Feminists and blue pillers often make the argument that gender is a social construct. They claim that besides our genitalia everything else and everything that what we view as the typical male and female gender roles are almost entirely learned, and that if we just encouraged girls to go into STEM fields and to pursue other traditionally male interests they would be just as good at it on average as men. They deny that there is a significant difference between the male and female brain on average, claiming the difference is close to negligible and possibly nonexistent. However, there's been an interesting development as of late. With the transgender movement now having won in the West, progressives have generally held the belief that someone can be born with a female brain trapped inside of a male body/vice versa. The problem is that this completely undermines decades of feminist thought. They've just inadvertently admitted that there is indeed such a thing as a "female brain." Gender cannot be both a social construct and simultaneously also a genetically determined and real thing when in the case of a woman being born inside of a male body. How do you reconcile this fundamental hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance?