RPers can respond but I don't want BP to ignore.

edi: Despite the title, which draws attention to my condition for context, this thread isn't particularly about me, but reactions to TRP in general.

Yet you've all made it aboit me SMH

Basically I admitted to another website that my mental health was affecting my dating chances. Tl;dr "I know women want high status men or men demonstrating high value, my conditions make me do the opposite often, will I be foerveralone?"

I also wanted an explanation for my ostensibly emotionally abusive behaviour towards my 'ex'/old friend.

This is really ridiculous. I ask you this q. "Can you deny that women high status men or men demonstrating high value?" The majority of responses are go to therapy just because I added diagnostic buzzwords. This thread has little to do with my MH. All they could say was "don't date right now, work on yourself". So I pressed for a "right, so you agree women need high status men and I need time out to stop exhibiting low status behaviour?" They got uncomfortable and said "no, women don't want high status men" but offered no convince argument for this. Then because I don't accept their argument, theybtell me I have issues?!


I met 2 people who responded.

Person 1: Trans-gender rad-fem, mid-late 20s

-> Response "ugh Hypergamy? Ignore that RP bullshit and go get some therapy"

-> messaged her for debate

-> she proceeded to fem-splain to me what I was reading, and very vaguely and somewhat manipulatively why what I was reading was wrong because feels over realz and basically I am a bad person for believing in this who women will never want to hang out with

-> sent a response back to continue debate, no response

Person 2

Mental Health advocate, c. 30s

-> "Forget dating, get better, go to therapy to get rid of toxic beliefs like 'women only date men of high status' then you can go back to it"

-> Again messaged. Asked why women's craving for high status is a toxic belief. Said I have read many books and viewed many studies which all talk about the importance of status or behaviours indicating status, not pulling the belief out of my ass.

-> "I'm successful with women. None of them care how much money I make. They all like my sense of humour, emotional maturity and availability. Your problem is you view women as aliens with robotic motivations. This is dehumanising. Treat women as people, and get rid of those books"

-> me in head "beta Game, Beta Bux"*

-> didn't say this

-> linked him to r/K mate selection theory, discussed various variants on Status e.g. Looks, Behaviour, concept of power talk e.g. "I like men with ambition"=wants a high-status BB if not AB [used different terms], r/K vastly applicable to vast majority of heterosexuals taking into account variation on Kinsey scale (LGBT at extreme ends)

-> Continued, said [sic, abbrev.] "we are all animals, all prone to human error, man or woman btw. Dehumanisation is bad but why is it bad to extrapolate the behaviours and mentalities of individuals onto a larger behavioural model/heuristic, taking into account anomalies?" [e.g. AWALT, although see my last post for reserve at ions on that]

-> Response [sic, informalised] "This shit is way above my pay grade. You need professional therapy, lots of it and you need to be willing to commit. This may take months if not years to recondition. I'm out, good luck man"

-> MRW

  • Because this is true. Let's put these words into Nice Guy straw man speak.

"I am a young man. I try to support feminism. I treat women with respect just like they're people. I'm there for them and listen to their problems, give them a shoulder to cry on. I make them laugh. I like to think of myself as mature.

But when I fall for one, they're never interested. I hate feeling like this, but I'm starting to become bitter and resentful at women in general, and the hot guys they all go after instead of me. What can I do to get rid of this feeling please? I don't like feeling so sexist"

Knee-jerk Femmespire reaction: OMG YOU'RE A STUPID NICE GUY(™) SEE THAT TRADEMARK? SEE IT?! IT MEANS YOU"RE NOT REALLY NICE YOURE A SEXIST ASSHOLE!!!! GET OVER YOUR ENTITLEMENT ISSUES AND STOP FEELING SORRY FOR YOURSELF AND BEING BITTER. WOMEN AREN'T JUST FUCK MACHINES YOU PUT NICE TOKENS INTO AND SEX POPS OUT!!! I HATE YOU I HOPE I GET TO MOCK YOU AS A 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN THAT'S IF YOU LIVE THAT LONG

Beta Game is a risky investment and can be used against you when unsuccessful.

To clarify on the frequency of my being turned away to therapy, here is a thread from another site again where the mods eventually conclude that the website is unequipped to help me. (I was super-beta at this point btw, bordering on omega)

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2672263&page=4

edit2: haha here's a gem from TSR this week. Under my old pseudo, I slowly indoctrinated a forum into TRP-although I did not wish to. NOw, RPers come out of the woodworks

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=3598963&page=3&highlight=riku&p=59432173#post59432173

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=3598963&highlight=riku

  • u/yoradicalone, Miser dispensing RP troofs bro, finally catching onto the Feminine Imperative

  • Truth bomb: Hypergamy

  • Truth bomb: Looks matter, money gets you laid

  • Truth bomb: Nice Guy™ accusation as knee-jerk reaction to words 'misogynistic' and 'virgin' (cf feminist shaming tactics(

  • Truth bomb: The Wall and powers of women in the SMP 18-30 y/o (explained by Foo)

  • Truth bomb: The Paradox of Commitment

  • Truth bomb: Women encourage beta orbiting, see "stop being so sexist and actually make friends with women"

  • Feminist shaming tactics: Bitter misogyny, Entitlement etc.

-> see above 'treat women as people'

At this point I shall elaborate upon what I said to Response 2 on other website

"While I dislike objectification, I do not feel that just 'treating women as people' is actually attractive. This makes for platonic relations. I am sure that there must be something else you need to do, to maintain the 'spark' of attraction..".

Final truth bombs:

  • Truth bomb: Neediness explained

  • The 1st page, 2 sentences in. Fem-centrism is strong in these waters.

Glad I got out.

This month I summed my anxieties up to my doctor and she was overwhelmed by the concepts I was discussing. I have been to a psychologist and he gave up because he said I out-witted him and basically discharged me a session later. What the hell. This is a recurring pattern. The outside world is threatened by Redpillers and those with my thought patterns.

TBP, why do I keep receiving cop-outs like this? They basically just gave up on convincing me of anything other than a shoddy feminist argument…

Key points

  1. Inability to accept women are pre-rationally and covertly attracted to men of high status or demonstrating behaviours indicating high status or potential to acquire it

  2. Inability to accept that we are not all special snowflakes, we all have general drives and impulses which govern our behaviour, we have to actively work to overcome and restrain these through exercising our virtues and 'higher mind'

  3. Shaming tactics: Anybody who believes all this must have 'serious issues' or be a 'bitter virgin'. I actually take less offence to the latter than the former. I do have issues, but debating some views which I acknowledge as prejudiced does not fall under mental illness for me. Paranoid reactions and obsessive/intrusive thoughts regarding hypothetical scenarios acquired from this, yes; but that's not that I asked

Here's the thing. TRP sounds really dehumanising online because it's a set of principles which divorces a woman from her personality, for the purpose of determining what is going on. In reality, TRP still takes into account that women are humans with eprsonalities-just also have base primitive drives, sexual strategy and an environment which may predispose her towards a certain form of conditioning. (Compare it to the fact that most feminist are on the lookout for a man who's a misogynist, constantly 'screening' as it were-e.g. in the above TSR thread.