I've encountered many men in the redpill spheres who literally insist that both genders were treated horribly throughout history, maybe even more so men than women, and therefore even the first feminist movement was kind of pointless and a call for female supremacy.

EDIT:

I've read through all of the interesting replies and here's my final view. Without trying to be offensive to men: women still got the shorter end of the stick. I can see that everyone is pointing to social class for their arguments, and that's specifically what I'll tackle.

Both men and women in the lower classes were treated really horribly yes, but in the upper classes, women's rights were significantly less than men's. And no, the philosophy of "having different roles" i.e women staying at home and raising kids and the men only occasionally fighting in a war, is simply not equal or correct.

  • Men in the upper classes could do pretty much anything they wanted: own a business, have bank accounts, become a doctor lawyer etc., travel, remain single, have extra-marital affairs while not getting judged for it and the blame being instead put on the wife for not satisfying her husband.
  • Women had no such freedoms. They received an education yes, but it was mostly for show, dubbed "a lady's education" and mostly comprised of learning languages, music, art and embroidery. They couldn't do much with their education except use it to maybe enhance their prescribed life by impressing other women and hopefully attracting a man who won't cheat on them with a mistress. They couldn't excel to professional positions relating to what they studied, they were not allowed to have any job other than teaching perhaps. They could not open a bank account or own or buy a business.
  • A woman staying single or not having children (even due to things she couldn't control such as fertility issues) was social and sometimes financial suicide.
  • Arranged marriages happened all the time, especially in the upper classes for financial reasons and reputation. Sure you might argue that the men in those situations may have been just as disapproving as the women. But let's be honest: most of the men didn't mind, and liked the control. That's not even mentioning the fact that maritial rape was not considered wrong until very recently, and throughout all of history, young girls as young as 14 could be paired up with far older men and it never happened the other way round.
  • Upper class men could vote and have their say in politics. Women sometimes couldn't even have a say in politics without men dismissing them because of the notion that women were too emotional and stupid.
  • Less men were forcefully drafted into the army than you think. And then, many men the upper classes could bribe their way into at least doing very menial work. Also it's not as if all countries were full on at war all the freakin' time.