1527672 https://theredarchive.com/post/1527672

Comments