There are guys out there that don't necessarily fit into the "alpha male" criteria, nor are they remarkably good looking (sometimes even short or ugly) but seem to rarely have trouble with women. Whereas most other guys who are fairly average or even good looking seem to have trouble. The one's that don't have much trouble seem to "have it" and by that, I mean natural game (like they no what to say at the right time and have the right push/pull balance).

Guys are either too passive/shy or they're too aggressive/try-hards etc. Personally myself, it took me a couple of PUA books, trying to learn the concept of NLP (neuro linguistic programming), a lot of gym, trial and error, emotional breakdowns and 25 years of being able to get laid whereas some low-life Chav with an IQ of a brick would get it easily. I can see why some feminists/bluepillers could say that PUAs have the tendency to over-complicate things and to treat women as humans but when you don't have natural game (not everyone was the cool kid at highschool), that shit can be frustrating as hell.

Do you believe in the concept of "having it" or was it merely just that these people got a girl for every 100 rejections or where they just merely high status belonging to certain groups?