TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

MP Jess Phillips: ‘You have to be a remarkable woman to get to the top, average men get there all the time...

CarbonBlob78

November 23, 2015
41 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://archive.is/9I86b
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title MP Jess Phillips: ‘You have to be a remarkable woman to get to the top, average men get there all the time...
Author

CarbonBlob78

Upvotes 41
Comments 35
Date November 23, 2015 10:49 PM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3u0432/mp_jess_phillips_you_have_to_be_a_remarkable/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/mp-jess-phillips-you-have-to-be-a-remarkable-woman.966493
https://theredarchive.com/post/966493
Top posts by CarbonBlob78

Male politician endures embarrassing radio interview about his love life; imagine the outrage if the sexes were reversed...

65 upvotes
February 26, 2015
/r/MensRights

Clever girls, stupid boys? (An old but still relevant article)

58 upvotes
December 6, 2015
/r/MensRights

New app Lulu allows women to rate the men they've dated | Daily Mail …

38 upvotes
June 21, 2015
/r/MensRights

13 Ways White Male Privilege Shows Up as Early as Elementary School (Yes, really)

36 upvotes
December 31, 2015
/r/MensRights

A brief history of Feminism, Men's rights, and MGTOW (Bane666au)

28 upvotes
June 28, 2015
/r/MensRights

The propaganda of toxic feminism part 33-Misandry in education special

22 upvotes
July 2, 2015
/r/MensRights

FGM and male circumcision: should there be a separate ethical discourse?

18 upvotes
June 24, 2015
/r/MensRights

Testosterone boost 'could cut deaths'

16 upvotes
March 16, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]azazelcrowley 37 points38 points39 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Literally the opposite of the truth thanks to all women shortlists.

[–]ashlaaaaay 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My first thought as well. She's a completely disgusting individual.

[–]Capitalsman 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My thought was actually it's not average men at the top, the men at the top usually have some learning disability or something along those lines.

[–]pnw_diver 21 points22 points23 points 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

"Jess Phillips" is walking, talking proof that remarkable women apparently don't ever make it to the top, as she is at the top.

I wonder how her male constituents feel, being represented by someone who so viscerally hates men?

[–]montereybay 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think women are just like men, It seems like the slimiest idiots make it to the top. Carly Fiorina is the female GWB. Meg Whitman is another self-unaware dumbass.

[–]pnw_diver 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hillary Clinton is the female GWB. She's even running on his foreign policy.

But yes, you make a fine point.

[–]SirSkeptic 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Is she saying that you have to be in the top 5% of women to match the skills of the average man?

That's pretty insulting to women isn't it. I'm sure women are more talented than that.

[–]cgwriter 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe she is implying that men coast through life, so even an average man can end up in good positions. The corollary is that women have it hard, so it takes an extraordinary woman to get to the same level as an average man. She is also, in part, patting herself on the back quite a bit.

By almost every statistical measure we use to calculate one's standard of living, the average man is actually having a pretty rough go of things, but that doesn't make for good gender politics so... yeah.

[–]ExpendableOne 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes and no. Let's say you have a thousand men pursuing a certain career, and only a hundred women pursuing that same career(which is often the case in a lot of professional fields, because women don't want to compete at that level, or don't need to because they have a lot of other alternatives available to them that men do not). The odds of having the best woman, in that hundred woman, be better than the best man, in that thousand men, is very slim(just mathematically, the odds are not in their favour). For every exceptional woman in that hundred, there would be ten exceptional men.

You'd also find that the top women in that hundred is comparable to your average man in thousand(with the bar being set that much higher because of the bigger pool of talent to pick from, and higher level of competition due to higher number of competitors). What she's saying could be interpreted as either misogynistic(essentially saying that a woman have to be exceptional to be on par with your average man, therefore inherently inferior) or misandric(dismissing the skills of men because they are men and over stating the efforts/talents of women), but it's a stupid comment to make either way. Men in female dominated fields have the same problem(at least as far as I know, I imagine the most talented of male cheerleaders is about average compared to the number of female cheerleaders there are).

[–]Jonesey505 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It must be all those female only shortlists they have in politics, ensuring women get to the top based on talent alone.

[–]rottingchrist 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The hubris is cringeworthy. She is not even average. She is mediocre.

[–]tallwheel 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

men’s-rights lobby

I didn't realize we have a "lobby" now.

In the worst of these someone threatened to pour molten metal into her vagina.

I'm pretty sure she can rest assured that isn't a legitimate threat.

[–]JohnKimble111 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jess Phillips is a huge liar. I've seen the comments in question in their original form before they were taken down and also examined the full posting history of those behind the comments. Both were racist National Socialists with no posting activity anywhere about men's rights at all. None.

[–]j_hodder 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"You have to be a remarkable woman to get to the top. Average men get there all the time."

I guess that means a "remarkable" effort from a woman is equivalent to a man's average. The fact that men, on average, work longer hours and take shorter vacations and other forms of leave would seem to back that up somewhat.

[–]xNOM 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I had no idea she thinks so lowly of women, in general. Oh wait, she's a feminist I forgot.

[–]TheDude41 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Try getting to the top by being a altruistic-appearing human being who fights for those of the opposite sex instead of always their own, MP Jess Philips. You know, how chivalrous douchebag males have to pander to women to claw their way to the top, and how women always seem to be offered the upper hand in everything.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

So she sees herself as a warrior...for social justice.

And we've come full circle.

I don’t fear some horrible rape person online. What I fear, actually, is the men’s-rights lobby just turning up,

So much for her desired open door policy.

“A load of men who feel they have got a bit of a crappy existence, which somehow is entirely down to the fact that people like me are sticking up for women. The two things aren’t mutually exclusive.

That doesn't refute their claims either.

“She was basically telling me I didn’t have any right to be upset. And that’s not right."

No she was saying you have no right to be taken seriously simply because you're upset.

There’s something wrong with the fact that women never rise to the top.

She said, from the top, maligning another woman at the top for questioning her reasoning.

[–]jimbobrosso 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

how far was that trumpet shoved up her arse

[–]fourthwallcrisis 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Considering how far below average she is herself, it's hard to believe this statement.

[–]aussietoads 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So Jess Phillips will never get to the top then.

[–]Deansdale 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She's a remarkable cunt.

[–]garglemesh42 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're giving her too much credit, she isn't even that remarkable in her cuntiness.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women have different incentives, they have more freedom to do what they really want to do - kids, friends, shopping and stuff. That's why they tend to end up lower than men. That remains true even when women are given privileges to bypass men in public jobs and politics in particular.

So, the real question, she should be asking, is: how to force women to appreciate the same things as men?

[–]Landjo 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And of course: how to open up more choices to men. Feminists are right every once in a while: gender roles are very constraining. Especially for men.

[–]Landjo 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What is bothersome is not that Jess Phillips says something like this, but that few people call her out on the blatant sexism publicly. We have freedom of expression; but there should be mechanisms in place that make sure people are accountable for the things they say. On a few issues, notably gender, that is not the case.

[–]BruceCampbell123 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Average men make it to the top? I'm great at being average, it's what I'm best at! Where's my slice of the Patriarchy?

[–]garglemesh42 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When you ignore the bottom 90% of men like a lot of women do, the "average" (the average she perceives) is skewed pretty badly.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because women see top quality men as average. We all remember the OK cupid date: men rated women roughly along the bell curve. Women meanwhile rated 80% of men as below average.

[–]ExpendableOne 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems like a very good example of the Dunning–Kruger effect(basically the inability to recognize how inept you are, because you are inept). Either that or just a combination of delusional narcassism, female chauvanism and misandry(basically, her inability to recognize the value in men, because they are men, and overvalue her own value, or the value of average women, because they are women).

[–]Blutarg 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, look at Hillary. She got to where she is with no help from any man.

[–]Antrophis 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Glancing towards her ex president husband .Yup no help. Glancing towards here total corporate sellout position

[–]Blutarg 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

[–]Alkomb[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"rape person"
Laugh my freaking butt off, what?

[–]Black_caped_man 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn’t make me feel scared. At all, because I recognise the internet can be a toilet for idiots who make those threats.

This may well be the best statement from this woman that I found in this article. I only managed to get halfway through before I couldn't stand the authors obvious infatuation with this woman. Still I felt the need to note the positive things.

I don’t fear some horrible rape person online. What I fear, actually, is the men’s-rights lobby just turning up, A load of men who feel they have got a bit of a crappy existence.

Wow such empathy, such caring, such humanity.

which somehow is entirely down to the fact that people like me are sticking up for women. The two things aren’t mutually exclusive. The fact that I stick up for women doesn’t mean that I think all men are rapists. But that’s lost somewhere in translation. Obviously I don’t think that. I married one! I gave birth to two of them.

It's funny because I bet the backlash she's getting isn't because she thinks all men are rapists it's not even because she's interested in womens issues, it's because she completely disregards and minimizes the struggles of men. She's not just sticking up for women, she's actively pushing down men, and that is exactly the reason for why men's rights exist. Men calling for their issues to be taken seriously, to be seen, is something that actually scare her. I don't get how she can look her husband or her sons in the eye while having laughed at an initiative to take their suffering seriously.

If I knew the answer I would be cracking on with the solution. It’s not like they weren’t democratically elected because they are. You have to be a remarkable and amazing woman to rise to the top, whereas average men get there all the time. It’s really, really depressing.

You don't have to be a remarkable and amazing woman to rise to the top, you just have to put in a little bit of effort. (I suppose that means you have to be a remarkable and amazing woman thouhg /s) The reason that so many men make it to the top is that a much larger amount of men will actually put in time and effort to get somewhere while women are much less likely to do so. I'm sure there are plenty of capable women out there but they just don't choose to go somewhere with those capabilities. That's their prerogative as human beings. But you are free to force them into doing something they don't want if you can manage to. Just realize that you will be forcing women to do things they don't want.

This woman seems to be not much different than what she accuses men to be, she's not very remarkable she's just loud, a bit of a bully and willing to make herself heard. The fact that she's a woman also means she can tell someone to shut up and still be where she is now.

After this point there was way to much British politics that I don't know shit about and seemingly even more praise towards this woman by the author, I totally lost interest.

[–]Rockbottom503 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This woman is loving the limelight she has created for herself. She might as well get it all off her chest now, come the next election she'll be out on her ear!

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter