Us men have attempted to explain to women why: women can't rack up their n count like men can and why women are judged on their n count, to almost no avail.

We've tried the lock and key analogy, we've tried using economic terms (value, mileage), and even tried evolutionary psychology/biology arguments (still to no avail).

Female solipsism, a redpill term, may be the reason why women can't understand or comprehend these arguments, so let's try using the marriage analogy.

Before I get into the argument, let me address some underlying points which underpin the argument:

  1. Men typically have to exert more effort in obtaining sex
  2. Women typically DON'T have to exert more effort in obtaining sex
  3. Men most of the time propose to women
  4. Women most of the time are proposed to
  5. Men typically want sex
  6. Women typically want relationships

The argument:

If a man has proposed to 20 women, that is indicative of low SMV and low RMV. This is because ideally, women should have to WORK for relationships, especially marriage which is arguably the endstage of the girlfriend/boyfriend relationship. It's a woman's duty to keep a guy around after sex. The fact that a man is handing out rings like pennies shows he is desperate and low value.

On the other hand, if a woman has been proposed to 20 times, that indicates high value. There's something good about her which multiple men have identified, which is why many men wanted to wife her. It shows she is good at keeping men after the initial sex and is good long term relationship material for men. She's high value.

Now, compare this to sex:

If a woman sleeps with 20 men. That indicates low value. Why? Women don't have to work for sex. Women are the gatekeepers of the sexual market place, they choose which guy gets to have sex and which guys don't. So, if a woman has a high n count, it indicates low value, because she sleeps with many men, most who don't commit and rack up many bodies. As a female she doesn't filter and vet properly and gets smashed by anyone.

On the other hand, if a men sleeps with 20 women. That indicates high value. Multiple women let him have sex. He as a man had to work for sex, sex doesn't come to him, and he managed to sleep with 20 women, indicating there's something about him attractive to women which is why he slept with 20. He's high value. This is why the lock and key analogy is quite accurate, Men have to unlock sexual access of women who are the gatekeepers. It's got nothing to do with objectification, feminists don't even THINK about that.

The reason why the pencil and sharpener counter analogy doesn't work is because sex doesn't come freely to men, like it does for women. So the argument is irrelevant.

Obviously, I speak in reference to society as a whole and general male nature and female nature. Sure, there's some women who don't want relationships and just wanna have sex with young men, sure there are men who just wanna have families and not have a lot of sex. Sure there are more anomalies and exceptions to the rules but we're speaking in general here. Specific anomalies can't be used to discredit the argument.

Let's go!