CMV: The fact that it's harder for men to get sex makes high n-count guys more pathetic not more admirable.

There is a common argument here that studs are admirable and sluts are not because it is easy for women to get sex but not men.

I disagree since by itself, being hard doesn't make something admirable.

For an example, it would be very difficult for a woman to sleep with all the A-list celebrities. Imagine a woman bragging that she slept with Tom Hanks, Justin Bieber, Brad Pitt, Denzel Washington, Bradley Cooper, etc. She had to spend years infiltrating herself into their social circle and seducing them. Would you really admire this woman or would you ask yourself, what was the point? Just bragging rights? It's pathetic to spend so much time and effort on something so trivial. In fact the harder it is, the MORE pathetic it is.

In the same way a guy with a high n count is pathetic. He spend so much time getting laid, for what gain? Once the sex is over its over. He is no better off than he was before besides feeling a little validated, just like the woman above. It's not admirable, it's stupid. Accomplishing something difficult is only admirable if the end goal is something worthy of praise, and having sex is not something worthy of praise because it doesn't have any value outside of the initial validation and dopamine hit.