You could say that this allows us to determine what is good for women and what is good for men but the thing is, in all jobs, there are application processes that are used to assess how qualified an applicant is before being employed. So it doesn't matter whether women on average tend to have certain traits that men lack on average, the system should be/is designed to pick the best people anyway. I don't know why it's so important for people to make blanket generalisations about stuff like race and sex. IMO we should stop spending money on social scientists that study useless stuff like that, I don't see any use for those kinds of studies (i.e. difference between A and B type studies) except for pushing agendas. Maybe instead of studying for example whether men are lazier than women on average or whatever, money should actually be spent on finding out why people are lazy and how to reduce laziness. Which would be a much better way of spending research money don't you agree?