TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DistrictAccurate Archive

View 46 posts and 807 comments by DistrictAccurate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1146

IntactivismDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights31/07/21 06:19 PM
343

social issuesDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/21 08:40 PM
301

IntactivismDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights13/09/21 07:46 PM
203

social issuesDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/22 06:15 PM
195

mediaDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/21 09:16 PM
166

misandryDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/21 06:40 PM
166

social issuesDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 11:07 PM
154

misandryDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/21 06:42 PM
145

legal rightsDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/21 06:12 PM
145

articleDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/21 05:45 PM
134

sexualityDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/21 08:09 PM
125

news/opinion articleDistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry28/07/24 08:59 PM
118

misandryDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/21 06:24 PM
118

misandryDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/21 09:02 PM
114

discussionDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/21 06:30 PM
114

Social IssuesDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights28/01/22 08:37 PM
101

DiscriminationDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:54 PM
76

Anti-MRMDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:35 PM
73

misandryDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/21 01:07 AM
61

social issuesDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/21 08:55 PM
61

resourceDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 10:15 PM
60

GeneralDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights26/05/21 10:41 PM
59

discussionDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/21 01:25 AM
54

GeneralDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights30/08/21 06:26 PM
53

misandryDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/21 06:08 PM
46

news/opinion articleDistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 08:01 PM
38

DiscriminationDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights06/03/21 04:42 AM
33

DistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/21 07:03 PM
30

discussionDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/21 06:46 AM
30

metaDistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/21 11:46 PM
30

misandryDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/21 08:30 PM
29

DistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry05/08/21 08:37 PM
28

resourceDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/21 07:05 PM
26

DistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/21 06:15 PM
24

discussionDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/21 08:19 PM
19

discussionDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/21 12:07 AM
14

DistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry23/05/21 03:28 PM
12

Social IssuesDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights07/12/21 09:15 PM
11

PsychologyDistrictAccurate/r/Male_Studies21/05/21 07:10 PM
10

SociologyDistrictAccurate/r/Male_Studies25/05/21 09:29 PM
7

DistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/21 07:33 PM
1

IntactivismDistrictAccurate/r/MensRights13/09/21 07:45 PM
1

legal rightsDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/21 06:05 PM
1

news/opinion articleDistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry02/03/22 05:08 AM
1

news/opinion articleDistrictAccurate/r/EverydayMisandry02/03/22 05:01 AM
0

discussionDistrictAccurate/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 12:17 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

NOT A SINGLE WOMAN Putting this in front of a statement is a great way to be wrong about almost anything. Perhaps it is not as common as it should be, but there are women who call this out, obviously.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/26 09:04 PM
1

The comment is slightly confusing. Is it about the "man" in superman? What does "but they do opposite" mean? I guess there is also an argument to be made about the "boy vs, man" trope, often related to the shaming of male non-conformity. Nonetheless, I feel like there are less ambiguous examples of this, so I decided to remove it for now. Feel free to post other examples though.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/26 09:16 AM

You forgot to redact the profile pic on the first slide.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/26 08:11 AM

Please remove the last image. I get that you were trying to illustrate the issue, but it is unnecessarily off-putting for some and regularly redirects the discussion away from men's issues. This is not the right sub for that approach.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/26 07:54 AM

Please redact the profile pic, username, and handle from the quoted tweet on slide 3.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/04/26 07:19 PM
2

Do you know Kesha's "Boys"? https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/keha/boys.html I know there is girls by bestie boys, but I believe the lyrics of "boys" to be far worse. Not comparable at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 02:29 PM
26

I do not see why the list should be the defining factor in comparing misogyny to misandry, regardless of accuracy. It is literally arbitrary examples. Besides, violence against men is gendered overall, with pretty tangible mechanisms like the empathy gap, bystander behaviors, differences in perception and description, sentencing gap even among crimes that are described in equal terms at the stage of sentencing (meaning they have been affected by biases at earlier stages, might have been subconsc…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 07:35 AM

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1sbrb9j/men_1745_are_now_not_allowed_to_leave_germany_for/
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 01:54 AM
8

I would prefer trying to talk to them instead of taking their stuff away or banning songs. I am not sure that will help with their sentiment or make them understand what the issue was. Will they be able to see issues with media in the future or will they just get better at hiding their consumption? If they know what they are doing, it should be up to them whether they still want to listen to it. I would hope that they would move on on their own. There is tons of catchy music that is unrelated to…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 01:40 AM

Source: https://www.elle.com/fashion/celebrity-style/a70884176/lili-reinhart-graphic-tee-forbidden-fruits/
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 08:33 PM
53

Why does anyone need to be "blamed"? The solution, according to the report, is to encourage marriage at a younger age and for men to “enter adulthood” earlier than 25. This can be achieved by offering more internships and apprenticeships so that men have to mature faster. [...] The biggest hurdle wasn’t just my fertility falling off a cliff, but that my partner wasn’t ready to have kids with me. [...] That’s when I gave him an ultimatum, then called it off because the pressure was too much, then…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 04:48 PM

A Few points: The CDC definition of mtp only covers some types of it. Lifetime estimates may be of litte interest compared to 12-month data when talking about the current situation, especially given the stark difference between the two using the same methodology. Even if the CDC definition were changed to a less gendered version, keep in mind that misandry still distorts these numbers (see self-obfuscation of misandry in the linked post) and there are various other methodological issues and disa…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/26 11:53 PM
1

It's saying its ALWAYS men who do it AGAINST women. Where's the issue here? Statistically, it's true. A single counterexample disproves this. Phrase things more carefully. Avoid generalizations.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/26 06:21 PM
5

I do not know if there are free counseling services for women in their area. OOP may be wrong about that, I do not know. What I find frustrating at times is when they describe a few aspects of misandry and end with "current men need to do a lot more...". I would say that society needs to do a lot more (the user touched on that, to be fair - and society does include men), and it could start by trying to understand why some call this stuff misandry (I assume this is where they would disagree). Tea…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/03/26 10:37 PM
2

Men are monstrous and in charge, but utterly incapable of abusing women. All the people that die early in almost every variety of way and by volume are men. I assume you meant to say that if men were truly trying to produce the best possible outcomes for men, then the bad outcomes for men suggest that men are not reaching their goal (they are not competent, capable). incapable of abusing women Some have interpreted this literally and reported your comment for suggesting that men would never abus…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/26 08:35 PM
1

women are responsible for 75% of non reciprocal domestic violence You may cite the study, but not like that. This is not how you interpret surveys. Phrase things more carefully. There are limitations and uncertainty attached to these findings. This might interest you. It is a recent review. rates of female-perpetrated unidirectional violence were higher than the rates of male-perpetrated unidirectional violence (31.4% and 16.9%, respectively).
/r/EverydayMisandry25/02/26 09:44 PM

Kindly censor the profile pictures in the first two screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/26 10:56 PM

Kindly obscure or cover up the depicted person in the first image. If they are not the author, then eliminating such visual cues could help avoid incorrect implications about their authorship. Otherwise their body should be retracted in addition to their name.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/25 04:48 PM

When personal information or content is discernible through the text, roughly blur out or mask the space between the lines. Thanks! I had to tell you multiple times already, please respect this.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/25 04:42 PM
9

That is against our rules. Please report them to us.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 06:58 PM

Lists like these are common. They do not pertain to what I term misandry or misogyny (which would be roughly in line with this stickied post), nor is the existence of misandry something that necessarily depends on these lists. It's a question depending on the employed definition. Remember definitions cannot be true or false. At least a few aspects here could even be considered somewhat accurate (for example, see the vasectomy camps in India under a woman's leadership, Steve Jobs being rejected b…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/25 11:56 PM

When personal information or content is discernible through the text, roughly blur out or mask the space between the lines. Thanks!
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/25 08:11 PM

When personal information or content is discernible through the text, roughly blur out or mask the space between the lines. Thanks!
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/25 08:05 PM

You missed a profile picture at the bottom of slide 5.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/09/25 02:12 PM

When personal information or content is discernible through the text, roughly blur out or mask the space between the lines. Thanks!
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/25 10:55 PM

Kindly obscure or cover up the depicted person in the first image. If they are not the author, then eliminating such visual cues could help avoid incorrect implications about their authorship. Otherwise their body should be retracted in addition to their name.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/25 06:15 AM

Could you possibly point out an extra reference or credible evidence that corroborates this? Assuming that the photograph originates from Ukraine still leaves considerable uncertainty about the interpretation of the events portrayed.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/25 08:42 PM
1

Them*
/r/EverydayMisandry25/07/25 07:11 PM

Omit everything from the image except for the text.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/07/25 06:29 PM

I feel like this needs some clarification. But I may be misunderstanding things and a lot of it is about perspective. It is also a repost. Some issues (not exhaustive): The study does not pertain to what I term misandry or misogyny (that would be roughly in line with this stickied post), nor is the existence of misandry something that depends on being measured. It's a question depending on the employed definition. Remember definitions cannot be true or false. In my view, the employed definitions…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/25 02:08 AM
1

Source?
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/25 05:35 PM

All misandrists are feminists. Avoid generalizing language. I am skeptical of the definitions of "misandry" or "misandrist" that informed your conclusion. Consider reading the stickied post for a broader perspective on misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/25 04:14 PM
1

All I'm saying is that the only reason men make up 80% of murderers is that men are stronger than women. Please say something such as "I suspect that..." or "I read research (link) suggesting that..." It's also essential not to assert or hint at research making something true.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/25 10:54 PM
1

That is not what that source says. It said that "In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases." This is not necessarily the same as "Women perpetrate more intimate partner violence than men in the USA." The study solely gauged physical intimate partner violence and enlisted participants between ages eighteen and twenty-eight years old only. Certain individuals may extend their interpretation of "more violence" to encapsulate the frequency of…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/25 10:26 PM

Reminder that men are three times likely to not report domestic abuse from women. I presume your statement was meant to indicate that there is "a study providing evidence supporting X" as opposed to stating unequivocally "X is true". Kindly modify your post accordingly, ensuring it accurately reflects this distinction and incorporates a reference link to said study. Additionally, if uncertainties persist regarding the existence of any conflicting studies on the subject matter, please explicitly …
/r/EverydayMisandry30/06/25 02:47 PM

For the lurkers: The users in these screenshots seem to be unaware of what I and some of the users here mean by "misandry" and "misogyny". Relevant post for those who want to learn more about misandry: https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1dyhogs/some_clarifications_on_misandry/
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/25 10:50 PM

Is this a celebrity, popular influencer, or other person of public interest? If so, please explain who they are and what they are known for. Otherwise, please cover as much of the video as possible (including clothing and room) and dub it using text-to-speech.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/06/25 08:21 PM

Note that "serious suicide attempt" is a category used in the academic literature. It does not imply that other deliberate self-harm would not be a serious issue. Suicide intent data from 5212 participants was included in the analysis. A significant association between suicide intent and gender was found, where ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA) were rated significantly more frequently in males than females (p < .001). There was a statistically significant gender difference in intent and age group…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/25 02:18 AM

Is this a celebrity or an ad or something? If so, provide the source and context, otherwise cover the face.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/25 12:00 AM
1

Sorry to hear that, but this is not the right place for that. Please consult a lawyer to explore your legal options.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/25 05:31 PM

Hey, thank you for removing the names. Please remove the avatars as well (even generic ones). Everything that isn't essential for understanding a post should be removed by default to prevent unnecessary discussions about what qualifies as personal information.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/25 06:42 PM

Please remove all profile pictures and avatars (even generic ones), thank you!
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/25 08:31 PM

Please remove the handle behind "followed by ..." at the bottom. Thanks!
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/25 08:26 PM

Please remove even generic avatars like these ones, thank you! While you are at it, please make sure that all information is covered entirely.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/25 08:24 PM

Please remove the handle behind "followed by ..." at the bottom. Thanks!
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/25 07:54 PM
-1

While there may be differences in average stamina or other variables (not sure on how relevant that is for running), it would be better not to judge people by the averages of their demographic. Same goes for women who struggle with being underestimated (e.g. when it comes to strength) or who are disadvantaged within their group. The current system is not fair, it just hides the issue. We do not see that men with certain predispositions (Some men will more easily build muscle than others, are tal…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/06/25 09:20 PM
2

Source?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/25 05:47 PM
1

Statistics are complex and do not automatically become "facts". In this particular instance, acknowledging the statistic would mean accepting its definition of "raising kids very well". Similarly, many decisions made throughout research allow for disagreement. Quoting a study (and providing a link to it) would be fine. That does not allow declaring a statistic as an undeniable "fact" beyond personal judgment. No link or source was provided, so the comment was removed as a generalization.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/25 05:44 PM

If I remember correctly, these videos contained some statements that were tainted by misandry themselves. Like downplaying the prevalence and severity of real-life rape against men (outside of prisons) and things like that. I lack the time to check, so I might be thinking of a different video. So yeah, take the video with a grain of salt, still good to have some examples.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/06/25 09:10 PM
6

Minus women receiving the described comments. That is not desirable.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/06/25 08:46 PM

NO IT IS NOT! Unclear in my opinion. Unless by that you meant that misogyny would not be the "only reason it could be", as you said before. It obviously would not be the only way to interpret the behavior. The comments about men in the following slides are still problematic, of course. I remember my first few years in Stem, yes I got teased, ribbed. It's the modern workplace. Does not mean you should not be allowed to criticize it. It should not be this way, in my opinion. Regardless of the reas…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/06/25 04:12 PM
1

Generally correct, users must remove all references to other subreddits whenever possible. This is to avoid conflict and brigading. Exceptions may be made on a case-by-case basis.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/06/25 04:07 PM
5

Please do not generalize. Things like "all these women" and "they all have" should be avoided.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/06/25 04:03 PM

No, the hate does not need to shift to her. If you feel like hate is the way to go, then this sub is not the right fit. We oppose all hate. We also do not allow personal attacks, including calling her an "asshole". Please remain civil in the future.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/25 08:45 PM
1

The meaning of your comment would not change if you just removed the "are dumb enough to". Please do so and avoid insults in the future, they add nothing.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/25 08:35 PM

Please avoid links to other subreddits to prevent harassment and brigading. Instead, either use a censored screenshot (see rules) or just describe the issue without mentioning users or subreddits. In this case, they already mentioned being annoyed by comments calling it misandry, no need to add any more fuel to the fire.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/25 07:58 PM

Please make sure not to be sloppy when covering info. Slide 15 exposes almost the entire handle and slide 16 shows the entire face. Many show at least parts of faces. Thank you!
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 09:04 PM

Please entirely remove profile pictures as well (even generic ones).
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 08:58 PM

I have not looked at the paper in detail. The classification of content seems to have been based on models using manually classified training data. As with other approaches, this means that (subconscious) biases in the classification of what does or does not represent "hate" could affect the results. Different people might disagree on what "hate" means to begin with. The dataset their classifier was trained on did not contain any hate targeted at men: 3.2 Targets of hate Hate can be targeted aga…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 08:24 PM
3

women do not want to marry men who are feminists they just want to treat their enemies this way. Please do not generalize or talk about groups as if they were a monolith. Be more specific, like "most of the women I talked to..." or something. That way, you can still talk about your personal experiences without generalizing.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 04:44 PM
7

I disagree with assuming bad faith by default.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 04:34 PM

Please cover profile pictures *entirely*.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/25 07:51 PM

They did not seem to ask in bad faith though? And they asked about philia, not behavior. They may still be wrong, I don't know, but those are two different things. I am not sure this fits the sub. Also, please remove the names and logos of subreddits in the future, thank you.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/25 07:49 PM

Please remove the profile picture at the bottom.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/25 07:34 PM

When posting content showing faces, please add a note on who that is and what they are known for.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/25 09:23 PM

Is this a celebrity/influencer? Otherwise, do not post anything showing faces.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/25 09:21 PM
3

[...], but women want only [...] This is never recognized by feminists, they always [...] Please do not generalize. Instead, use qualifiers like "some" and use "in my experience", "I believe" or similar to clarify that this is not meant to be a definitive statement of fact.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/25 05:47 AM
-3

Honestly, reading the entitlement, victim culture and blame on misandrist (female) spaces a woman would last 5 minutes being a husband. Please do not generalize. Instead, use qualifiers like "some" and use "in my experience", "I believe" or similar to clarify that this is not meant to be a definitive statement of fact.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/25 05:43 AM

Please avoid using "males" or "females" as nouns in reference to humans, especially when not doing so consistently across sexes. Also, pedophilia is not the name of a crime to my knowledge. You were looking for "statutory rape", I believe.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/25 12:35 AM

Please remove usernames (second picture) and all avatars/profile pictures (even abstract ones).
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/25 12:31 AM

Please remove names of subreddits and profile pictures, even abstract ones, as well. If the people in the picture are not celebrities, redact their bodies (make sure even their clothing is removed).
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/25 12:25 AM
0

Please do not generalize. For example, say "some women" instead. Please edit your comment.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/25 12:19 AM
0

Please avoid statements that make claims about every member of a group or every instance of a situation. There will be exceptions. Edit your comment to be more precise and add the source (even if that source is your experience). Perhaps try to clarify the underlying issue and how it relates to men. Is it the empathy gap? Or about false accusations? Or about the perception of tears? Women being believed would not be an issue on its own (meaning if there were no false accusations or other issues),…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/25 12:03 AM

Hey, thanks for posting! Please remove all names and profile pictures from screenshots, even if the user argues against misandry. Use colors to represent different users. Also use a different title, because we do not support harassment, bullying, or revenge. Maybe "User calls Y chromosome a "little distorted version of chromosome X"".
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/25 09:06 AM

Please do not generalize. Repost it with a title saying "some don't understand ..." or something.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/25 07:31 AM
1

Please do not generalize. Edit your comment to say "some" or something. It also is not just women.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/25 07:16 AM

According to Politico https://web.archive.org/web/20240718020609/https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/17/council-member-susan-zhuang-arrested-protesting-homeless-shelter-00168960 Video obtained by POLITICO showed Zhuang being led away in handcuffs by cops. Another video shows Zhuang and other demonstrators pushing metal barriers up against police officers. Yet another shows Zhuang resisting an NYPD officer’s effort to handcuff her. [...] Zhuang was charged with a felony count of assault in the …
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/25 07:00 AM
1

Bringing up misogyny is irrelevant to the question of misandry, as one may concede that something could represent aspects of both. This does not mean one has to agree on it representing misogyny, it is simply not relevant unless you make further assumptions. Same goes for the "by men" thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 09:14 AM

I just want to clarify a few things for readers: If you are dissatisfied with parts of your relationship, do not deal with it in the way described by OOP. Do not refer to what is or is not "normal" (should be irrelevant), do not imply that your partner "should" do something to please you (they have no obligation to) and do not use indirect communication (like sharing reels) to get a point across. That said, I am not sure if the reel was meant to be received the way it was. Always respect their d…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/25 11:59 PM

Please, when you mean misandrist or misandry, then use those terms. Do not use femcel as a proxy. This is not about celibacy and misandry is seen across all demographics, not just women. Please edit the post.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/25 08:46 PM

The part that is most relevant to this sub, in my opinion, is the comments blaming men by default. It does not even matter whether one believes that there is something to be "held accountable" for to begin with. If they did not blame men, this would probably be off-topic. Therefore, no discussion of fantasy vs. reality is even necessary. The title of this post should focus on them defaulting to blaming men for what they perceived as problematic, regardless of whether one agrees with their percep…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/25 07:11 PM

Hey, thanks for submitting. While I agree that there are issues with how men's day is handled, I am not sure if this fits the sub. As much as there is a double standard in how these things are treated, a comment like that will be seen as a provocation by at least some. I can see how reactions to such a comment could be guided by denial or misunderstandings of men's issues or their need for advocacy and awareness initiatives in general ("everyday is men's day", etc.), which would be part of misan…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/25 08:39 PM
1

You could make a perfect punching bag you know. Statements like these are against our rules. Consider this a serious warning. Remain civil at all times, report content if necessary. Throwing around personal attacks is in conflict with the community we are trying to build.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/25 07:28 PM

Please make sure to remove the profile pictures as well, even generic ones, thank you. More generally: Please make sure that logos, names, and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major inf…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/25 05:29 PM
1

Retaliation is not a human right to my knowledge, if you mean revenge/self-justice. I believe that it is a crime and it should be. As I said in my top-level comment, some of the OOPs do oppose male self-defense, which is different and should be equally available to everyone.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 07:47 PM

Please make sure that logos, names, and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencer…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 03:35 PM
1

People are not supposed to know which post it is, that is the point. You are correct that a quick "inspect element" could make it say anything. That is the trade-off for allowing content from non-celebrities and reddit in general to be posted at all. If there is a link, some will unfortunately follow it and vote, comment, or harrass. Given the nature of our sub (users often posting content they disagree or take issue with), that might be seen as brigading and against the rules. Allowing that cou…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 02:38 AM
0

Do not link to the post or sub. Unless it is necessary context, even retract the name of the sub, logo, and the title of the post. While you are at it, also make it a habit to always remove profile pictures and avatars together with the usernames/handles, even abstract ones. I am sorry that they were not as careful, which may have contributed to the brigading. Let's not make the same mistake, which is why I removed this post. Please remove the information mentioned above from the screenshots, te…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 01:46 AM
13

Based on how I interpret this, I would not call that self-defense (if it went down the way I would imagine based on this), though I am aware that there are way broader definitions than mine. As both her and her partners accounts would be affected by the internalized environment of misandry (besides all kinds of other influences, of course), even hearing both sides would not necessarily help us imagine what actually went down (e.g. downplaying or denying domestic violence against men). The commen…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 01:15 AM

I removed the post due to the following: She’s a “human” being, [...]. Please do not let the emotional reactions to societal misandry turn into hate. Turn them into positive activism and advocacy. Becoming hateful is not what we are about, and please take care of your mental health, even if that means distancing from spaces like these for some time. I know that this is harder said than done. Still, we try to represent the issues we care about in a way that may affect positive change toward equal…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/25 06:32 PM

Thanks for submitting! I appreciate the effort to cover the names. Unfortunately, some are not covered enough and still easily recognizable. Please make sure that the names are covered entirely. While you are at it, please cover all profile pictures/avatars as well. When resubmitting, also try to chose a title that is less divisive and generalizing. Titles set the tone and decide if people even bother looking at the content. If we want people to take notice of these issues, titles like these do …
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/25 07:52 PM

Please make sure that logos, names, and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencer…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/25 01:11 AM
1

Hey, mod here, please edit your comment in the following ways: Please edit the sources into your original comment. How is emotional regulation relevant to the post and your point? If it isn't, remove it from the comment. It would be off-topic. If it is truly relevant, is it also relevant if men are "more" or just if they are "not less" developed? I do not see why this sub would be interested in the former, true or not. Given the understandable sensitivities surrounding such claims, please change…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/25 12:38 AM

Glad to see that most here recognize the issues associated with the depicted post. I want to add some clarifications in light of a few of the comments. First, there is some evidence suggesting the average volume of the prefrontal cortex to be larger in women, and the average overall volume of the brain to be larger in men. Neither means that one is "a better human" or "more deserving" than the other. Do not jump to conclusions either, as greater volume may not just equal "better performance". An…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/03/25 10:56 PM

Please remove the name and logo of the subreddit and the username. More generally: Please make sure that logos, names, and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other …
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/25 12:54 AM

Please remove all usernames, handles, profile pictures, and avatars (even abstract ones). Cover them with different colors to represent users in comment chains.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/25 12:50 AM

Please remove names, handles and profile pictures.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/25 01:45 AM

Please refrain from personal attacks, they only distract from your message. Furthermore, even though your comment was not meant literally, violence is an entirely unacceptable response, so do not even joke about it. Please remember to retract all profile pictures.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/25 01:04 AM
1

Women can legally rape anybody, including children. That is not quite correct. For what it's worth, it would usually still qualify as a (different) crime. Some jurisdictions even recognize (some select forms of) rape by women as such. Reddit is a global forum, so it would help if you could cite the laws you are referring to. Women are actually more abusive than men, the latter also being abused more by their female partner. It would help if you supported such statements with some kind of argumen…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/24 11:56 PM

Please remove the profile pictures as well. More generally: Please make sure that logos, names, and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public intere…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/24 11:32 PM

Please make sure that logos, names, and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencer…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/24 08:51 AM

Please make sure that logos, names, and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencer…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/24 08:48 AM

Please make sure that logo, names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers/…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/24 08:46 AM

Please make sure that logo, names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers/…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/24 08:45 AM

Please remove the logo of the subreddit, the title of the post, and all avatars and profile pictures. Feel free to resubmit once you have done so. You may keep the picture of Goode. In general: Please make sure that logo, names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/24 08:44 AM

Please make sure that names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), all (user-)names and handles, profile pictures, and (if present) other personal information (like faces in other pictures) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers retweet or post a screenshot of a non-celeb, then the information of that non-celeb still needs to b…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/11/24 10:55 PM

Please make sure that names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), all (user-)names and handles, profile pictures, and (if present) other personal information (like faces in other pictures) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers retweet or post a screenshot of a non-celeb, then the information of that non-celeb still needs to b…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/11/24 10:44 PM

Please make sure that names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), all (user-)names and handles, profile pictures, and (if present) other personal information (like faces in other pictures) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers retweet or post a screenshot of a non-celeb, then the information of that non-celeb still needs to b…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/11/24 10:43 PM

Please make sure that names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), all (user-)names and handles, profile pictures, and (if present) other personal information (like faces in other pictures) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers retweet or post a screenshot of a non-celeb, then the information of that non-celeb still needs to b…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/24 06:22 AM

Please make sure that names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), all (user-)names and handles, profile pictures, and (if present) other personal information (like faces in other pictures) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers retweet or post a screenshot of a non-celeb, then the information of that non-celeb still needs to b…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/24 06:17 AM

Please make sure that names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), all (user-)names and handles, profile pictures, and (if present) other personal information (like faces in other pictures) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers retweet or post a screenshot of a non-celeb, then the information of that non-celeb still needs to b…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/24 06:16 AM

If possible, post a censored screenshot. Mask all personal information, including all profile pictures and all names (unless celebrity, company, etc.). When in doubt, mask it. Even pictures of a room or driveway could enable identification by those who know the individual. If you can't post a screenshot, you might be able to post the text directly. This would also allow you to add some explanations amd thoughts. I know that links are the most credible piece of evidence and the only one allowing …
/r/EverydayMisandry03/09/24 03:26 PM

Please remove the name of the sub.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/09/24 10:14 PM
3

I do not believe that phrasing it this way is useful. No matter how (in)correct you might be in substance, I expect only few (if any) of those identifying with that label would see themselves in your arguably hyperbolic/sarcastic statements. All the others would leave, satisfied that they can now claim to have had a look that confirmed their misconceptions of what spaces like this are all about. I am aware that there are individuals that would fit your description, but still. Word it so that it …
/r/EverydayMisandry02/09/24 09:59 PM
0

https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1dyhogs/some_clarifications_on_misandry/
/r/EverydayMisandry31/08/24 06:59 AM
1

I am glad it sparked a conversation. You were told what to do in order for it to stay, but you did not do so (see https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1f1b5ne/man_tells_of_his_medical_history_and_gets/ljz2j70/). To be clear: The new screenshots still contained a full username, a full handle, part of another handle, and multiple profile pictures (even including faces and full-body shots). You were told to remove all of this. None of this was a big deal. Everybody misses stuff, mysel…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/24 10:15 PM

Please remove the name and profile picture of the non-verified user. And perhaps don't use a provocative title just for the sake of it. Does OP even identify with that label? There would be more fitting titles for this.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/24 09:03 AM

Please make sure that all names and handles, profile pictures, and (if present) other personal information (like faces in other pictures) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers retweet or post a screenshot of a non-celeb, then the information of that non-celeb still needs to be removed. If you need to indicate who said what in a chain of co…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/24 08:41 AM

Please make sure that all names and handles, profile pictures, and (if present) other personal information (like faces in other pictures) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers retweet or post a screenshot of a non-celeb, then the information of that non-celeb still needs to be removed. If you need to indicate who said what in a chain of co…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/24 08:39 AM

You forgot to censor the handle, name, and profile pic at the very bottom of the second screenshot. I assume the non-redacted account is well known (lots of followers, etc.)? A checkmark can just be bought, as far as I know. If you need to indicate who said what in a chain of comments, please use different colors or manually add other indicators like a number or letter for each unique user.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/24 08:36 AM
1

Thank you for adjusting the screenshots. You might have missed that the message we sent you also said to cover profile pictures. To be clear: Whenever you retract usernames and handles, make it a habit to remove the profile pictures as well. Whilst not every profile picture might contain unique information, it is not feasible for us to check. If you need to indicate who said what in a chain of comments, please use different colors or manually add other indicators like a number or letter for each…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/24 07:52 AM

Please make sure that names and handles, profile pictures, and (if present) other personal information are covered entirely, then resubmit the post.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/08/24 05:01 AM
2

Well, you can also ejaculate without the (full) experience of an orgasm. One way to achieve this is to halt stimulation right after the point of no return. This is called "ruined orgasm" in misandry/femdom fetish circles.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 08:13 AM

You can still blur the handle, the first word of the username, and the profile picture without compromising your message. In the end, even the whole username is not essential and probably should be removed just in case. We need to be responsible with such information. Unless it is a public figure, it should be removed if possible.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 07:48 AM
2

https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1dyhogs/some_clarifications_on_misandry/
/r/EverydayMisandry19/08/24 06:59 PM

I am not sure I understand... In a truly equality and fair society we would see the 50% rule, meaning that women positions wouldn't be forced and have a balanced play between actors. This was duly implemented in the last century but slowly devolved in an abusive power trip from females who have no merit, experience or knowledge; Positions were balanced? No disparities? How did you come to that conclusion? One might provide various reasons for those disparities, but still. This is specially unhea…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/08/24 09:36 AM
1

Source?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/08/24 07:10 AM

Please remove the profile picture as well.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/08/24 08:41 PM

Just noticed that you forgot to censor the usernames. I mean, a post with 70k upvotes borders on being "of public interest" in and of itself, but still... please remove the usernames (reddit and facebook), the facebook profile picture, and the name of the subreddit. I am aware that the original post left the facebook name there, but we need to hold ourselves to higher standards. Feel free to repost after. Edit: You can keep the names of Tate/Thunberg.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/24 09:41 AM
1

Some comments here are discouraging. Many of them receive community disapproval, which is a good start. Still, I want to make it clear that I take this issue very seriously: https://reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/rexs2y/more_than_just_jokes_the_societal_treatment_of/ https://reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/t56e2x/male_body_shaming_in_the_context_of_the/
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/24 08:50 AM
1

The comment was removed due to the following statement: When that pendulum finally swings in the other direction (& it will!), those practicing misandry these past few decades are going to be in for a terrifyingly-horrific awakening. . .even worse than what the situation will be in America when men finally balance the scales here. Many people visiting this sub will hold various misconceptions about it, which in turn inform their perception of statements like these. This is too ambiguous and coul…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/07/24 08:29 PM
10

Relevant additions: The FBI definition is purely statistical and has no immediate legal implications: "The new UCR SRS definition of rape does not change Federal or state criminal codes or impact charging and prosecution on the Federal, State or local level, it simply means that rape will be more accurately reported nationwide.". The CDC definition of mtp only covers some types of it. The "new" FBI definition explicitly excludes some types of mtp whilst being ambiguous about others. Even if the …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 08:18 PM
4

The description would call for a very different, more fitting term and it appears to be a wildly inaccurate and outstandingly shallow perspective on the complexities of society to my "extremely stupid" "idiot" eyes. <Warning: Sarcasm and exaggerations ahead.> I am sure, however, that there will be evidence to convince even me of the meeting where the empathy gap was created and history was rewritten to hide the accounts of a "time before" /s. After all, if those men and their decisions were - ev…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 02:19 PM
2

You mean the purely statistical definition that is still ambiguous about including any types of mtp whilst undeniably excluding some types of mtp? That is, actual mtp. Not the CDC definition of mtp that only includes certain types of mtp as well... https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1dygpdj/if_i_could_remove_a_single_double_standard_from/lcfhi45/
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 06:49 AM
7

It would also be important to consider how the societal environment of misandry might contribute to this. From the enforcement of conformity to the empathy gap. That said, all of this would not be that simple in practice. For example, we might not agree on what "problematic" even means or how to quantify it. Same goes for basically all decisions along the way.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 04:03 PM
2

And the ironic thing no one talks about. Is despite all the complaining these women do about toxic masculinity and patriarchy. These same women still perpetuate toxic masculinity and patriarchy. And ironically prefer to still live in a society where men are still forced to live up to ridgid ideas of masculinity. Please make sure to differentiate between talking about these labels and concepts versus using these labels and concepts. Regadless of whether I agree with your assessment, I guess you m…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/24 05:28 PM
4

I am afraid we won't agree and that's okay. I am not sure what your second paragraph is meant to say? After all, ignorance is not in conflict with those things being misandry in my book, as I said, and the "erection equals consent" example makes it an even stronger case to me. Prime example of how misandry permeates society to me. Misogyny is absolutely already used that way, so that's not a hypothetical anymore. Perhaps you think it should not be that way, but I do not see that changing any tim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 07:02 PM
2

I haven't looked into this particular case. In general, there is a good post on everydaymisandry including a paragraph about why ignorance may be considered and called misandry (by the definition I, too, currently endorse), though you'd have to move away from misandry as an insult or a conscious action. From this societal perspective, ignorance can absolutely be considered misandry, even if there was no choice or way around it. The post uses the example of the term "misandry". I would agree that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 04:57 PM
1

This has been a pattern for years. (Edit: To be clear, I am only referring to how she talks about male violence. I am not aware of how she may or may not talk about female violence beyond what is discussed in the linked post. Specifically, I am not sure about her stance on how mental health relates to female violence.) I made a whole post on her questionable practices multiple years ago... Maybe one day you will reconsider your values and beliefs... until then, people should know about the way y…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/24 03:57 PM
3

By far (in the US), according to the national violent death reporting system. And thats despite the facts that: a) based on the things we know, male numbers are disproportionally underestimated as a result of misandry b) there is substantial observable and experimental (and thats despite both sources being limited by misandry as described) evidence for perceived male gender as a serious contributing factor throughout the whole journey of violence overall (e.g. via empathy gap, gamma bias, and la…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/24 03:34 PM
5

Just reversing things would not be better. I understand that this comment was not meant to be a serious suggestion, but still. Revenge is destructive, even as a way to try and "make them see what it is like". Given the widespread myths about egalitarian spaces, we need to be especially clear about our goals. Revenge is not among them.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/07/24 11:02 PM
2

Few points: As far as I am aware, the FBI definition is purely statistical and has no immediate legal implications. Your own link says "The new UCR SRS definition of rape does not change Federal or state criminal codes or impact charging and prosecution on the Federal, State or local level, it simply means that rape will be more accurately reported nationwide." The CDC definition of mtp only covers some types of it. The "new" FBI definition explicitly excludes some types of mtp whilst being ambi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 11:24 PM

Please make sure to redact things like profile pictures as well.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/24 09:41 PM
4

I disagree on it being a mere usage issue. Alternatives have been proposed and discussed by multiple generations of advocates for years (perhaps decades) at this point. In my opinion, the term itself would not do the nature and severity of the underlying issues justice. See below for more issues. In fact, some of the discussions linked below were with a ML mod. https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1cvtn6a/comment/l8vi22k/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 02:00 PM
0

I guess this needs some clarification. First, please be careful with statements like this: It's women who want a man who is better than them. Be it taller, stronger, has more money.... I am aware that all of this may be a spiteful reference to the generalizations about men. Still, just making similar generalizations about women is not a good way to "show them how it feels" or whatever. It just provides invalid pseudo-evidence to anti-egalitarians' mischaracterizations. Avoid general statements l…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 11:29 AM
4

Removed due to the following statement: Lmao, what a lunatic. A mentally ill femcel. Personal attacks are against our rules and do not add any value. I know that online discourse has made it all too easy to resort to this and many subs are happy to allow it. Still, these statements do not represent our peaceful values, distract from our message, and may turn some of those away who could have benefitted most from engaging with egalitarian spaces. Please remain civil at all times.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/24 12:00 PM
6

Just to clarify for lurkers: The comment does not suggest flooding such services with fake calls, which would be unacceptable. The comment is in reference to things being abolished/banned once they are found to primarily support men. Examples would be university affirmative action in sweden and the australian public service's blind recruitment trials.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 09:42 PM
6

Removed due to the following statement: OP is a cunt. Personal attacks are against our rules and do not add any value. I know that online discourse has made it all too easy to resort to this and many subs are happy to allow it. Still, these statements do not represent our peaceful values, distract from our message, and may turn some of those away who could have benefitted most from engaging with egalitarian spaces. Please remain civil at all times.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 05:29 PM

I strongly recommend using the term (internalized) misandry to describe (among others) the enforcement of conformity to what some describe as "traditional gender roles/norms". The restriction of men's lives, wellbeing, emotions, safety, autonomy, expression and overall freedom via the (at times) violent, traumatizing and life-threatening enforcement of conformity to misandristic rules certainly fits my definition of misandry. I do not believe that this is adequately described as anti-femininity,…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 04:00 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 10:33 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 10:32 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 10:31 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 10:25 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 10:24 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 10:23 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 10:22 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 10:21 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 10:20 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/02/24 08:00 PM
1

I recommend to use (internalized) misandry to describe (among others) the enforcement of conformity to what some describe as "traditional gender roles/norms". The restriction of men's lives, wellbeing, emotions, safety, autonomy, expression and overall freedom via the (at times) violent, traumatizing and life-threatening enforcement of conformity to misandristic rules certainly fits my definition of misandry. I do not believe that this is adequately described as anti-femininity, either. Instead,…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/23 11:14 PM
1

As far as feminists are concerned the only good man is a dead man. Well, this exaggerated generalization is unhelpful and inevitably inaccurate. Perhaps it was meant to be a play on the content of the illustration (i.e. "not all feminists"), yet I do not feel like the comment is sufficiently clear about that.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/23 11:07 PM

I am not certain the article says that there is such a law in the making. That said, indeed there appears to be a difference in how criminals, on average, are seen and treated by society depending on their perceived gender. We should be very clear about the fact that there is nothing wrong with efforts to reduce the prison population. Being concerned about these matters is not the same as demanding impunity for a whole gender. We should strive for accuracy here and constructively discuss why suc…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/23 10:59 PM

The screenshot appears to have been altered. Whilst perhaps a "humorous" over-simplification of her work to some (yet dangerous misrepresentation to others), it does not fit this sub and was thus removed. To summarize her work as "work less, earn less" without any discussion of possible explanations for such disparity besides entirely autonomous choices is at best incomplete and only reinforces the perception of egalitarian spaces as minimizing or denying issues faced by women. The fact that thi…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/23 09:45 PM

Patriarchy is what built our society up and gave us modern technology. I am not sure what your definition of that term is, but to many others, it incorporates some variation of either "men being in power" or "those in power being men". Without going into the numerous conceptualizations of "power" in this context, it should be quite apparent how this could lead to interpretations of this statement/submission that would not reflect the values of this sub. Please reconsider if you align with egalit…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/23 09:43 PM

Thank you very much for your participation. I feel like this is phrased problematically and want to emphasize that the proposed characterization is one possible opinion and rests on various assumptions surrounding the intentions of groups that are generalized to a degree that is effectively impossible to be accurate. Being more precise by adding qualifications like "some feminists" would help. There are various reasons to call for an overhaul of the definitions, concepts, terms, and sentiments s…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/23 10:45 AM
1

Commment removed due to the following statement: Who care's what she wants to hear, she's a woman. Implying someone's wishes to be less worthy of consideration due to their sex does not represent the egalitarian values of this community.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/23 11:45 PM

Please censor usernames, profile pictures, and other identifying information on screenshots.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/23 11:30 PM
1

I removed this comment due to the following statement: Stupid is as stupid does..: the general rule when talking to feminists. The comment does not really add anything whilst potentially turning some of those away who could have otherwise benefited greatly from engaging with the content of this sub. Constructively calling out misandry does not make an exception for self-identified feminists. Your comment, however, does not fall into that category. Remember that change has to be the objective. An…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/23 09:40 AM
1

Thank you very much for participating. There is systemic sexism. I am quite sure the OP did not intend to insinuate there to be no systemic sexism. Instead, they likely aimed at the fact that especially the systemic nature of sexism is commonly used to minimize or outright deny misandry as supposedly non-systemic (which may or may not be claimed to be a requirement for it to constitute sexism or misandry in the first place). Whilst you may not be able to realise it women face issues everyday suc…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/08/23 10:26 AM
2

Removed due to the following statement: Damn that’s even worse lol I’m sorry for whatever happened to you but fueling the fires of these often broken men won’t save you either See above.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/23 03:36 PM
2

Removed due to the following statement: Sounds like she hates men because of you If you disagree with users, feel free to engage in constructive debates. Personal attacks like this add nothing and will be removed.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/23 03:35 PM

I removed this post as its terminology is likely to harm the movement as a whole. Specifically, criticism of misandry does not need misandrists to be called some derivative of other hateful groups, movements, etc. Calling feminism "the gender kkk" doesn't really add anything whilst making anti-egalitarians feel validated in their opposition as they may inaccurately claim extreme statements like that to be representative of the subs values. In reality, it is irrelevant to our egalitarian =and by …
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/23 03:16 PM
0

Note that your comment could be interpreted to use mental illness as an insult, which we should make sure to avoid. As a society, we have to strive to incorporate all parties into society as best as we can. This does not mean to accept discrimination - of course - which would be incompatible with that goal, but it does mean to address the discrimination itself rather than the assumed illness of those who engage in it. I will thus remove the comment and advise you to clearly identify who it is yo…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/23 12:51 PM
1

I will remove this comment due to the following statement: Also, women love to see others in misery, as can be seen by the comments in the post. I think they might be genuinely evil. These comments and statements you are seeing, as disturbing and common as they might be, are not suitable to draw such general conclusions about the individuals belonging to a demographic. Now, it is true that similar provisions (i.e. "not all ...") are commonly ridiculed, ignored or deliberately doubled down on whe…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/23 10:15 AM
2

Well, depends on the specific advance, I guess. Some misandrists reduce men to malicious intentions and violent behaviors. As it stands, however, asking for consent to make sexual advances would almost certainly qualify as a sexually-motivated advance itself. Whilst probably not in the spirit of the law (or intended by the author of that article), the phrasing used in the article indeed seems to make it effectively impossible to comply.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/23 10:35 AM
1

Be careful with sarcasm, which allows for misrepresentations of subs like this. Also, I don't believe anyone should suffer (nor should mental suffering be used in ways that make it sound like an insult or something to be ashamed of, imo) - the goal should be to faciliate change, not to get revenge.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/23 10:12 AM

Please censor usernames and profile pictures on screenshots as per Rule 2.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/02/23 10:41 AM
0

I doubt that to be a convincing answer, given that one who is looking for an intimate relationship might not desire a partner whose primary motive is getting into one's pants. At the very least, they probably wouldn't describe it that way. Without going into whether and to what degree this characterization of the signals "women" are sending is accurate or useful, I would assume that romantic success and general social approval can indeed generally, and partially subconsciously, influence norms a…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/02/23 10:28 PM
2

I lack the time for an in-depth answer right now. That said, it is important to recognize the severity of the described crime as well as its implications (regarding the autonomy and safety of those wanting or having to leave a marriage). Whilst experiences of abuse and discrimination might be some of the contributing factors in cases of violence, they do not justify them - and that has to become very clear. I feel like your comment might appear a bit too careful with regard to condemning the cri…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/23 01:29 AM
0

Your comment made it very hard to assume good faith. Please closely reexamine what you wrote and whether you feel like it properly represents your point. I assume your comment was not meant to justify the violent reaction, question the need for any party to safely leave a marriage or take away from the horrific nature of such crimes or the extremely problematic implications, like making people feel trapped in their relationships for fear of retaliation. If it were not for the misandristic statem…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/23 12:44 AM
1

Not splitting up is not always an option and it should be clarified that, of course, there should be equitable ways to leave a marriage for all parties involved - and do so before potential conflicts escalate. Men enjoying equitable opportunities to split whilst remaining as involved with their children as the other parent is one way of ensuring that.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/23 10:39 PM

Please also censor profile pictures showing faces or other identifying information (perhaps just censor profile pictures by default) in cases where you had to censor their usernames on screenshots as per Rule 2.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/23 12:43 AM

Please also censor profile pictures showing faces or other identifying information (perhaps just censor profile pictures by default) in cases where you had to censor their usernames on screenshots as per Rule 2.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/23 12:39 AM
1

I know you are coming from a place of frustration regarding such discriminatory treatment, but two wrongs do not make a right. Remain civil at all times - if anything, you will reinforce the distorted perception of our efforts toward equality by a portion of people who have never bothered to engage with advocates for men beyond the stereotypes they were told. Our goal is to eradicate all body shaming, not create more of it in revenge.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/23 12:26 AM

Please censor usernames on screenshots as per Rule 2.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/22 09:34 AM
1

I can see why you feel like flipping it, trying to highlight the issues associated with it. I am well aware that you do not condone the statements - in fact, your point was to show why they are so bad. Nonetheless, there are multiple issues with this, which result in me removing the comment. First of all, I doubt that such an approach will be convincing to those making statements as shown in this post. If anything, they might use it to reinforce misconceptions about egalitarian communities. If o…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/22 05:26 PM
2

For the same reasons as before, a better title would have been "Enough about "misandry is not systemic"" or something like that. Once again, "speaking up about systemic misogyny" or similar is part of our egalitarian principles - even though we (vs. those opposing us) almost certainly disagree on what would constitute "systemic misogyny" (just like we do for "systemic misandry"). Even if one were to deny the existence of either (as is almost the default for systemic misandry), I doubt anyone wou…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/12/22 05:53 PM
3

Note that your comment could be interpreted to use disability as an insult, which we should make sure to avoid. Yes, this includes insults regarding low intelligence. As a society, we have to strive to incorporate all parties into society as best as we can. This does not mean to accept discrimination - of course - which would be incompatible with that goal, but it does mean to address the discrimination itself rather than the assumed disability of those who engage in it.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/12/22 05:41 PM
2

Your comment was removed due to the following statement: And very very few of us who were circumcised are whining about it. I am sure you had no intention to harm anyone, but your comment is not acceptable in this state. Your personal assessment of the "procedure" might deviate from that of others for a variety of reasons, none of which, however, could even remotely justify the assessment of efforts to put an end to these atrocities as "whining", a term that does not accurately reflect the basic…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/22 06:51 PM
3

Obviously, you are referring to the double standard. Nonetheless, I want to clarify that, of course, neither should be acceptable.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/22 05:21 PM
3

A good portion of our opposition does not bother to read beyond the title - and their interpretation of the title might influence their subsequent intepretation of the post when they do. If anything (and regardless of whether I would agree with that assessment), a title like "MeToo is not about justice for victims" or "MeToo does not do victims justice" or something like that would be less prone to be misrepresented. As it stands, those who otherwise do not engage with male advocacy might as wel…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/12/22 07:33 PM
3

Equality is only one aspect of desirability. Not only the treatment of male victims but also that of male perpetrators is monstrous and not part of a desirable future, even if that treatment was applied equally. It depends on the case, but according to my subjective evaluation of severity, men have been beaten and tortured to death for far, far less than what this video shows. And in far too many cases, even genuine, proportionate self-defense by a male victim against a female perpetrator will b…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/12/22 07:01 PM
1

This is not the first time you posted this, so a good start would be to stop that. If you disagree with a decision, argue against it - otherwise do not spam this same statement. You appear to contribute in good faith at times, so I am unsure where you are coming from with these.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/22 09:58 AM
1

Don't get me wrong, it is no problem to disagree - it is just that the feminist affiliation alone should not be the reason. I certainly disagree with the usage of the term patriarchy, see it doing serious harm in the way it frames gender issues and do not see society moving toward a state where such usage would be more constructive or accurate.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/22 09:54 AM
1

Statements should not be dismissed for being made by a feminist alone. Instead, disagreement should result from opinions, arguments, statements, actions, and so on. Look at their claims in a fair and open manner and if so, explain the issues you see with that claim/figure/argument/term/etc. If a feminist makes a valid point, acknowledge it. This, of course, does not deny that there will be moments when it becomes clear that your disagreements are not easily solvable and as such, moving on will b…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/11/22 02:25 PM
4

To be clear, there is nothing inherently wrong with having a high "body count".
/r/EverydayMisandry23/11/22 01:48 PM
3

Removed due to the following statement: Put a hundred of this bunch in with a hundred incels on a desert island or maybe a prison on Mars one day lol It was not meant to be serious, I guess, but I struggle to see what's funny about that comment. Whilst the legal implications of such hate-promoting messages are up for debate, even if I might disagree, the addition of "a hundred incels" allows for (mis-?)interpretations that would be inacceptable. If by "incel" you mean a person who makes hateful …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/11/22 01:44 PM
1

Calling it out does not need insults - it is not like misandrists would not provide enough material to criticize them in a constructive manner. It is understandable that exposure to misandry results in strong emotional reactions, but channeling that into advocacy is the preferable response to that. Anything else only provides an opportunity for those whom we consider to be anti-egalitarians to feel validated in their opposition. Furthermore, it should be clear that it is the misandristic views, …
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/22 12:23 PM
2

I don't think the descriptor you used adds to the message. I am sure you had no ill intent when using it, but it may still be considered offensive by people whom we want to feel welcome around here - including members of aforementioned groups who want to educate themselves on or engage with those who (at least from our pov) advocate for more egalitarian perspectives. I believe that neither the perjorative it was derived from nor the resulting insult properly represent our goals, views, and appro…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/22 02:16 PM
2

More examples (first one being the one linked above): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362069361_Reactions_to_research_on_sex_differences_Effect_of_sex_favoured_researcher_sex_and_importance_of_sex-difference_domain https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359612823_People_react_more_positively_to_female-_than_to_male-favoring_sex_differences_A_direct_replication_of_a_counterintuitive_finding https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343169602_Reactions_to_male-favouring_versus_female-fav…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/22 05:10 PM
3

"Voluntary"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/22 06:56 PM
11

Just my two cents: This debate is not what will change the world. Apart from my general criticism of especially live format debates, note that those who decide on your future may listen - even if they genuinely don't intend to get influenced by it, they are still human. I doubt that any progress will be made, nor does the format allow the depth necessary to make a compelling case for something that feels counter-intuitive to most and goes against conventional wisdom. You would have to start from…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 07:49 PM
10

Note that even if it is fake (as mentioned by some in the comments over there), the fact that this is what society posts and upvotes on reddit - supposedly for entertainment purposes - and makes those comments about is itself disturbing. Furthermore, not all comments seem to have been made under that impression.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 07:02 PM
10

I am a bit sceptical with regard to the backstory, but whatever. I usually wouldn't have answered, given that I lack the time to go into this, meaning you won't really benefit from this comment. It mainly serves to make sure that the overall perception of lurkers isn't skewed by this, as people present the post in a more positive light than I would. I disagree with other users and do believe that there are severe issues here, at least in the first half I was able to read before I will have to go…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/22 06:39 PM

Please redact identifying information from screenshots as per rule 2.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/08/22 03:11 PM

In cases where the name is to be redacted from the screenshot, so is a photo supposedly showing the author.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/08/22 03:07 PM
2

You should reconsider the second part of your comment. The connection between women being on discord and it being primarily aimed at gaming is unclear. Not only has discord long surpassed the phase of only being the teamspeak replacement for online games anyway (I do not know the actual stats on that though, so it might still be quite one-sided as a whole), it is also easy to misinterpret why you chose sex as the variable to classify those who you would want on there. Instead, you probably shoul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/22 07:21 PM
2

Hey. I am not going into anything but the "suicidal thoughts" stuff, given that that is what this post was meant to be about. I would recommend staying away from discussions with people who deny the contents of the underlying material. If they are actually convinced of their claims that "He did not mention “suicide” not one time, YOUR mind mad that connection." or just trying to troll, I don't know. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, I guess they could have missed everything but the first scr…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 10:57 PM
2

Didn't make it past that "activity" (euphemism) thing. Sadly, I lack the time to go into this stuff and nothing but a more or less in-depth discussion on why this is so extremely bad would do it justice. At this point, its questionable assumptions or their accuracy are irrelevant. At this point, it is the action itself that is inherently inacceptable in its entirety, to say the least.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 09:11 PM
10

I believe people might want to keep their expectations at bay. Whilst there is no doubt that public cases can generate a lot of opportunities for talk, that is not magic. Unfortunately, biases persist on avg. even when people observe violence against men or their suffering. Look at bystander behaviors in videos, look at the thousands of reactions to those videos posted online, look at the way (if at all) articles talk about it, look at the legal consequences, look at how it is dealt with through…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/22 01:47 PM
3

There are multiple problems here. First, violent retribution is inacceptable and unhelpful. By focusing on the veracity of the allegations raised against these victims in the context of said retribution (vs. for their own sake), too much credit is given to the potential motivation and it may appear as though such deadly attacks would be an acceptable response to someone grabbing another person's butt. One does not have to condone the latter at all to come to the conclusion that that is undesirab…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 12:25 PM
6

First of all, if you make it a public event, it will be considered a fight, not a discussion. People want to see drama, not nuance. Which brings me to point two: Nuanced arguments are not possible in a "live" discussion format. If it even deserves the label "discussion". I usually do not even watch them, let alone participate. The arguments are horribly presented, neither party gets the opportunity to properly present their own and actually consider and research their "opponents" claims. I also …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/22 10:32 AM
1

I disagree. Fortunately, anyone can simply watch the video and decide for themselves. It is only one video, by the way. The victim was not only intoxicated well beyond the point of being able to consent (in fact, he is clearly depicted as being barely able to move and almost immediately falls over as he lacks support) - let alone to a violent cnc scene - which would already suffice to classify it as rape. Additionally however, the victim was subjected to severe coercion by means of serious viole…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 10:26 AM
1

Yeah, it is pretty disturbing. Relevant: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/rexs2y/more_than_just_jokes_the_societal_treatment_of/
/r/MensRights21/05/22 04:03 PM
5

It is generally important to once again acknowledge the essential distinction between a) norms as a set of behaviors, types of expression and so on beyond their function as norms, b) the enforcement of norms generally or c) the undervaluation of men that may influence the contents. Criticism of the criticism of (parts of) the contents of male gender norms does not at all imply support for the enforcement of restrictions of men's freedom and wellbeimg, let alone the associated undervaluation of m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/22 08:36 PM
3

I assume you are searching for this: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/pf6n66/need_your_help_ive_created_a_compilation_of/
/r/MensRights28/04/22 10:13 AM

Please censor usernames in screenshots as per Rule 2.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/22 10:45 PM
5

cuckish Given this term's association with the misandristic restriction of men's freedom, their behavior, expression, sexuality and so on as well as the undervaluation of their and other men's health, suffering, wellbeing and lives, I would ask you to refrain from using it. There is no shortage in things to criticize about them and their mods - them being "cuckish" is not one of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 03:56 PM
1

I like the idea and wholesomeness, honestly. :) Of course, there are more sensational headlines that bury such posts and that's okay. I can't risk to provide any info of my own given some people's threats. Still, I wish that none of you lose hope in the progress to a more safe, compassionate and peaceful future, even if it may be difficult at times.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 12:09 PM
5

This is due to ridiculous views about gender and privilege causing innocent men to suffer and societal apathy towards male victims. The phrasing may be to combative for many. You may want to instead explain how the current state of affairs affects men. Now to the answer: Domestic abuse can happen to anyone, regardless of age, class, gender, ethnicity, disability, and sexual orientation. Who is the audience for this? The person who asks about male victims? Or do they expect any sympathy points fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/22 11:05 PM
3

2/2 I obviously noticed the gendered phrasing, so I tried to find some information on how often men receive unsolicited "tit pics" (their word, not mine), and I couldn't find very much. Let me take this chance to address a certain sub... I will try to phrase this very nicely, because their "plausible deniability" stuff upsets me a bit. Reddit has an issue with this, it normalizes, celebrates and encourages its in-person perpetration, filming und nonconsensual sharing against men on subreddits wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/22 06:07 PM
4

1/2 Ok, so first: I would think that most users of LWMA would be against unwanted and unsolicited sexual images and materials Yes. Do you believe jail time is an appropriate response, and will it act as a deterrent? If not, what do you believe would be a better way to stop this from happening? I mean, is it just about that though? Like, if it was that easy, why not just put life on everything and enjoy a maximally crime free world? What I mean is: Whilst deterrence is certainly one aspect of it,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/22 06:06 PM
3

Whilst not directly relevant to the article (which isn't about fleeing ukraine rather than kyiv within ukraine): The men who don't have a problem with staying don't need a law and physical force to make them stay. Additionally, misandry is a societal phenomenon that is in no way restricted to women. Men's (internalized) misandry is still misandry and incompatible with egalitarian values.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 09:06 PM
5

Some examples: Rape More rape (In)voluntary circumcision More mutilation Body shaming Misandry (incl. the empathy gap) as explained here, here, here, here, here and here Domestic violence
/r/MensRights27/02/22 02:58 PM
3

Thoughts? Thing is, I don't really have new thoughts on this. I am still sad that conversations like this are regularly burried below reposts and low-effort headlines... but in the end, I feel most has been said. The whole experience of male victimization is influenced by manifestations of misandry like the empathy gap. This applies not only to the perpetration but also third party perception and so on - as is regularly seen in bystander behavior and online commentary.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 03:56 PM
11

You may want to have a look at this: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/rexs2y/more_than_just_jokes_the_societal_treatment_of/
/r/MensRights17/02/22 06:22 PM
3

I want to clarify a point you responded to. You wrote: Additionally, to be published in a reputable journal these papers need to go through peer review. Therefore, I would suggest the idea no one scrutinises them to be a simply incorrect claim. In particular, if I understood u/peanutbutterjams correctly, it was not claimed that there was no scrutiny as per a lack of peer review (or similar). Instead, it was claimed that there was a lack of empirical testing and adherence to what some consider to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 10:44 PM
4

Old vid, but a good reminder that the way misandry shapes the whole experience of male violence goes beyond the assault iself (and connected things like law enforcement). It will be talked about, glorified, ridiculed - videos may be shared and go viral (but not to bring attention to violence against men and the influence of the empathy gap), you may face further ridicule, get potentially retraumatized and see that there are quite some people who more or less knowlingly contribute to the culture …
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:33 AM
1

The ridicule and shaming of men's body issues is itself a men's issue. No idea what your title is implying, but it does read as though you try to use it as an insult toward self-proclaimed feminist men. Maybe I misunderstood, but needing ED medication is nothing to be ashamed of. And without digging deeper, it says they take it more even when erectile function is controlled for (when they don't need it more) - but that's just from their title.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:48 PM
1

Boys expressing themselves freely should be a good thing not an insult. Societal enforcmeent of gendered restrictions leading to the oppression of freedom in men is our enemy. I support femboys.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:43 PM
8

I believe that is not what the comment said. If I am not mistaken, the comment said that if "toxic masculinity" was to lead people into denial about their experiences, that would affect the very statistics these people use to establish a warped perception of reality. Issues of denial and the reluctance to give their own experiences the descriptors that properly imply a level of severity they deserve have been discussed before. Some researchers have since replaced terms like "IPV" with "boundary …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/22 08:54 PM
29

I wanted to address the now removed comment... anyway: Sympathy for the male victims of male violence doesn't stop it from happening. The empathy gap and all of its correlates do impact perpetration. Honestly, going into why focusing on the victims makes more sense thwn focusing on the perpetrators may require its own post some day. That said, it appears unreasonable to only tackle the differentials in empathy in men as there are de-facto negative outcomes from womens biases as well. No reason t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/22 01:39 PM
1

May wanna readjust that guess. It doesn't come up that often in spaces that welcome me - especially not with people taking sides - so I don't get the chance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/22 01:23 PM
2

I hope all involved parties receive the support they need and that the outcome is that of least harm to anyone. I don't know them nor the case. I don't feel sufficiently informed on the situation to pick sides. Regardless of who is right, my only demand would be change and the focus should be rehabilitation. I oppose those attacking either party and I oppose retaliation. Same would apply if the sexes were switched.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 09:34 PM
1

Given that people here were shamed about turning 30 and the assumed changes in fertility it implies, I'd say that this shaming refers to stuff they do not choose to do. Given your claim, People here are “body shaming” on stuff that people chose to do. however, you seemed to disagree - hence my rethorical question. Regardless, I do not believe the differentiation to be relevant.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 09:07 PM
-5

people chose to do You mean like reaching 30 years of age? Or does it become valid because it is not body shaming? I can replace body shaming for shaming in general, if that is what bothers you. Want to explain how exactly someone with frequently switching sexual partners becomes a "used and damaged good"? I personally can't stop you. I just told you that it harms the progress men need and I believe this sub should care about that. Similarly, a sub asking for compassion for men should care about…
/r/MensRights31/01/22 09:04 PM
-13

This comment section is a dumpster fire so far. No idea what you believe where counter attacks will get you, but a world in which women are shamed to the extent of men is not at all desirable to me. Complaining about body shaming and then body shaming the offender in response is ineffective. Saying that those who make fun of a guys dick size are small themselves is about as irrational. If these users actually feel that such attacks are valid, I hope they may reconsider if making others feel bad …
/r/MensRights31/01/22 08:42 PM
11

Look, the societal glorification of misandristic shaming is horrible. That said, those who regularly engage in sexual intimacy are not to blame. And if they were, attacking them in retribution would still be as destructive. The only thing calling them "used and damaged goods" achieves is to chase away those who may actually care about the valid issues whilst providing those attempting to silence valid issues with content they may then use to misguide third parties regarding the validity of men's…
/r/MensRights31/01/22 08:30 PM
13

I do not know any of these names, honestly. I do not doubt that he may have done / does bad stuff as well and that it may contribute to peoples opinions about him in general, but I struggle to imagine how any of that changes the things said in this post (though you may not have meant to imply that it would - I appreciate you providing more info in general), not to mention that most comments do not appear to have been made based on that knowledge or at least didn't bother to mention it over him b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 09:19 AM
20

I don't feel like using "femcels" as an insult is in line with our stance on the inflationary usage of "incel" as an insult. Additionally, angry comments on men hitting their assailants may be justified if it was retribution instead of self defense. Any violence against an assailant that goes beyond the least severe measure possible to stop a currently ongoing attack may be considered self-"justice" at best and shall be condemned regardless of sex. Don't get me wrong, even the condemnation of se…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 12:12 AM
18

What do you mean? From the article: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). Given the stark differences in numbers between lifetime and 12-months, it would appear unreasonable to prefer evidence that includes half a century old cases (lifetime) over the cur…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 11:51 PM
1

Also note that the FBI definition is not gender neutral in the way you would expect it to. Not only is it not fully inclusive regardless of the made-to-penetrate question, it would also need someone to have gone out of their way to deliberately make it ambiguous for the very population that needs it the most to be clear, thereby continuously silencing them whilst telling the public that they are totally included though. It does not matter if mtp is "technically included". If you need a confirmat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/22 11:50 PM
1

That is why I am compiling evidence on sexist (misandrist) behaviour by high-profile feminists, not just any crazy person calling herself a feminist. I have no idea how that is to be determined (and what "high-profile" means to you), but you do you. I have switched to practically only talking about "self-proclaimed" feminists anyway - as can be seen in my newer posts and comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/22 05:35 PM
14

It is from here: https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:15 AM
3

All feminists are self-proclaimed feminists, so I am unsure what you are searching for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 09:14 PM
2

Please read the linked post. The empathy gap is surely not restricted to a single instance.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 12:08 AM
3

This is not the only mechanism, as differentials in empathy (the empathy gap) as well as pushback from third parties as a function of their empathy have been established. You can't just claim them to magically vanish. Additionally, there was no fighting back and the lack of empathy was also present in the medical workers, making matters worse.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 12:05 AM
5

Your view on how the bias manifests itself is too narrow. This bias absolutely applies, as the man will act differently toward the man than they would toward a woman in the same situation. Similarly, third parties evaluate the situation of male on male violence differently than if it was male on female violence. Obviously, the evaluations of male on female interactions will be great at highlighting this, but the comparison to make is always if you would have been treated the same if you were fem…
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:30 AM
0

Meh. "Be a man" is often used to make sure that those who dared to take back some freedom (or asked for it) will adhere to the misandristic and oppressive rules again. So long as being a man means not valuing your or any other men's wellbeing, emotions and so on whilst making sure to be the most effective provider and bodyguard for non-men, then being a man is bad. Misandry makes it bad. That said, it doesn't matter too much what it means. As long as there is a set of rules that restricts men's …
/r/MensRights10/01/22 05:27 AM
64

Ah yes, Gigi Engle. People here should remember that name. That said, there is more about her - I could have easily added her to the post on body shaming, as she believes no women to be satisfied by average men and those who claim otherwise are lying. She also used a gif of rihanna mocking men for it in her article. Good to know linking to her is fine but linking to lwma is not. This is what I wrote: Or they are award-winning feminist authors who joke about real stories of men being beaten to de…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/22 03:52 AM
5

see the stickied post. u/BaddyRio https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rycnwn/on_the_gender_empathy_gap_and_its_correlates_a/
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:04 AM
5

The gap is present in both men and women. It is a societal issue.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 02:23 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/pbh579/additional_evidence_on_the_systemic_denial_of/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/oyrlhh/video_showing_a_woman_raping_a_man_got_hundreds/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ovc5lp/video_shows_family_and_health_workers_laughing/ https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lrm69c/made_to_penetrate_excludes_male_victims_of_rape/
/r/MensRights09/01/22 02:39 AM
2

Whether he is innocent or not should not even be relevant at that point. Self-"justice" is not an effective way to deal with criminals. Given that, their stance on the use of deadly violence (outside of hollywood, people die from single punches no problem) is messed up either way. Not to mention the lightyears of difference in severety that lay between different cases that are all called rape - meaning that unless more info is known, even a conviction would make it impossible for them to determi…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:55 AM
9

A conceptually consistent implementation of rape by deception isn't that easy. In the end, who is to decide what information others base their sexual decisions on? Race? Prior sexual experiences? Medical history? At that point you could just make lying toward sexual partners illegal. Even if a direct connection to the act was necessary, it would remain problematic, as - conceptually speaking - if lying about the risk of pregnancy (stealthing) is rape but lying about the risk of std's (cheating) …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/21 11:13 PM
1

I'm saying that masculine is just a construct that ultimately you get to decide what it is. We currently don't get to decide what it is, as non-conformity gets punished. We fight this and obscuring language like "toxic masculinity" slows that down whilst claiming to help. The first step in fighting the misandry in restricting mens freedom, behavior, sexuality, health and so on is to start calling their restriction misandry in the same way I'd be called a misogynist if I were to demand women to b…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:32 PM
7

You are describing misandry. This has been mostly addressed here, here, here and here
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:14 PM
3

Just pure determination and time? Yeah
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/21 03:57 PM
0

You should have taken that advice and refrained from throwing insults back at them.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 09:34 PM
3

It is absolutely sexist. When evaluating the bigger picture of how men and women are seen, what kind of behaviors and statements toward them are acceptable and so on, then stuff like this is one of the steps on the stairway to the most severe forms of misandry. Especially given that stuff like this often leads to the reinforcement of the highly incorrect notion that it would be okay because men don't face the severe misandry it leads to (we know they do, but most are uneducated), it also takes p…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 09:30 PM
3

Yeah, I just fixed a few links
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/21 01:44 AM
26

Loose Pussy Logic sexist hypocrisy. Two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/21 09:18 PM
-4

Really glad you are here. Of course women can advocate for men and there are numerous ones around here. So are trans sisters and brothers, non binaries, non-conformers/femboys... you name it. This sub has loose moderation as is considered necessary by some to foster constuctive debates without bias against outsiders. Inevitably, there are numerous ones abusing it to attack people in whatever way the consider us vulnerable - some with the intention to give the sub a bad name. Still, I'm stoked fo…
/r/MensRights12/12/21 07:24 PM
5

which was a 7/10 but How does that matter? Even though I knew she wasn’t interested I still tried making moves on her Why? What were you expecting from it? This makes no sense. Play fighting doesn't need a romantic relationship at all, but you calling it "making moves" suggest you having romantic interests in doing so. If she isn't interested, then you'll need to move on. like tickling her or hugging her Was she interested in hugging and play fighting with you? Laughing is a given if you get tic…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 08:01 PM
28

Conformity enforcement is contingent on the perceived sex of the receipient, not on the gender role they present. Additionally, the belief that deviations from the male gender role would equate the adherence to a female gender role is incorrect. Non-conformity is punished in both men and women and a general hostility toward women can thus not be blamed for that. Non-conforming men and misgendered transwomen are not at all treated as or like women - even if, in the case of the transphobic treatme…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/21 01:15 PM
1

because the post is actually saying: " Stay away from men who have depression or autism, because they're all evil ". Please be careful with statements like this. This is not a quote from the post. You could rather say that it "implies" somethng like that, though the posts is too much for me to properly unpack right now.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:26 PM
1

world wide true First of all, this isn't maths. Studies provide evidence but should not be overestimated regardless of their findings. I know the other side (and some around here) are doing it, but it will come back at you once you realize that many on the other side magically adjust their threshold for evidence once it does not align with their views anymore. Their criticism might be valid and their issue usually lies with not considering the limitations of their own evidence. Do not make that …
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:14 PM
8

I don't think they are funny either and believe it to definitely be an issue. That said, I don't think that this negates the existence of double standards at all. There are also examples of groups of bystanders not intervening in violence against women for varying reasons - still, on average there is a substantial bias against men and reasons for a lack of intervention can be a lack of opportunities without putting more people in danger and creating more victims without helping anyone. That's di…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 02:00 PM
4

Saying someone's machismo is getting in the way of positive health outcomes is not victim blaming. What are they a victim of? Machismo? They are victims of society's restrictive and deadly requirements, enforced at the point of a gun shooting ridicule, violence, bullying and humiliation. If a girl starves herself and those behaviors are detrimental to her well-being is identifying the social pressures of anorexia victim blaming? We blame fat-shaming/body-shaming and should do so in a consistent …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 03:06 PM
5

We do call restrictive norms misogyny when applied to women. Men's conformity to norms that require an undervaluation of men's lives is misandry just as much as any restriction of men's human nature (emotions), freedom, sexuality, safety or whatever else based in their sex (wearing dresses, engaging in male on male intimacy, crying publicly, showing fear, low risk tolerance... you get the point). Of course, misandry entails more, includong differences in violent behaviour toward men, symapthy fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 01:48 PM
19

Comments joking about murdering husbands as we print KAM on knifes whilst men make up the majority of murder victims, induce less hesitence to use violence against them, receive less sympathy, less endorsement of bystander intervention, less engagement of law enforcement, lower sentences if they are killed... do I need to go on? Violence against men is totally not gendered and men do not need to be afraid of being killed at vastly disproportionate rates as a result of the differential in evaluat…
/r/MensRights22/11/21 10:51 PM
8

Here is an archived version of the censored Video: https://web.archive.org/web/20211120071946/https://cdn-videos.timesofmalta.com/5c3a0cc91dafe0023995cf56ebb9c94869943588.mp4
/r/MensRights22/11/21 10:36 PM
1

I mean "one-tailed" as men are overperforming/overrepresenting women in [field] in [country] is the "one-tailed" analog to the "two-tailed" concept of inequality, with the "other tail" being women are overperforming/overrepresenting men in [field] in [country]. Of course, this is not a "real" hypothesis you would test rather than a clarification on why the methodology is invalid if they want to measure inequality. You could, of course, publish additional reports that go more into depth about eac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 04:10 AM
1

A one-tailed test is incapable of measuring inequality (let alone equality, which isn't even tested in the two-tailed case), both of which are necessarily two-tailed concepts. This is what they claim to measure, but don't. It tests, if anything, the presence of a disadvantage for women (which is a subset of inequality, but not equal to inequality) within the single measure. That said, usage of a one-tailed test to make insignificant results significant is not valid anyway. That is, if you believ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/21 06:52 PM
4

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205349 Still, a real comparison of total inequality is impossible in my opinion and I have yet to see anything coming even remotely close.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/21 12:17 PM
18

Discrimination needs differential treatment based on a characteristic (like gender) to be present. Bad treatment would not be discriminatory if everybody was treated badly. All men need to accept this fact first that "In general, women face a lot more serious problems than men. And we acknowledge the in general systematic exploitation of women. We strongly condemn it". So now we are back to comparing the issues men and women face? How do you even compare who, in total, has it worse? We need to r…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:44 AM
4

I feel misunderstood, because male disposability and empathy for men is what I consider maybe the most important men's issue. I just don't think we should make that issue about feminism or think that women are the cause or resolution. You did not address it, nor the fact that it needs a societal response that includes women - as do other forms of misandry (conformity enforcement,...). It is a fallacy that what is true for men should be oppositely true for women or that it would be right and fair…
/r/MensRights20/11/21 11:14 PM
2

Wait, so now toxic masculinity means typically masculine behaviors again? What about the conformity enforcement and oppression of men's behaviors? So it is not toxic because of the enforcement, but because of what is enforced? If "men shouldn't cry" was toxic masculinity, "women shouldn't work" would be toxic femininity, but that is not the case. It is restricting the freedom of individuals due to their gender and therefore oppressive and discriminatory. You also seem too unconcerned with male d…
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:31 PM
2

"Harmful stereotypes" that restrict the actions of men whilst depriving them of help and value for being born with the wrong chromosomes are called misandry. Differentiating between those who are "real men" and those who are not is misandry. Enforcing conformity is misandry. We used misogyny like that for ages. No new terms needed. It's not that we do not consider these restrictions to be problematic. Even less so that they would be desirable. The terminology, however, is inconsitent with existi…
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:21 PM
1

Women restricted to gender roles are subjected to misogyny, men (violently) restricted to gender roles suffer from the toxic aspects of masculinity and privilege backfiring... and we somehow gotta get the patriarchy in there as well /s. I could go on... but no. When you look at what some of them believe men's "gender norms" to be, it becomes even weirder.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:16 PM
7

Not really, but I believe that many people believe/experience it and am happy for them, even though that may further depress the chances for proper activism to emerge in the future. The more accepted the terminology that clearly puts men's issues below that of women (and thereby leads to less endorsement of activism, change and acknowledgement of men as valid victims on par with women rather than a sidenote "men get raped/abused too") becomes, the harder it will be to change peoples minds. I do …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/21 09:52 PM
1

Edit: Your quote (?) does not appear in the pdf btw. Please give a page number if I somehow missed it. Spreading information on the basis of claiming men who are forced into sex with a woman may not be called victims of rape (and thus implicitly deny them the implication of equal severity when compared to women who are forced to sex) directly contributes to men's sexual victimization, their secondary victimization as well as legal and administrative abuse against male victims. Your comment contr…
/r/MensRights19/11/21 09:23 PM
1

r/mensrightsmeta
/r/MensRights18/11/21 08:38 PM
1

It is well known that she was... different in the past. And I don't think it should be held against her. Sure as hell I had to revise things I did, said, believed, etc. over the years. I ask for change, so I welcome whoever is open to it. Her forgetting about that sub is unfortunate, but understandable. I don't quite know why she didn't just delete it once called out though. Edit: This does not mean that everything she does is great though (just like not everything I do is great). Whilst her apo…
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:57 PM
8

Whilst not exactly the way you said, there are double standards in how strippers are treated: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kh3ahr/male_stripper_and_double_standards/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/l3e7f8/study_on_male_strippers_agressive_women/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/o78xn0/female_strippers_have_their_rules_so_follow_them/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/n0tsqc/male_strippers_on_ellens_shows_objectiying_and/ https://www.reddit.com/…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 11:43 AM
12

When a transwoman is told "You're not a real woman." That is seen as transphobic and transmisogyny. Progressives recognize that transwomen are women, and therefore being bigoted against them because of their gender is transmisogyny as a result. This strongly depends on your perspective. Is saying "you're not a real woman" based on them being women or on them being incorrectly perceived as non-women, as they were assigned male at birth? When evaluating the behavior of the person who misgenders th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/21 07:07 PM
6

Who knows if it is from someone who was just publicly abused and raped as bystanders cheered, laughed, humiliated and filmed him before uploading it for it to gather millions of views with a positive like/dislike ratio. As he hid in the toilet, angry at his hopeless situation and societal misandry, he punched a wall. Interesting how many people manage to "justify" or even call for mindless self-"justice" to the most irrational degrees in cases where a man wronged a woman or child, yet can't come…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/21 05:37 PM
1

There is no single study. It is a project that is still going on. Here is a chapter that mentions some of the findings up until 2004: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235912004_Women's_involvement_in_aggression_in_young_adult_romantic_relationships_A_developmental_systems_model Some of the OYS couples have been parents for some time now. Here is a Nov. 2021 paper on them: https://doi.apa.org/record/2021-99947-001 Your claim that the OYS (or whatever "other similar ones by Dr. Capaldi" me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/21 07:17 PM
1

Thank you for your comment. Please consider using reddit's quotation function so that it is easier to know which statement of the post you are referring to. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your comment. That being said, table 14 of the first pdf does not report numbers, it reports the proportions by use of force. Among victimized youth that reported force, 9.9% were boys reporting only male perps, 79.3% were boys reporting only female perps and 5.5% were boys reporting mixed perps. As the columns add…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/21 03:10 AM
5

Maybe im a soft little bitch im 24 years old and male. I won't say that your concerns don't make you soft, because it entertains the idea that it (being "soft") would be something to avoid. Similar to stuff like "real men cry", it does not address the actual issue - which is that we even differentiate between "softies" and the tough men, who might even qualify for the "real man" title. Whilst most don't intend to, or think about the misandristic implications of these concepts, it doesn't make th…
/r/MensRights27/10/21 06:00 PM
-14

Netflix does send some disturbing stuff as "comedy". That being said, I believe that: ...I'm just tired of it. I'm not a woke punk who gets easily offended every time someone farts Was not necessary to get your point across. It will just make people become defensive. Additionally, it is quite subjective when it is "appropriate" to become offended, so it is hard to argue beyond "I disagree".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 07:12 AM
4

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoubleStandard Not all relevant pages are linked, but it is at least some. There are multiple that fit your topic, so look through all of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 07:02 PM
2

You could have just said "it's a joke", just like everyone else who does not care enough about the consequences of their statements to see how that makes it even worse. We not just insult them, we have thousands of people laugh and cheer as Wolfe tells them to kill themselves or Harvey said that the root of all of hitlers evil was his allegedly small dick (which was probably made up itself as the two historicians never provided any evidence for their claim and it runs contrary to the evidence we…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 09:44 AM
1

I mean, men were banned from wearing long hair in many(some?) schools already.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:45 AM
2

So if socialization and the lack of attention given to men and their safety lead the gender with a higher risk of not making it home to take less precautions... would that be misogyny or misandry?
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:42 AM
15

The assumed difference in confidence between the two stem from societal torment. Having a small dick would not be assumed to lead to insecurity if we didn't know how they are treated by a society that cheers and laughs at comediennes telling them to kill themselves. Sde is the equivalent to "Why are you hitting yourself?" and attributes negative qualities to the size of a body part, which in return further supports the proliferation of stereotypes and hostility toward a demographic that is degra…
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:16 AM
10

Pussy is about the enforcement of conformity to gendered requirements in our society by pointing out someone's non-conformity, i.e. them not being a "real man". The issue would not be being a woman - the issue is that both others and they themselves know that they are not and will thus be affected by the enforcement of conformity in men. As it is used to restrict men, it is misandry. Having a pussy itself, without the connotation of non-conformity, is not an insult - unlike having a small dick, …
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:03 AM
11

The assumed difference in confidence between the two stem from societal torment. Sde is the equivalent to "Why are you hitting yourself?" and attributes negative qualities to the size of a body part, which in return further supports the proliferation of stereotypes and hostility. It is de-facto body shaming.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:58 AM
8

In my opinion, next to people getting tortured to death in "self-justice", severly assaulted in "self-justice", socially excluded (incl. work, shelter...) and otherwise attacked - a conviction is anything but necessary to make this a lifethreatening crime. And that's without even mentioning the suicides. It is just that the statistics are on reported cases - even a report wouldn't be necessary. Additionally, it would be expected that those cases that can be proven to be false would also be those…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/21 04:37 PM
98

I believe it to be absolutely essential to point out that this does not mean that 92% are true. In fact, only mentioning the 8% number without context - or even in an incorrect context, like crimes that go unreported, might do more harm than good. We have no idea how common they are, as most cases are inconclusive. One would need to compare the rate of those found to be false to the rate of those found to be true (convictions). Still, it only gets you so far if 80% could be either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/21 01:16 PM
3

Just to put the given answers into context: Each participant completed a five-item Relationship Dilemmas Questionnaire (RDQ) designed to determine which of two gender-linked violations-of-trust presented in the familiar forced-choice format distressed or upset them more. Each participant was asked to, “Please think of a serious committed romantic relationship that you have had in the past, that you currently have, or that you would like to have. What would distress or upset you more?” (Buss et a…
/r/Male_Studies17/10/21 06:28 PM
2

TheTinMen has a podcast
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:07 PM
3

He believed that women's happiness was just as important as women's happiness ;)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/21 01:46 AM
1

Don't take negative comments to heart. We need people that are willing to listen. I'd also suggest the more progressive r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates, as well as this post on feminism: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/ Other important posts that might surprise you: The rape case which the example in the abovementioned post was based on: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/oyrlhh/video_showing_a_woman_raping_a_man_got_hundreds/ Rape: h…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 01:38 AM
2

Shaming circumcized men is still not the way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/21 12:30 AM
1

Shaming circumcized men is not the way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/21 12:29 AM
2

That has practically nothing to do with normal kink play though - of course, there are people who genuinely self-mutilate and I won't decide if that's okay - though it shouldn't be confused with a normal D/S dynamic. I'd personally not call anything of that severety without safewords kink. And from what it sounds like, I would doubt it could be called sane from either party even if basic safety measures were taken, though that's obviously subjective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/21 08:40 PM
3

They're gross and inegalitarian, and I think they say something about the kind of person who would have them. Strong disagree. There is a huge difference between kink and reality and I have no issues with fantasy / consensual kink. Both misandry and misogyny in kink are fine to me. It is hard, if not impossible to explain - then again, it does not harm you personally so long as it is kink and not real. Obviously, it depends on what exactly you are talking about - not using safewords or using vio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/21 08:25 PM
3

Oops, fixed :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/21 07:35 PM
29

Stricter moderation, more progressive perspectives overall, less internalized misandry (downplaying of certain instances violence against men, restriction of non-conformity...), higher average quality of posts and comments. Reddit is based on snowballing: if enough stuff is posted and you don't take off immediately, your post will get burried and is dead. Ironically, this may result in your average engagement being higher in smaller communities with low quantity/high quality posts than in big su…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/21 07:03 PM
3

You use terms like "reasonable" and apparently don't think that such an attack would be reasonable in response to verbal attacks, yet later claim that it is impossible to determine the harm done by a smack on the butt. So for other attacks, be it verbal, psychological, physical, emotional or whatever else, we can determine that? How? And should the justice system recognize differences in crime severety or honor the individual experience? My personal experiences of actions against me vastly devia…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:24 PM
3

Some suggestions: The bars could be mistaken for being stacked. Maybe put them besides each other. There are no sources given The title "Fatality rate of police encounters" suggests you are talking about the proportion of police encounters that lead to death. Is that how it is intended to be?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:36 PM
3

If you are so open to adopt feminist terminology, why do you refuse to be as open to ours? "Harmful stereotypes" that restrict the actions of men whilst depriving them of help and value for being born with the wrong chromosomes are called misandry. Differentiating between those who are "real men" and those who are not is misandry. Enforcing conformity is misandry. We used misogyny like that for ages. No new terms needed. It's not that we do not consider these restrictions to be problematic. Even…
/r/MensRights09/10/21 08:25 PM
7

he literally fell to the ground just paralyzed lmao Idk, but that "lmao" feels out of place. I know that people slap it behind everything without thought - doesn't mean that's how it should be though. Might just be me though.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 02:15 PM
2

You can find deaths by legal intervention here: https://wisqars.cdc.gov/data/analyze-compare/deaths/compare/Legal%20Intervention/All%20Injury/selected-year?dths_anc=eyJpbnRlbnQxIjoiTGVnYWwgSW50ZXJ2ZW50aW9uIiwiaW50ZW50MiI6IkxlZ2FsIEludGVydmVudGlvbiIsImludGVudDMiOiIiLCJtZWNoMSI6IkFsbCBJbmp1cnkiLCJtZWNoMiI6IkFsbCBJbmp1cnkiLCJtZWNoMyI6IiJ9
/r/MensRights07/10/21 11:32 PM
1

NCVS and BJS have nationally representative surveys with much better methodology I guess I would disagree. Too many questions on too many topics, phrasing that was prone to misunderstandings the last time I read the questionnaire, classifications I disagree with, no use of BSQs afaik, use of data (partially) collected in person, retention of data on person, houshold and who lives there as the whole household is included and kept for over 3 years and so on. I'd question its suitability for measur…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 06:16 PM
2

Yeah saw that as well. Their coding was odd as well. It legitimately implied that you are biased against women if you believe that there might be situations where one might need to act in self defense. Practically everyone agreed it was almost never justifiable to use violence against women/a female partner. Everything but "never" was rated as "they think it is justifiable" and biased. Violence against men was not even asked about. See page 9 of this report: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/fil…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 08:02 PM
16

Interesting how, out of all the characteristics of criminals, they exclusively consider sex. Not that the suggestion would make any more sense if they didn't. Also funny that these statements come from a hate group with mods that promote androcides suggest its users murder their boyfriends/husbands agree that "worthless men should disappear", noting that "reddit won't let" them say more and that "even this could be too far". I'm sure that they are talking about a nice vacation that reddit won't …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/10/21 07:49 PM
2

This is not a kink sub. Seeing that you already found bdsm communities on here, I wish you all the best.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 06:12 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lrm69c/made_to_penetrate_excludes_male_victims_of_rape/
/r/MensRights02/10/21 10:55 PM
1

We should come up with a modern male identity, one young men can relate to and feel inspired by. We should establish men as free individuals who are not violently restricted to adhere to what others want from them anymore. No set identity needed.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 08:19 PM
3

r/MensLibWatch Apart from that, they remove and ban stuff for no apparent reason but personal disagreements (including disliking authors of sources).
/r/MensRights01/10/21 09:35 PM
2

"Harmful stereotypes" that restrict the actions of men whilst depriving them of help and value for being born with the wrong chromosomes are called misandry. Differentiating between those who are "real men" and those who are not is misandry. Enforcing conformity is misandry. We used misogyny like that for ages. No new terms needed. It's not that we do not consider these restrictions to be problematic. Even less so that they would be desirable. The terminology, however, is inconsitent with existi…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:22 PM
6

"Harmful stereotypes" that restrict the actions of men whilst depriving them of help and value for being born with the wrong chromosomes are called misandry. Differentiating between those who are "real men" and those who are not is misandry. Enforcing conformity is misandry. We used misogyny like that for ages. No new terms needed. It's not that we do not consider these restrictions to be problematic. Even less so that they would be desirable. The terminology, however, is inconsitent with existi…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:11 PM
4

"Harmful stereotypes" that restrict the actions of men whilst depriving them of help and value for being born with the wrong chromosomes are called misandry. Differentiating between those who are "real men" and those who are not is misandry. Enforcing conformity is misandry. We used misogyny like that for ages. No new terms needed.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 02:57 PM
7

Glad you made a channel. All the best!
/r/MensRights25/09/21 10:46 PM
7

No. In self-defense, yes. That being said, many seem to believe self-justice and self-defense are the same thing, which they are not. Same thing applies to any sex-combination, of course.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:55 PM
3

Also see https://archive.is/0OpXF
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/21 03:25 PM
2

I can’t stand him and the way he speaks, such a feckin softyyy, tries make everything sound rosey and speaks like a naive innocent 5 year old like in what you just shared. Considering the inherent misandry in the restriction and oppression of men's behavior and expression, I doubt that being a "softyyy" and sounding "rosey" should be the way forward to describe unpleasant features of male vocalization. You are free to dislike anyone, but I'd prefer criticism of the contents rather than the perso…
/r/MensRights24/09/21 09:14 PM
24

So they subscribed to pro-life talking points and only apply them to men? In fact, even most pro-lifers would agree with exceptions for rape victims - something that's not mentioned and by now not even allowed to be talked about anymore. Well, it is mentioned that the consent only applies to consensual heterosexual sex - yet such exception is not made for the ban on the discussion. The mod also fails to clarify how the consent to pregnancy is related to the bodily autonomy. If consent to the pre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 07:00 PM
2

Listen and speak up. Question yourself - would that be funny if it was against women? If so, should it be? Would this concern me, would I intervene, would I call the police or anything else if the sexes were any different? If not, should it? Even though men aren't equal by law (see rape definitions), it wouldn't help them if they were, as long as crimes against them aren't taken serious, people don't intervene, don't call law enforcement, make less concerned statements toward law enforcement, la…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 09:08 PM
12

Don't take negative comments to heart. We need people that are willing to listen. If you still need a label, I'd suggest the self-explanatory "Equalistarian/Egalitarian". I'd also suggest the more progressive r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates, as well as this post on feminism: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/ Other important posts that might surprise you: The rape case which the example in the abovementioned post was based on: https://www.reddit.…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 07:51 PM
5

Did you read the rest? I was not serious.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 08:00 AM
16

According to interviewees, food, money, water, sanitation, clothing, and other basic needs are issues of concern for many adolescents’ households. During health talks, some mobilizers emphasized the incentives that boys will receive (e.g., sodas and/or new underwear) following circumcision—items that may be significant inducements among impoverished children. Not sure if you read the whole post, but there is a paragraph on that. The ones targeted by soda and underwear are children, at times 8 ye…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/21 07:21 PM
2

Proper link: https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/auto/latest-auto-news/story/ola-futurefactory-to-employ-over-10-000-women-will-be-world-s-largest-women-only-factory-1852307-2021-09-13
/r/MensRights13/09/21 06:38 PM
10

Provide statistics and sources. Take their statistics at face value and address the issues associated with them. If there are none, acknowledge them. If there are persistent disagreements about the quality of the data, methodology used, inclusion and exclusion criteria and so on or even outright denial, then there is nothing else you can do. In that case, you should prevent yourself from wasting your time and instead ignore them. It is true that there are brigaders - some of which happily boast …
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:58 PM
2

can't get a hug anymore because someone will think I'm falling for them What if I'm falling for you tho? "Can't get a hug cause they'll fall for me" UNO reverse
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/21 04:09 PM
1

Shouldn't it be simply traditional gender norms? Yes and no. Yes, because "hatred" is very vague and less of a description than an accusation. No, because the termonology used in the context of women's issues carries an inherent connotation of severety that cannot be matched unless a consistent terminology is used across all issues. Such attempts have failed every single time so far, as you can't prevent alternative terms (which are usually only applied to female victims) from being used.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/21 04:00 PM
20

That user is not "the sub" and you know barely ayone from here. I don't really think her comment was really fitting, but neither is yours. That said, the person meant literally killing children. Interestingly, if a mother murders her own child in the UK as described in "Policy D: Ensure Whole Life Orders are the sentencing starting point for premeditated murder of a child", policies are in place to downgrade the crime and sentence as described in "Equality considerations" afterwards. There is a …
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:48 PM
2

The fact that boys had to line up to be thrown into busses like animals and taken to "hospitals"(euphemism) for their "surgery"(euphemism) did not come up? A year earlier, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had declared a national emergency because of what she deemed an “internal disturbance.” In fact, Gandhi was in danger of losing power, having violated multiple election laws, and the courts were closing in. Meanwhile, India was weathering a perfect economic storm: Food production had fallen thanks …
/r/MensRights04/09/21 11:36 AM
1

Made me think of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OVpLBIlTMU
/r/MensRights04/09/21 11:16 AM
4

well maybe try living a few years in their shoe? Just avoiding intimate interactions with those you feel attracted to is not comparable to being even theoretically unable to have it. The mere knowledge that one could if they really wanted to makes it completely different, I guess.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/21 04:11 PM
1

Unfortunately not surprising, yet still inexcusably empathyless.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:55 PM
13

Stricter moderation, more progressive perspectives overall, less internalized misandry (downplaying of violence against men, restriction of non-conformity...), higher average quality of posts and comments. Reddit is based on snowballing: if enough stuff is posted and you don't take off immediately, your post will get burried and is dead. Ironically, this may result in your average engagement being higher in smaller communities with low quantity/high quality posts than in big subs where people sp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 10:55 AM
16

See this: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=21629&langId=en The broader the definition the higher the proportion of women. For example, one difference would be whether women in women's shelters or those living with families and friends are to be counted as homeless. Among rough sleepers in brussels, about 8 out of 10 are men (page 38). Whilst they say something about the undercounting of women, in the end it once again boils down to different ways of saying the same thing. Here is a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/21 04:09 PM
11

Men's issues are not restricted to how men are treated by women and misandry is in now way something restricted to them either. Misandry in men is real and extremely prevalent. It is essential how men are treated in general.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/21 05:52 PM
2

I know fetish content and I have no issues with it as long as it is fantasy or consensual (and not necessarily life-threatening or otherwise trying to stretch what can be considered sane). In fact, my first post on this account was about the SheFights debacle. Note that they have been found guilty multiple times and spent time in jail for it. Yes, it was real. Yet still there are masochists on one of the femdomgifs subs that still share their gifs and insist they did nothing wrong and cindy shou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/21 11:08 AM
4

Both feminists and right-wingers are welcome to present their points here and the sub is open about that fact - though there is a good chance that users will not agree with them. In fact, there are even separate flairs - for those who feel comfortable using them. I have a hard time seeing what you are even theoretically trying to expose by claiming that there are right-wingers here... like, of course? Just banning anyone who disagrees on some points is not constructive, as long as they do so in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 09:45 PM
23

What on earth were those answers. So when men are violent, they lie about the abusive behaviours of their wives, yet when talking about female on male dv, it being in the context of things like lying etc. (coercion, gaslighting) is claimed to be important in differentiating their violence from that of men. In some cases, women may be perpetrating as much or more physical violence as their partners, but their partners may be committing other types of abuse that are not always assessed, such as se…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 12:17 AM
3

Any suggestions?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/21 07:19 PM
2

Please publish this Any suggestions?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/21 07:19 PM
2

What exactly are you thinking about?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/21 05:47 PM
7

True, fixed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/21 06:57 PM
11

I wonder if the numbers are broken down for fondling / oral sex / etc in some of their data tables, and if we could "fix" their numbers and see what the results are. See the questions and Table 4. Fondling is not an item that accurately addresses the differences in definition, though that would still need to be discussed. In terms of intercourse, the outside of the penis corresponds to the inside of the vagina. Also the CDC stats are for attempted and completed rape (/ mtp). True, they are a bit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/21 07:24 PM
1

Misandry is perpetrated by all sexes and genders, not just women or feminists. And obviously I am affected by it. Both, as someone growing up in a society that has us internalize misandristic biases which we might at times struggle to get rid of as well as a boy/man falling victim to it to varying degrees on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 02:47 PM
1

I strongly disagree with the classification of the chosen examples, but it's not my sub and I would never say either of those things. My issue with more descriptive terms is consistency vs. accuracy. And this does not only apply to misogyny and misandry. Other terms might be more accurate, though I value consistency with already established and unfirtunately and destructively persistent language in regard to women's issues as well as certain behaviors higher, as they carry a connotation of sever…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 02:29 PM
10

Agriculture was listed in the definition and excluding it would not change the result.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/21 01:48 PM
3

It is quite easy: whoever aligns with the egalitarian values of the sub is welcome. I don't care if you were a misandrist or whatever. If you want to change and your statements reflect that, I'll help you. If they don't, you will be banned and may come back when you are ready to change. There are no specific missions needed to carry that out and it applies to anyone. I am not going to push people back into hateful and destructive spaces over offending me in tweets a few years back - if I did, I …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/21 01:28 PM
1

Yes, the mere fact that in this specific context only one sex is correctly seen as a human being with basic human characteristics like vulnerability and one sex elicits greater concern in others creates a problematic dynamic where the fact that one can scream and have the other put in serious danger is at times abused to extort or get back at them. Considering that jail is one of the less problematic consequences of false accusations, at least compared to being tortured to death, it is obvious t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/21 06:48 AM
6

See this as well: https://faculty.umb.edu/gary_zabel/Courses/Phil%20281b/Philosophy%20of%20Magic/Arcana/Witchcraft%20and%20Grimoires/witch_hunt.html
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/21 03:07 PM
1

Meh. It was changed for 2015 and mainly deminished the numbers of men. My personal reasoning were the differences in acknowledgement of what happened as more than a crossing of boundaries as well as how consent is generally addressed - asking men if they were unable to consent might generally not be the best phrasing, as the answer is influenced by men's socialization and the requirements put onto them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/21 11:53 PM
7

So is it better to fix misconceptions about what average is, or argue that size doesn't matter I don't think either is helpful, nor do they address the root of the problem, which is societal.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 11:05 PM
1

I do not know if you answered the wrong comment, but there is practically no similarity there. We are talking about a specific section of a specific survey on contact sexual violence. You did not adress the topic at all, let alone my comment. I did not talk about who perpetrates CSA and my last statement does not reference severity in any way.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 06:12 PM
3

You comment is not even close to being about the same general topic as mine. No idea what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:45 AM
4

It does not matter too much anyway - see: This and This. That being said, caution should be used when a blog's only source is that a random redditor who re-sent their mail claimed that screenshot to have been a legitimate FBI answer (at least that's how I understood it). I thought the discrepancy signified some plasticity in the definition and decided to send an email to Ms. Reese (who was listed as contact person on the first document) and ask whether this plasticity could also mean that rape b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/21 06:17 PM
11

That one graph is practically worthless compared to the impact the terminology as well as primarily advertising lifetime instead of aggregated yearly stats had and still has. Why do they make a graph on the situation including cases from 50+ years ago when the data they collected in the last 10 and especially that before they changed the intoxification question shows a picture that could not be further from the lifetime stats. Applying those to current day politics and activism is harmful. They …
/r/MensRights12/08/21 05:49 PM
3

The proven true rate is the conviction rate. For false reports, see: https://www.datagoneodd.com/blog/2015/01/25/how-to-lie-and-mislead-with-rape-statistics-part-1/ https://www.datagoneodd.com/blog/2015/01/27/how-to-lie-and-mislead-with-rape-statistics-part-2/ You could, of course, try to argue it - or you just take their numbers and point out how substantial even those already are when put into context.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 05:55 PM
2

Do you? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ovc5lp/video_shows_family_and_health_workers_laughing/
/r/MensRights11/08/21 12:55 PM
7

Yes. I also strongly dislike the attempts to compromise when it comes to this. "toxic gender expectations", etc. It does not tackle the underlying issue, which is the belief that discrimination against men - even when it manifests in the same or more severe ways - is inherently less serious/concerning or less of a priority than discrimination against women. Women experience hatred, sexism, misogyny or discrimination whilst men experience "gender norms". The belief that it would be privilege back…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 11:00 PM
35

The 2-10% have to be put into context: a) 2-10% of reported cases are proven false b) a similar portion of reported cases are proven true c) about 80% of reported cases are inconclusive, which means they might very well be true, yet just as well be false d) cases of both false allegations and crimes going unreported are valid, yet separate issues and have no impact on the stats of reported cases e) what is invalid (yet done by certain subs), is comparing the number of proven false allegations am…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:47 PM
10

Save the time. This is far from what would be needed for them to take action. Even when talking about men as genetical failures and trying to push them towards suicide, it strongly depended on which admin saw the report and who the perp was (the FDS founder, for example, has de-facto immunity - having broken numerous site-wide rules to the most severe extent in more than a hundred instances without being permanently banned). That being said, be glad they even sent you the automated answer. Even …
/r/MensRights09/08/21 12:55 PM
7

Society as a whole is part of the problem and men are in no way an exception. They engage in, contribute to and enable a lot of misandristic practices whilst exhibiting a ton of internalized misandry - for example showing in physical violence, where the assumed sex is an inherent disadvantage to those assumed to be men: be it via differences in reluctance to use violence depending on the target's sex, differences in assumed harm, differences in bystander behavior (likelyhood to report, guilt att…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 12:35 PM
3

:)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/21 07:20 PM
1

First of all, your comments did not age well looking at the ban of the misandry sub. But I still want to address it: What is or is not a grave offence is not objective, though. It is up to the individual to determine where the line is - and in the case of reddit's admins, that line is - on average (they are concerningly inconsistent) - vastly different based on the target's gender. Whether banned subs crossed my or your personal threshold is irrelevant and it is thus impossible to answer your qu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/21 03:29 PM
1

Now it can be found here: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-this-researcher-discovered-after-years-of-studying-matriarchal-societies_n_5d9f60bfe4b06ddfc515f767 I fixed the link in the post.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/08/21 12:41 PM
5

The title is a bit unhelpful as people will get defensive over it instead of listen. We do not have a lack of issues nor a lack of evidence - we have a lack of people willing to listen and do something about it. There are many who left feminism behind once they dared to listen and noticed that what was brought up was valid and incompatible with the influencial parts of the movement they inevitable supported by spreading its name. Don't make it about labels, make it about the points brought up. S…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 05:53 PM
2

No idea what they thought when creating another one. Was to be expected that they would ban it. Good thing they don't yet flood this one though.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/08/21 08:48 AM
22

Yeah. It is important, however, to realize that not a lot of CSA victims will become rapists whilst many rapists will have been CSA victims. This meta-analysis, for example, found adult sex offenders to be more than 3 times as likely to have been victims of CSA: We compared rates of sexual and other forms of abuse reported in 17 studies, involving 1,037 sex offenders and 1,762 non-sex offenders. We also examined the prevalence of different forms of abuse in 15 studies that compared adult sex off…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:03 PM
1

Please read this paper: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=cflj
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:54 PM
2

Just because there have legitimately been situations like that against men and boys does not mean it is in any way shape or form desirable to have others go through it - even if they were ignorant about or even contributed to it by spreading misinformation. Self-justice is not the way to go and we should strive for a future where help is reasonable regardless of gender. Beating someone up or even killing them is not reasonable, usually surprisingly inefficient and practically never needed - espe…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 09:45 AM
2

Differences in expectations, the way both parties and society handle rejections, the prevalence of rejections and differences in anticipated future possibilities all could easily explain these issues as a side effect of the widespread misandry as well as differences in personal preferences regarding romantic partners by gender across society. That being said, last time I checked, Incels were not shy to point out their perceived ugliness and so on. Not all of it is, in fact, changeable and that w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/21 01:08 PM
4

Not having the time to go into this, but: For example in 2012 the United States changed its definition of rape to No. A purely statistical definition of the FBI was changed in a way that is useless, if not harmful to men as it does not reach whom it is supposed to whilst providing misandrists with hypothetical but practically useless arguments on why they are not on the streets against it. Not only does it not pass the fleshlight check (i.e. dildo on woman is rape but fleshlight on man is not) l…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:17 AM
28

Honestly, first: A lot there are giving much better answers than I would've ever hoped for from them - especially given past experiences. It might even be most. Kudos to all the ones over there who did not have to belittle the sexism it is. That being said, this: I'm plainly aware men enforce patriarchal norms on other men. As I said, phrases like 'small dick energy' are patriarchal. Patriarchy is sexist, but not all of the harm that patriarchy does is sexism. Men enforcing patriarchal norms on …
/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:41 AM
138

Agreed.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:57 PM
90

Just to be clear: the video contains no nudity and the induction of artificial erections during surgeries is in itself not abnormal - surgeries, however, are usually consensual. This case is not more sexual than others, which is why the reaction of the boy is a strong indicator that the practice as a whole is experienced as much more sexualized than many want to admit. I would love for me to not have to see this either - and at some point had to accept that telling people about it was not enough…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:55 PM
11

Agreed. It is unfortunately easy to see how one would just accept misleading statistics as long as it fits in with what everyone is saying. Especially when you are in denial about your own treatment and experiences for them to fit in with conformity requirements and other's reactions to them. It is tough to realize that either none of them have looked further than feminist/misandristic instagram accounts or deliberately used these definitions and in many cases methodology to frame forced envelop…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 09:12 PM
4

It may well be that this is the point where I'm just to stupid to get it, but most of what's said in the quotes makes no sense to me even when just applied to the given situations, let alone reality. Additionally, there appears to be zero evidence for the existence of such envy (an envy that vastly exceeds the mere curiosity that "it would be cool to give birth" to almost gender dysphoric levels in order to be in line with some of these claims), even if its hypothetical existence could explain h…
/r/Male_Studies28/07/21 08:51 AM
3

People act destructively in groups. One does something and the others hype it up by default which can quickly escalate the situation. If all of your friends think its all funny, it has got to be, right? It inhibits critical reflection on what you are doing and shields you from any negative feedback by people outside of your group. It is unfortunate how much people enjoy to display what they consider dominance when they are protected from moral considerations by peer encouragement - which might b…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 09:37 AM
4

Tactile inspection of the testicles is generally within the scope of what is normal to do when checking the genital area. What seems to have been the main problem here was her lack of communication on what she was doing and why she was doing it. Maybe she wanted to do a full quick but she didn't do an actual testicle lump check and she didn't announce, explain or prepare me for anything she was doing. And no explanation after either. Yeah, I guess that's kinda what happened here.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 07:35 AM
-1

I didn’t physically harm her, don’t worry, I’m still the good guy here . I stormed out of the house, and furiously walked towards fuckface mcsnakes house to confront him, ready to go to prison for life. I had decided that tonight would be my last night as a free man, and made peace with it. Luckily, he wasn’t there. . My ex told me that if I show up at either of their houses, she’ll call the cops on me and have me arrested. I didn’t even get to beat his ass, and if I do, I’ll be facing a prison …
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:37 PM
1

Thanks, fixed, but you could've just copied it and put it behind the "reddit.com" manually as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/21 08:31 AM
5

I did edit out one account though, as she deleted her old comments and I don't want to out her if she doesn't want people to know anymore. As for the number of transwomen, I believe your struggle to be relevant to mensrights and vice versa as it is often those who do not accept you as women who act transphobic. They thus hold you to the restrictions put onto men and punish you for obviously failing to obey them similar to how parts of homophobia might be understood (see end of comment for studie…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 04:38 PM
11

Sure thing. Just a few examples besides those that were already mentioned, regardless of my agreement with their statements: Edit: Despite the generally positive rating of the comment, I reconsidered my approach of providing examples for the contributions by women around here by linking them. Another intention of mine was to point them to a thread they might be interested in and that might benefit from their contributions. I mentioned examples of both cis and transwomen in an attempt to be inclu…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 10:36 AM
1

Meh. Not addressing the rest, but there is offensive language used here. There are people who use insults and whatnot as well. It is certainly possible to find civil discussions, but some still abuse the loose moderation to attack others.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 07:35 PM
42

It was always harder to get them to act on misandry than misogyny. Back when they still reacted to my reports, they did regularly take action, including bans - though more often when it was not against men (seemed to depend heavily on which admin saw the report). It was very variable and sometimes they would approve comments that were far worse than the one in this post - for example, calling men genetical failures and such. There is an undeniable issue within the admin team that would need to b…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 05:55 PM
1

Have never seen it brought up outside of radfem spaces either. W vs P is bringing it up at times. Whatever, I consider the whole topic unimportant. r-WitchesVsPatriarchy/comments/mfy9dq/i_think_we_know_why/gsr25am r-WitchesVsPatriarchy/comments/nbtf1n/was_told_to_post_my_art_in_here_and_i_cant/gy2o5ua r-WitchesVsPatriarchy/comments/mkiw5j/comment/gthn7j7 r-WitchesVsPatriarchy/comments/omp4pm/im_tired_of_the_way_women_and_feminism_are_blamed/h5mqb4w
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 11:53 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/MensRights17/07/21 03:40 PM
14

No, depending on your definition of rape. In that case it would be a semantic discussion without practical relevance though, unless you consider forced sex on men to be somehow more acceptable, regardless of the term used to describe it. If you are talking about unconsensual sex or sex equivalents, then no. It depends on your source. Using the cdc source it is only given lifelong data, which has proven itself inaccurate in describing current day victinization vs. 12 month prevalence numbers, and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/21 03:04 PM
3

It was meant as a joke, yet while I think anal can be very pleasurable for everyone, d/s dynamics can be hot in both directions and pegging is nice, I did not like the scene. The joke about it appeared that he was not into it - uncomfortable and in pain, yet had to go through with it because apparently that's what fairness is about. This "female payback" fetish that attempts to justify the maltreatment of men with these people's misunderstanding of current day gender dynamics and issues. If my g…
/r/MensRights15/07/21 12:20 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/MensRights15/07/21 09:17 AM
-15

The video has been posted like five times (hyperbole) on this sub alone. Edit: Which means that the comments might be skewed by thqt and the average user would be more accepting of this. Though I actually didn't go and reqd the comments.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 02:09 PM
5

How fast "I studied theology and public administration" becomes "I specifically studied gender-based trauma and got two relevant master's degrees FrOm HaRVaRd." When you don't have a single source but the name of your university to back anything up is quite interesting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 06:37 AM
3

Granted it was the 90's, and people weren't as concerned or cared about this kind of thing then. Has 40 thousand tiktok clips with up to a million likes each. This is - unfortunately - still absolutely acceptable, encouraged and glorified. The most messed up is how they used common bullying quotes and laughing tracks and thus, even if they might not have though that much about it and did it due to their ignorance, inevitably retraumatize those affected. Then again, it has been around and played …
/r/MensRights11/07/21 04:27 PM
10

Just a quick sidenote: I did this at around two in the morning, admittedly cowardly, as I figured it was unpopular enough to advocate for men that I would face push back. Cowardice is a term that should not be used anymore as it is primarily used to shame non-conformity (rightfully fearing pushback in this case) in favor of deadly and irrational conformity (being "brave", able to defend yourself, willing to fight verbally and physically and risk your (mental) health and life, fearless, etc.). Fe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/21 02:53 PM
10

In the UK it is legal for a woman to rape a man, so if hypothetically if I lived in the UK and were raped by a woman, I couldn't do anything about it, I wouldn't be able to take any legal action against my rapist This is not correct. It would not be called rape, but it would still be illegal, though lead - depending on methods used (e.g. fleshlight instead of body) - to comparatively little consequences. It is still discriminatory and has to change - but it is not completely legal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/21 04:41 PM
2

How is feminism a hate group? It depends, a lot of influencial feminists are de-facto misandrists, though not every feminist might be. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/ What do you call women who want equal rights? A woman who wants equal rights. For short, as already included in your description, equalitarian or egalitarian. If feminism was equal to that, the term would be obsolete as there already was a perfectly good term available - …
/r/MensRights06/07/21 07:01 AM
1

First link seems broken.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 10:22 AM
1

What? What are you talking about? You can use the "f-word", hell, there's even a separate flair for it! If you don't want others to be allowed to criticize you for it, that is the opposite of diversity. Appart from that, I have no idea in what way me describing this place would have to fit another sub I recommend?
/r/MensRights04/07/21 05:43 PM
9

For rape, see: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf NISVS 2010 showed that in the past 12 months, 1.1% of men were made to penetrate and 1.1% of women were raped. Look at Table 2.1 and 2.2 on pages 18 and 19 respectively. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6308.pdf NISVS 2011 showed that in the past 12 months, 1.7% of men were made to penetrate and 1.6% of women were raped. Look at Table 1 on page 5. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf…
/r/MensRights03/07/21 09:11 AM
16

It another way of saying straight and therefore a victim of a crime. But gay guys groping gay guys is... also a crime, no?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 08:08 AM
60

Still remember to take every single statistic at face value, look at them and then constructively address their issues. Yes, many will get mad or go into denial, but still. Don't just dismiss sources for being brought up by a feminist - dismiss them after explaining why they are invalid and accept and acknowledge them if they are valid.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 11:30 AM
6

If they fall under the statutory rape law, then that is unfortunately not a false accusation - the law is dysfunctional though and no matter how rare, it still wastes time and resources on stuff like this, which is why the laws need a complete overhaul to properly address actually dangerous individuals, which they are currently incapable of telling apart. The lying part could save him - ask a lawyer for that. I don't know about your state, but I would be more concerned about the name of the crim…
/r/MensRights30/06/21 01:39 PM
18

Well, it may have a lot to do with misandry. Homosexuality is non-conforming with misandristic expectations and homophobia may be the punishment for the non-compliance with oppressive restrictions put on men's sexuality and expression as well as a way to protect themselves from the consequences of others seeing them as non-conforming. If nobody cares, then caring alone may lead to ridicule - see men who speak up about body shaming being themselves shamed for the alleged inadequacy of their bodie…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 06:33 AM
7

Don't forget this: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lrm69c/made_to_penetrate_excludes_male_victims_of_rape/
/r/MensRights29/06/21 10:11 PM
5

Who's gonna out them? The male victim who will see himself against administrative and legal abuse as well as the punishments for non-conformity? The access to law is low, bystanders will report less often, guilt attributions and compassion are skewed against men, leading to biased witnesses and jurors, law enforcement will refuse assistence and support services are disturbingly unqualified to provide services to men. Research and support for men were 20 years behind women - and that was 20 years…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 09:20 PM
10

Make sure you keep a backup to repost when it's taken down. Preferably also post it somewhere in list or table format to cite. Backup all articles using archives. Faking screenshots is extremely easy using free tools and devices you already own and needs no special skills to reach basically flawless results. They are thus not capable of providing proof when the articles get changed, moved or deleted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/21 02:36 PM
6

The reason you are not comfortable with everything here is that in order to prevent bias in moderation nothing that does not risk the sub getting banned is deleted. This sub is a diverse mix of ideas and ideologies and I sure as hell do not agree with everyone here. In fact, there are some people here from subs that I'm permabanned on for allegedly being a simp after I criticized them. Another Issue will be terminology. Some here strongly reject the term toxic masculinity, how it is used and to …
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:03 PM
1

Whilst I agree, it is fascinating that if you just make your statements extreme enough you will barely get any resistance as people let you pass. See how FDS gets backlash because people take it serious and FDSp, with posts glorifying murderers, calling male suicide misogynistic and whatnot get a free pass because they are extreme enough and thus considered to be satire. Well at least as long as it is targetting a group you are not concerned about.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 11:28 AM
3

Posts can and will get deleted without banning you. You get banned if you are a threat to the sub / get the sub banned.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 11:17 AM
6

Last time I checked I rightfully saw nobody make an exception for female infants if anyone chose to do that.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 11:14 AM
18

Are men allowed to fear being attacked and voice or otherwise show that fear without serious consequences? Last time I checked me walking the girl home and then going alone was simply expected. Non-conformity in general may raise the chances of victimization even further. Most men who are not afraid were simply never educated on these numbers and internalized societies misandristic and at times violent socialization on which carefully chosen human characteristics a "real man" is allowed to keep …
/r/MensRights28/06/21 01:09 AM
63

That post, considering the amount of ignorance and denial one has to invest to believe men would not be more violent and especially deadly towards men for being men, may be one of the worst I've come across yet. It is one thing to say all men bad, but another to just completely turn reality on its head in order to dismiss the suffering they had to go through. Not just the deadly additional misandristic suffering, but even equal suffering at all. It is crazy to believe that that is actually a ser…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:37 AM
1

Violence is surely no solution to this. Refusing to pay/bring anything other than your own food and to meetup anywhere but halfway and in a public spot with extensive security cameras is. Make equal investments so there is no incentive to lie.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:30 AM
12

It is not a "mistake". It is the law allowing this as well as misandristic biases: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=cflj
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:56 PM
39

All that's left is killing and hating women. Give me a break. What kind of person plays a game torturing, murdering and otherwise causing disturbing amounts of suffering in thousands of men in every imaginable way and after seeing a usually lighter version of that done to a, in comparison, usually barely relevant amount of women drops that statement? Maybe I forgot, but could you torture a woman in GTA the way you did with a man? If being able to kill everyone in GTA is misogyny to you, you are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/21 09:05 AM
7

Reddit snowballs everything quite hard. The more you scroll, the more you expect to see people making misguided statements. If you have to expand a comment, you prepare for the worst and if there is a clear voting discrepancy, one might interpret the words in a way that better fits the voting of others. As for assuming bad faith, I guess it is usually just meant as assuming someone to be ill-intentioned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/21 06:52 PM
2

The Steven Wilko Case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj61jur9My4 That being said, Steven Wilko is absolutely unqualified to do what he does, has major issues with empathy and rationality, glroifies self-"justice" and is ill-informed on how "lie detectors" work - in fact, nobody who has any interest in the actual truth would even consider a polygraph. They are a device to scare someone into telling the truth more than to actually detect lying, which they are not accurately capable of.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 10:23 AM
12

As with all crimes, it is internationally ambiguous. Claiming it to simply not be rape is, regardless of whether I like it, inaccurate. In New Zealand it is rape: https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/man-jailed-for-rape-after-removing-condom-without-consent/news-story/8a38d9aaa24cb03485b21740b8ffe065 In the UK it is rape: https://graziadaily.co.uk/life/in-the-news/stealthing-conviction-rape/ In Victoria it is rape: https://www.starobserver.com.au/news/national-news/victoria-news…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 10:04 AM
1

Thank you for your comment. He is calling cat callers who only target women who are alone cowards, specially because of the “targeting women who are alone” part, it has nothing to do with non-conformity, and it definitely has nothing to do with soldiers who where executed for being deserters or whatever. Like that is literally what I'm talking about. This does not change anything. In fact, I have a hard time coming up with any other way than the one you mentioned it could have been meant? Coward…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/21 10:57 PM
13

You lot need to do a better job with your moderating and get off your asses. I'm sure that will change their opinion. /s Please remain absolutely civil in all communications or you'll have to acknowledge that you actively hurt this sub. They have never been consistent in the enforcement of their policy and in terms of gender, they have shared problematic and times misinformed views multiple times. They just don't care and unless there is serious pressure on them to do, they probably never will.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 10:59 PM
2

The third part of the data analysis examined the association between dominance by one partner and PV perpetrated against a partner in dating samples using data from the IDVS (Straus, 2008) because this was the only multicountry study to consistently provide data for men and women on dominance scores. Male dominance mean scores were not found to be predictive of male PV perpetration (b* = 0.335, t[23] = 1.666, p = .110). Conversely, female dominance mean scores were found to significantly predict…
/r/Male_Studies23/06/21 10:49 PM
4

So why not call it the same for both then? Why do we use misogyny and internalized misogyny for discrimination against women and toxic masculinity instead of misandry and internalized misandry for deadly discrimination against men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 10:21 AM
2

I guess we agree, though I disagree with creating special terms for issues in men to make them seem less seious. Misandry should not be called "toxic masculinity" nor be devalued into mere "gender norms" compared to the "hatred" and "misogyny" women experience. This way of talking about issue simply further pushes a dismissive attitude towards the deadly discrimination men face. What you described is misandry - as enforced and internalized by both men and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 10:11 AM
1

That is not much better to me. Sounds far less serious than hatred, misogyny amd whatever else similar issues affecting other groups are called. It still sounds as though men's issues are a parody of other's "real" ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 10:05 AM
2

But I think our mindset of not letting boys and men to express themselves is to blame for that rather than these stores and companies being misandric. If there is a demand, there will be a supply. Correct. And that is, by extension, misandry, at least by the standards other forms of discrimination are held to. Blaming the stores themselves would probably miss the issue, but the thing as a whole is a manifestation of the expectation of conformity to misandristic requirements put on men. Restricti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 11:17 PM
-4

Lying is a symptom of "mental disability"? Like, could you maybe clear up what exactly you are even talking about? And how exactly would that make her less believable than anyone else who can lie just as easily? Statements, just like chat histories, are simply unreliable evidence - prone and easy to be tampered with, incomplete, made up or lacking context. A mental disability that actually renders the patient unable to control the truthfulness of their statements would challenge the consent in i…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:27 PM
2

We can write a thousand of these posts. In the end, they will not stop. Either we provide a more fitting term that people will intuitively accept or nothing will change (hello misandry and whatever else one can use to describe issues instead of shoving them into this dumpster of a label made to hide whatever challenges their hatred). Just refuse to call it that term and call it something proper instead. If enough do it, others will follow. Discussing the terms is rarely successful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 05:09 PM
11

Falling asleep every 3 seconds and crawling over the floor is not incapacitated by title IX standards? Is he serious?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/21 10:49 AM
4

Going there, ok. Accepting that he's drunk and it doesn't work, ok. But the entitlement and ignorance to go out and publicly devalue this obviously barely conscious human, which friends of them know who it is, in such an extreme manner, from complaining about how barely conscious he is, how he didn't get hard, how she didn't like the smell or what his asshole looked like and how he thus was misandristicly deranked from man to boy is absolutely horrendous. It is this very attitude she portrays in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/21 10:30 AM
8

Compared to the average redditor, redditors from there are the following times as likely to post in (incomplete): 125 in fragilewhiteredditor 50 in trollxchromosomes 35 in inceltear 23 in witchesvspatriarchy 23 in menslib 17 in niceguys 15 in justneckbeardthings 13 in twoxchromosomes 12 in femaledatingstrategy 10 in mensrights (Hi!)
/r/MensRights20/06/21 04:07 PM
2

rape laws de gendered. Could you give a source? According to those I found (a bit older, so I am not sure - https://www.ejtn.eu/PageFiles/6533/2014%20seminars/Omsenie/WetboekvanStrafrecht_ENG_PV.pdf) , this is not true. Similar to most, in Section 242 of the criminal code, they use the penetration of the body as the definition, which makes penetrations using dildos, etc., for example, rape, but penetrations of fleshlights or anything else not. Also see: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvoc…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 09:38 AM
6

Yes, homophobia and misandristic requirements are probably connected. I therefore guess that similar mechanisms are at play with people whom others misidentify as men yet don't conform with the restrictive and oppressive requirements that come with it: Bias-motivated aggression is an ongoing problem in the United States, and data show that men comprise the majority of both perpetrators and victims of these types of offenses. Although gay men appear to be at particular risk for victimization, the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/21 09:13 AM
6

she must google these 'men's rights' Did you ever google men's rights? We'll if so, you know the issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/21 04:49 PM
15

<s> Be right back, gotta tell a few people that I had the power to decide who gets access to resources, who has control over their bodies, and what is deemed important when they apparently didn't know that. I'm sure that must've been a miscommunication. Maybe that was why law enforcement refused service? </s>
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/21 09:05 PM
1

Absolutely know what you mean. The phrasing is a bit unfortunate. That being said, the suicide intent is different and serious suicide attempts are more frequent in men. Don't overestimate the strength of that difference though - there is a range of reasons for the differences in completed suicides. Suicide intent data from 5212 participants was included in the analysis. A significant association between suicide intent and gender was found, where ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA) were rated signi…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 11:34 AM
1

I believe I have misunderstood your comment or something. Anyway, the "anecdote" was not an argument at all - it was an example for why your comment is valid. But I won't go into that for now - I hope you one day get whatever info you are searching for.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:54 AM
2

See, I also believe that compared to the value/empathy gap, violence, murder and rape against men, feminists addressing this whilst still frequently spreading false info about the others looks almost like they're making fun of men's issues and the fact that despite that behavior people still believe feminists to hold the monopoly on what issues are real and whether they are gendered - those who still haven't read the definitions of "rape" in their stats. The typical "women get killed and men get…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 08:06 PM
3

I believe that "gendered" was not meant to represent the relative freqency it is worn in(that could stay "gendered" if peoples free decisions lead to that) rather than the belief that there is a "right" type of clothing for men, thus restricting other men's style for no reason. Identifying clothing with gender is why this is stigmatized. Turning social rules 180 would be to say people need to wear this or that the rules should swap, none of which was said. If one acknowledges the freedom to wear…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 07:43 PM
3

Another point is that "women fearing men more than women fear other women" is different to "women fearing men more than men fear men". Men are misandristic and are in many ways more dangerous to men than to women. "By men" is usually thought to somehow belittle that fact, as apparently getting killed by a man only counts if you had two x chromosomes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 07:29 PM
3

Every message that does not point out how ridiculously wrong that 92% stat is as well as the ways it is skewed just makes them believe that you are actually arguing a 92-8 situation or at least something close. It reinforces harmful misconceptions. Same for victimization rates. Whilst the "bowl of sweets of which one is poisoned" thing would have to apply to any number, no matter how low, this isn't such a case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 07:23 PM
1

Yeah, one has to be careful, though truly representative samples are arguably rare, as it might raise other issues that skew the data further and it doesn't always make sense. There are known groups that will be more or less likely to engage in this behavior by common sense and in cases of lifetime stats, cases that happened 30+ years ago might not be representative of current day behavior. I mean, one can get that data, but data including some 80 yo grandma is simply not relevant to me or my ev…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 07:00 PM
57

Nah, reasearchers did in some studies. The present study examines predictors of a deceptive form of the foodie call in the context of male–female dates: when a woman purposefully misrepresents her romantic interest in a man to dine at his expense. In two studies, we surveyed women regarding their foodie call behavior, dark triad personality traits, traditional gender role beliefs, and online dating history. We found 23–33% of women surveyed had engaged in a foodie call. https://journals.sagepub.…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:44 PM
3

Yeah... Just looked it up for those outside the home and none of them was in self-defense either. I mean, to be fair - it does not necessarily say that the victim was a prostitute rather than that prostitution was part of the circumstances, but still.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/21 09:35 PM
3

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_water
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/21 09:20 AM
5

It will be barely possible to not have someone spot these kinds of "tests" ahead of time and then respond as they are expected. Thus, both direct questions and hypothetical scenarios may fail to uncover hidden biases. She knows about your beliefs and therefore knows the "right" answer. Of course, maybe she would just openly tell you - though even if she didn't that would not say much. In the end, what you believe is what you should act upon. If you have the feeling to not be properly accepted by…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 11:57 PM
1

I could give one reason in that the women may possibly have to undergo pregnancy and until recently abortion was illegal in Ireland (thankfully no longer). In that case, masturbation by finger, oral and anal penetration would have to be assessed separately, though, which I have only seen in some US states so far - I may be wrong as I do not know every jurisdiction. Additionally, protected would have to be separated from unprotected vaginal intercourse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 11:45 AM
11

Last time I checked they had no product of a quality that would need any boycott for me not to buy it and that did not change with the ad. There are much cheaper and arguably better alternatives, which are even cruelty free and vegan - something one can accept as positive even in times peta is probably among the most sexist well known and influential organizations still existing. Even vegans have to acknowledge that shaming dick size, erectile dysfunction and ridiculing male victimization, oppre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 12:05 PM
4

Good point! It's sexist and objectifying whilst setting irrational beauty standards for men. Thanks for pointing it out.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 02:43 PM
1

Honestly, as far as I can see they are not mod of that sub anymore. It's not like they were too active anyway, it just kind of didn't fit. I will adjust my comment accordingly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/21 05:42 PM
14

Unlike that dude here in the comments suggested, respecting pronouns should be the default and is definitely not an issue - no idea why he has a problem with it. Try r/BroEnergy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/21 07:30 AM
4

No. https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043079412-I-see-several-posts-or-comments-in-a-subreddit-that-I-believe-infringe-my-copyrights-Can-I-report-the-entire-subreddit-so-that-Reddit-can-remove-the-whole-subreddit-community- https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360058311612-How-do-I-report-a-community- You can report posts and comments via this: https://reddit.com/report - results are extremely inconsistent and sometimes disturbing. Some time ago, you would at least receive …
/r/MensRights02/06/21 11:23 PM
10

Do they actually believe this would be counted as rape by law or statistics? What kind of utopia they live in? He penetrated, so in most cases that train's gone per misandristic definition. This is not progress - this is denial of the issue Some purely statistical definitions are unneccessarily suggestive to not including it whilst ambiguous enough to shut people up and claim it does even though it would be intuitively assumed not to - which makes it effectively equivalent to not including it an…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:42 PM
2

Yeah, it is mushy and no side is purely good if you go too far. I refuse to go full real scottsman and not acknowledge the reality of that, even though some can't cope with that and instead use denial to somehow rationalize how someone on the left can not approve of violence against those on the right. I mean, looking at how much some far left mods approve of and glorify violence and hatred at times as long as they can make up some random invalid non-justification is nothing short of disturbing.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/21 04:07 PM
12

This is the best way to falsify your statements even if they were true. Take a popular post, make a copy with the genders 50% semi-swapped and believe people to actually behave the way they would have to a genuine, original post... Even if they wouldn't have noticed in a second, this would not have worked out - the way it played out though, it is nothing but non-evidence that might still be used as evidence by others to go "see, there is no double standard" even though studies have shown it over…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:28 AM
6

"Not privileged" is not enough. It sounds as though the mentioned issues would not be gendered. It sounds as though men are only either privileged or not, but you completely ommit the fact that we are discriminated against and oppressed. It might be in good faith, but "not privileged" does not make me believe that those areas need immediate intervention, even though they do. Whole labels have been made up (hello toxic masculinity) simply to avoid having to call misandry misandry as gender roles …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/21 06:13 AM
7

I hope your friend will find the help and support he needs. That being said, everybody keep in mind that people have abused emotional stories like this for ages. As frustrating as it is, we have currently zero evidence that the person even exists, let alone that the story is accurate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/21 06:09 PM
16

Saying "we have privilege, and in many scenarios we don't" does not quite grasp what it is called when a statistical definition including all male rape victims does not even yet exist https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lrm69c/made_to_penetrate_excludes_male_victims_of_rape/ - let alone it being called rape or even implemented in laws. Made to penetrate literally does not include all victims of made to penetrate... how can this be an "accident"? "Not privileged" does not quit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/21 06:03 PM
8

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/21 05:48 PM
3

We are now at a point where women refusing to be used as a resource be men is viewed as selfish and harmful, merely for refusing to be a slave! We are now at a point where rape against men is still barely considered a crime and no well known statistic even attempts to properly collect data on male equivalents to rape https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lrm69c/made_to_penetrate_excludes_male_victims_of_rape/ ... and still men have to read uneducated nonsense like that. Law enf…
/r/MensRights31/05/21 09:11 PM
1

I feel you. This is what misandry does to society. Male freedom is to be controlled and restricted into being a money shitting bodyguard to children and women. No support, no empathy, no protection from violence and as a consequence of all of this there is little hesitance to use violence against you. Either you live up to expectations and fight or you don't and will be attacked to the laughs of an entertained audience nonetheless. It is frustrating, and unfortunately it is deeply internalized a…
/r/MensRights31/05/21 08:37 PM
1

Obviously, equality is a myth. Some statistics reveal that fewer percentage of women are billionaires even if a larger percentage of them start companies. And the majority (60%+) of women billionaires have either inherited or made their fortune by divorce, the same doesn't hold true for men where we have many self-made tycoons, just look at the richest 20 men and women. There are other possible explanations for this other than one gender being more capable than the other, regardless of whether o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 08:09 PM
3

For 20% input leading to 20% output, we gotta assume that all the prerequisites are the same That's what I meant with If we assumed all genders to be equally qualified That may, of course, not be the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 02:32 PM
1

I know why you say that and trust me many of us tried. But your average girl reposting a feminist instagram story every other week is not in charge. She is used by those with influence to flush the streets from time to time and make sure that their feminist card granting them funds and power doesn't lose its worth. Those influencial feminists are extremely misandristic and those who enable their actions are ignorant to that fact. Nowadays, it has become much worse with the things that are called…
/r/MensRights31/05/21 12:16 PM
12

Well, it would be a start if they were gender neutral and implemented in a gender neutral way. Currently, they are one-sided or otherwise abolished once they would give men an advantage. Places where men are underrepresented usually don't feature quotas. Of course it is questionable why quotas are not relative to the portion of applicants of a certain gender. Some claim that static quotas would be needed for women to apply, yet this is a non-argument considering that, as long as the quota actual…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 11:48 AM
12

Agree with this and have said so many times. Two X chromosomes are protective against violence and spark more support and empathy across the board. Being a man, yet not a "real man", will, if anything, lead to the opposite. An oppression of male freedom - male freedom first and foremost being the allowance to be a basic human being with basic human features like vulnerability and emotionality. If transwomen were seen as women, they would not be held up to misandristic expectations and therefore …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/21 10:47 AM
8

The comedians are by far the worst to me. When "kill yourself" towards a group regularily bullied to suicide and at times denied treatment if they decide to do so is seen and accepted as a funny joke, it's over. The post explains quite well how the things said were problematic compared to offensive jokes. Unless this is seen as as unacceptable as it would be with any other group, we should not even think about telling incels that we give a shit. Just my opinion though, maybe someone finds the ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/21 07:57 AM
5

What the fuck did I just read.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 08:00 PM
3

I would get it if you posted it in MensRights, but lwma? Barely ever saw that here and have been permabanned from mgtow for forever because they consider me a simp.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 07:40 PM
14

This post includes the link to the comdienne saying men with small dicks should just kill themselves and another about a black man with a micropenis and how men who don't want to immediately fuck want to trap women by sparking feelings and how his black friends wanted to assasinate him for damaging their reputation. BLM protesters were using "racism is small dick energy" signs which were then posted by celebs with tens of millions of followers - the reddit post includes some pictures of the sign…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 07:01 PM
43

I believe the ridiculously open and severe bullying and body shaming towards men to be highly problematic. As long as prime time TV women tell men with inadequate bodies that thyare of no use to anyone or that they should kill themselves to laughing audiences, it will be hard to convince them of anything other than to react with hatred. Unfortunately, most who unsuccessfully try to address this issue are completely uneducated on the reality of many men and just claim them to be paranoid regardin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 03:24 PM
-13

There is no need for it as the term does nothing to enhance the meaning of what you could've called a behaviour without it. It even did the opposite for you. If you want to call something bad behaviour, call it bad behaviour. Otherwise people who are diagnosed with the used term will be stereotyped into assigned behaviours they may not even show. If anything, it completely blurred the meaning of your statement as autistically made barely any sense in that context beyond "something negative" that…
/r/MensRights27/05/21 12:56 PM
7

Male gender roles aren't always (obviously) misandrist though they can be weaponized for misandry. Male "gender roles" are special in that they are not voluntary, nor is adherence to them. You will be met with violence, torture, physical bullying, physical discipline and murder more often and rape probably as, if not more often when controlling for reluctance to disclose, denial and so on throughout your life for no reason but you being denied the privilege of safety and staying alive that women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 11:51 AM
11

Just a question I have if you are comfortable with it: when you say unsure - What way do you feel like towards your assigned sex? Do you feel the same negative feelings towards your body, genitals etc. as trans(wo)men? Or is it different? And what would you imagine it to be like if one was sure? Hope you can help me out :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 11:23 AM
4

Knowledge of preincarceration experiences of abuse among youth in the juvenile justice system continues to grow, however we know very little about their experience of abuse during incarceration. Empirical evidence on abuse during incarceration is needed for policymakers to advocate on behalf of the safety of incarcerated youth. This preliminary study evaluated the prevalence of abuse during incarceration in secure juvenile facilities and examined how abuse during incarceration is associated with…
/r/Male_Studies25/05/21 09:30 PM
35

Don't address the empathy gap, don't address misandry and hatred against men, address violence by men against women more than the vast majority of violence - violence by men against men simply for not being women... They appear to have no idea about men, but it is easy to exploit male victims as they have no choice. They can't back someone who actuall cares because there is nobody. This is a feminist side-quest to diffuse the narrative about feminist misandry in a way those who have no idea abou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/21 08:41 PM
5

Women and Children first, right? That's all well and good. No, it's not.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 08:18 PM
9

a) Upholding this opinion inckuding the cases of rape she pointed out would need her to advocate for completely banning abortion, save haven and adoption laws including in rape cases. b) When you made the decision to have sex knowing that she could get pregnant is when you could have opted out Once again, would only be consistent if you said the same about abortion, save haven laws and adoption, but: knowing she could get pregnant . Even if she lied about birth control and infertility Did she re…
/r/MensRights25/05/21 08:04 PM
2

Yeah, I'd say so.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:56 PM
2

I got called out for essentially editing comments People who complain about edits have no interest in finding a common ground or building more accurate opinions. Whoever believes a more accurate comment to be an attack on them just because their tirade of insults, which was never warranted, now seems even less rational should not engage in debates in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:10 PM
2

A lot of guys make fun of uncircumcised males. Irrelevant in prevalence. Men have different issues, mainly bullying of penis size, erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. They are denied mental health treatments for it. I have barely ever heard anyone tell men with foreskin to just kill themselves or that foreskin is the root of the holocaust - the same was told to laughing and cheering audiences about small dicks on netflix and TV though. As long as nobody cares about that even when it …
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:57 PM
2

They can't dismiss the legitimacy of a movement (MRA) without reading a single of their sources and apparently being more ignorant to reality than should be in their best interest.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:47 PM
2

Don't worry about their jobs. They'll just be tortured to death: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8673621/Innocent-trucker-raped-metal-pipe-vigilante-parents.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2259064/Luke-Harwood-death-Woman-led-vigilante-gang-tortured-killed-teen-accused-rape.html https://web.archive.org/web/20200403103637/https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2398405/parents-chile-tortured-13-year-old-boy-wrongly-raped-daughter/ http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/girls-rapist-invited-to-din…
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:38 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lrm69c/made_to_penetrate_excludes_male_victims_of_rape/ I really need to make that post on the additional issues of that mess of a "definition".
/r/MensRights24/05/21 08:13 PM
3

The issue is people believing it would be black and white one-sided and claiming male objectification to not exist whilst the difference may lay more in how they perceive the same performance / text etc. based on who performs it. https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2013/sep/03/music-videos-addicted-misogyny-sex This is not true for everyone, as shown in the article, but all too often this is not just presented as fine, but outright empowering.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/21 11:12 AM
1

Make sure to look at your countries laws first though. If you are in a country where you have to give your full name and address on your channel or stuff like that and someone reports you to the authoritie, you might be in trouble depending on your country. Stay safe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/21 06:43 AM
166

I would have suspected AHS would have digged into some age old thread to find anything. The fact they found absolutely nothing even remotely problematic is a huge win.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/21 06:37 AM
13

I'm tired of people calling misandry "toxic masculinity" but misogyny misogyny.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 05:36 PM
2

which was interesting, because it indicated to me that they don't actually believe the dictionary definition is what makes someone a feminist I'd argue it's usually that they do not consider differing views to be compatible with wanting equality. They are convinced to be fully educated on issue X and anyone who even wants to argue that is an uneducated misogynist. They believe that feminists want equality - which might be why their only source on what is needed to achieve that and which issues e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/21 05:38 PM
2

Individual situations vary a lot and maybe that person has found a place where that is the case. Then again, it was posted on twitter. First of all, strength is probably something close to a normal distribution - at least not constant and people know that, otherwise weight classes would not even exist and doping (steroids etc.) would be legal. Assuming women to be weaker on average would not logically explain why one willingly ignores the huge overlapp as well as things like weapons, drugs etc. …
/r/EverydayMisandry22/05/21 12:07 PM
6

The stepdaughter is the wife's daughter with her ex.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 06:49 AM
3

Apparently that statistic - worth so much to make a post about it - was not worth a source. One look at this sub will give you countless cases of women getting sentences well below 16 years - and not just in the us. The claim is therefore already untrue.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 05:57 PM
4

The source on this issue really doesn't even change much. Considering that false allegations in terms of research means only those brought to court and only those proven to be wrong, you can only compare that number to real allegations brought to courts and resulting in a conviction, i.e. proven true. Everything else is inconclusive. Even the lowest rates reported for proven false reports are quite substantial compared to proven true reports. The vast majority is inconclusive.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 11:20 PM
2

I guess it was the name of the sub, the link or if you quoted some of their extreme stuff that might've filtered you.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 08:27 PM
4

Read the worst stuff from it: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/iryats/comment/g53xp9k Or read it in full: https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-54117562
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/21 04:48 PM
17

We have no idea how it went, but when it comes to calling the police, it is men who are both more hesitant to call and more likely to be arrested after asking for help, signs of DV are less likely to be seen on them and they are rarely brought into an environment to open up. Heck, the BBC had a whole story about a team gaslighting a man into the perpetrator after seeing with their own eyes that it was him who was "beaten into a pulp" and nobody gave a shit. It is frustrating to see how empatheti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/21 05:37 AM
5

You going there and harassing anyone will just verify what they think about us. If you care about misandry, do not engage in any behaviour that makes people even more ignorant and dismissive towards us.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/21 07:36 PM
3

If you know the guy, you know this is about him and that should be more than enough. There is a lot of info between the lines aswell. Especially when working with vulnerable people, one has to know better than that. Him or anyone who slightly knows him seeing that post will be a severe risk to both him and others and will make matter much worse.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 03:49 PM
3

What needs to be countered? If they don't feel that there is equality in how the work is distributed in their relationship and are unable to agree on thag, they are free to just go and I'd argue that people should think about this before having children. Of course you might say that men could lie and misrepresent their behaviour for years to trick women into having children and then have her do the work... No idea. In the end, I agree with having both parties involved. Both can and should cook (…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/21 11:53 PM
8

Homophobia against men may be connected to internalized misandry and an overall hostility towards male freedom and nonconformity to misandristic expectations. Bias-motivated aggression is an ongoing problem in the United States, and data show that men comprise the majority of both perpetrators and victims of these types of offenses. Although gay men appear to be at particular risk for victimization, theory suggests that aggression of this type may be understood as a way to preserve exclusive mas…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/21 10:35 PM
16

How fast "I studied theology and public administration" becomes "I specifically studied gender-based trauma and got two relevant master's degrees FrOm HaRVaRd." When you don't have a single source but the name of your university to back anything up is quite interesting.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 07:59 PM
1

What is actually frustrating is that this exact statement is how you would be seen. Presenting those claiming to be victims of oppression to be unable to form an unbiased opinion as well as unable to defend their opinion as they are considered unable to determine if their opinion is biased and presenting yourself as the authority to decide on that... sounds quite oppressive. Last time I checked, feminist students orgs weren't canceled, gender studies was a recognized field, feminist peer-reviewe…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:49 PM
5

Humans need meat to survive Most vegans are quite alive. All neccessary nutrients are obtainable in different ways in a vegan fashion. to keep their muscles and testosterone counts up Rice and Pea protein. Where I will agree, is that it is filled with misandrists. That does not outweigh the consequences of not being vegan though, as that is not about supporting the misandrists rather than the animals.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 08:19 AM
6

Here is my take. Keep in mind that it is opinionated and I am aware of that - I just didn't mention it in every other sentence. Also keep in mind that I address many points made around the topic of porn and not just by you. There is a difference between helping those who have issues and spreading misinformation. Nobody claims you can't get addicted to porn - just like anything else that releases dopamine, like sex, games, working out or food. Pretty much everything that is fun to us. It is norma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/21 04:55 PM
12

Not only has it been shown time and time again that especially in moral judgements, both men and women are biased towards women - it is also much more effective to stack papers showing the same misandry again and again than newspaper articles, even though both are valid in different contexts. Discrimination against men is discrimination against men, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 02:15 PM
1

Or am I overlooking something, I didn’t look at the links super closely so I’m could have missed things Suicide intent has been studied a lot and shown that not all attempts are created equal. The idea that differences in suicides could simply be explained by methods alone is outdated and incompatible with research. Men suffer significantly more serious suicide attempts - even in drug overdoses alone. Suicide intent data from 5212 participants was included in the analysis. A significant associat…
/r/MensRights13/05/21 03:36 PM
2

On the article: They claim an accusation against feminism to be a strawman based on what they determine feminists to actually say. How was that determined? Where does that info come from? Source: trust me bro. I do not even have to disagree to point that out. Then again, there are de facto feminists who do and those who don't make that claim, making it more of an issue of generalizations rather than a strawman per se, unless of course every feminist engaging in that logic would be denied their f…
/r/MensRights11/05/21 05:40 PM
19

Suicide intent has been studied a lot and shown that not all attempts are created equal. The idea that differences in suicides could simply be explained by methods is outdated and incompatible with reasearch. Men suffer significantly more serious suicide attempts. Suicide intent data from 5212 participants was included in the analysis. A significant association between suicide intent and gender was found, where ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA) were rated significantly more frequently in males th…
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:03 AM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/21 10:43 AM
3

obviously this happens to both men and women. in my own experience, i’ve only ever been made uncomfortable by men. My suggestion would be to try and seperate the gender of perpetration from victimization. In this case, you seemed to somehow semi mix them up. Men victimizing men can be, and in many cases is misandristic in nature and just as gendered - even though in cases of sexual violence, women are the sole perps in about 70-80% of cases against men.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 11:52 PM
2

Thanks for coming here. There are many toxic people on reddit without any intention to find a common ground. Even just disagreeing without having to resort to personal attacks is too much to ask for many. Well, and there is a certain amount of trolls here as well - certain users from certain misandristic subs openly post about how much they love to troll around here, including attacks on users like you and even emotionally vulnerable men (depression, suicidiality) in an attempt to push them towa…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 11:43 PM
2

I do not believe they meant to blame it on one party, yet there is clear discrimination in that topic. First though, the mistake the others here made at the beginning was to generalize in a way that could be considered dismissive if you do not fit the results of scientific studies. Then again, your anecdotal evidence does not change the reality of society as a whole. Women and men as groups are not treated equally when it comes to this, but averages should not be used to address individuals, as …
/r/MensRights10/05/21 01:51 PM
28

This is my primary criticism of the sexual revolution. It evidently didn't teach women that they don't have to prostitute themselves under equality, but rather, merely how to be the most efficient one possible, getting more resources out of the transaction, all while feeling somehow "empowered" in doing so. You neglect that it is not a transaction. Your friend might have better chances / gain the possibility of getting laid if he displays his money, but he spends his money either way. Men being …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/21 10:28 AM
10

I'm gonna say it: does it actually matter? Of course I know some who voice their gendercidal tendencies about getting rid of men. But like... do we need an argument against that? Will they become capable of feeling empathetic towards men once a man tells them that men are needed? Are those actually arguments where our time and effort are well spent? I feel a much more compelling approach would be that claiming men not to be needed unless evidence is provided is a manifestation of men's perceived…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/21 09:21 PM
0

You completely lost me at “we should invent a new law that fucks people for Infidelity by redefining it as a kind of rape.” Not what I said nor what I meant, let alone any kind of redefinition needed. The question is if a redefinition would be needed for it to not count as rape and until now, I'm still searching for and hoping for someone to come up with an argument for that. and then you retreat to this argument about STDs as if that’s what at stake Again and again and again I mentioned that th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/21 06:39 AM
6

I still believe it would be better if every time someone mentions "made to penetrate" one would include a specific acknowledgement of those who are excluded from it as to not create misunderstandings or inhibit progress for them: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lrm69c/made_to_penetrate_excludes_male_victims_of_rape/ On top of that, this is a survey based on self reports, which might fall victim to the significant differences in usage of denial as a coping method and their…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/21 07:39 PM
10

The article by the petitioning organization can be found here: https://www.womensaid.org.uk/international-womens-day-womens-aid-launches-petition-to-require-local-authorities-to-fund-womens-domestic-abuse-services/ Farah Nazeer, chief executive of Women’s Aid, said “Today, we are launching an emergency petition to the government, because we are seeing established women-led domestic abuse services lose local authority funding. This has to be stopped before it leads to more women and children dyin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/21 05:49 PM
1

If you are going to compare it to drunk driving you better have some extraordinary numbers, because it’s an absurd comparison. My quote You can engage in drunk driving without harming anyone as well, but it is not on a third party to decide who is to play russian roulette with STDs today. Good thing I didn't compare that then. Drunk driving endangers others in uncontrolable ways - not even controlable by the perpetrator - that's where the overlap lays and ends. Then again, the second part of the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/21 01:21 PM
1

Suicide intent data from 5212 participants was included in the analysis. A significant association between suicide intent and gender was found, where ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA) were rated significantly more frequently in males than females (p < .001). There was a statistically significant gender difference in intent and age groups (p < .001) and between countries (p < .001). Furthermore, within the most utilised method, intentional drug overdose, ‘Serious Suicide Attempt’ (SSA) was rated s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/21 05:38 AM
1

Where is making fun of it?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 08:33 PM
1

Forget about the consent argument for a second, let me ask you, what exactly do you imagine you will achieve with this? Who do you imagine you will be empowering and or protecting? Again, if it was after me, a lot of what is currently called rape would not be called rape as neither the perpetrators nor the victims are properly addressed with that term and the consequences that come with it (including reluctance to allow themselves that term as it may feel too strong for their experiennces). Then…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 06:34 PM
1

That is not how rape is legally defined, nor how it is enforced. I am searching for the answer to this: How can one consent to an elevated STD-risk one is made to believe to not exist but not an elevated pregnancy risk one is made to believe to not exist? It is not about what is more severe, that would be reflected in the sentencing, it is about the rationale behind the absence of consent based on unsufficient information to accurately assess the risk associated with the act.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 05:22 PM
0

How can one consent to an elevated STD-risk one is made to believe to not exist but not an elevated pregnancy risk one is made to believe to not exist? It is not about what is more severe, that would be reflected in the sentencing, it is about the rationale behind the absence of consent based on unsufficient information to accurately assess the risk associated with the act. That being said, I do not agree with the lack of nuance and differentiation in the usage of the term rape either - both in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 04:50 PM
1

It does not surprise me that this thread would be too uncomfortable for some as many might themselves be affected, but I hoped some would be able to understand that they vote on the discussion, not the current enforcement of the law. However, I still lack arguments as to how the essence of the proposed argument is wrong, i.e. accepting that stealthing is currently considered and charged as rape and accepting that the severity of the case is currently not reflected in the term rape (which might h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 04:12 PM
3

Thanks for giving an argument. I do not agree with the lack of nuance and differentiation in the usage of the term rape either - both in statutory and non-statutory cases, which show an enormous complexity and varience. That being said, I feel its enforcement to be inconsistent in many ways, including gender and what does or does not negate consent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 03:43 PM
2

Of course it is. Still disturbing.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 12:24 PM
2

Lying about your std-relevant behaviour to a partner in order to trick him into sex inherently negates his consent. In this case, this std-relevant behaviour was actively made even more risky to the victim by the wife's refusal to use protection in form of proper usage female or male condoms (which would still be a relevant risk and negate consent of the husband), therefore raising questions regarding an intent to harm the husbands life, who - unlike her - has no idea of his need to get tested a…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:26 AM
9

Actually, I kind of agree. There is a fine line between taking down radicalizing imagery and silencing real issues. In cases of mensrights, these issues are largely denied to even exist, which is why I am not too much of a fan of them being taken down without a proper societal acknowledgement of their hateful contents.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:03 AM
5

By using the "/" when mentioning a subreddit, it get's automatically linked. Mods of that sub might then be notified that you did that, as with every link to their sub. By replacing the "/" behind the "r" with any sign like "-" you can prevent it from getting linked and they won't be notified.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 08:16 AM
3

They get notified when you link it. Use r-againsthatesubreddits to mention other subs.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 07:51 AM
1

Thank you for your answer! Let me clarify: I was actually referring to this: when in reality the only time you'd be imprisoned would be if you literally said "we need to kill all the transgenders!". Which is true for Section 318, but untrue in the context of 319. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 07:01 PM
1

Considering that statement, I doubt anyone would need to invalidly use your preferences to point out the discriminatory nature of views like that. How about you accept transwomen and just go about your day as you do with every other woman you would never ever date?
/r/MensRights04/05/21 08:50 AM
0

That's like saying therapy for Body Integrity Disorder is to cut off your limb, or paralyze yourself. It can be and is discussed in medical literature. Once again, case by case basis and risk-reward analysis. One might outright call it unethical, that's a separate question. That being said, not all transsexuals have their primary gentials cut off and one might argue that the ethical considerations of silicone boobs and HRT are different from amputations. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20133399/…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 03:02 PM
2

And much of “trans-activism” seems to be about compelling people to affirm these people are what they decide they are. Would there be any downside in you treating them as "what they decide they are"? The pronoun stuff is particularly egregious as you never address a person by such a pronoun: that’s always something you do in third person when the subject is usually not there! If we just talk about them asking you to do it, there should be little reason for you not to. It takes nothing away from …
/r/MensRights03/05/21 02:42 PM
1

Regardless of it being good or bad, Section 319 of the criminal code reads: Public incitement of hatred 319 (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction. Marginal note:Wilful promotion of hatred (2) Every one w…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 10:07 AM
-1

Furthermore, gender dysphoria is a mental disorder. If therapy can resolve this mental disorder, that's the best way 100% of the time. Transition is only the option when therapy cannot treat the mental disorder, and is the only option left. Transition is therapy (aswell). Not the only way, and as with any treatment, a risk-reward analysis has to be made on a case by case basis. Disorder is a double-edged sword unfortunately. Looking at adhd for example, we clearly see how its serious effects are…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 09:49 AM
2

I do not have it in a way that would be easily presentable. That being said, here are a few interesting topics: https://www.reddit.com/r/ReportMaleHateSubs/comments/j9gf7m/sourced_summarynsfw_girls_purposefully_beating/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/ https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lrm69c/made_to_penetrate_excludes_male_victims_of_rape/ And many papers: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mrt0pl/comment/…
/r/MensRights28/04/21 04:42 PM
1

The red x's are supposed to be the testicles, I guess.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 04:16 PM
50

Steve Harvey has said things on a whole different level, but I am not too surprised that that wasn't seen as too controversial. He bought the "Hitler had a micropenis" hoax* and went on prime time TV to tell a cheering audience how he believes the root of the holocaust to have been Hitlers lacking penis size... Not the worst statement on this topic on TV (unlike others, he did not ask anyone to kill themselves for good), but the bar is about as high as it can get, so that does not say much. *The…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/21 10:06 PM
1

Many will misunderstand the title as if you were complaining about this. I'd probably suggest to delete it in order to prevent others from spreading misrepresentations of your intentions.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 05:39 PM
12

Thank you very much for coming here. If you want to know more about why there is a backlash against the term feminist here, see this: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/ Be aware that the loose moderation here does allow for the inevitabke abuse of some to spread hate in whatever way the believe us to be vulnerable. We all face this and you should not take it to heart :). can only be applied to specific circumstances when men put down othe…
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:09 AM
5

I am happy to inform you that women are not legally forced to be property in the US or Europe. Have a great day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/21 10:48 PM
2

One of your links is broken. Here is an alternative: https://www.victimsupport.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/documents/files/VS%20Insight%20Report%20-%20An%20easy%20target.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/21 11:47 AM
9

which found that annually men report being forced to penetrate at comparable rates to women being forcibly penetrated. Not quite, an actual "made to penetrate" statistic in line with rape definitions wasn't collected. Rape includes women being penetrated by anything (including other body parts,objects...), made to penetrate does not include the penetration or (partial, no matter how slight) envelopement of the male genitalia by anything but the vagina, anus or mouth. Therefore, you'd need to add…
/r/MensRights21/04/21 10:53 AM
30

"We care about male victims" Proceeds to not acknowledge their existence in line with statistics and reality and spreads further misinformation instead. women make up the vast majority of victims The statistics illustrate that when women are the victims of partner abuse, the majority of the perpetrators are men; however, we agree that the use of the word ‘vast’ is not an appropriate description of how large the majority actually is. We also agree that the use of the word ‘vast’ in second paragra…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/21 01:22 PM
2

Comment 2/2 Interestingly, MHP (Mental Health Professionals) also gave lower psychopathology factors to female subjects in most of the paraphilic vignettes (exhibitionism: F1,510 = 35.95, p < 0.001, frotteurism: F1,516 = 7.34, p = 0.007, sexual sadism: F1,513 = 17.46, p < 0.001, and pedophilia: F1,523 = 26.50, p < 0.001, Fig. 2A).[...] in the exhibitionistic (χ²(3) = 62.20, p < 0.001), frotteuristic (χ²(3) = 34.14, p < 0.001), sexual sadistic (χ²(3) = 21.03, p < 0.001) and pedophilic (χ²(3) = 47…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:54 AM
3

Of course. Theres quite a lot, but here are some samples: Women are nearly five times more likely to show an automatic preference for their own gender than men are to show such favoritism for their own gender, according to a study in the October issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 87, No. 4). Through four experiments, psychologists Laurie A. Rudman, PhD, of Rutgers, and Stephanie A. Goodwin, PhD, of Purdue University, used the Implicit Association Test to discover 204…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:54 AM
15

At the end of the day it's not harmful if done properly so whats the issue with it. Calmly proceeds to cut off parts of the children's body.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 11:47 PM
19

Meh, there is quite a variety of people on here displaying all kinds of views. Unlike other subreddits, anyone is free to join and discuss their issues here, as well as to incite a less constructive environment by abusing the lose moderation. I'd probably agree that on average internalized misandry gains more support here than misogyny does in terms of upvotes, yet it does absolutely exist. That being said, as has been rightfully pointed out over there, the 99% stat is so far from the truth that…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 10:44 PM
4

By "men beating each other up", she didn't mean men getting attacked by other men, but the stereotype of men mutually getting angry at each other and starting to beat each other up. Of course. These people are known for their extensive pre-negotiations to ensure consent, use of safewords etc., their immunity towards social pressure and shaming and to get included in statistics because they want the police to know about their fightclubs as it surely won't get them in trouble as well. /s I notice …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/21 11:47 PM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20200915161103/https://www.imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360 (multiple slides with links to sources underneath them)
/r/MensRights12/04/21 08:05 PM
8

I believe anything that includes "real man", "true man" or whatever else you want to call it implies that men would have the obligation to adhere to a set of rules for their existence to be deemed valid, which is a misandristic idea. However well intended all those "real men show emotions" posts may be, imo they miss the point by a long shot and are not helpful. The whole idea of any set of rules for what a "real" or "true" man is has to be dismissed. There is no reason for me to gatekeep that t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/21 06:36 AM
7

Replace patriarchy with misandry and toxic ideals of masculinity with internalized misandry and I'd agree with the posts apart from the inaccurate statements like the one on suicide which is completely ignoring the research on suicide intent. The text would lose exactly nothing to these replacements apart from the desperate attempt to avoid the acknowledgement of the existence of misandry. There is nothing in this post that even on anything but misandry to exist - including the highly violent an…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 06:19 AM
1

Meh. This is not really inclusive and we should be more careful with stuff like this. This is spreading everywhere by people who do not look up what made to penetrate does not include compared to rape and may therefore inhibit these excluded victims getting the same recognition as people will already feel like they did enough to fill up their karma again once mtp might get recognized. I do not believe that rape on its own is a term that is even remotely able to represent the complexity and nuanc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/21 01:43 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/MensRights04/04/21 12:00 PM
3

If it means anything: I am sorry :( You might as well want to post it in r/LeftwingMaleAdvocates - posts like these usually get a bit more exposure there as it is not already flooded with news articles.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 06:30 PM
6

Looking at the comments should give you a hint that this is not just an issue of women, but actually of society as a whole. A good, at least considerable, amount there are men, further spreading the lies of their internalized misandry and putting men at risk in the process. The misandristic women are just as real, no doubt, yet the perpetration is not dependent enough on the perps gender to call it "society and women", which might be easy to misinterpret by lurkers etc. Actually, there has been …
/r/MensRights30/03/21 07:39 PM
6

And some papers on and around the matter: It is interesting that less than one fifth (16%) of the men with documented cases of sexual abuse considered their early experiences to have been sexual abuse, compared with 64% of the sexually abused women (Table 3). https://www.jimhopper.com/pdf/widom1997.pdf This is particularly important as men are much less likely than women to spontaneously disclose abuse. Men who are raped or sexually abused do not often come to the attention of healthcare profess…
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:56 AM
5

This will be two Comments: Definitely lack the time to go into this. Take this with a grain of salt. This is an incredibly complex topic. But a few things (I mention some sources later on) are: Men are not awarded bodily autonomy nor safety and internalized misandry makes them consider suffering part of being a man and complaints are seen as a failure to meet the requirements for the misandristic award we created called "real men", which (the failure) will be socially sanctioned with bullying an…
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:55 AM
2

You should also adress the mentioned stats, which are on the gender of the perpetrators, not on prevalence. First of all: Rape in this context only talks about passive penetration. Made to penetrate (unlike the passive penetration of rape) only talks about penetrating genitalia (not other body parts or objects) and the rest is thrown into unwanted sexual contact, which therefore becomes an inconclusive stat when compared to women aswell. Comparisons between men and women are basically impossible…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/21 07:09 PM
37

I'm probably gonna get shit on for this but i don't agree with the existence of the mra. To me that implies that men were at one point lacking rights and that simply isn't true at all. https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/metlth/comment/gsjocyw Yo what. Overall the answers are much worse than I expected, damn. Almost trying to one up themselves in their display of the empathy bias. Like: Not a lack of empathy exactly, but when someone says “men get raped too”. Yes and that’s awful and it sh…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 03:16 AM
5

The snowballing on reddit is huge, leading to the fact that the by far best posts end up far away from the top.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/21 03:02 AM
3

Sorry if anyone brigaded you. And you actually believe it was the 35 people that engaged with this post? Believe they are having any noticeable effect on a post with 16k+ upvotes? Keep on searching I guess, cause this ain't it, sorry.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 05:03 PM
2

The first paragraph is mainly valid criticism as these kinds of posts do exist, yet the second is a generalization we should absolutely stay away from. It is not constructive, nor true.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 04:55 PM
2

Absolutely, yet the suggestion was that it is actually his internalized misandry that makes him accept this instead of leaving for good. Calling him "omega" is in itself claiming a hirarchy among men that is very much based in internalized misandry and treats certain men as inferior based on their traits, behaviours, opinions etc. It not only completely misses the goal of equality, but in this case also blames men for the possible effects of socialization of many among them or any of the ither r…
/r/MensRights27/03/21 07:15 PM
1

And vegans would not be mad if we did not eat them, huh? /s
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:10 PM
1

but not really intentionally mean It comes across as: "We destroy the world, that's bad.... but now imagine there would be more men with small dicks!? Better come to the protest." Yeah... if you portray a group as less apppealing to society than destroying planet earth based on their genes and inevitably cause your 4 million followers to harrass that group... that's crossing the line of "mean" quite a bit. That's closer to hateful.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:06 PM
1

Although it’s not a matter of life and death https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:02 PM
2

Of course these tests are usually not accurate at all. Yet, even if they were, mindsets that include things like "my brain is horrible" inhibit change. This is true for everyday people as well as highly criminal individuals. Telling people they are inherently bad is a self-fullfilling prophecy. And we know it is not true. The vast majority of people suffer from the emapthy bias towards women. They are more empathetic to female victims, more willing to prevent their victimization and less resentf…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/21 06:26 PM
4

yup, it's satire
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:07 PM
1

Please give a source to that qoute.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 12:27 PM
15

we agree that he should have a vasectomy You apparently do not. Only, he won’t do it. Great, decision made then, I guess. But my body has been cut in half 3 times! I’m DONE being the only one to have to control pregnancy. Both female and male condoms exist. I don’t need to make excuses anyways, he needs to give a shit about me and get the vasectomy. If anything, needs to file for divorce as he's apparently married to someone who does not respect a man's bodily autonomy. Considering how often men…
/r/MensRights25/03/21 11:16 AM
59

That's called revenge porn. People are somehow able to comprehend that when a man leaks nudes of a woman who did bad things to him, who might have lied about the circumstances that led to him ever consenting to it, yet if a man fucked up it seems hard to get how that does not give you the right to send the resulting nudes around either. I never got why people send those pics, nor why people glorify completely irrational reactions when it comes to this.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 11:34 AM
13

The Federal Statistical Office apparently begs to differ, looking at first year students by sex and subject: Psychology 23.1% male Medicine 35.25% male Law 38.12% male Biology 30.82% male Nutritional Science 13.26% male Financial Administration 36.84% male Health Education 18.49% male Health Science 28.19% male Journalism 24.95% male Food Chemistry 26.72% male Media Science 27.97% male Pharmacy 29.8% male Administration of Justice 20.57% male Applied Social Science 20.1% male Dentistry 32.63% ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/21 02:32 AM
3

Hey, thanks for visiting! Yeah, generally nobody here is censored/banned unless it risks the existence of the sub in order to generate a proper environment fir debate, yet it is inevitably abused by some to be insulting. Therefore, people here will have very different opinions on the same issue and some have a rough way of phrasing it. Do not take it to heart. Also see this post on the feminism issue: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/MensRights24/03/21 12:16 AM
2

You mean the way that 84% of men with a documented history of sexual abuse consider their experiences not to have been abuse? The percentage of women considering their experiences sexual abuse, 64%, was 4 times higher than that of men, being 16% It is interesting that less than one fifth (16%) of the men with documented cases of sexual abuse considered their early experiences to have been sexual abuse, compared with 64% of the sexually abused women (Table 3). https://www.jimhopper.com/pdf/widom1…
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:18 PM
7

See, it's equality. Wheter it's a man or a woman crying, it's always the same reaction. /s
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:00 PM
9

I guess it was more about the fact that sayin KAM one day, because funny, and then claiming to help men with their issues the other seems rather pointless. Those who defend KAM and still claim to help men apparently seem to believe KAM could be part of that (like part of a movement bringing positive change to men, if you know what I mean), I guess. Not sure though.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 04:58 PM
7

Yeah, it's to point out that we bully men with that condition to the point that they would feel so inadequate that they would do anything not to be seen as a failure. And then, when the consequences of our tormenting show, we are like: "We know what made you this way. Now we shame you for our bullying". Talk about beating someone up and then shaming him for bleeding.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/21 11:36 AM
7

It does translate into the adult world and the adult world modulates the bullying in the high school world. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/21 11:33 AM
2

Many other countries go the "he's gotta compensate for something" route, which is said in relation to similar behaviour.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/21 11:30 AM
1

Relevant: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/21 11:24 AM
8

Same to the comments. That being said, what is interesting is how "she ignored my no but it's fine" is just accepted. In the cases where women said this, I usually immediately see people calling the men predatory rapists who are an eternal danger to society and the woman's "it's fine" is called internalized misogyny and trauma coping by denial. Another thing I see is the high prevalence of negative experiences regarding "no" in addition to all the virgin/single male shaming and misandristic expe…
/r/MensRights21/03/21 11:44 AM
4

Why not just call the toxic aspects themselves out instead of using labels that inevitably drive any debate towards a discussion about the definition of that label instead of the underlying issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/21 04:35 AM
4

Misandrists if it is against men, Misogynists if it is against women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/21 04:32 AM
3

Thank you for your question. There are a few things to consider. To make sure we talk about the same thing, source in this context would simply mean a link to the screenshot content - preferably archived, or any other news source. Anything is better than a screenshot. a) Screenshots aren't sources. Rightclick - inspect element and have fun. Impossible to verify. But even paint will do if you put enough effort in. It should be irrelevant how plausible we think something is, giving sources is alwa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/21 12:35 AM
1

I think it would be best to give a source to this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/21 09:04 PM
5

They deserve to receive help in whatever made them this hateful. They deserve to become aware that what they do is harmful and destructive and that they might need help in getting there, which is okay. What they don't deserve, however, and I want to be very clear about that, is insults or violence. If anyone is willing to change for the better, I support them. I do not want revenge.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/21 08:24 PM
2

That is a kink novel afaik. Far from the scum manifesto. And Amazon lists stuff like this: https://www.amazon.com/Boys-Stupid-Throw-Rocks-Them/dp/0761135936 as well. I think not too many people would have an issue with a femdom fantasy novel. Then again, I don't know.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 06:13 AM
1

Without posts like that, any statements regarding misandry on reddit will be seen as just as illegitimate as they are now. There is exactly zero reason for the admins to do anything about it and considering all dedicated subs are either abandoned or dead, there is no way for this to change without exposure. This is a prime example of taking rules ad absurdum until they are hurting your own cause.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/21 05:59 AM
1

Don't have the time to go in depth on this right now, but I saw that that askfeminism has censored your answer reading: "I think feminism should stop trying to frame all male issues as part of a a patriarchal feminist theory." - and censoring everything one does not agree with is definitely problematic - even though these subs obviously do not represent all of feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 09:48 PM
13

Do you still feel like changing side of the road, slowing your pace when walking behind and in general find ways to make a woman on the street feel safe? I stay away from people to keep myself safe, actually, and that didn't change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 10:15 AM
1

Afaik it's automatically restricting people who take part in certain subs.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 01:39 AM
2

Hm, what are you thinking about exactly? I have not yet seen much relevant contributions by any "theory" (unless you understand that term differently) other than dismissing reality in favor of anecdotal and cherry-picked history whenever reality once again doesn't fit your narrative. Oh and using labels to hide uncomfortable things like misandry in a way that suddenly includes misogyny (toxic masculinity) as well as re-defining terms or using terms that are defined differently than the average c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 01:15 AM
6

And please finally include all male victims in situations equivalent to female victims: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lrm69c/made_to_penetrate_excludes_male_victims_of_rape/
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:52 AM
1

This will be seen or framed as an attack on female victims due to the name. Try to choose a name that's disconnected from other movements.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:49 AM
2

Thank you very much for you experiences. As you rightfully pointed out in another comment, the experiences of people differ and invalidating other peoples experiences just based on that anecdotal evidence won't really lead anywhere. While that could've been a valid comment, you for some reason decided to do the same here, which makes you appear a bit inconsistent. Let me explain: You stated this: Labeling everyone who experiences shit that goes agianst your own internal programming and preconcei…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:34 AM
7

Oh, that's why we only call the things she pointed out "hate speech" and "hate crimes" when they target women.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:11 AM
41

Undersexualized? Did you ever watch tv, a movie, comedy programs, commercials, listened to music, podcasts or questioned why mental health crisis teams send suicidal patients away if they are reasonably sure that their episode is connected to dick size?... Body bags have been opened by a woman to show her girlfriends a dead person's unusually large dick. A men's value across media - besides money - is dick size, sexual stamina and erectile function combined with overall looks. Setting the standa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/21 02:24 AM
2

Collect content and report it to the admins. Report back that content and the admin's answers to a subreddit. Unfortunately, there is a ridiculous bias in reddit's moderation at times (sometimes they are reasonable). That being said, pointing that out does not need reactionary subreddits. There is enough stuff you can report on a dedicated sub like r/everydaymisandry. Doing so is one of my projects, but I lack time and can't give any more information on it. Fighting fire with fire is not going t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/21 09:34 PM
1

Unfortunately, the feminist subs ban everyone who advocates for men. The only thing they approve of is the feminist subs that refuse to acknowledge men's issues as not just a part of a double edged sword and therefore compensated by the "privilege" that backfires and in the end subconsciously lowers the priority your intuition assigns to the problem at hand. As for this statement: I consider myself a feminist as I genuinely care about social issues of human beings regardless of gender. I applaud…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/21 08:56 PM
6

Crazy how she asks if "that's a reason to break up" as though he'd need prior approval. It is a reason if he feels like it is and same goes for women.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 08:28 PM
4

Hollywood has fucked up peoples perception of how vulnerable humans are. People have killed others by pushing them. Just need to be unlucky and you crack your skull open on impact. "Stab him, but don't kill him - stab the hand or something" is a symptom of that... But of course, we all know those unrealistic 30 min. hollywood fights predominantly among male characters that would've killed any real human at least 25 times.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 09:36 AM
2

Quite common, you grow numb to it. As a man, just isolate forever, I guess. There seems to be little incentive for both men and women to keep you safe... or not assault you. Anyway, extremely telling that she was aware that a snapchat message by her was literally enough to have him killed and felt the need to specifically address that.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 09:27 AM
3

I don't see how that comparison would make sense or change anything. That being said, to my knowledge there is nothing in terms of breast/butt size body shaming that comes even remotely close to all the things outlined here (and there is much more on this level): https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/ I also believe people are significantly underestimating the prevalence of this, even amongst themselves and their environment. I call out all bod…
/r/MensRights06/03/21 11:04 PM
2

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
/r/MensRights06/03/21 05:15 PM
2

Just to be very clear, as pointed out in the comment Iinked at the end, the victims I mention here are not included in the purely statistical FBI def. and there was never any debate about that, as can be seen in the definition. I know the articles about someone claiming to have received a mail by a third one (without any evidence), though that debate was about including made to penetrate and completely ignored the existence of the mentioned problem. There are more issues with reporting than just…
/r/MensRights06/03/21 04:53 PM
3

Put the least known statistics at the beginning and stuff like suicide rates at the end to not give it away too soon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/21 04:05 AM
2

If they would mind their own business, I'd mind my own. But unfortunately they can't decide at all on what feminism is and accuse each other of not being feminists. Some say you can only be misogynist or feminist and others say that me attempting to "abuse the feminist movement for my own advantage" would be misogynist and robs them of their movement. It is really frustrating because none of the two get the issue at all, as to them, the others aren't real and therefore should not influence my de…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/21 03:52 AM
1

Be VERY careful with that. There are people walking around on reddit including subs like this who are just throwing around random terms thinking they are aristoteles himself. Meanwhile they themselves attempt to allow themself said arguments (the issue here being their claims they would be valid) and come in with a comment that could itself serve as a prime example of someone who deliberately tried to include every fallacy, be it poisoning the well as they come in with the "he wrote on another p…
/r/MensRights06/03/21 03:42 AM
4

Thank you for coming here. A few notes on things I noticed: The women who truly have been raped don't want anyone to know, I can say this from experience, the shame of it is a cross we bear alone because we feel filthy. So, these women out there decrying men are evil are a bunch of women who need there vaginas glued shut so they can quit using the pussy card. This appears to question the existence of accurate accusations, which is not constructive. What upsets me further, is I am raising my son …
/r/MensRights05/03/21 10:38 PM
1

There may be a difference in reading habits though, not only may boys appear to think of themselves as worse readers, but also enjoy and engage in it less. Finally, they may prefer reading in digital form and visit libraries less often. Therefore, I could see a difference in demand accounting for some of this. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812055966 ; https://journalissues.org/ijeprr/abstract/reading-habits-by-gender-in-new-students-entering-the-psychology-department…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/21 10:04 PM
3

Here is their explanation as to why: "Rules reminder: Reply to the posted content. Any comment that does not clearly reply to something in the posted paper will be removed. You may see about 570 removed comment. None of them replied to the posted content. It needs to be obvious that your comment replies to the OP. Argue your position. We require arguments, not mere assertions and opinions. This is r/philosophy, not /r/politics Be polite. That's an obvious one, but out of the 570 comments before …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/21 12:02 PM
2

Men treat them like humans. Humans are pretty damn vulnerable, but internalized misandry begs to differ.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 01:34 AM
170

r/everydaymisandry
/r/MensRights03/03/21 09:00 PM
3

How would the rate of one gender amongst perpetrators relate to unfair treatment compared to a minority of perpetrators? These rates are irrelevant to the point. And don't kid yourself, some people are resentful revenge-seekers and care about perpetrators. Others are compassionate and empathetic and realize that men are the main victims of men. And the critical ones will ask why that is, soon finding the overwhelming support of the empathy gap across all types of social interactions, realizing i…
/r/MensRights03/03/21 08:12 PM
2

There not much to do at that point. That's just straight up ignorance, denial and lying. The dismissal of men's issues is so prevalent that they seem convinced they don't exist. They clearly just do not care about men at all, otherwise they would not ignore their suffering and spend their time assuring each other how non-existent it is. Not that this sub wouldn't have featured that as well, but they are the ones demanding me to assume them to fight for equality when they are clearly not and this…
/r/MensRights03/03/21 07:31 PM
6

You can click on blue text and it will open the pages. I stated multiple times that you have to look at all of my comments as I had to split it due to reddits character limits. Here is a link to easily see the whole thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lwd6sx/comment/gpiehjt
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/21 07:26 AM
5

He [Mr. Black] argues that victim's have less access to the law if they have lower status than their adversaries, i.e., “downward law” is greater than “upward law” (p. 21). If women have lower status than men, then men’s assaults on women should be less likely to be reported than assaults involving other gender combinations.[...] For example, Felson (1996) examined police notification using data from a violence survey collected in 1980 in Albany, NY.[...] In addition, violent disputes between me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/21 07:25 AM
5

Some sources: It is interesting that less than one fifth (16%) of the men with documented cases of sexual abuse considered their early experiences to have been sexual abuse, compared with 64% of the sexually abused women (Table 3). https://www.jimhopper.com/pdf/widom1997.pdf This is particularly important as men are much less likely than women to spontaneously disclose abuse. Men who are raped or sexually abused do not often come to the attention of healthcare professionals, decreasing the poten…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/21 07:17 AM
10

The first part of your comment is purely anecdotal and therefore not to be debated. The judge's statements were of no legal value and strongly critisized in the appeal. It is well known that people, including judges, are biased against men, attribute less guilt to female perpetrators and assume consent of male victims. Even male victims showing signs of substantial trauma regularily deny their victim status and do so significantly more often than women. I will answer to this comment with some li…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/21 07:15 AM
8

I see what you mean, but I think there is nothing wrong with asking about our stance, considering others have repeatedly resorted to asking third party subs about our opinions and didn't bother to ask us directly even when it was suggested to them. They repeatedly believe third party voices regarding our opinions and what our motivations are over ours. I think coming here to ask and make up their own mind is definitely better - that way they can base their judgements on accurate information inst…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/21 09:49 PM
17

FML, accidentally deleted my draft. Anyway: No need to take from others. There is no limited supply of empathy, fair trials, non-violent enforcement of the law etc. Only exception would be funding, of which we currently have about none, so I doubt we will even receive reasonable amounts during my lifespan. Even if, men are strongly suffering from internalized misandry aswell, being mainly violent towards and killing men for reasons they would rightfully not touch a woman, etc. And Of course I do…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/21 07:41 PM
2

I agree, but I will warn you that there are quite some people here who hold different opinions on stuff like this and what does or does not constitute a men's issue. Unfortunately, boys are never allowed to experience what bodily autonomy and being allowed to say "no" feels like, so I can see how some develop issues with this over time that result in their dismissal of others whishes regarding their bodies aswell - that's just something that came to mind, don't quote me on that. I think you woul…
/r/MensRights02/03/21 03:59 AM
13

I'd be highly embarrassed if I was her, to the point where I might want to reevaluate whether or not I can be a good partner ever. That is a destructive mindset and not reasonable in my opinion, regardless of gender. Just as in perpetrators of other crimes, the assumption of oneself as inherently evil and incapable of being good inhibits change. Change that is needed and definitely possible.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:19 PM
7

I said she didn't make it about gender and then went on to explain that there may be misandristic issues underlying the fact that she still felt the need to post it in twoX and the fact that men would not be met with that amount of positivity and even if, there would still be the negative subconscious implications due to how we generally view men. That being said, TwoX is not feminism, despite the overlap in content. It is a huge sub that was default at times. It is officially a sub for female p…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 07:45 PM
3

Did I miss something? Like, she didn't even make it about her gender or ask for a reward, did she? I mean, what's wrong with being happy about solving problems? Yes, men are expected to and it is seen as devaluing for them if they fail or complain, but that's an issue we rightfully call out. I do not think the way men are currently treated should be how anybody is treated regardless of gender and instead we should demand the same admiration and support from both women and fellow men. Stop holdin…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 06:36 PM
8

It depends on what you call masculinity. Internalized misandry is seen and accepted as part of "being a man" and based on that especially men who would be rated as traditionally masculine are usually hostile towards men who do not live up to society's misandristic ideas of what a "real men" should be and how horrible other men deserve to be treated. A girl going on joe rogan's podcast to talk about how she dumped her bf fighter for covering his face as he was knocked out and she could not stand …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/21 08:27 PM
9

I do think that not fitting the classical image of masculinity is a problem. Absolutely. Men show little empathy towards men and hold them up to a misandristic set of expectations in order to gain admission in the elite club men and women call "real men". Violence towards men, bullying of men, fighting men when you get the chance and winning are all encouraged attitudes, just like the violent protection of women using self-justice and calling it defense later - if the initial perpetrator was a m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/21 07:50 PM
3

and 99% of rapists are men. This is so astronomically wrong that I have to assume bad faith. I would like to understand, though, why do you enjoy to hurt men? What is it about invalidating victims that brings you pleasure or joy? There has to be a reason you try so hard to belittle and make fun of traumatized men and their often lifelong histories of ignorance, invalidation and people throwing them out of definitions just to make this very claim you just did. Why do you want to see men that you …
/r/MensRights27/02/21 01:24 AM
2

World history can't be necessary for that, though. You can use it to explain why a certain system is in place but you can't use it to prove that a certain system is in place. Until you have proven the thing you try to explain to be present today, it is just a hypothesis. A bit like the weather forecast - it can sound incredibly plausible, yet the only way to verify is to look out of the window and use real world parameters to determine our explanation's applicability to reality.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 01:10 AM
-1

Even if men may not use these specific terms all too often, they still do reinforce that sentiment. We actually do have examples of that in this very sub, you know that as well as I do oncefa.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 12:58 AM
3

Glad you came here, great to see you! So, first: No it is not men's access to guns: Serious suicide attempts occur significantly more frequently in men, including by overdose. A significant association between suicide intent and gender was found, where ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA) were rated significantly more frequently in males than females (p < .001). There was a statistically significant gender difference in intent and age groups (p < .001) and between countries (p < .001). Furthermore, …
/r/MensRights27/02/21 12:51 AM
2

It depends strongly. Men on average earn more than women. Many will then claim this to be a direct result of sexism, which is ridiculous. Some of the reasons do include men working more hours and in jobs that pay more, and if you believe any employer would pay their employees more just because it is a male dominated job (including the women in that job), better think again. No employer pays the women and men they employ any more than they have to to ensure work of proper quality by properly qual…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 01:54 PM
35

I do not see the argument here? I guess it is meant to mean that it can't be misandry if it's enforced by men, which is obviously wrong. Most violence against men would not take place if they were born with the protection of being seen as an innocent, valuable and vulnerable woman. This goes as far as men helping female strangers in the perpetration of crimes they literally torture men to death for if they are even accused, let alone convicted of it. The misandry in male on male violence is so b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/21 09:43 AM
8

I fail to see how this connects to my post. What you talk about is the FBI including "made to penetrate". Same for NIBRS. My post is about the fact that many male victims are not included in made to penetrate and the FBI definition is not ambiguous about that at all. It excludes them explicitly and there was never any uncertainty or debate about that. The thing that was uncertain and debatable was forced penetration of vagina, anus and mouth, which are just a portion of possible male victims. Bu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/21 03:53 AM
5

Serious suicide attempts occur significantly more frequently in men, including by overdose. A significant association between suicide intent and gender was found, where ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA) were rated significantly more frequently in males than females (p < .001). There was a statistically significant gender difference in intent and age groups (p < .001) and between countries (p < .001). Furthermore, within the most utilised method, intentional drug overdose, ‘Serious Suicide Attempt…
/r/MensRights24/02/21 07:25 PM
2

I do not have a solution to this issue and there might never be, but your statement appears to be contradicting itself. While I think men should be able to have a say in having/not having to be a parent, the law is completely backwards. Therefore, a woman is allowed to decide whether or not there is a baby to pay for and a man is not, regardless of it being a product of raping him, stealthing or whatever. The child is there if she wants it and it won't be there even if he'd want it. The choice o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/21 01:10 AM
3

Because I am talking about their misandry. For most cases of both misandry and misogyny, you could phrase a vice versa. Let's mostly ignore if I deem those valid for now. Men are violent towards men for not being considered innocent, valuable and vulnerable women, so misandry. ~ Men are comparatively less and rarely violent towards women for them being considered weak, so misogyny. Let's just lead it on for now: Women are considered weak and men are not, so misogyny. ~ We mainly call the normal …
/r/MensRights22/02/21 12:20 PM
3

Men are huge contributors via internalized misandry, no doubt. That being said, I'm not worried about crying, I'm worried about men killing me(n) for being men and lacking the protection of being women. Same for physical violence. I'm worried about them not helping me in these cases, them laughing me out of court and whatnot. I'd be happy if crying was the main thing being a man interfered with. That being said, I have strongly disagreed with this sub on these things before, but you are, in some…
/r/MensRights21/02/21 11:50 AM
1

You can't be "accused" of being a pedo. You can be diagnosed with pedophilia, but that needs more than a post history from some random reddit account. You can probably go to the library of your closest university and read up on it. Make up your own mind. You will not get a credible diagnosis here. Not over the internet, nor by reddit's hobby-psychologists.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 06:51 AM
3

I do not think that there is much of an argument to be made in favor of trp. Overall, the sub is pretty toxic, and so is the mgtow sub. Just my 2 cents.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/21 01:34 PM
1

A hit to the vulva is just as painful if not more painful than a hit to the balls. Not measurable and therefore not falsifiable, but an obvious contradiction to the vast majority of anecdotal evidence. Therefore, it could be, and maybe even should be, assumed as wrong, but you do you, I can't debate that, so I have no idea why you even bring it up - I didn't talk about pain. An ovarian torsion is just as bad as a testicular torsion. True from its characteristics, but Irrelevant to my comment, as…
/r/MensRights18/02/21 11:04 AM
3

Yup, white can stand up for black, heterosexual for homosexual, Humans for other animals, men for women and the like. But if it's about dick size, people just go crazy all of a sudden. Not to mention it being actually quite a serious issue: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/
/r/MensRights16/02/21 10:40 PM
1

Her reaction is clearly based in misandristic gender roles and expectations that typically apply to men but not to women. I doubt it would be reasonable not to call out social discrimination, as there is even a flair for it, despite the name. Very prevalent and importnat men's issue that is in our best interest to be wiped out. This does not only apply to fighters. We had men who were left for getting raped and the reasoning was almost identical to her's seen in the video. It shows a clear lack …
/r/MensRights16/02/21 12:21 AM
7

And there is another issue. a) Taking the "all" in kill all men at face value. 1 in 5 women is also not all women, so where is the line? b) It does not state "women kill all men", but "kill all men". Murder victims, be it from someone else or even themselves, are predominantly men. So are covid and workplace deaths. Whatever it is, if it is not aging, there is a good chance it is much closer to killing all men than killing all women. c) By that reasoning, supporting and cheering on anything wome…
/r/MensRights16/02/21 12:08 AM
17

You mean like the dude who spoke out about his experiences with abuse in the film industry on live television to a woman telling him what he does would put a whole industry at risk? He apologized then and there. This was before metoo. People do not listen if a man speaks up, which is why they only seem to hear it whenever female victims are the topic and complain about it being nothing more than a disturbing background noise that would only be there to take away from women's experiences. They do…
/r/MensRights15/02/21 11:47 PM
2

I fail to see the connection to my comment? What is the context? Regarding risks? Believing an action that went well 1000 times to go well the 1001st time is irrational if we know for sure that it is possible and has happened, as well as that the inter-individual differences in likelyhood are substantial and it is therefore unlikely to happen in a randomly selectes sample. It is even unlikely regardless. But people would consider me insane if I did a russian roulette hand shooting challenge, reg…
/r/MensRights15/02/21 11:31 PM
1

Does it need to be "objective"? If it needs to be objective, I guess there would be some kind of disadvantage to anyone if one was to lie about this "objective measure"? What is that disadvantage? Why do you need to "trust" and what would the downside be if someone "lied" about it? We do not sacrifice reality. If you want to know your chromosomes, you get a screening. You tell doctors anyway, if you want to survive. So why do we need to determine ones gender in an objective manner? What I mean i…
/r/MensRights15/02/21 10:55 PM
2

It is not reasonable to equate "real women" with XX chromosomes. Why would I care, I can't see those anyways, nor am I attracted to chromosomes. It is literally irrelevant what chromosomes one has in almost all situations, so why make that the determining factor?
/r/MensRights15/02/21 05:49 PM
10

There is nothing comparable for women. No low force impact on women is nearly as dangerous and results in lifelong disability within a few hours without treatment while lacking specific symptoms to properly diagnose it like a testicular torsion does. Let alone the ridicule if you demanded to be rushed into emergency surgery like you had to in case of a torsion, as people just ignore its existance. The inter-individual variance in likelyhood of a torsion occuring is huge, which makes people belie…
/r/MensRights15/02/21 05:14 PM
7

If you actually reached the ovaries it would, but for anything else the risk of low force impact to result in significant damage up to lifelong disability is comparatively high in testicles. A testicular torsion can be inflicted upon oneself on accident during everyday activities if you are at high risk of it (you won't know before tho). If you got a torsion and are not in surgery within a few hours, it's already dead. It is basically undetectable, as every impact will result in the symptoms of …
/r/MensRights15/02/21 04:56 PM
5

That is not entirely true. They get off on the evidence of degradation and the enjoyment of women in these videos - and in reality consensual infliction of pain on the balls (though there is also a strong emotional component to that). Many of them would not actually enjoy unconsensual sexual assault, even though some would. That being said, ballbusting has a lot of issues esp. because they and female doms even more so are uneducated on male genital anatomy and how injuries actually happen. Absol…
/r/MensRights15/02/21 04:46 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/21 03:59 PM
3

And to answer your question, here are some studies on the emapthy gap: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1020583425623 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1948550616647448 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00918369.2017.1374066?journalCode=wjhm20& https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597820303630 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829224/ https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2016/jun…
/r/MensRights13/02/21 04:39 PM
6

Agreed, it is really sad to see how internalized misandry leads many men to restrict other men, do so violently and often manage to receive laughs by both men and women as a reward for it. I support femboys. :3
/r/MensRights13/02/21 04:22 PM
2

I agree with the statement, though I argue that it is internalized misandry that is the obstacle, results in the empathy gap, male on male violence, male on male self justice, men as personal violent bodyguards for women and so on. Homophobia (predominantly gayphobia), transphobia (predominantly mtf phobia) and so on are also part of that. I do consider the term toxic masculinity as highly misleading and its definition usually leaves out misandry and includes misogyny instead, which is not in li…
/r/MensRights13/02/21 05:01 AM
2

Probably rather take over r/ReportMaleHateSubs. If I understand it correctly, the mensrights mods have already removed the thread on this topic following reports for brigading, which is a ridiculous claim as every link would then be brigading and subs for the purpose of doing exactly this (calling out) regarding misogyny (though they do not actually mind misogyny nearly as much as porn, kinks and men and are fds-run) have been reinstated after being banned for hate by the admins. Guess it would …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/21 04:38 AM
0

There's more: Eitherway, OP's views are irrelevant to this study. The original comment was relevant to the study because it was accusing it of being bullshit. The follow-up comment was relevant because it highlighted other problematic beliefs of lightfiend. He is not the scientist who made the study. He posted it, because he found it interesting. Irrelevant. He posted a bad study with horrible conclusions and somebody called it bullshit. Someone else then pointed out other problematic beliefs. I…
/r/MensRights12/02/21 10:14 PM
4

Don't forget the source: https://np.reddit.com/comments/3tbmhl/_/cx7tpsz Also, if you want to report something, do not use the comment menu, as that goes to the mods. To report violations of the content policy to the admins, click here. More Snippets: Ad hominem = you're wrong because you're a bad person. Even if we accept that as their argument (to me it looks like they're saying "You're wrong about lots of things including this, and you're a bad person" but whatever), you still haven't shown w…
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:50 PM
4

Yes, it is possible but very hard. I am active in reporting all kinds of hate and have gotten people perma-banned and whole subs closed single-handedly. That being said, it is very random. I have had statements dismissed as okay by the admins calling men genetical failures, telling "boymoms" who "didn't flush it down the toilet like the piece of shit it is" they are unwanted and stuff of that league. That being said, r/ReportMaleHateSubs exists and would fit the cause, though it is abandoned, so…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 05:50 PM
3

Read what I referenced here: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/li16qt/comment/gn1q1y9
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 11:20 AM
13

It's far worse than that. According to that person, Koss' statements on male rape victims being merely the victims of unwanted contact are not dismissive and MRAs are a lost cause. From a purely objective point of view, MRAs are a lost cause. There's nothing in the MRM that is useful or needed for men's issues.[...] Importantly, there's nothing inherently wrong with generalisations. The problem is when they are inaccurate and not at all useful. Throwing away MRAs is useful. [...] You say this, b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 11:11 AM
15

Mods giving themselves a PhD flair is not a proof of qualification and it is questionable if these publicly visible appeals to authority would support or diminish their credibility even if they were valid. I agree that absolutely sound psychological statements will get downvoted into oblivion on reddit if people do not want it to be true. Also on mensrights. But the psychology sub usually does not share the controversial views anyway, so it does give off the impression to be questionably motivat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 10:41 AM
10

The admin's comment on how mocking incels and anti-feminists would "not be wrong" is not only ignorant and hateful, but also resembles a lack of empathy that someone with a phd in psychology should be simply unable to have. Note that I'm only talking about this particular comment for now, not the person itself. Really hope that person enjoys being a bully as much as the consequences they should be aware and are by extension, at least imo, in part responsible for by supporting and encouraging tox…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 10:19 AM
2

Imagine only speaking about male victims when invalidating their claims that people only listen when female victims are the topic as being meant to invalidate female victims on the basis that you only hear about them when female victims are the topic. Maybe this would be less of a problem if they actually listened to male victims, instead of merely considering them as nothing more than an annoying background noise whenever it's about them.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 09:39 AM
12

People can't even really write down their stories here as they would de-anonymize them. The fact that mental health crisis teams got away with stating they send acutely suicidal patients away if they believe their episode to be caused by bullying over small penis size and had patients found dead hours later while being seen making fun of their issues by multiple other nurses is unbelievable: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:58 AM
1

The Black stereotype thing is strongly connected to the reduction of a men's value to his penis size as well as the connected body shaming. Without it, it would not function nearly as well as it does.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 05:37 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/lg9oc7/comment/gmqdfft Regardless of the case itself, did the highest voted answer to this comment just call believing women to be unable to groom men internalized misogyny? Damn, I sure know why I do not frequent the advice subs...
/r/MensRights10/02/21 04:42 PM
1

2 This doesn't looks so bad, i mean it hurts like hell, but you will survive the pain (there isnt much you can do), and then the healing goes on for a month, thats kinda bad, but many people go through lot worse in life even if they are innocent... breaking a leg is probably more painful and the damage lasts longer. If they wanna go full on punisher, they should rape him and put it on video tape. Hopefully, the other inmates take care of that. https://reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/dlogwd…
/r/MensRights09/02/21 11:44 PM
1

I won't even come close to sending it all in, and some of the stuff I consider the most harmful is not widely accepted as harmful, so I left that out, but still... not hostile? Those might not be popular opinions there, but you mean the sub where people advised sexually frustrated women to rape their partners and call it a necessary evil? That sub? The sub where people have advised others to hire rape-hitmen? That sub? Where pics alluding to literally chopping their partners into pieces are gett…
/r/MensRights09/02/21 11:42 PM
1

The issue is that last time I heard someone talk about it, they attempted to portray it as something that would be primarily porn-related and had no effect on real-life. That's missing the issue tho imo, as seen here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/ Porn in general does not portray men as humans. It is "[Name of woman] [Sexual act] [Dick size] Cock." And then throughout the Clip you won't even see the man's face. It should've been quite …
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:46 PM
1

Women know how to raise boys. Very few know how to raise men. I do not like that differentiation between boys and men. I'm a boy and I'm a man. No matter how you see yourself, society sees your sex first and judges you bag upon that. It's best to come to terms with what those qualities are that are being held against you, so you can own them... Even if you don't think they're yours to own. While it may be practical advice as in "the world is evil, just accept it", I do not see it as a healthy wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/21 09:29 PM
4

If you are so new to this, you might appreciate my comment on feminism then as it will help you understand where many people in this sub are coming from. Though I agree that men come in wide varieties and that fact is not problematic nor caused by feminism. The comment takes a more general approach: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/21 09:17 PM
4

I think I know what you mean and I believe I agree. The fact that people even come up with phrases like "a real man does", "a real man would", "like a real man" and so on. And this is, by the way, not stopped by bs reading "real men show emotions" or whatever. This pushes the idea of "man" being some kind of title that can be awarded and retracted based on your biography. Be aware though, that only men fight for that, as women are seen as too innocent, valuable and vulnerable to withhold them th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/21 09:06 PM
3

Here are a few notes I have about this: a) Even if we considered that to be the case, which there is no first party, nor second-hand prove for it to be broadly understood that way (just a random blog reporting on the answer someone else reported to have gotten by a third person https://tamenwrote.wordpress.com/2014/04/04/fbi-clarifies-definition-of-rape/), it is highly unlikely that this is the way the reporting agencies and other parties involved understood and report it. Rephrasing it would be…
/r/MensRights07/02/21 05:21 PM
5

Sure, here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lec134/re_do_you_guys_hate_feminism/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/21 01:27 AM
7

Please provide evidence for that claim about me.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 11:08 PM
6

I fail to see the connection to my comment, unless you believe this to not exist at all. There was no report, no name, no picture nor a process, so how does it matter if the example given is true as long as we agree that it happens? It is also very true that the comments to his comment were a woman concerned about having to see his ass and junk in the process and a slightly downvoted dude telling him he should've liked it. Disturbing, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 10:47 PM
8

We are talking about a male victim of sexual abuse speaking out here and you decide to comment that you are jealous he was allowed to show off his upper body in the process? I feel overwhelmed by the amount of empathy you have for men. /s
/r/MensRights06/02/21 10:37 PM
1

I do disagree with a lot of MRAs and they do with me. Spaces like this sub, which allows for a constructive debate without censorship, will need moderation that is loose to an extent that will inevitably get abused by some to spread hate. Feminist subs do not provide that and gladly ban even self-proclaimed "feminist" voices if they don't agree. MRA is first and foremost a subreddit and comparing that to the actual influence on policies and even rape definitions the feminist movement had is ques…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 10:27 PM
11

It is a huge issue that is harmful to mens advocates. I'd maybe even argue there's more people who believe feminism fights for equality than there is feminists, but idk. And it is actively used to force people into calling themselves feminists - see the video on the slides in my main comment. They canceled suicide prevention events over this belief. Because feminism allegedly gives men room to talk about it, feminism now takes men's own room to talk about it away because it was not approved by m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/21 08:37 PM
14

Hey, great to see you here. I am thankful for you taking the time to come here. Seeing that you are new here, I want to explain something that is regularly misunderstood and misrepresented: The way feminism is talked about here is based on the horrendous things those in power did to us and our loved ones in the name of it. Please read the following three posts to get a better understanding of it, it is absolutely worth the time: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/21 08:20 PM
2

Please take a look at these three posts. The last one also features a ton of evidence, but all of them are important. I give the sources to the slides of the first one as well. https://web.archive.org/web/20200915161103/https://www.imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360 (multiple slides) Sources for the slides: 1 - https://web.archive.org/web/20200915162045/https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/a-room-of-their-own-2/ 2 - https://web.archive.org/web/20200915162814/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thi…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 01:07 AM
2

Another article: https://faculty.umb.edu/gary_zabel/Courses/Phil%20281b/Philosophy%20of%20Magic/Arcana/Witchcraft%20and%20Grimoires/witch_hunt.html "In 1973, Barbara Ehrenreich and Deirdre English suggested that most witches were mid-wives and female healers. Their book Witches, Midwives, and Nurses convinced many feminists and Pagans that the Great Hunt was a pogrom aimed at traditional women healers. The Church and State sought to break the power of these women by accusing them of witchcraft, …
/r/MensRights06/02/21 12:51 AM
1

Even if it might be rare, idk, there is no real way to protect his life, which should be the main issue for now. People insulting him is one thing - being aware that people do very much get killed and tortured to death over messages reading "How are you?" is another. https://www.businessinsider.com/ap-germany-2-convicted-of-killing-man-who-contacted-daughter-2016-5 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8673621/Innocent-trucker-raped-metal-pipe-vigilante-parents.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk…
/r/MensRights05/02/21 11:47 PM
4

The law was already passed and the title says "in wake of new rape law", which is accurate as long as the mentioned law exists. Denmark's parliament passed a new law in December expanding the definition of rape to include any sex without explicit consent. Previously, prosecutors had to show that the rapist had used violence or attacked someone who was unable to resist. 'Now it will be clear, that if both parties do no consent to sex, then it’s rape,' Denmark's justice minister Nick Haekkerup sai…
/r/MensRights05/02/21 10:59 PM
2

Apex fallacy. Do not try to overuse the word fallacy without proving the fallacy to be present - reddit gives some confident sounding stuff far too much credit. A fallacy also does not disprove any conclusion. Have a look at ecological fallacies as well. Using the avg of millions of people to make statements abiut individuals. Also, you as an individual are not more likely to be something unless you are picked from a group. For example, you (sample size of 1) either earn more than the girl you t…
/r/MensRights05/02/21 06:21 PM
2

If a dude would have hit his girl, he would've probably resorted to self-justice right away. Internalized misandry - both things are wrong. Defend, but do not let anger take over and get carried away into attacking yourself. If the attack is stopped, the law enforcement should take over.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 05:36 PM
2

Even more scary is that the false accusation will probably be forgotten quite soon. Should normaly result in an much higher sentence than just the assault, which on its own will unfortunately already be much lower than his would've been - let alone the fact she apparently wasn't dropped by the team immediately. And the most scary is to think what would've happened had he not recorded it or had she broken the phone. I heard of girls deleting all chats of theirs from the boy's phone and they then …
/r/MensRights05/02/21 05:19 PM
4

Well, If you know you're not TA, then why make the post? Here's what I have to say about it: I do not really know if you are serious and why you spam this in dozens of subs, but here we go. In general: Afaik the father has no influence on the abortion anyway. I never understood people who are like "the father has to be heard but the woman makes the decision". Yeah, no, you can keep it then. Either it is our child or the fact that I did not have the chance to become pregnant myself and it is ther…
/r/MensRights04/02/21 01:23 PM
1

If you have an idea: try to do it. Create the sub and ask people to create posts that are up to those standards. See if you can come up with valuable strategies and practical suggestions. If anything promising comes out of it, I will support that. All prior attempts have failed afaik. Therefore, I remain skeptical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/21 11:29 AM
1

Focus on the fact that we should rather normalize helping men than not helping women. You are right though, men do not really receive that kind of help and it is their right to refuse to then still hand it out to others, if they choose to do so.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 04:17 AM
3

Far more importantly, she changed the story after the fact and nobody cares. Her initial reason was, and I am serious about this, "premature" ejaculation: On the stand Lorena insisted rape had driven her to rage. But on June 23, she had told the police in stilted English, "He always have orgasm, and he doesn't wait for me to have orgasm. He's selfish." John's defense attorney Gregory Murphy noted, "That doesn't sound like the statement of a woman who has been raped." Lorena also claimed that Joh…
/r/MensRights04/02/21 03:03 AM
2

It does. I have always gotten an answer apart from one case they currently just ignore. I have my own opinion why, but I haven't given up yet. Those automated answers are occasionally quite disturbing, though. Calling men genetical failures is fine to some of them, for example. From what I've seen, the admins do varry a lot tho. I've seen some reasonable decisions by them as well, but it is very rare and you need to be lucky.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/21 05:59 PM
1

You can't do pedophilia. You can only get diagnosed. You can commit statutory rape. That being said, even that term is problematic as it incorporates so much that it becomes meaningless. Perps who are still developed like a minor or are legally a minor and were in loving relationships with postpubescents of minor age and pose little to no risk of reoffense nor caused any damage according to the victim are called the same as proper adults who prey on 7 yos, use codenames for sexual stuff instead …
/r/MensRights31/01/21 06:29 PM
2

Sure, read the text in my main comment by Karen Straughan (and the other texts incl. the countless sources as well if possible) as an answer to people who believe that feminism would either fight for equality or at least not be misandristic. When confronted with counter examples, they usually claim them to not be "real feminists" or something like that. The text goes on to show that the ones who actually hold power use it to actively attack and damage men. They question the existance of male vic…
/r/MensRights30/01/21 10:09 AM
1

If the second link did not work for you, this one should: https://web.archive.org/web/20200915161103/https://www.imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360
/r/MensRights30/01/21 09:52 AM
3

Does this work for you? https://web.archive.org/web/20200915161103/https://www.imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360 If you are on phone, chances are you have to load twice to get the pic in the right size
/r/MensRights30/01/21 09:34 AM
3

I had other people have that error before, though it is working for me. And no, the images are not cached. I will see if I can find a viable alternative.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 09:29 AM
12

Hey, great to see you here. I am thankful for you taking the time to come here. We do not censor anyones opinions - unlike other subs - but this also means that, to get a suitable environment for debate, we only delete what could get the whole subreddit deleted. Unfortunately, this freedom is inevitably abused by some to insult others. This happens to all of us in whatever way they believe us to be vulnerable and you should not take it personally or assume it to be targeted at you specifically. …
/r/MensRights29/01/21 06:30 PM
2

You are kinda correct in that they do not use the contraceptive properties of testosterone itself and instead use the progestin Nestorone (Segesterone acetate). The path is still identical, the gonadotropins are suppressed and that inhibits both spermatogenesis and natural testosterone production, which is why there is still testosterone gel (which is the same I was talking about - they even administered Nestorone and Testosterone seperately in 2012 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22791756/ and …
/r/MensRights27/01/21 05:33 PM
2

The gel (Edit: only the testosterone part of it) hase been used for decades (Edit: does not make it safer) in hypogonadal men as enclomiphene was rejected for bogus reasons until the company Repros was aquired by allergan, who haven't mentioned it since the rejection by the EU in 2018. You will usually become fertile again in a few (Edit: few means 6-12) months, but it may take up to two years. (Edit: This is for LH/FSH suppression by Testosterone alone). Some have randomly become fertile after …
/r/MensRights27/01/21 03:10 AM
3

The scary thing is that even if people read it and agree it is unfair and made from double standards they deep down probably wouldn't feel the injustice. They'd probably still find it amusing on the inside and not have the reactions they would if this were extreme violence against women. This is in fact a huge issue we face and we see it all the time in how people react when called out. They kinda know it's wrong, but they don't feel it's wrong. When called out, they might agree - but ultimately…
/r/MensRights27/01/21 01:52 AM
3

Hey, great to see you here. I am thankful for you taking the time to come here. Seeing that you are new here, I want to explain something that is regularly misunderstood and misrepresented: The way feminism is talked about here is based on the horrendous things those in power did to us and our loved ones in the name of it. Please read the following three posts to get a better understanding of it, it is absolutely worth the time: /r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_ar…
/r/MensRights25/01/21 10:12 PM
11

In that context: According to Pink News, delegates at the LGBT Campaign's yearly gathering decided that "Misogyny, transphobia, racism and biphobia are often present in LGBT+ societies. This is unfortunately more likely to occur when the society is dominated by white cis gay men." University LGBT clubs are often run by committees that have a trans representative, a gay male representative, a student of color, and so on. But since white cis gay men are relative enablers, rather than victims, of o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/21 05:16 AM
3

It is an injustice against the patriarchy? What is she even talking about? But "All my statistics showed with multiple fact" convinced me in the end.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 05:00 AM
20

In that case we can start saying good women have Tight Pussy Energy (TPE) and bad hypocritical women have Loose Pussy Energy (LPE). It isn't just a joke unless you can say it in reverse as well. Are there popular comedians saying "honestly if you got a loose pussy you should just kill yourself"? Are there popular comedians saying they dated a black girl with a lose pussy and her friends assasinated her for damaging their reputation? Are there comedians answering "women with loose pussies can hav…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/21 04:28 AM
5

Here is a great post in that context, outlining how extremely dangerous and damaging it is: /r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/21 04:15 AM
12

Here is a great post in that context, outlining how extremely dangerous and damaging it is: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j81aw1/nsfwhigh_effort_man_denied_lifesaving/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/21 07:00 PM
8

But there is no shaming needed over this and we do not apply the principle "just bully them till they change" to anything else that is damaging to them and even regularily damaging or killing innocent third people (like alcohol, cigarettes etc.). Bullying and instability in peoples lives lead to wheightgain in and of themselves. Fat shaming is not in line with the logic we apply elsewhere, nor with the goals people bring up when it is talked about (like not denying facts). If they want to suppor…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 04:43 PM
3

I have a hard time thinking of the positive aspects you are talking about - let alone aspects that would come even close to all the things I outlined throughout my post. What freedom are you talking about that depends on violence against men? Would you mind being more precise?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/21 04:48 AM
2

2/2 r-teenagers/comments/j6nvo7/comment/g802ol6 Most sexual assaults perpetrated against men, are by men. This is completely false, but it's not your fault for not knowing that. For statistical reporting, rape has been carefully defined as forced penetration of the victim in most of the world. You should listen to this feminist professor Mary P Koss explain that a woman raping a man isn't rape. Hear her explain in her own voice just a few years ago - https://clyp.it/uckbtczn. I encourage you to …
/r/MensRights23/01/21 01:26 AM
2

Even if one just includes "made to penetrate" there are already reports of parity in perpetration. Thanks to feminist Mary P Koss, rape by the CDC only includes actively penetrating someone else, explaining the observed discrepancy in perpetration. According to her, male victims are "ambivalent about their desires" / actually wanted it. There is an issue with "made to penetrate" as used by the CDC aswell tho: See, according to them, right now if you use your hand to simulate intercourse on a wom…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 01:16 AM
3

Even if one just includes "made to penetrate" there are already reports of parity in perpetration. There is an issue with "made to penetrate" as used by the CDC tho: See, according to them, right now if you use your hand to simulate intercourse on a woman (fingering) - that is considered penetration and therefore called rape. If you use your hand to simulate intercourse on a man (jerking) - that is not considered penetration and therefore not even called made to penetrate, let alone rape. If you…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 01:07 AM
4

Good answer, looks like we agree! And yeah, practical advice does not contradict it being a men's issue though, which is why I think the comments are so problematic. Most victim blaming can be framed as practical advice if you think about it. There's definitely some ignorance in that comment chain but like you said it was just one person. With what looks like 4 people questioning or disagreeing with him. Four comments in that chain, three by one person and one by me. And 4/7 to 5/7 (depends on y…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/21 09:53 PM
1

If this is the widely held position here, then I guess I might as well leave. It (the empathy gap and internalized misandry) is number one on my list and a men's rights issue as men are far more likely to be treated like this for lacking the protection of being considered an innocent, valuable and vulnerable woman.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 10:11 PM
3

I'm so glad you still chose to come here, thank you! This is true and I am sorry for your experience. There is a lot more, but these are other examples: By the founder of FDS and TFS: Go be a pickme bitch somewhere else. The men you’re pandering towards will use you and discard you, as they’ve always done. If that’s your preference, then enjoy. But take that toxic shit out of this sub and go choke on some more loser dick. Bye! r-PinkpillFeminism/comments/dt7hbe/why_are_moids_so_pissed_at_wgtow/f…
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/21 03:27 PM
12

Because posts on reddit snowball big time and therefore make votes not too useful as a measure of post quality. If a post gains enough upvotes in the beginning, more will see it resulting in more upvotes. The time taken by the mods to approve it is also a huge factor. An even 1 day old post is so far down that it is basically a lost cause if it didn't get any activity yet. Unfortunately, multiple identical posts make finding stuff unnecessarily difficult, so it is always a fine line between expo…
/r/MensRights21/01/21 12:05 AM
1

"My ONLY question...is why are people so sure he is innocent?" People don't have to be sure, people have to assume innocence until proven guilt because it is essential to the judical system. Until now, people wanting to challange these views have failed to provide said proof in the eyes of these people. If you believe there to be proof, you are free to present it to them. Apart from that, you put that statement in a top level comment on a post that, as was pointed out before, was not in line wit…
/r/MensRights20/01/21 11:41 PM
49

Was already posted with the exact same title. Not to attack you or anything, just so it doesn't get all chaotic :) https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ktatuk/uk_manipulative_florist_22_obsessed_by_men_avoids/
/r/MensRights20/01/21 09:59 PM
11

No, the downvotes came because your comment was just one big assumption - the assumption that the judges conclusions are to be believed without you giving a single reference to the actual explanation, simply because he's a judge. No link, no pages (it is more than 120)... If you want to actually argue using the judges arguments, then cite those and give pages. Until then, your comment misrepresents an appeal to authority as evidence and therefore gets downvoted. Here is the judges explanation. F…
/r/MensRights20/01/21 01:39 PM
5

Hey, glad to see you! There is also this pearl: https://np.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/im5saz/my_brother_was_sexually_assaulted_and_i_dont_know/ Boy gets drugged and raped, people around are sure to help. Helping the girl raping him by holding off anyone who would have wanted to ask her nicely if she might stop, I mean. I am against violence in these cases, yes also if it is man on woman. Punching, kicking and whatnot are usually useless in cases like that, esp. considering multipl…
/r/MensRights19/01/21 07:57 AM
10

Her: Kill all men doesn't refer to every man, just the sexist ones. It was over then and there. Not only is this a contradiction in itself. Even if we would pretend it to make any sense, "kill every sexist man" does not make it better. How about we leave out the killing part, especially when talking about the gender that actually does include the vast majority of victims of killings by both others and themselves. Men are the vast majority of killed humans. Kill all men is literally used against …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/21 07:29 AM
0

Be open in online dating. In real life you can often analyze people beforehand and see who might rather fit and stuff. There is nothing to gain for you if you lie in online dating and it won't make you happy nor find you a suitable partner. Try not to make it sound demanding. Just open. Ya know, just present yourself as who you are instead of what you are searching for as in most cases these things go hand in hand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 06:09 PM
3

You meant internalized misandry, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 05:33 PM
7

Sure, read the text in my main comment by Karen Straughan (and the other texts incl. the countless sources as well if possible) as an answer to people who believe that feminism would either fight for equality or at least not be misandristic. When confronted with counter examples, they usually claim them to not be "real feminists" or something like that. The text goes on to show that the ones who actually hold power use it to actively attack and damage men. They question the existance of male vic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 12:38 PM
5

Hey, great to see you here. I am thankful for you taking the time to come here. Seeing that you are new here, I want to explain something that is regularly misunderstood and misrepresented: The way feminism is talked about here is based on the horrendous things those in power did to us and our loved ones in the name of it. Please read the following three posts to get a better understanding of it, it is absolutely worth the time: /r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 12:33 PM
78

FDS members are 20 times as likely compared to avg. to be active in r-breakups. 15 times as likely in survivinginfedility 10 times in fatlogic 8 times in antiwork 8 times in deadbedrooms 7 times in loseit 6.5 times in coronaviruscirclejerk 4 times in lockdownskepticism 4 times in covid19positive 3.5 times in povertyfinance 3 times in amiugly 3 times in lonely 2 times in asexuality https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/femaledatingstrategy
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/21 03:31 AM
1

The thing is, we say "innocent" as if this would be acceptable if he wasn't and as if non-innocent women were treated the same as non-innocent men. Self-justice and the belief it would be a honorable thing to use violence to enforce the values of whatever they deem to be "real men" is a huge issue. So huge that unfortunately the meanings of self-defense, courage and self-justice have all been mushed together into the first two.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 01:41 AM
3

The constant acknowledgement of the other side is an essential part of even getting them to listen, especially if they are served one heavily biased and altered representation of reality countless times a day every day of their life and are therefore ridiculously convinced of their representation of reality. Unfortunately, even if one is aware of that, one needs to be emotionally disconnected from most of these issues to calmly sit through the constant reminder of just how ignorant and misandris…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 12:55 AM
3

There is one "issue": that way, the CDC would have to include all male rape victims into that category and for them that would be too close to equality already. See, according to them, right now if you use your hand to simulate active intercourse on a woman (fingering) - that is considered penetration and therefore called rape. If you use your hand to simulate passive intercourse on a man (jerking) - that is not considered penetration and therefore not even called made to penetrate, let alone ra…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:50 PM
4

Violence happens predominantly against men (8/10 cases are against men; and that's just reported. There is no crime I have witnessed so incredibly often and have still seen it reported just a single digit amount of times.) by men suffering from internalized misandry, simply for being born as men who lack the protection of being born a woman, and even then they receive mostly ridicule due to the lack of concern and empathy towards men. It is beyond me how no (political) activism seems to properly…
/r/MensRights16/01/21 08:05 AM
2

i dont really understand what you mean by your edit could you please explain further? Sure, the text you replied to was by Karen Straughan as an answer to people who believe that feminism would either fight for equality or at least not be misandristic. When confronted with counter examples, they usually claim them to not be "real feminists" or something like that. The text goes on to show that the ones who actually hold power use it to actively attack and damage men. They question the existance …
/r/MensRights15/01/21 03:41 PM
2

Thanks so much for actually caring in times where this feminism gains enough support to have the influence it does. There are even more examples though: Really worth the read: /r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/ https://www.imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360 (multiple slides with links to sources underneath them) /r/MensRights/comments/9v6tqj/a_list_about_feminism_misandry_for_anyone_who/ You are obviously still free to support whatever you believe to …
/r/MensRights14/01/21 10:32 PM
1

The way feminism is talked about here is based on the horrendous things those in power did to us and our loved ones in the name of it. Please read the following three posts to get a better understanding of it, it is absolutely worth the time: /r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/ https://www.imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360 (multiple slides with links to sources underneath them) /r/MensRights/comments/9v6tqj/a_list_about_feminism_misandry_for_anyone_wh…
/r/MensRights14/01/21 10:26 PM
2

Hey, great to see you here. I am thankful for you taking the time to come here. We do not censor anyones opinions - unlike other subs - but this also means that, to get a suitable environment for debate, we only delete what could get the whole subreddit deleted. Unfortunately, this freedom is inevitably abused by some to insult others. This happens to all of us in whatever way they believe us to be vulnerable and you should not take it personally or assume it to be targeted at you specifically. …
/r/MensRights14/01/21 10:04 PM
2

Hey, great to see you here. I am thankful for you taking the time to come here. We do not censor anyones opinions - unlike other subs - but this also means that, to get a suitable environment for debate, we only delete what could get the whole subreddit deleted. Unfortunately, this freedom is inevitably abused by some to insult others. This happens to all of us in whatever way they believe us to be vulnerable and you should not take it personally or assume it to be targeted at you specifically. …
/r/MensRights14/01/21 10:03 PM
3

The report button on a comment (if you used that) goes to the subreddit mods, who surely won't act. However, these comments are unfortunately lightyears away from anything the reddit admins would act upon. They even claim that statements like "men have no value" and "women are just superior, period" are not against the content policies, so I guess that should give you an Idea of what we are talking about here.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 04:58 PM
5

The issue with feminism is that some of them claim to fight for equality and actually attack people for not (only) being feminists on that definition alone. See the video on one of these slides: https://www.imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360 They cancel men's events and then go on to state that feminism would give men enough room to deal with suicide already so they should not need / be allowed their own. That's as if someone prohibited their wife from earning her own money and tried to justi…
/r/MensRights13/01/21 09:43 PM
3

From that misandristic TERF shop Rowling supported: There is nothing anyone can do but for the love of the Goddess, women please! If you are a feminist, if you have any sense of women’s oppression and systematic economic exploitation by men, if you understand the scope of women’s erasure under patriarchy, I beg you to consider carefully before you spend your hard earned pennies. Do the feminist thing! Support woman-owned business – non-exhaustive list posted above, there is enough choice! Put yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/21 01:45 PM
1

I agree, dk why people here have to engage in this. Last time we had trans folks here people seemed pretty open minded, but now apparantly some people have gone back into believing that they betray the chromosomes if the used pronoun differs. It's a shame.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 01:31 PM
-1

No, she's MtF trans and there is no reason to not accept that imo.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 01:26 PM
7

For Organization? Like FDS and TRP (though none of the two is about fighting for equality), I guess a self-hosted site would be optimal. Until then, there would be alternatives at hand if needed: Steemit.com Hive.blog Ruqqus.com Saidit.net Notabug.io
/r/MensRights12/01/21 04:43 AM
17

Welcome, sister! Glad to have you around.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/21 11:42 PM
3

Yes. This post in particular is not even that bad, but the implications of some statements that get huge upvotes there are quick to destroy any hope one had that anybody would actually give the slightest f about men.
/r/MensRights10/01/21 08:07 PM
2

What anti MR sub was banned just for that? r-againstmensrights is up and running. That being said, we attack feminism for things that are directly hurting us and the lives of boys and men. For example, having them successfully cancel our efforts to combat suicide amongst our peers. We will surely not just look away. Please read the following three posts to get a better understanding of it, it is absolutely worth the time: /r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_rea…
/r/MensRights10/01/21 06:06 AM
4

It is beyond me how ironic the fact they removed it is. What has to go on in one's head to read that and think "nah, male victims are heard, let's make sure nobody hears him".
/r/MensRights09/01/21 05:49 PM
1

Don't. That is my advice and I stand behind it strongly regardless of gender. If she threatens you to stay in the relationship either herself or with violence etc. from others, that's another issue, but as long as you believe to be safe if you leave do it. Be prepared for potential complications though. She is obviously a notorious liar.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 05:44 PM
4

Again? Oh man, well... I am still a bit torn as to the explanation for why she set it up in the first place. I have a suspicion, but it isn't more than that... Anyway, attempted murder is a useless term by now. If beating someones brain out is not attempted murder, then whatever else it is (in this case grievous bodily harm) is undoubtably attempted murder now.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 11:59 PM
3

He grew up hating his dad, his mom spread lies about, cheated on and chased away his dad and he's mad at him? What should he have faught for? The notoriously lying and cheating mother that probably threatened him with her lies to not come back or the children that were fed lies until he had to accept they hated him aswell. Not only do I question if he had much choice in not seeing them unless he wanted to go to jail, but also don't really think there was anything for him to fight for. His childr…
/r/MensRights08/01/21 11:59 AM
58

Read the conclusion in the paper, it's hilarious. However, given that we did not have an objective or predefined estimation of the quality of manuscripts (if any) and could use only referee recommendations as an indication, this positive inclination by referees and editors could simply reflect some intrinsic characteristics of the manuscripts. Previous research suggests that women could be inclined to invest more in their manuscripts to prevent expected editorial bias (10, 33), which could also …
/r/MensRights08/01/21 11:29 AM
2

Nice wordplay.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 07:08 PM
2

Please read the following three posts to get a better understanding of it, it is absolutely worth the time: /r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/ https://www.imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360 (multiple slides with links to sources underneath them) /r/MensRights/comments/9v6tqj/a_list_about_feminism_misandry_for_anyone_who/ You are obviously still free to support whatever you believe to be a genuine way into a better future - it is simply to put things i…
/r/MensRights07/01/21 05:08 PM
11

I don't know why they still maintain it. They openly say they don't like it nor the members: "I think that the sub being how we want it depends largely on people not being awful human beings, and our sub contains far more awful people than good ones." r-AskMen/comments/i685ab/comment/g0urmme "We fucking hate the sub because no matter what we try it never even comes close to what we "envision" (which is something not a total dumpster fire)." r-AskMen/comments/i685ab/comment/g0umbtz I'm not even s…
/r/MensRights07/01/21 03:23 AM
3

Taking into account how the questions were asked in the CDC survey, I guess almost all of them did, which is why the number is probably too low. Fun Fact: According to the CDC questions, making you penetrate an object, fist or any other hole- or ring-like shape used to imitate intercourse on your dick is not included in their "made to penetrate" category. Using hands, objects or any dick-like shape to imitate intercourse on someone is included in their rape questions though. The fact they still …
/r/MensRights07/01/21 02:39 AM
2

Hey, great to see you here. I am thankful for you taking the time to come here. We do not censor anyones opinions - unlike other subs - but this also means that, to get a suitable environment for debate, we only delete what could get the whole subreddit deleted. Unfortunately, this freedom is inevitably abused by some to insult others. This happens to all of us in whatever way they believe us to be vulnerable and you should not take it personally or assume it to be targeted at you specifically. …
/r/MensRights07/01/21 02:27 AM
11

It is not the first time that message was used: "yes we get it, you all hate feminism." r-AskMen/comments/goh684/comment/frovnsm And here's the explanation: "it has nothing to do with personal opinions on the subject, it's about keeping your head (and the sub) above water. for example: my opinion on certain topics related to feminism are irrelevant when i pull that content from the subs I mod because I know that I'm going to see (or already have seen) lots of comments that are essentially "women…
/r/MensRights07/01/21 02:17 AM
2

I agree with your comment as everybody is free to wear pubic hear without shame. Comments about it being disgusting are destructive and unhelpful. That being said, every woman and every man is free to chose their partners based on their personal preferences and everybody does so anyway. This includes if a man shaves his beard or a woman shaves her armpits (and vice versa) - again, no excuse to attack anybody for said decision or shame them. Bullying and shaming are not the same as having prefere…
/r/MensRights06/01/21 08:08 PM
3

Yes. She has been supportive of and asked others to engage in trolling around here in other subs in the past and throws random, sometimes unconnected statements at people until she finds someone to hold a destructive opinion and then attempts to spread said comment as the answers of this sub to a certain issue. That being said, she is free to share her opinion on things and said opinion itself is not falsified at all by any other things she says or believes. It would just be nice if said sharing…
/r/MensRights06/01/21 04:56 AM
1

I know de-facto both women and men that I personally consider equally capable of being caregivers as well as women and men where the man is far more suitable to be the caregiver. I do not like the way individuals are judged based on the averages of a group they happened to be born into. Even if other men were less capable of this... how does this affect me as an individual? Apart from the chromosomes, there's almost nothing that is present in all or no individuals of one sex. I have no idea why …
/r/MensRights06/01/21 04:17 AM
3

Any reason you both do not state sources? The definition he cited does use a different name if it is not by a penis. But idk. Fun Fact: According to the CDC questions, making you penetrate an object, fist or any other hole- or ring-like shape used to imitate intercourse on your dick is not included in their "made to penetrate" category. Using hands, objects or any dick-like shape to imitate intercourse on someone is included in their rape questions though. The fact they still matched the rape nu…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 01:17 PM
3

The studies and data have been there for ten years and more. Suicide, murder, empathy gap, rape, physical violence... So if that's what we need, where do I get my equality? Doing research on these things and publishing it seems to become increasingly hard and soon they'll call the data outdated and have won. I don't have a plan on how to progress right now.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 01:07 PM
7

On top of that approximately half of LGBT people are male. Don't worry, the National Union of Students is aware of the issue and trying to "fix" it. According to Pink News, delegates at the LGBT Campaign's yearly gathering decided that "Misogyny, transphobia, racism and biphobia are often present in LGBT+ societies. This is unfortunately more likely to occur when the society is dominated by white cis gay men." University LGBT clubs are often run by committees that have a trans representative, a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/21 05:46 AM
11

Feminists are not critisized for not caring about men's issues. They are critisized for claiming to fight men's issues when they don't. They even go as far as to accuse others of sexism if they do not call themselves feminist - that is how convinced they are of that. I never saw that around here. Apart from that, we mostly critisize feminists that do not just "only push for equality when women are affected" but those who actually actively fight against equality and promote discrimination against…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 12:36 AM
4

I don't see any reason to use female as a noun. That being said, I do not get how this comment makes any sense under that post... "Pretty sure there was a post in r-MenAndFemales where a super insecure douchebag posted all these screenshots of women using male/woman and acting like he uncovered a conspiracy to enslave all men. My response: "r-FragileMaleRedditor". He accused me of being sexist." https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/ko1mji/comment/ghoaa6j
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:28 PM
34

The dating and advice subs here are mostly insane. PurplePillDebate is basically unmoderated to a ridiculous degree. Nothing left about it, it is extremists throwing extremist hate at each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/21 10:51 PM
7

Slide 1: "If you are a straight, white and cis-gender male, [...], you literally are not oppressed in the slightest" Pretty ableist of him to say that, actually. The point is obviously clear nonetheless. Slide 2: Ok. Slide 3: "Men aren't discriminated against based on their gender because men are discriminated against based on their gender by men". Also, peer-reviewed studies report that: A significant association between suicide intent and gender was found, where ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 09:12 PM
21

How is this even a question. He's not closing a door on a fetus that she is the mother of. It is literally only his sperm. If he wants a vasectomy, not getting one should be out of the question. You can talk about it to help her understand the decision but the decision is made - again, she is not the mother of his sperm, it is not their sperm - it is his.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/21 08:46 PM
5

People do not decide to be born into these groups. And why do we not do this for other statistics? What about glasses vs no glasses? Ethnicity? Mandatory IQ tests? Shoe size? You would surely find some correlation that would benefit you. Yet, because some men and women are raised into this misandristic idea of what men are and should be pressured to be, we punish everyone with a Y chromosome for the consequential risky behaviour of a subset of people that overlap with you on at least this one me…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 05:04 AM
3

Of course you are :) And I agree, MensLib is a sub that simply serves the conscience and not issues. Nothing interesting, thought provoking or let alone a constructive discussion - though this also means I have not spend much time there, so idk. I felt like that sub exists as an argument for people who do not care about men's issues to shut up men who speak up about them and the fact that people do not care. Like: "Look! We do care!"...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/21 05:22 PM
0

My first thought was "they were siblings pantsing their little brother, what's the big deal" Uhm, you do realize that the very fact that you can watch it is it was filmed and uploaded to the internet for everybody to see until the end of time? That being said, I can't stress enough how strongly I disagree with the quoted statement regardless of age, gender or a camera or how the reverse would look. But I guess that's just me...
/r/MensRights01/01/21 04:16 AM
6

Issue is that you would inevitably leak your identity, which might lead to harmful consequences. On top, speaking freely will, even more than text, pose the risk for you to say something you did not properly think through or that was unfortunately phrased - which people will then use to try and illegitimize other statements of yours or even you as a person. One could still do it - but be aware of the risks if you do and be prepared for what you get yourselves into.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/21 03:56 AM
1

That's weird. Maybe the page was down as you tried? Could you try again and tell me if it works for you now? Alternatively, how about this: https://web.archive.org/web/20200915161103/https://www.imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360
/r/MensRights01/01/21 03:07 AM
4

I guess you are fine here, but there is also /r/SupportForTheAccused/ People get tortured to death over accusations like this. The fact that your wife instantly picked sides whithout having to and believes you to be guilty this easily is alarming regarding her opinion of you. But for now that is a seperate issue to handle, I guess. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8673621/Innocent-trucker-raped-metal-pipe-vigilante-parents.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2259064/Luke-Harwood…
/r/MensRights31/12/20 04:38 AM
8

We are talking about the ones that did these (see below) things to us. I beg you to read it. If you still don't understand - that's fine, but please try to imagine what you would think if the ones in charge of a movement would do these things to you in its name and a friend came to you and told you that, by definition, they care about you... I am still very thankful for you to visit and hope you will support the fight against misandry. Thank you.: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/695…
/r/MensRights31/12/20 04:07 AM
6

Hey, great to see you here. I am thankful for you taking the time to come here. We do not censor anyones opinions - unlike other subs - but this also means that, to get a suitable environment for debate, we only delete what could get the whole subreddit deleted. Unfortunately, this freedom is inevitably abused by some to insult others. This happens to all of us in whatever way they believe us to be vulnerable and you should not take it personally or assume it to be targeted at you specifically. …
/r/MensRights31/12/20 03:38 AM
12

There IS stuff in feminism that can help men (not gendering rape to prevent it from being a women-exclusive issue, being for a not fully male draft or for none at all, the abolition of gender roles, being against body shaming, etc...), but feminists don't help because they shame male rape victims (or even deny it as much as dudebros), backpedal on pushing women in the draft because god forbid having responsabilities, only care about abolishing the roles that harm women and not the ones that harm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/20 05:44 PM
1

I agree. For the giggles, some take it ad absurdum: Language throughout history has always been in flux. That's herstory for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/20 05:13 PM
1

Additionally, regarding thr statements on feminism: /r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/ /r/MensRights/comments/9v6tqj/a_list_about_feminism_misandry_for_anyone_who/ https://imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360 (these are multiple slides - sources are given in the text below that)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/20 02:22 PM
1

You asked the following Let me ask you one question: Is your agenda to make your own suffering more visible? Or is it to prove that women have a better life than we claim we do? Because as long as you keep insisting that women have it much easier than men, you won't get women to listen to you because our experiences are real as well. Here is my answer - in quotes from my comment. I clarified that I do not share the same experience nor background as you do and therefore pointed out my limited amo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/20 01:38 PM
3

No, we wouldn't, considering how many here have lost friends to suicide and have seen feminists encourage it by blocking and eventually cancelling the centres, clubs, speeches and so on targeted to prevent that and did so for ridiculously misandristic reasons (you can find the sources under the slides): https://imglade.com/media/2397404382175142360 Sources: 1 - https://web.archive.org/web/20200915162045/https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/a-room-of-their-own-2/ 2 - https://web.archive.org/web/20…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 01:00 PM
1

That's just the beginning of it. Many will claim that rape on men is called made to penetrate. On the topic of made-to-penetrate: according to them, masturbation of men [meaning the penetration of foreskin, fist or other hole-like shapes made with one's body like fingers or breasts] and the forced penetration of objects (like fleshlights) is not even "made to penetrate" whilst using fingers, fists, objects (like dildos) etc. to penetrate others is considered rape again for both genders. Very int…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 12:43 PM
3

Thank you so much for coming here! If I had a dollar for every day one feminist told me that I am a horrible person if were to not be (just) a feminist as they are angels who fight against all inequality and not just for women and another one bashed me for trying to use their movement to fix everybodies issues instead of starting my own, I'd be rich. It is just ridiculous. In the end, feminist subs are banning and censoring so much that their subs do not provide material for actual progress anyw…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 12:20 PM
1

being proud of being a sexual alpha predator like some guys Sexual alpha, yes, as they are taught that that is the standard that men have to live up to. Their proudness is proudness of being enough while other men are not - and those are bullied for it. Especially, men around me were socialized like sex toys to women. Men whose body does not live up to societies standards are failures and bullied for it while they stay lonely. Sex is mainly about the women's satisfaction while the low expectatio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/20 09:31 PM
1

Yet, you feel like i am not trying enough to understand what it is like to be a man That is not what I intended to say. I clarified that I do not share the same experience nor background as you do and therefore pointed out my limited amount of information. I also said that you are not responsible for me to feel a certain way. I would argue that there is a difference between "you do not try enough" and "I do not feel like they tried". I do not determine what is and what is not "enough" in an obje…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/20 09:31 PM
3

I'm sure she would stop using it in my presence if I told her I found it hurtful I never understood this. How would that be less hurtful? That's like "yeah I only make fun of you behind your back now, therefore I don't hurt you" or "I wanted to cheat on you, but I couldn't because he was busy, so I stayed faithful". None of these make sense to me. In all of these, the actually hurtful thing was still done. If it wouldn't change her mind, she would not be the right one for someone who finds it hu…
/r/MensRights28/12/20 02:54 AM
1

What norms do you think of and why would they be thrown into one label with stuff like "be violent towards men as you please and violently protect women from male violence at all cost" that regularly leads to male deaths and irreversible damage simply because they lacked the protection of being seen as innocent, valuable and vulnerable. "Show now emotions and be violent" is often used to promote how toxic masculinity affects men, but it doesn't. Internalized misandry affects men and everything e…
/r/MensRights28/12/20 02:45 AM
1

The issue is that you cannot come here everytime she makes a counter argument. As far as I have seen it, toxic masculibity mostly describes internalized misandry. Being violent towards men, protect women with violence and self justice (often misrepresented as protection even though the attack has stopped), enforce unwritten laws with violence, make themselves vulnerable for violence (on the way back when walking a girl home), don't complain about violence and abuse, expect violence and abuse if …
/r/MensRights28/12/20 02:27 AM
2

Hey, great to see you. I hope you do feel welcome here, even if people were to disagree with your views. That being said, I doubt MensLib would want us as a sister sub nor would the majority here want them. I haven't really spent enough time there to be sure as they censor everything interesting anyway, but I do not consider them all too helpful. That being said, I do not always consider mensrights helpful either, but as they do not just delete everything they disagree with, there will always be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/20 01:39 AM
1

No need to make it about age. The list is ridiculous and even if she was 20, nobody in their right mind would want to deal with someone like that. That being said, I could not care less about age if she was attractive to me and if she wasn't, then being 20 wouldn't change that. So no idea why age above 30 is even a topic of interest.
/r/MGTOW26/12/20 11:55 PM
9

It is not about validation but about showing concern. Nothing wrong with that. And someone else did remind her that people have issues of their own atm, so I don't think you're being entirely fair here.
/r/MGTOW26/12/20 11:32 PM
1

Kinks are a very hard topic, so I won't comment on that here, even though I have a feeling you might have misunderstood some things. That being said, read this passage: The female is born innately by the love of the man’s control over her, especially from the sexual point of view, and this trait remains in the female no matter how feminists try to fight her and implant sadism (as opposed to masochism) in the female psyche Are you trolling? No idea how this even got accepted. This is the type of …
/r/MensRights26/12/20 11:22 PM
3

Here are two great links about that. Read both, please. /r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/ /r/MensRights/comments/9v6tqj/a_list_about_feminism_misandry_for_anyone_who/
/r/MensRights25/12/20 04:29 AM
5

Wow, really sorry to hear that you experienced this. If you'd want me to, I could try to give reasons why they might act like it, but it would inevitably sound like a justification. It ultimately does not matter. I do not call myself mra and nor do you have to. I do not need a label and the only thing it does is to redirect the discussions away from the issue onto some disagreements about the definitions of words and who constitutes a real scotsman... It is tiring. So in terms of being welcome i…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 04:04 AM
2

Why do we call it internalized misogyny when it comes to women, but toxic masculinity in men? On top of that, the term gets used in different contexts and with different meanings and all of them believe that theirs is the real definition and that the others are wrong or they might even change their definition during interactions. Men believe it is their duty to physically abuse each other and physically fight for what they believe is right and use self justice to punish other men for not adherin…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 01:21 AM
2

I got downvoted on every comment, even though the commenter just threw insults. Yup, the way people interact and vote does often not reflect a will to change anybodies views and people who actually seem open to discuss or even admit they were wrong will be voted and cussed out.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 04:53 PM
1

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01544134
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter