I'm reading a book called The Evolution of Desire and the author is discussing mate retention tactics. According to their studies, men tend to cry, beg, and do anything for the other person in order to keep them 25% more than women, despite the stereotype that women tend to be submissive. He then states that researchers don't yet know why this is the case.

Of course, having swallowed the red pill, we know about dread as the true mate retention tactics that focus on being strong, decisive, and on your purpose. Anyone who has lingered here for any length of time knows that being anything your partner wants you to be is probably one of the most unattractive things you can do, not to mention incredibly unhealthy.

If men are traditionally seen as strong, resilient, unemotional, direct, and stable...why do so many lose their backbone and become so low value? Why are there so many love songs when the male is singing about "doing anything for you" and "can't lose you" and "you're my everything"?

From my experience and observation, women don't want a weak supplicator, they want a leader with strength, resources, provision, and stability (and this doesn't have to mean that he makes more $$ than her, these things come in many forms).

If the stereotypes about men center on strength, why do more men than women resort to weakness in relationships? Is it that many have lower SMV than their wives and they know it (at least subconsciously)? Is it that they tend towards laziness and complacency as the relationships mature? I'm not sure, but I thought I'd throw the question out there to get some feedback from the brilliant minds that occupy in this subreddit :)