Why take away women's right to vote and not just ban the left?

BPremium · 2017-06-29T17:25:31+00:00

cause the USA needs 2 parties to pretend to battle it out while the oligarchs rule things behind the scenes.

goatismycopilot · 2017-06-29T17:32:07+00:00

Abolishing women's suffrage is not (at least to my knowledge) a core idea of TRP. Truthfully, I think anyone advocating for it is a retard trying to solidify their own right leaning opinions into law. They probably would love to ban the left, or anyone that disagrees with them for that matter, from voting. But unfortunately for them, we don't live in a fascist patriarchy, we have freedom of speech and other inalienable rights that happen to prevent the oppression of half our population (women).

If they believed women as a whole are too incompetent to vote, then they may as well advocate for a pre vote exam that requires every voter to have an aptitude in economic/worldly/political knowledge. I bet half of these female suffrage abolitionist idiots would fail it.

What's ironic is that their solution to trying to prevent third wave sjw types from turning their country into a leftist authoritarian state that will oppress their beliefs is to use the government to oppress enough people from being able to vote in favor of THEIR own beliefs.

HigHog · 2017-06-29T18:06:09+00:00

why not just go all the way and ban the left

well , we could, but the problem is that politicians make their living on the votes of those who do not contribute as much, or do not contribute at all, yet still get to vote.

I am all for tax based voting. No taxation without representation, no representation without taxation.

EliteSpartanRanger · 2017-06-29T21:18:21+00:00

God forbid those dumb wimminz voting for things like health care for the poor when there's a country out there to be invaded.

Dumb hoes voting with their feelings dammit.

AutoModerator · 2017-06-29T17:23:52+00:00

Attention!

You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

wub1234 · 2017-06-29T18:04:17+00:00

I don't believe in giving politicians any credence at all because it's almost without exception completely undeserved.

RockinSocksII · 2017-06-29T19:20:14+00:00

I think we aren't going back far enough tbh. Only white, land-owning males should be allowed to vote.

InformalCriticism · 2017-06-29T21:42:13+00:00

It has more to do with how women think, which is typically emotional, rather than rational.

If a man chooses to be a liberal, at least he can explain why in ways that make sense, and that's good for democracy. If you choose to be a conservative, because you're afraid of immigrants, the gays, and the devil, then that's bad for democracy.

Littleknownfacts · 2017-06-29T17:25:17+00:00

Because muh two party system!

5th_Law_of_Robotics · 2017-06-29T17:41:44+00:00

Not a red pill and I don't think we should ban women from voting but... It's a bit easier to block certain demographics from voting than certain ideologies.

sweet_samsara · 2017-06-29T20:14:39+00:00

why not just go all the way and ban the left

Isn't it obvious? Women would still be constituents, and smaller candidates on the right would immediately pander to the newly disenfranchised women to win elections. The candidates who would win would be the ones who pandered the most to women. Eventually you'd just end up with the same thing.

[deleted] · 2017-06-29T20:15:35+00:00

Because banning and using govt force is beta.

I'd rather let my enemies flourish so that I have something to fight

blackedoutfast · 2017-06-29T20:43:09+00:00

yeah im fine with banning all the liberals too.

disposable_pants · 2017-06-29T22:17:59+00:00

Who gives a shit about a post that could barely get to +30. Here's what it looks like when TRP actually supports something -- vote totals around +600, +700, or even +800.

This is nothing more than the typical blue pill strategy of picking out dumb shit on TRP that pops up and doesn't get deleted, and then pretending that's what TRP is focused on.

despisedlove2 · 2017-06-30T02:45:42+00:00

Every society that begins, also ultimately dies. You can't stave that off by just preventing a group of people from expressing their opinions. You do that, and you will end up with civil war. Which will accelerate the decline you are trying to prevent.

When a society is on its way out, it will find a way to kill itself. Its ruins will enrich the next civilization that supplants it. It is the natural order of things.

darksoldierk · 2017-07-01T17:29:42+00:00

Well, let me put it this way. Up here in Canada, we have a pretty boy liberal running this country. His fiscal policy was atrocious. A first year university student could see the flaws in it. However, I must say, his social policy was decent. The conservatives, on the other hand, had an atrocious social policy but a pretty decent fiscal policy. I wanted the liberals social policy with the conservatives fiscal policy, but that wasn't an option. Logic told me that improving our social policy requires funds. Lots of funds. Logic also told me that considering our debt level at the time, Canada could not handle a deficit, which is what the liberals fiscal policy said it would have. I went conservative in hopes that we would be able to pay off some debt, then focus on fixing our social issues. The liberals won.

Now we have pictures of our prime minister shirtless in the newspaper. We've seen women hold up signs of that were similar to the signs that teenage girls held up when they saw their favourite boy band. We have a cabinet that was hired because of what was in between their legs instead of what was in between their ears. We have an ever growing deficit.

We can't ban people from voting for the liberals and neither can the states ban people from voting for the left. I never agreed with the statement that women shouldn't be allowed to vote, but I do believe that people should only be allowed to vote after they have taken a course that educates them about politics and the various types of policies that politicians run on.

Love8Death · 2017-06-29T17:29:56+00:00

Lol ban the left. That we can't do.

But if a woman is going to vote based on feeling, we're going to have absurd results.

Title	Why take away women's right to vote and not just ban the left?
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	0
Comments	119
Date	June 29, 2017 5:23 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/6k9ur0/why_take_away_womens_right_to_vote_and_not_just/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/why-take-away-womens-right-to-vote-and-not-just.267286 https://theredarchive.com/post/267286

Comments