Vice doesn't think men should be upset about having part of their dick cut off (also I CAN'T archive, they block the sites)

RapeMatters · 2017-09-21T19:31:24+00:00

She said the surgery could be more accurately understood as a cosmetic modification like labiaplasty.

That's ridiculous, but even taking it at face value, how many people give newborns labiaplasties?

What if post-birth labiaplasty was the norm?

HotDealsInTexas · 2017-09-21T22:06:40+00:00

"Women don't want to deal with an extra skin flap that smells kinda weird."

Then they can get their outer labia removed.

"Researcher found that circumcision strongly affects sensitivity to touch, but doesn't affect sensitivity to heat, which is what's important in sexual interaction."

Translation: Researcher retroactively decided that heat sensitivity is more relevant to sexual function so that the data would fit her pre-determined conclusion that circumcision isn't harmful.

Fuck off with that bullshit. heat sensitivity more important?

Okay, guys, turns out we've been masturbating wrong all these years. All you need to do is point a hair dryer at your dick for a while, because what's really important is the temperature and not the touch! /s

Seriously, how the flying fuck did she come to that conclusion?

TryhardPantiesON · 2017-09-21T18:09:39+00:00

Imagine the uproar if a news outlet made a article with the headline "Female circumcision is not as bad as women claim it to be".

PowerToAnnihilate · 2017-09-21T19:58:33+00:00

BTW she says that the foreskin DOES provide a lot of fine-touch receptors but, concludes that circumcision does nothing.

She's basically saying she KNOWS the foreskin has a function, but we shouldn't care if it gets cut off because reasons.

facts about circumcision

It removes part of a man's penis when he is an infant
That part has nerves (can feel things)
Removed parts no longer feel things

Therefore her conclusion is.... Circumcision has no impact on sensitivity. Top fucking kek

HeForeverBleeds · 2017-09-21T19:01:21+00:00

Typical hypocritical feminists cunts. They say "no uterus; no opinion", yet write pro-circumcision articles and think they can decide how men ought to feel about getting their dick mutilated without their consent

It's not just with this, though; feminists routinely say things like "men don't know what it's like to walk in women's shoes!" when they want to complain about some real or imagined women's issue, like the manspreading or the supposed wage gap

Yet any time men say something about a discrimination against males, feminists say "stop being whiny man-babies", "male privilege", "you have it easy!"

avr9 · 2017-09-21T20:45:06+00:00

I've noticed that the young left, especially the SJW types, have gotten really pro-circumcision lately. I've been called a neo nazi by secular "progressives" for saying it should be banned.

It's bullshit because they don't even have religious reasons for supporting it. They even seem to acknowledge some of the functions of the foreskin, yet they advocate cutting up infant penises anyway.

My penis is a train wreck and part of my head was cut off by whoever butchered me. If I open up about it to anyone besides MRAs I either get mocked, told to suck it up, or even told to check my privilege. Meanwhile these same people consider dumb shit like manspreading to be a serious issue that needs to be stopped by any means necessary.

I hate this fucking society, one of these days I'm going to blow my brains out over this.

Dembara · 2017-09-21T22:20:39+00:00

According to every estimate I can find, the foreskin has more nerve endings than the clitoris. Also, is FGM OK if you just cut off the outer labia? Or is it wrong regardless on the basis of principle? Also, comparing fetal development, the clitoris is analogous to the head of the penis, not the entirety.

jeff_the_nurse · 2017-09-21T20:36:02+00:00

Thanks for womansplaining, GABBY...

Luchadorgreen · 2017-09-21T22:07:36+00:00

I'm so tired of this stupid ass claim that cutting off the clitoris is "equivalent" to cutting off the penis. That's like saying that cutting the tail off of an ox is the equivalent of cutting the tail off of a kangaroo.

Alexander556 · 2017-09-21T23:07:27+00:00

I think this could be called femsplaining. Talking about things you dont know anything about.

Rodian-Singer · 2017-09-22T00:27:26+00:00

I seem to remember an episode of Strange Sex about a man who was determined to perfect a way to "regrow" his foreskin. Of course this is just an expression, but he made great strides in a device that was deigned to stretch the skin of the penis over a period of months and even years, which gave hime back some of the benefits of a foreskin, if not being totally, anatomically an actual foreskin. If I remember correctly, both he and his wife benefited greatly from the extra skin he'd managed to achieve. I still don't understand why this procedure is done without consent. Why not just start removing everyone's gallbladder, appendix, and tonsils at birth. I mean, those are all basically redundant now too, and carry serious chances of complications later in life. Why not remove them when you're too little to remember it?

MyNameIsSaifa · 2017-09-22T14:55:14+00:00

According to a new study, men are freaking out about this way too much

by Gabby Bess

I'll freak out about it as much as I want, thanks. The article is total horseshit, shown below:

Studies have shown, however, that circumcision comes with health benefits

The evidence is obviously scant, most of it seems to come from this study and is then endlessly re-quoted. There are several flaws, including the timescale of the study (participants were only studies for 2 years), the lack of proper controls (uncircumcised men had several extra months in which to contract STDs), etc.

women prefer circumcised penises for vaginal intercourse and fellatio

Men in the middle east prefer mutilated vaginas, doesn't mean we should legalise FGM.

men circumcised at birth often lament the fact that they never got to experience life with foreskin

Perhaps we should give them the choice later on in life rather than forcing it upon them at birth then.

Women don't want to deal with an extra skin flap

Tough, it's there for a very good reason. Men don't want to deal with your periods, it's a fact of life.

researchers found that sensitivity to both heat and pain didn't differ between the two groups

Excellent, I'm sure those are the two sensations men are focused on during sex. A video refutation, which explains the mechanical purpose of the foreskin demonstrates the point nicely. Circumcised penises are significantly less sensitive to touch, because the nerve endings don't have a chance to form properly.

that circumcision actively harms the physical aspects of male sexual function is not backed by science

See above, botched circumcisions

With FGM, oftentimes the clitoris is removed

This woman lacks an understand of basic biology. Since we all start off as girls, would anyone like to guess what part of the female genitalia develops in to foreskin when we develop off as boys?

sexual response didn't differ between those who were circumcised and those who weren't

Because your brain isn't located in your foreskin. Moron.

Aivias · 2017-09-22T06:41:41+00:00

Men prefer big tits.

Bolt on for all children. Thats how it works, right?

MraBob · 2017-09-21T20:12:22+00:00

There's a chrome extension that screenshots a page, they can't do shit about that.

Imnotmrabut · 2017-09-21T21:56:34+00:00

If In Doubt, Archive the Google Cache page -

https://archive.is/fjqnC

jimmywiddle · 2017-09-21T23:38:25+00:00

Oh come on Vice and Broadly are the most retarded idiotic and overtly sexist and anti-male you can get. They make buzzfeed look timid in comparison. Its just yet another example of feminist writing and how moronic feminist mindsets are today.

I am sure if you looked, you would find doctors and organisations that support FGM, does not mean its ok. These types of article (which don't allow comments) are just there to show everyone how retarded the feminist movement has become.

ifelsedowhile · 2017-09-22T06:05:27+00:00

let's see when Muslim lobbies try to promote GM (either male or female) and these leftist rags will disavow their previous stances in the blink of an eye.

RaptorLog · 2017-09-22T03:20:04+00:00

It's regrettable that the practice of circumcision is more in vogue then it has ever been in.

jmg83 · 2017-09-22T11:19:35+00:00

I've just looked up this woman's blog and her twitter. I've seen enough to realise that she's an idiot. She apparently believes in all this new age crap, astrological crap. Well, I believe that my penis doesn't work as well as it would have had pieces of it not been sliced off when I was a child. Who's crazier?

CristiTanase · 2017-09-22T18:02:53+00:00

when most of the left media is ran and financed by a certain pro male mutilation group that we shall not name

is a hard battle to fight, remember, the mutilation of boys is at the core of very very powerful and RICH forces that will gladly trow billions at feminists and leftists in order to defend their barbaric practices

Title	Vice doesn't think men should be upset about having part of their dick cut off (also I CAN'T archive, they block the sites)
Author	PowerToAnnihilate
Upvotes	89
Comments	100
Date	September 21, 2017 5:36 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/71ks60/vice_doesnt_think_men_should_be_upset_about/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/vice-doesnt-think-men-should-be-upset-about-having.914042 https://theredarchive.com/post/914042

Comments

If In Doubt, Archive the Google Cache page -

https://archive.is/fjqnC