~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]super-commenting9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Seems like almost every guy does one of the two options at some point of their life.
Not at all. Plenty of guys only do relationships and plenty of other guys are able to get casual sex without making false promises of future commitment.
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Right? I've never done either of these
I have not called back because we're sexually incompatible tho, or because she was awful in bed
[–]Peter5930 points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Same. I have sex with someone to see if we're compatible, and if so, and if she agrees, we then have more sex on some kind of ongoing basis. If not, we go our separate ways. I wouldn't even have a relationship talk with someone I haven't slept with yet because it would be premature. That stuff comes after we've had sex at least a few times on separate occasions and gotten comfortable with each other. All my relationships start off as casual sex where we find we like each other enough to keep hooking up.
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Right? There is a certain point where both parties take a risk on each other, sometimes it doesn't work. It isn't anybody's fault most of the time, most of the time everyone is acting in good faith.
(This goes for pre-sex rejections as well as post-sex)
[–]wilk24 points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
At earlier ages most guys don't really do relationships. Why are girls always saying guys just use them for sex?
[–]super-commenting3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Lots of guys are like that but not all of them or almost all of them
That's why mentioned a lot...I guess this begs the question what counts as a hookup? My friend said he hooked up with a girl that says she doesn't do hookups. Did she sleep with him hoping he'll stay or did not care if he left? Is that the same thing as lying?
[–]shogunofsarcasmI do what I want2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well I will use an example from my life. One guy tried to date me and would say he loved me. I think that is promising commitment. He was lying just to get in my pants and it hurt a lot when I found out. Another guy was just a ONS we kind of expected it wasn't going to go anywhere and it didn't and it was ok
[–]DupreeMcJones points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
those guys who are using girls for hookups aren't just out to use girls for hookups; they just didn't view that particular girl as relationship material but still wanted to have sex.
there's definitely a decent amount of guys that dont want to be in a relationship and want to hook up with as many girls as possible
[–]GridReXXit be like that7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't see anything wrong with seeing an escort.
I do see something wrong with lying about wanting a relationship just to get sex and then leaving.
[–]shoup88Report me bitch5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I think lying to women is "objectively" worse, but it's also the one I would prefer my SO to have done in the past. It may be worse because someone is getting hurt that didn't have to, but it's also way more normal.
[–]prodigy2throw#Transracial1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So you'd find more acceptable a guy who pumped and dumped a girl than a guy who hired a professional for sex and reimbursed her accordingly?
[–]shoup88Report me bitch1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes.
Interesting..lmfao well don't worry both events are easy to lie about!
[–]shoup88Report me bitch0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And that's what they should do. Don't share that info with your new girlfriend!
[–]uto-uto 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
going to go with the last question you asked, and say that i'd rather he saw an escort. neither of these are good, to be, but as others have said, there's no misunderstandings that took place with the escort vs. the girl who he lied to just to get into her pants. seems like a no-brainer.
Yeah if he is honest about it it isn't a big deal. At least as long as he is clean and stopped before he started seeing me
[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Which one is morally worse
This question is very different from
Which one would you prefer your current/potential boyfriend to have done in the past?
Morally speaking, as long as the prostitute is of age and doing it of her own free will, I see nothing wrong with it. Stringing a girl along and lying is morally wrong and would be worse than seeing an escort. But if the escort is more of a sex slave, that would be much worse.
While I see nothing morally wrong with seeing a prostitute, I wouldn't want my boyfriend to have seen one. It's a pretty big negative. If I could choose neither, I would. But gun to my head, I would probably opt for the guy seeing prostitutes. Seeing prostitutes and having casual sex are pretty on par in my eyes. At least with the escort he's giving her what she wants in the end, implying he is a bit more of an honest guy. Maybe.
[–]waciwazo 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lying to a woman. With an escort, there is an exchange that both parties agree to, and neither one is hurt. It should not be illegal.
[–]Waleis1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lying to a woman. You're having sex on false pretenses. At least the escort isn't being deceived.
[–]LeaderOfGamergateNon-Red Pill, anti-BP, anti-feminist1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I honestly have more respect for hookers and escorts than I do for women who deny they're sluts but demand full commitment. At least hookers know their worth and don't try to hide it, and monetise it in a fair and honest playing field. They don't play silly games like the average woman who sleeps around but demands commitment.
[–]IIHotelYorbatreats objects like women1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Why are you comparing pump and dump to lying? The two have nothing to do with each other.
Most cases pump and dump cases involve lying
[–]IIHotelYorbatreats objects like women3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No just set expectations correctly
[–]disposable_pants1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
...you claim, based on what? If you're a high-value man with a bit of game it's not that hard to get women into bed without lying.
[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
I don't think so. It may be that many girls hope or think that a relationship can be established with her sleeping with the guy. And feel cheated if he isn't interested. But that's entirely on her. As long as there is no express agreement, there is no tacit agreement either.
Its comparable to guys who think a girl ought to have sex with them after they've bought her drinks or taken her out to dinner.
I don't think lying about commitment is very common. Guys just stay silent on the issue and dodge the question a bit.
Does that count as lying or manipulation? Going on dates, asking to have sex, then ghosting?
I think there's a kind of sexism common in girls where they just assume that sex should mean a relationship if they want one, but are of course all too happy to accept the offer of casual sex when they want it.
To me, this is a bit like guys who think "you owe me sex because I took you on a date". If I didn't make any implications as to commitment and you just assumed it, you fucked up.
[–]Wallstreet31 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Seeing escorts leaves less damage in your wake. These are escorts, not streetwalkers or lot-lizards. They do more than just sex. You get companionship at the club, dancing. Flirtatious talk. And then sex.
Pump and dump is deception. Using escorts is a simple transaction where both parties know what the other is all about.
[–]Wolfsouls 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pumping and dumping is morally worse, but I'd still date a guy who has done that in the past, assuming he's changed and feels bad about it. I would never date a man who's seen an "escort" (prostitute).
[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Attention!
You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!
Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Guys generally don't pump and dump in some kind of sinister way, there's usually some reason why they don't call back
Oh I don't know, I knew many guys that would try to sleep with as many women as possible and bragged about lying to them. I may be biased though with some of the people I hung out with though
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Kinda crazy, I've known a lot of guys who were very successful with women, they generally (with a few exceptions) acted in good faith
I really believe guys out there wth bad intentions are an exception
I don't think so with the amount of RP posts and the amount of women that say no hookups
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
This is a little controversial but the vast majority of women that say "no hookups," in my experience, are just presenting an image so they don't get swarmed by bottom of the barrel dudes
Hmm but women get a lot matches anyway and can just swipe left on the bottom barrel guys
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Hmm I mean that's just my guess/interpretation of the fact that generally girls who write "no hookups" are very likely to bang on the first date
[–]HoxHoundEfilist1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Women prefer the guy who pumps and dumps by a large margin. It's not even close.
[–]GroovyEFS 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I like the replies that say pumping and dumping via deceit is worse but they'd still prefer it. Wat? PPD girls are weird sometimes, this is an example of what I meant when I said this sub is mostly traditional law abiding citizen types. Alien compared to my IRL social circle and my girlfriend.
[–]Wolfsouls 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
One is immoral, the other is unattractive
For me personally, being chosen for commitment by a dude who has pumped and dumped lots of other girls is very validating in an almost vindicating way. Because I've been on the wrong end of a couple p & ds.
[–]squidracer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why would you have to lie?
[–]ManSentHisOwnWay 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think pump and dump is more often about leading someone on by implication than actual outright lying. Plus, leading someone on is far more usual than seeing a prostitute. I think most people will be okay with the former but not with the latter. Even though, if done right, prostitution doesn't have to be immoral at all. Can be a simple transaction.
[–]Fijiwater690 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Honesty is good. Nothing wrong with seeing an escort I guess, though I'd likely think less of someone who used them in the usa seeing as how it's unregulated and illegal almost everywhere. You really decided to risk arrest to pay to have sex with a girl that could have any number of diseases?
[–]disposable_pants0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You're assuming that pumping and dumping by definition involves lying, even though it does not. It's simply sleeping with a woman and then deciding you aren't all that interested in seeing her again.
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link
Lying is much worse. I wouldn't date a guy who has done either of these things. I think prostitution should be legalized, but since it is used almost exclusively by low value men, I would not be interested in that man.
No. Not most men have done that. Only 7% of men are rapists, I don't know how many have seen a prostitute but a high estimation would be 10%.
Well I think for those who did lie they were not charged with rape
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Well I'm just saying. Very few men sink to that level of desperation to get laid. You're acting like all men are horrible rapists unable to control their urges and that's not true. 90% of men are respectful of women and respect their right to choose their partners (so they are honest with them and respect the woman's right to reject them).
Lmfao 90% then why are there so many red pill posts and women saying no hookups? There are many girls I'd have sex with but rather be in a relationship. Lots of my friends say the same thing and lots of guys on the internet say the same thing
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Yeah there are a lot of guys I'd fuck but not date too. That doesn't mean I would rape them or flat out deceive them into fucking me. Most people wouldn't.
I love how you ignore my part about red pill posts and no hookups. And yeah of course not cause girls can fuck any guy they want, but won't always get commitment. It's not rape if both parties agreed to the event
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Yeah I didn't understand it. Hookups do happen... so not sure what you meant by no hook ups?
If women could have sex with every guy they wanted, men like Chris Pratt wouldn't even have a dick left because all the pussy would have eroded it.
If 90% men are respectful, why are there so many red pill posts? A lot of women tell guys they don't do hookups. Another indication the percentage is clearly not 90%.
Obviously cause he's famous. You know what I meant. If you messaged any non-famous guy, majority would say yes as long as you're not extremely unattractive. You're delusional if you think otherwise
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
There aren't many red pill posts. There's 3.5 billion men in the world. A very very very very very small % even know what red pill is, let alone read it, let alone post.
Of course women do hook ups. If they told you otherwise it was because they don't do hook ups with you. Almost everyone has some form of causal sex in their lifetime. You think women don't get bored? Or horny? Or want to fuck that hot guy without having to marry him?
Nope. I have to use a famous example because otherwise you won't know who I'm talking about... there's this guy that works at my hospital naked Jason. Hottest guy ever, but he has a fiancé. He wouldn't fuck me and I would never ever try to force him into it with deceit because, as 90% of people will tell you, that's fucked up.
There are a lot more red pill posts than blue pill. Plus add on the MRA, MGTOW, Incel subs its a lot more. The red pill is a very large sub for reddit and a reflection of real life. Most people don't know what red pill is, but these idealogies are rampant everywhere. You're not a guy so you wouldn't know the conversations in real life
Im just going off tinder profiles. It's almost laughable how many girls put that in their profile. Yeah of course there are girls that want to hookup, but there are less for sure. You even see this said by many women in PPD that they dont prefer to hookup
Yeah cause he has a FIANCE, jesus christ hahahaha your examples are so absurd
[–]Zoidbergluver1 point 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Blue pill is a satire sub, so of course there are less posts. You can't make fun of something that's not posted. Lol no, red pill ideas USE TO be rampant... in the 50s... but obviously we have been moving away from sexism. 40% of married women are breadwinners and 16% of men are SAHDs. Men are no longer providers, men and women are equals
I agree, most women on dating sites are looking to date lol. But most women still hook up at some point in their lives. Again, we can want to fuck a guy without wanting to commit to him.
You said that women can get any guy they want. It's completely untrue. If women could do that, why don't they? Why aren't women fucking 100 guys a year? It's not that easy. You're not a woman so you have no idea what it's like.
[–]funny_lyfeMostly rational0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Lol. Even prostitutes have standards. If you think they'll sleep with fat stinky slobs you'd be surprised. They easily could say no after seeing a guy. Plus all men who seen one aren't low value.
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
If they could get sex for free they wouldn't be paying for it. So yes, they are low value.
If you offer enough money, you can find a girl (or guy! Whatever you're into no judgement) willing to do whatever you want.
[–]funny_lyfeMostly rational0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Many many reasons, and I say this as a someone that can find sex without paying for it.
Quality of woman's beauty. Man is a 6 but can only sleep with 5's, wants to try a 9.
Wants to try something regular women won't do.
Doesn't want to deal with a pump and dump situation. At that point he has no choice if he wants sex. Most guys cannot swing a FWB.
Dating costs a lot of money. Then it might not even lead to sex. Paying a prostitute is a sure thing.
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So he's a low quality man who wants to fuck up? I understand, but he's still low quality.
He wants to try something that NO non prostitute would do? I can't imagine what that would be. There are some freeakkyy women out there...
If he can't get a willing fwb he's a low quality man
If he can't get a LTR he's a low quality man.
used almost exclusively by low value men, I would not be interested in that man.
I think it's actually bimodal - low value men and very high value men
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Why would high value men pay money for a woman to fuck him? A high value man could get any woman he wanted for free because he is desired by lots of women.
Married
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
If he's willing to cheat with a prostitute he would be willing to cheat for free... the only difference is with a prostitute there's a paper trail. There's $ missing from the bank account. If he gets sex for free (like a high value man would) he can hook up with a random girl and give her a fake number.
And again, why pay for it if you could get it for free? That's what it all comes back to.
[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
TIL: People pay for hookers with credit cards /s
You can pay with cash too I'm sure. But either way, how are you going to explain the hundreds to thousands gone from your bank account?
And again, whyyyy pay hundreds or thousands if you can get it for free?
[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Gifts, alcohol, skydiving, misc cash expenses. Just say they give a cash discount, or don't take CC. Lots of places do. If you're famous, it's a lot harder to have an affair without anyone finding out, so I can definitely see the benefit of something that can't be traced, and doesn't need to be cuddled afterwards. That being said, most clients for prostitutes ARE low value men, I don't think prostitution is real work.
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Uh huh. You don't think your wife would want to see pics of you skydiving? Or find it suspicious that you gave a thousand dollars as a "gift" to a woman?
Prostitutes would be less discreet. If they know you're famous they will just go to the tabloids to make more money and fame off of being the girl you cheat with. Just go to a bar, pick up a stranger, and give her a fake name so there's no paper trail.
[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, those prostitutes usually sleep with multiple high profile men. They know they'd lose clients if they out any of them. That's the reason why you don't see prostitutes coming forward about this, and lack of a vendetta against the men, like a jilted lover might have. Sure, you go skydiving too and take pictures, not that hard. The key is to make expenses the shit you normally do, but saying you're doing even more of it.
Another thing: Why would a man marry someone who's paranoid like that? Don't you think most women are gonna get screened in advance?
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SeemedGood0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
You really don't have to lie to women about committing in order for them to share their sexual energy with you. In fact, offering commitment first probably inhibits getting laid more than it helps.
Yeah I agree offering commitment directly would probably hinder. Does going on dates not imply some kind of commitment? Why do a lot of women write no hookups on their profile then?
[–]SeemedGood0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
No, going on a date or even a few dates is not at all a sign of commitment, and probably hasn't been since the 1950s.
Women write no hookups because they:
Don't consciously want hookups, but sub-consciously will if the right guy shows up (one of the few to which they are actually sexually attracted) and they think there's no chance that they are able to lock him down for commitment.
Are actually consciously looking for a hookup from one of the "right" guys but don't want to advertise that and don't want a million of the "wrong" guys asking for hook-ups.
Don't want to appear slutty, even though they're on Tinder, etc.
Hmm I concur about the first. What if you meet some girl online and she doesn't look as good in her pics, but still want to sleep with her, is that bad?
For your other points:
[–]SeemedGood0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
What if you meet some girl online and she doesn't look as good in her pics, but still want to sleep with her, is that bad?
Absolutely not. If looks are the only (or even the main) determinant of with whom you want to share your sexual energy, you're going to have a lot of shitty sex.
Women have different cues for sexual attraction and relationship attraction, they're dichotomous like that.
Yes, but why increase the extent to which they have to swipe, most of them probably get more matches than they want anyway.
The apps are presumed to be for hook-ups, especially Tinder, so the pressure's there - even though being on there and saying "no hook-ups" requires the ability to ignore cognitive dissonance.
Hmm I don't know if you've ever created a girl tinder account (I admit somewhat attractive), almost every guy you swipe right on is a match so they can pick the most attractive guys. If that's the reason why they don't put no hook-ups, that's really self conscious of them. Having a blank bio would be easier
[–]SeemedGood0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
that's really self conscious of them.
And this is surprising?
As I suggested, the only reason to do it is to maintain an internal lie - thus the cognitive dissonance.
[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
What about there's no pumping and dumping and the dudes would stay if the woman was actually worthy?
That would be the ideal situation for both sides!
[–]Peter59300 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Pump and dump never entirely made sense to me as a concept. I mean, if if they're good enough to sleep with at least once, why would your game plan going into that situation be to sleep with them once and only once? A more sensible game plan is to sleep with them and see how it goes and whether you both agree afterwards that it was good enough to warrant a second go-around. Sometimes it's not good. Sometimes there's size issues or libido mismatches or personality clashes or differences in sexual tastes that weren't apparent before you were intimate and that's as far as things are going to go with that person, but that isn't a game plan, that's one possible and suboptimal outcome. Ideally, you sleep with a person and it goes fantastically and you sleep with them many, many more times.
Honestly this is just something recently come up in my mind. I've never really had this thought in real life. But recently after some online dating some girls dont look as good in their pics, im at a stall at what to do
[–]Peter59301 point 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ah, so what's going on is that you get to the bar or wherever and she's about twice the weight her photos suggested, but you're horny, you've had a couple of drinks, you've made it this far and you're locked on target and go for it, and then the next morning once you've been sexually satiated you start feeling a bit disgusted with yourself and nope out of there?
[–]tplg 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lying. The escort and the man have an agreement in which they both get something they want, there's nothing wrong with that.
[–]MissMaude 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pumping & Dumping
Lying and manipulation is always wrong. But I don't think this is all that common. I think that often men are pretty honest about wanting things to be casual and women make assumptions. "Sure he SAID he's not going to be my boyfriend but we hang out all the time and I spend most nights at his house." Let's not normalize lying and manipulation... Hell, my husband has done the "we're not together, together but if you wanna come over you can..." to me. It's fine, he was being honest and my feelings were on me.
Seeing escorts
Ugh. There's just so much possible exploitation I couldn't move past it. My husband actually did voiceover work where he had to play a John (the dialogue was pulled from real emails/posts of men talking about sex workers) and he talks about it with such disdain which is a relief.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]super-commenting9 points10 points11 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Peter5930 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]super-commenting3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]shogunofsarcasmI do what I want2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DupreeMcJones points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GridReXXit be like that7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shoup88Report me bitch5 points6 points7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]prodigy2throw#Transracial1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]shoup88Report me bitch1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]shoup88Report me bitch0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]uto-uto 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]shogunofsarcasmI do what I want2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]waciwazo 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Waleis1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LeaderOfGamergateNon-Red Pill, anti-BP, anti-feminist1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IIHotelYorbatreats objects like women1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]IIHotelYorbatreats objects like women3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]disposable_pants1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DupreeMcJones points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DupreeMcJones points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Wallstreet31 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Wolfsouls 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point2 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp2 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]HoxHoundEfilist1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GroovyEFS 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Wolfsouls 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]squidracer 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ManSentHisOwnWay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fijiwater690 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]disposable_pants0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zoidbergluver1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funny_lyfeMostly rational0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]funny_lyfeMostly rational0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DupreeMcJones points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SeemedGood0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SeemedGood0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SeemedGood0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SeemedGood0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Peter59300 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]wilk24 points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Peter59301 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tplg 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MissMaude 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link