Manipulative Time-waster is a term I first heard used by author Alan Roger Currie and I believe it can be applied to both sexes.

One reason TRP blew up is because men were tired of dealing with manipulative time-wasting women, who feign interest to extract attention, resources and status. Examples range from women displaying fake interest to get free dinner dates, to women child-support trapping and/or divorce raping wealthy men. Awareness had to be spread and solutions had to be devised to prevent men from getting used and/or screwed over.

FDS seems to primarily exist to spread awareness and devise solutions for women to vet manipulative time-wasting men, who fake interest in a committed, long-term relationship, just to get sex and move on to the next woman. Am I correct about FDS primarily serving this purpose?

These manipulative time-wasters are why you see men and women at each other's throats. And this is what makes me question if sexual strategy is actually amoral. If people continue to condone this type of sexual strategy, we might be looking at an increasingly degenerate sexual marketplace in the near future.

You can be the most hardcore TRP dude, but can you really blame women for being fed up with men who manipulate them and waste their time?

You can be the most hardcore, scrote-hating FDS woman, but do you really blame men for being fed up with women who engage in manipulation and time-wasting?

Do you think TRP and FDS provide the tools to reduce the amount of manipulative time-wasting going on or do they actually exacerbate the problem?

Or maybe you believe that misleading people is a completely legitimate sexual/dating strategy? Is it Blue Pill to be critical of this strategy? Let's hear why.