PsyPost can sometimes be irritatingly neutral to the brink of being tautological. But the other side is that because of that, issues addressed in it may get an audience men's sites, pages and video channels never will.

“Research on sexual health has mostly focused on sexually active individuals, with some surveys excluding inactive participants from answering questions about feelings about their (absence of) sex life. Given that sexually intimate relationships are important for many (though certainly not all) people’s well-being and quality of life and the substantial proportion of individuals who are sexually inactive, as shown in our study, we need more knowledge about reasons for, and potential feelings about, sexual inactivity.”

"Sexual inactivity (if not voluntary) might be a sensitive topic because it entails sexual desires, and for some individuals, a sense of rejection and insecurity. Sexual inactivity should not be subject to shame or ridicule."

https://www.psypost.org/2020/11/study-uncovers-a-large-increase-in-sexual-inactivity-among-young-heterosexual-men-in-the-united-states-58505?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=study-uncovers-a-large-increase-in-sexual-inactivity-among-young-heterosexual-men-in-the-united-states