Science gives people tools to debunk feminist lies, so feminists now try to undermine science as a relevant source of knowledge.

Feminists have a long term history of manipulating data and statistics to fit their narrative. However, there's a growing trend inside and outside of academia to undermine science as a method for obtaining knowledge as it is "insensitive", "patriarchal" and has "male bias".

[...]because science evolved within patriarchal society, it took on a decidedly masculine tone and became burdened and distorted by a pervasive male bias. [...] It gradually became clear that deeply held beliefs, coupled with poorly designed techniques of data collection and analysis, had led the science establishment into grave distortions in the analysis of primate sex roles and social organization, which were then used, in turn, to support sociobiological notions about the inevitability of patriarchal social organization in human society. source: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mdr2/classes/76_101_D_Fall_04/readings/Namenwirth.htm

Science doesn't fit the narrative? It's male biased!

Patriarchy within the scientific community is manifested through male control of elite positions and various exclusionary devices. The scientific method incorporates masculine features such as the objectification of nature. Scientific knowledge is masculine in its neglect of women's experience and its adoption of paradigms built on assumptions of competition and hierarchy. source: http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/85spp.html

Sure, the speed of light should be based on feelz of oppressed cis gendered womyn. Some insane feminists, like Luce Irigaray, go as far as to call e = mc2 a "sexed equation" and label Isaac Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica "rape manual".

Is e=mc2 a sexed equation? Perhaps it is. Let us make the hypothesis that it is insofar as it privileges the speed of light over other speeds that are vitally necessary to us. What seems to me to indicate the possible sexed nature of the equation is not directly its uses by nuclear weapons, rather it is having privileged what goes the fastest.

Richard Dawkins calls it "Post Modernism Invading Science": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1pJ8vYxL3Q

There is also a growing number of cases of rewriting school textbooks as they don't "meet contemporary standards". Google "science is patriarchal" for whole body of similar bullshit.

In my opinion this trend should come as no surprise, as actual science gives people tools to debunk endlessly repeated feminist lies like gender pay gap and rape statistics. Because feminists cannot argue with the scientific facts, they now try to undermine science itself. All of this goes on top of numerous feminist indoctrination policies already in place in schools, which leads me to predict sad future for our education systems. Home school your kids brothers, home school.