TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

TRP says that aloofness and holding frame fosters attraction in women. So why don't women find the fact that Christian Grey is a needy crybaby repulsive?

[deleted]

January 27, 2015
14 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title TRP says that aloofness and holding frame fosters attraction in women. So why don't women find the fact that Christian Grey is a needy crybaby repulsive?
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 14
Comments 97
Date January 27, 2015 10:15 AM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2ttt6a/trp_says_that_aloofness_and_holding_frame_fosters/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/trp-says-that-aloofness-and-holding-frame-fosters.283685
https://theredarchive.com/post/283685
Red Pill terms in post
framethe red pill

Comments

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory28 points29 points30 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you.

The simple fact about 50 Shades is that its a female power fantasy. Yes, she's "the sub" and he's "the dom" but the entire point of the book is he needs her and he'll do anything for her. This is the essence of female power under the traditional gender roles; the ability to enlist male agency through the power of innate feminine preciousness and specialness.

In short; the female power fantasy involves getting the biggest baddest most desirable male possible... and having him do anything for her.

This means Christian's domminess actually is, paradoxically, a heightening of the power fantasy; it shows how powerful he is which in turn increases the payoff for enlisting his agency.

I agree the idea of a "beta allowance scale" has some merit and explanatory power, but I think I'll phrase it differently; Grey already proves himself through being handsome and charming (and secondarily through showing an incredible amount of power over his business empire). He's already got 'natural' desirability.

Grey's vulnerabilities and need for Anastasia emphasize how much he needs her. This 'seals the deal' so to speak.

Now, in a real-life dating situation, things are different; Christian had a reputation, a massive business empire and very appealing looks. His desirability was established in advance and didn't have to be proven. But in the real world, one needs to prove that desirability at first unless one is similarly situated to Christian Grey.

[–]GreatZiggurat13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Haven't read the book but it sounds like Christian Gray has money, preselection (other women want him), and he's physically attractive. If you're high-value, you can be beta to a greater extent than someone who isn't. George Clooney can be as beta as he wants to be and still hook up with as many beautiful women as he wants. For someone of a more pedestrian background (most of TRP readers), it doesn't work that way. You gotta put much more emphasis on frame.

There's also a big difference between a man who acts Beta towards one woman, while acting like an asshole to the rest of the world (highly attractive) and someone who is needy or supplicating towards a number of women in his life. The former tells a woman that she's special, the latter tells a woman that the guy is weak.

[–]obstinatebeagle1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Haven't read the book but it sounds like Christian Gray has money, preselection (other women want him), and he's physically attractive.

Got to agree with you there. I was just going to write "because he's rich" :)

[–]Katniss_GrangerNo pill6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No woman with more than half a brain cell actually likes Christian Grey or thinks he's anything more than an insane dithering twit, I'd say the women who do like him probably have some mega daddy issues and if they don't then my guess would be that the attraction has something to do with his main trait - shit tonnes of money.

[–]SirNemesistitties not tithe1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Problem is a lot of women don't have half a brain cell, as can be demonstrated by the insane popularity of 50 shades of grey.

[–]RobotPartsCorp1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So what though? I find wrestling to be stupid but it is hugely popular with dudes. Those are dudes I wouldn't try to date though, and I don't believe all dudes are stupid like the ones who watch wrestling.

[–]SirNemesistitties not tithe0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well if you manage fine with a greatly reduced pool of people to date then good for you.

[–]RobotPartsCorp1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I manage quite well actually! It doesn't seem like a greatly reduced pool at all, could be the area I am in.

[–]OfSpock0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Interstingly, the one woman I know who read it is my husband's 60+ year old aunt.

[–]BakerofpieRed Pill Woman3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay, I'll actually answer, though. TRP is about men trying to act in their own best interests. It is sexy and enticing for a woman to be wanted so much that a guy will do anything to be with her, at least in concept. It's an extremely poor long term strategy for multiple reasons, but I'm not sure how many would deny the obvious sexual appeal of being the only one this former player type wants. However, it would be detrimental for TRP to advise that. A man gains nothing from being a submissive to a woman unless that is truly their "thing." It'll make things exciting for a short while and then he's simply a slave to her whims and her desire falls off until that spicy sex life they had becomes a thing of the past.

To me there's no conflict. My Husband doesn't express a ton of emotion whether positive or negative, but on the occasions when he lets slip how much he likes having me around it is incredibly hot to me and I want him then and there. But if that were the rule rather than the exception it would no longer be enticing at all.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Beta allowance scale (tl;dr: You get away with all kinds of shit if you already are supremely attractive to a woman). Credits go to /u/vaginalaquarium for coming up with that term.

they want to see a man's vulnerabilities and heal him (like Ana does with Christian).

Yeah, if they have the feeling that they are so superspecial that only they among all 3.5 billion women in the world are able to bring him out of his shell and make him behave out of character. I mean, this whole book is so full of wish-fulfillment, it would be porn even if there was no sex in it. However, there is nothing really attractive about a man being emotional and vulnerable if that's his standard M.O.

The actual question is how long she would remain attracted (if the story was real) if he was totally giving himself to her and would upset the whole D/S balance their relationship is based on.

[–]9Choronzon5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This, see also: high status, attractive musicians singing sappy love songs about how they'll love you forever baby girrrl

[–]MissPearlEditor of frequent typos.7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The reality is that romance novels generally offer rollercoaster emotional scenarios. It tends to pull heavily from as contrasting elements as possible as a form of wish fulfillment because part of most of these stories is that she (whomever the lead is) ends up with power over the powerful.

But romance loves its damaged hero- his behaviour of being acknowledged to be all sorts of fucked in the head isn't particularly unique. Much like male oriented stories love it when the women in them have implied sexual peril (eg kidnapped by the big bad) even though trying to have a relationship with someone with PTSD is nessarily harder.

The difficulty is parsing out how much of romance is pornography and how much is a power fantasy. With the historical and current need to use a heterosexual relationship as a tool for social navigation its hard to separate out which is about what is making the audience horny and which is affirming she holds the guy's reigns so she can be confident in her use of them.

TL;DR
It's helpful to remember that with much of female power being built on social control, our self indulgent fiction tends to want us to be winning at the social war.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I was always under the impression that 50 shade was THE romance novels for those that like to watch paint dry and can't handle cursing cursing in their milk toast bland dirty talk..

[–]MissPearlEditor of frequent typos.3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Shall we say I am going to roll my eyes so hard at the next kinky person who earnestly worries about the poor, niave person who has read those awful, awful books and is about to join the scene to discover twoo BDSM. :p

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the scene really. I wouldn't want to be newbie in the NYC scene. But in my local scene its a bit more newbie friendly. I am mildly worried about the one that keep it strictly in the bedroom and never learn proper play. Like rope, impact, fire, electric ect. Its not rocket science but you can still get hurt if you don't know what you are doing. But if they can't be bothered to learn i can't be bothered to care.

[–]MissPearlEditor of frequent typos.1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't make a distinction to what is "proper" but I expect since 50shades doesn't go any fancier than a prison strap, all I would expect was at worst one of the wannabe uber tops suggesting something elaborate and getting turned down and the sub sniffing he isn't a REAL dom because he's not paying her bills.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You common sense is incredibly sexy.

[–]GridReXXit be like that8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Never read it, but I imagine humans are going to human in spite of whatever TRP says.

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

humans are going to human in spite of whatever TRP says

We depend on it. The status quo is how TRP strategies remain effective.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds about rigtht

[–]QQ_L2PInterwebs Aficionado2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

To be successful with girls, you need to be OK at 2/3, or excel at 1/3 of these things:

  • Money
  • Looks
  • Game

The character in the book is desired by every other girl on the planet, it implies good game by preselection (other women find him attractive). He is clearly rich and has good looks, so essentially, he has the trifecta. He has every desirable trait in spades and can have any woman on the planet, but what does he do? He goes chasing after this one chick because apparently she lays golden eggs or something.

A womans ultimate dream (theoretically) is to have an Alpha be her Beta Bux, to have someone so desirable desire them so greatly that they are incapable of doing anything else. That's what womens fiction is essentially about. It's porn for the narcissism in her mind. That's what made Fifty Shades of Grey the biggest best seller ever and that's why Christian Grey is attractive to them. Not because of what he's doing chasing after this chick is attractive, but because he scores highly on the 3 categories of desirability. The desire to be desired by what is desired by others, by proxy, makes you the most desired thing out there. Ana is irrelevant, she is markedly plain and has no distinguishing features, which allows women to transplant themselves into the story, they become the protagonist. While they are reading that book (read; porn), they become the single most desired person on the planet, even if it is a fictional one.

In practice, if a guy did that in the real world it would be such a turn off that every light in a city block would immediately go dark.

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Probably because you're talking about fictional characters.

[–]PowerHuffGirl5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

He's a fictional character that real women are attracted to.

Why would millions of real women buy the book at an astonishing rate of one book per second if they found the love interest repulsive?

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Why would you ever listen to what women say (i.e. complaints on message boards/blogs/etc) rather than watching what they do (copies of the book purchased/in the future how much the movie makes)?

This is base TRP knowledge- what women say and what they do are not interconnected. Expecting to find this type of consistency will drive you mad.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Like when men complain on message boards and blogs about how disgusting sluts are, then go out to pick them up?

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'd absolutely agree if we were talking about the same people doing both things. The men of TRP complaining about sluts are generally looking for LTR material which sluts absolutely are not. The ones seeking sluts are the ones just looking to get their dicks wet. Two different groups.

Now, on the other hand if you replace disgusting with annoying/irritating then I'd embody your dichotomy because all sluts and a great majority of women lose all value to me when my dick isn't inside them.

[–]tigalicious3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Two different groups.

And why don't you think that's the answer to the original question? Women are also individuals with (gasp!) different opinions and desires.

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I explained that already. Try again.

[–]chasingstatueszion was part of the matrix4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not really. You said judge women based on their actions, not their words. Then went onto say that while they criticize the books, they still buy them. But this assumes that the same women who buy the books are the same women who criticize them. Two different groups.

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Let me spell it out to you simply- listening to women and expecting them to act accordingly is foolish. Watch the actions, ignore what is said.

[–]chasingstatueszion was part of the matrix4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But you're not accounting for any variations among women--as in, the fact that some women say they're disgusted by 50 Shades of Grey and act accordingly by having never read the series or bought the books themselves. You're instead speaking as if all women, all across the world, from every culture, are the same.

Edit: Just to note, there are some reasons why women who aren't fans of the series will still have read at least one of the books (i.e. I wrote a paper on it a year ago for one of my classes--didn't buy it though, borrowed it).

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Haha, kind of like finding those beta bucks really annoying valueless when their wallets aren't in you.

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly- mating strategies are what they are; they don't need to be pleasant.

[–]whiteknight521Blue Pill0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And men don't ever say things and not do them?

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does that change what I've said?

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Proud to say I did not purchase Fifty Shades of Grey and do not give a shit about Christian Grey. Blue Pill.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Same here. I've never read it. I should probably not be commenting on this post.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I really did not need to read it everybody I worked with did. I just listened to their summaries, harlequin romance with some pretend dominance for the mainstream market.

[–]Katniss_GrangerNo pill0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

My ex bought me all 3. I read them all. More than 2 years on and I'm still trying to forget the ordeal...ughh.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I love reading but any kind of romance genre just bores the shit out of me, if I just want to read trash I dive into a half assed mystery novel.

[–]Katniss_GrangerNo pill0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I read them purely because I didn't have any books that I hadn't read 10 times over. Got a kindle last month so in theory I'll never have to go through that again! I don't mind romance as long as it's an underlying theme, I can't stand a pure romance book!

[–]RobotPartsCorp0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There's three of them??

[–]Katniss_GrangerNo pill0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately...each as horrendously crap as the last, how is it that I could read those but a chapter of my university textbook is impossible?

[–]bgslaking1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The women who enjoy the book say that they find the idea of being an alpha's One True Love (that implies neediness on some level from the man) more attractive than the idea of being with an "aloof" alpha who could replace them easily if they slipped up.

Thats it right there. Most women who enjoy the book have the fantasy of conquering that alpha male. What the book probably doesnt go over is the reality once he changes into a passive guy that just wants to make her happy. Sooner or later, she will think, "He's just not the man I fell in love with..."

[–]Petticoat_Rule1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So, there are two contradictory and yet co-existing beliefs that you can find on TRP. In one hand, there's the belief that women want a man who holds frame all the time, so it's hard to be a man because "men can't ever relax". On the other hand, there's the belief that women want to be a man's confidante, they want to see a man's vulnerabilities and heal him (like Ana does with Christian).

Probably stronger women who are confident in themselves are fine with men showing a vulnerable side. I have an SO (of almost 6 years) who shows it to me often - and it's great and no one else is having him ;)

I think for women who feel vulnerable or like the feeling of being protected, they would like a man to 'hold frame' most of the time.

I might look and sound like a total 'girl' but I'm not 'girlie'.

I didn't read 50 Shades of Grey, but then, I don't read romance. I did read the sample on AMazon to see what all the fuss was about.

I guess women like the unrealistic fantasy and it get them off.

I've read lots of action thrillers. Got sick of the protag being an unrealistic man who can do anything, be anything - just as much of a wank as 50 Shades of Grey.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

Ok blue pillers how many of you are into whiny crybabies????

how many of you are currently dating emotional wrecks of men???

[–]some_pill8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

The male in my marriage is a masculine man. Yet, somehow he avoids being a misogynistic redpill "beta"

I would never be with a redpiller.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

you wouldn't even recognise a red piller if you met one.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She'd never knowingly be with one. It's like when manipulation works as long as you don't realize they're hiding something from you.

[–]powerkickPoly, Bi, Blue, Betafag4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Except when you start to recommend recognize the RP interaction and reaction script. Normal people don't dread or neg for example, and agree and amplify is pretty obvious. Then there's the oddly specific vocabulary. They're easy to spot if you know what to look for.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

dread is just having better things to do then be treated like shit. Negging is just playful banter which is used by a great variety of men and women, the same with agree and amplify. I don't know what you mean about oddly specific vocabulary, people don't use red pill terms in their real life. It would be impossible for you to pick someone as a red piller because you think they are misogynistic which you would not be able to identify when you speak to the average red pill guy that you would meet.

[–]some_pill3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I DRIVE A DODGE STRATUS

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL know Terpers are so fucking obvious.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

womp womp.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Seriously. The RP architype is such a turn off. I'd never want an alpha as they describe them. My husband has been giving me the 'gina tingles without all that phony frame for more than a decade.

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you don't know any better then he's doing it right.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Womp womp.

[–]Villaintine╰▄︻▄╯3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Did you have something aside from childish, made-up words?

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Blah blah blah

[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How do you know?

He has a "frame." Everyone does.

People who can't maintain their own frame are generally not seen as powerful human beings.

People respond positively to those who stay true to themselves, who don't succumb to bullshit, who have their feelings rather than letting their feelings have them, who show persistence in the face of adversity, etc.

That's all part of the "frame" that men are encouraged to maintain.

Are you saying that all of that is phony and that you are attracted to your husband despite his lack of all of those qualities?

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You can be an emotional wreck while being a crybaby 5% of the time and 95% being an abusive asshole, which is more likely to be the mix women of poor taste are into.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've never read 50 shades so I'm just going by this posts description. Are you saying a blue piller might of misrepresented what this character is like?? possibly because they are intellectually dishonest??

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, in this particular case it was more about the general trend of women claiming they like sensitive men who "come out of their shell" and "show their feelings" when it's actually more the raritiy of that happening that makes the whole thing attractive.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

oh I see, so they are the special snowflake that finally convinced a man to open their heart. If the man opened their heart to every girl that happened by then it wouldn't be so attractive?

[–]MissPearlEditor of frequent typos.1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Remember we won't call it that, we'll allude to it in positive, justified terms. "Consumptive poet", for example. " Oooh, I'm the only one he Lets In."

The answer is, most of us. Humans are leaky sacks of emotional and physical health problems. Only when you love them you accommodate accordingly.

[–]powerkickPoly, Bi, Blue, Betafag6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I like how RPers believe they aren't and are actually MORE stoic than everyone else...

[–]nomdplumeFormer Alpha2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't believe I'm not that.

I just recognize that being that is counterproductive to having a fulfilling life and I work to minimize the negative aspects of those flaws by having those flaws rather than letting those flaws have me.

I aim to be more "stoic" - that doesn't mean I'm always "stoic" (or whatever you want to call it). I'm also human.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And yet, let's defend the anger phase

[–]chazzALB37yo Purple Perma-Virgin1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Wait ... if they find this guy repulsive why is this piece of garbage one of the best selling "novels" (just threw up a little) of all time? Why is every female radio DJ saying "oh my God. I like totally cant wait for the movie"

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Because its flashy and touches on the taboo. It lets milquetoast housewives to scared acknowledge their desires much less talk to their SO's about their desires see there desire play out on paper or on scene. A few might filter in to the larger BDSM community but most will keep it in the bedroom.

[–]chazzALB37yo Purple Perma-Virgin2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But it's soooo poorly written.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

they are sexually repress housewives who the very thought of it is probably enough, they cant be bothered to read good erotica like story of O and the like. Also i am imagine a peggy hill type liking it. I don't imagine them having any taste.

[–]OfSpock0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

milquetoast

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

THERES A Q I never saw that word spelled before

[–]BakerofpieRed Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It IS! It IS repulsive! Fuck you to anyone who likes that book.

[–]PowerHuffGirl 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm honestly wondering, is that what you seriously think or... am I failing to detect internet sarcasm again?

[–]BakerofpieRed Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, I'm exaggerating a bit, I don't honestly feel a seething hatred for people who like the book, but yeah. It's horrible. And the Christian Grey character makes me want to throw up.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is a terribly written book

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Because midwestern house wives that can't be bothered to read good erotica like Story of O, and they have no functional knowledge of what bdsm is actually like. So they read and get turned on by an abuser alphatm. An abuser alpha i might add that by the end of the trilogy gets thoroughly mind fucked by the metaphorical embodiment of watching paint dry to no longer want to be dominant or have any D/s in the relationship. In fact by the end of the trilogy the metaphorical embodiment of paint drying is the Defacto domme. over the course of the trilogy its basically the inverse of Story of O but way worse and incompetently written.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The Story of O is about as abusive as it gets. I don't think that's any where near representative of BDSM either, and I know many people on /r/bdsm agree

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My point with story of O wasn't that from a IPV stand that its good. My point was that it is a better story and better written.

Also most BDSM erotica romance is going to tend that way, the fantasy of desire and reality of desire don't always mesh together well.

Romance novels are like comics books. Does it describe reality? no. do they portray realistic characters or standards of character? no its fantasy.

[–]nicethingyoucanthaveRed Pill Male0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Writing is a conscious, deliberate act - an attempt to create characters with believable motivations. Unfortunately, people are not necessarily conscious of every behavior or attribute to which they are attracted (or by which they'd be repulsed).

The above statements are true. I doubt anyone will have any argument against them. Now here's an opinion:

When the author writes about BDSM, she is relating a primal urge that she as a woman has experienced. That shit was hot. It turned her on. It doesn't matter why it turned her on but it did. So she is conscious of it and able to write it into her story.

When the author writes about a man infatuated with a woman and begging her stay with him, she is guessing that this is also something that would also turn her on. She's attempting to write a believable character, but she's not calling on personal experience.

As a red pill dude I am quite certain that, billionaire or not, getting on your knees and crying is going to turn a woman right the fuck off. But the author of 50 shades doesn't know this.

which one is it

This is logical fallacy: false dilemma. There's no reason at all that if I believe there is some interesting truth in part of the book, that I am therefore required to accept the entire thing.

[–]PowerHuffGirl 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

But the author of 50 shades doesn't know this.

But the millions of women who bought this book and made it a bestseller do know. If his begging was that much of a violent turn off, the female readers would have been, well, turned off by it and wouldn't have recommended it to their friends, would they?

There's no reason at all that if I believe there is some interesting truth in part of the book, that I am therefore required to accept the entire thing.

Except the fact that millions of women bought this book and felt turned on by it? Why is that not a reason?

[–]nicethingyoucanthaveRed Pill Male0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

the millions of women who bought this book and made it a bestseller do know

Do they?

Have you ever heard of Dan Gilbert)? He's a psychologist and did an interesting experiment involving happiness. Two photography classes were offered. In each one, the students produced two large prints of photos they'd taken. In both classes, the students were told they could keep one of the prints, but the university would keep the other as proof that they'd completed the class.

Half the students were told that once they made their choice, they would unable to change their mind. The prints the university keeps would be sent to storage, or something. The other half were told, if you get the print home and hang it up and it doesn't look good in your house, just give me a call and you can swap it out for the other one.

He later surveyed the students and found that those who (thought they) couldn't change their mind were happier with their choice than those who could change their mind. He also has an interesting experiment where he makes the same finding in people with no short-term memory. They can't remember that they can, or can't change their mind, but they're still happier when they can't.

So now consider this: if you were looking to take a photography class and you saw that two classes were offered, and that the only difference between them was that in one you'd be able to change your mind and swap out the print you take home for the one the university keeps - and in the other, you wouldn't have that choice - which class would you prefer to take?

I can't imagine anyone preferring the class that doesn't allow you to change your mind.

What's the point? The point is, people cannot accurately predict in advance what will make them happy. When you ask me why millions of women read about (I'll take your word for it) a crybaby and still like the book, this is my answer: none of those women have had a billionaire down on his knees crying in front of them, but it sounds pretty cool, so they like it.

Some of our innate instinctive desires we are conscious of, some we aren't.

There's no reason at all that if I believe there is some interesting truth in part of the book, that I am therefore required to accept the entire thing.

Except the fact that millions of women bought this book and felt turned on by it?

turned on by it - see that? you're still demanding that I accept the entire book as an "it" and either every single thing in the book is a turn on, or nothing is. You're still doing the false dilemma fallacy.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]nicethingyoucanthaveRed Pill Male0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

This isn't about predicting what will make them happy

Yes it is. It's exactly about that, and it's perfectly parallel to the study that Dan Gilbert did.

Women reading a book and thinking, "wow that's hot!" is exactly like students reading a course catalog and thinking, "this class sounds cool."

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]nicethingyoucanthaveRed Pill Male0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

No, it isn't exactly like it.

Yes, it is exactly like it.

In both cases, you're simulating an experience in your head.

  • this class would make me happy

  • a man acting this way would be attractive

Exactly the same. Dan Gilbert's research is the answer to the question you asked in the OP. If (as you claim) women read the book and think that guy would be attractive to them, they are wrong. Just like the people in his research who read the course description and think course B would make them happier.

It's exactly the same cognitive error. And by the way, if it makes this pill a little easier for you to swallow, men do the exact same thing. How many examples in literature use the troupe of the whore with a heart of gold? How many men could actually date a prostitute and be happy?

It's exactly the same thing.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]nicethingyoucanthaveRed Pill Male0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

why would the simulation be attractive, but not the real deal

???

For the same reason that the simulation would predict "happiness" but the real deal does not result in happiness.

Actually, it's not quite the same because when it comes to women and sexuality, they are further handicapped in their ability to predict attraction by two facts: (1) they have a dual mating strategy, and a vulnerable man meets the requirements of one strategy. (2) We've all grown up in a culture heavily invested in denying women's nature.

the physical arousal is factually there when they read the book. How do you explain that?

You can't seem to divorce yourself from that false dilemma fallacy. You want me to take the book as a whole or exclude it as a whole. I refuse to do that. The accept that the portions of the book featuring BDSM are arousing. What makes you think that the portions of the book where he cries, or whatever, are arousing??

I've offered you two answers (1) they aren't arousing, even though the book as a whole is. In this answer, you're just pushing a logical fallacy. (2) women are okay with what they're reading, because as Gilbert showed, they can't accurately predict what they'll be attracted to in real life.

For answer 2, I even gave you a parallel in men. Men reading a book or watching a movie about a hooker or a stripper and thinking, "wow that'd be great!" You seem to have just ignored that.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]YaBoiTibzzenjoying the blueper reels0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just have to point out, Ana did break up with him. Given that he has basically everything else ever going in his favor, I'd argue that her breaking up with him would be pretty much unthinkable if he wasn't so extremely dramatic and emotional. So from that point of view you could say that his behavior did decrease his SMV, luckily, he had many other factors in his favor to keep it high.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Has anyone looked at Nostalgia Critic's analysis of "Why is Loki so hot?" Loki isn't Christian Grey, but he's also powerful AND kind of pathetic at times. For a blue-pillish guy, NC explains it pretty well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl30aEahlIU

Short explanation: because vulnerability makes him accessible to That Certain Someone, who can heal his problems, and thus earn his undying loyalty. And then he will use his powers FOR That Certain Someone :)

[–]DownThaRabbithole0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because depression and vulnerability can bring out a woman's nurturing side. When combined with stimulating attraction it can be a very powerful combo.

Your example shows the incompleteness of TRP... Not that it's wrong. Good post nonetheless.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He's rich and other people do what he says. This is what makes him attractive to her. This is social proofing at its finest. He's a very busy man. He has lots of things to do with his time, and instead he spends it on plain jane.

This is the same as some average guy getting hit on by a supermodel.

His abasement to her is not what makes him attractive, but it makes HER feel attractive. She's getting validation that she's a prize to be won, and she's getting it from a rich and powerful man.

[–]Chasethehorror0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the second one. i loved holding my exes while they cried

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter