TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Woman to become FDNY firefighter... despite failing crucial physical test

PoppaDR3W

May 3, 2015
464 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://nypost.com/2015/05/03/woman-to-become-ny-firefighter-despite-failing-crucial-fitness-test/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Woman to become FDNY firefighter... despite failing crucial physical test
Author

PoppaDR3W

Upvotes 464
Comments 98
Date May 3, 2015 4:26 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/34q8rg/woman_to_become_fdny_firefighter_despite_failing/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/woman-to-become-fdny-firefighter-despite-failing.981253
https://theredarchive.com/post/981253
Top posts by PoppaDR3W

Women have an easier fitness test for the FBI

238 upvotes
January 2, 2017
/r/MensRights

Despite testing for the same exact position, women have easier physical fitness standards than men

120 upvotes
July 24, 2015
/r/MensRights

Men have a harder physical fitness test for local law enforcement careers

102 upvotes
April 24, 2015
/r/MensRights

How is this not discrimination? (NY)

68 upvotes
April 18, 2017
/r/MensRights

I see a lot of "no men in women in the women's bathroom" posts a lot on social media lately

61 upvotes
April 24, 2016
/r/MensRights

Only men interrupt women (Found on my Facebook feed)

45 upvotes
May 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

Saw a NJEA commercial that bothered me...

25 upvotes
June 20, 2017
/r/MensRights

Moms eat free... on Easter?

12 upvotes
April 5, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 103 points104 points105 points 11 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Under the FDNY’s new hiring policy, probies must earn at least 75 percent on the combined requirements of academics, hands-on skills and physical fitness. Wax had a high grade-point average on her academics, which officials determined offset her FST deficiency, the insider said.

Its good that she has good grades but if she is not physically capable of passing the test she should not be allowed to graduate and become a firefighter. This can put many people at risk when she is a part of a group responding to a fire. Regardless of gender, if someone fails the test that deems whether they are fit for duty, they shouldn't be allowed to become a firefighter.

[–]uncommonman 25 points26 points27 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She was also to old until they lowered those standards to:

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2010/12/21/city-councilman-wants-nyc-firefighter-age-limit-raised/

[–]TerdMuncher 25 points26 points27 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Too* and too*

[–]uncommonman 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

:-P

[–]ThePedanticCynic 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unless part of her academics included telekinesis training, this is bullshit.

[+][deleted] -50 points-49 points-48 points 11 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

There's a place for specialization in fire departments. Not everyone needs to have the strength to break open a door. Sure, it's nice to have everyone being able to do it in a pinch, but fire departments do a lot of things which have nothing to do with physical strength (and has a lot to do with education), and it would be nice if everyone were optimal there as well.

I assume the people who make the call know what they are doing.

[–]Bananahelicopter 86 points87 points88 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

If you want to be a cook in the Armed forces, that ain't going to happen unless you pass basic training.

[–]samsc2 30 points31 points32 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Sadly though even the military has sexist standards where the women only have to be a fraction as capable as the males when it comes to anything physical. For my job I had to lift something close to 100lbs to a top shelf but for my female counterparts it was a limit to 40lbs(I was munitions systems aka AMMO).

[–]InWadeTooDeep 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Aren't there single munitions which weigh more than that?..

[–]samsc2 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

shittons of them. Hell a single can of 50 cal is about 120 lbs and I was still expected to load an entire truck full of them then off load them into storage all while the two female coworkers of mine stood and chatted(this was in afghanistan where my main goal was to do w/e work was to be done and then get the hell away from all the explosives)

[–]InWadeTooDeep 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You should have gotten their pay.

[+][deleted] -50 points-49 points-48 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

... and because of that, it's a statistical fact that food in the army on average isn't as good as it could have been ;)

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]harryballsagna 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure the wink is intended to show it was a joke.

[–]TyrZero 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

See his other comment. He is serious, unfortunately.

[–]harryballsagna 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The other comment (women can do some different firefighting job) doesn't lead me to believe his second comment (women are good cooks, amirite?) is real.

[–]dickholedoug 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think "statistical" and "fact" mean what you think.

[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The set of all people who pass basic training, is smaller than the set of people who pass or fail.

We can assume cooking skill is randomly distributed and independent from ability to pass basic training. The best of a large set is on average better than the best of a smaller set.

Was that spelled out clearly enough for you? Sheesh, either mensrights has changed, or this got linked to by redpill or something. You wouldn't always get downvoted to hell for stating a simple statistical fact that goes against the preferred narrative.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Everyone starts out as a basic firefighter, eventually advancing with training. She should be able to complete the fundamental physical tasks at hand to gain access to being a basic firefighter.

Other women completed it, and they even agree it males ALL women look bad. This can get herself and ohers seriously hurt or killed.

[–]Lildrawers 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

she will most likely be forced out any way being as so many people are so pissed off. she will most likely be assigned menial tasks and given the shit jobs as well as treated poorly by everyone she works with and will quit because of it then sue the city because of it

[–]spankytheham 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then a lot of the weak men should be allowed to pass as well. Oh wait...

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I interpreted the article too mean she will be going into the fire with the other firefighters when I read this quote

"We’re being asked to go into a fire with someone who isn’t 100 percent qualified,” the source said. “Our job is a team effort. If there’s a weak link in the chain, either civilians or our members can die.”

What you said does make it less worrisome though. Let's hope she won't be one of the people who need to be very physically fit.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Commish all but said his rationale was being afraid of special interest lawsuits. Why test, then?

[–]ThePigmanAgain 87 points88 points89 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

"If there’s a weak link in the chain, either civilians or our members can die.”

Meh, what's a few lives compared to one woman's self-esteem?

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely fucking nothing if it comes to the lifes of men. We just recently had Hilarious Clinton explain to us, that the real victims in wars have always been the women.

[–]An_Octopus 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm genuinely curious if you have a source. I believe it but still want to see it with my own eyes.

[–]abcIDontKnowTheRest 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not american, or the one you asked, but I don't believe it was "recent" at all. The sources that I found cite it as First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, at the First Ladies' Conference on Domestic Violence, in San Salvador, El Salvador -- NOVEMBER 17, 1998

Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children.

It may be recent in that it's a belief she still holds and is coming to light again because of her presidential candidacy, but it's by no means a recently developed belief.

[–]Wargame4life 176 points177 points178 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

gambling with peoples lives in the name of entitled delusional morons

[–]Dr_Morsu 60 points61 points62 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Be firefighter Be in structure fighting fire AC unit falls thru roof on you Female partner doesn't have strength to move if off of you Die

Thanks Affirmative Action

[–]thegreyhoundness 29 points30 points31 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Hey, but at least she can feel "included"... totally worth it.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And write a book about HER experience watching helplessly as her colleague dies. Oprah will deify her. Ellen will dance with her. Steve Wilkos will goad his audience into laying off her. Glorious!

[–]Magicman116 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Girls rule, boys drool!

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Boys are stupid throw rocks at them

[–]mitchyslick8 36 points37 points38 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My dad was a firefighter for 25 years in San Diego. He was dealing with this kind of shit forever. The female firefighters take a different physical test than the men, or some cities just lowered the bar for everyone instead of having a separate test for the women.

I have no absolutely no problem with women being firefighters, as long as they meet the same physical standards as the men. The absolute truth is that there are almost no women that can handle the physical requirements. You've got around 70 LBS of gear on, minimal oxygen, you're skin is burning, and you've got to be able to singlehandedly carry a full grown man out of a building, possibly down stairs.

Here's the real problem, let's say a women makes the cut. The crew she's on goes out on a call that happens to be a multiple story structure fire. What if it's her and a male firefighter that are the last ones in the building. The roof collapses, or whatever and the male is incapacitated. She now has to get him out with the added weight of both of their gear. And that is in no way far fetched, I've heard plenty of stories about roofs and walls collapsing right on top of guys clearing rooms.

[–]Macismyname 53 points54 points55 points 11 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

There are women who can meet the standard. Watch some womens UFC and you'll see there are some kick ass ladies out there, but there is no god damn reason to lower the standard.

[–]scherlock79 93 points94 points95 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

From the article:

While Wax fell short, two other female probies in the graduating class passed the FST with flying colors.

then a little later:

Other female firefighters aren’t pleased about Wax’s treatment, either.

“A lot of the girls in the field are pissed because they feel like they’re getting lumped into the same category of a female getting special treatment and not meeting the same standards as the males,” the insider added. “It devalues what the women in the field have accomplished.”

[–]Macismyname 39 points40 points41 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good for them.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Nobody was saying a woman can't be a firefighter

[–]Macismyname 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

It's come in in these discussion before. For example, the women in the Infantry debate.

My point is, there is no god damn reason to lower the standard "for women" since there are obviously plenty of women that don't need the standard lowered.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Macismyname 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand why you can't say: Be able to haul 200 pounds or don't apply. And test the applicants, why does being male or female make any difference? Of course you should focus on the bigger bolkier blokes, but when that Brienne of Tarth looking lady shows up you give her the test too. If she can't "Thanks for applying"

I don't know why you would ever hire a frail looking individual male or female knowing that is a requirement, especially if they were physically untested.

Judging based on physical capabilities for a physically demanding position is fine, but saying you only allow men to apply isn't. What I really don't see is how it costs you somehow more money to allow a women to send in an application.

Also, I don't know how you people carry 200 pound things up stairs, but upper body strength? Lift with your legs!

(That was me closing on a joke to show this is a friendly discussion not an internet fight. I'm sure you all know how to lift)

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Macismyname 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It's sounds like your hiring process is VASTLY different from the hiring processes for fire departments/police/military where they go through lots of training programs/courses. So you only picking discriminating makes a lot more sense. Saying anyone can apply really is enough.

But you come across that resume from this lady talking about her construction work experience/personal trainer/whatever else that might be relevant. Maybe give that one a chance who knows. It totally makes sense in your process though that the risk vs reward wouldn't be worth it. However I don't think anyone is suggested you test all the women who apply because they are women in the same sense that you don't test all men who apply because they are men. Just the ones that sound qualified on paper.

I should also mention I have no personal experience with the hiring process at all, I've yet to have a job outside the military and have never needed to hire people within my business. Yet.

And as far as friendly discussion, dude you never know on the internet.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Macismyname 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

We take PT tests at the recruiting station, many are cut right then and there. And we had way more men fail the fuck out of basic than women, mostly because of the type of women that apply and also because of the ratio of men to women.

My entire point was for these jobs with specific physical tests and guidelines, of course women can pull it off, plenty have, plenty can. But the standard shouldn't be lowered. When standards are lowered to compensate you end up with that women who was the first ever air force pilot. She got her wings despite low marks, and crashed landing a plane some time later. Other women who didn't get a pass flew just fine.

You have every right to hire out men for that job, it's your god damn business. And you have logical reasons for it. But if Brianne of Tarth look a like showed up asking about a job, would you test her out?

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Arlieth 39 points40 points41 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Dude, this makes the firewomen who legit passed the fitness qualification exam look bad. There were two women who did just fine in the exact same class.

[–]HeroicPopsicle 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

firewomen

Frist off, Excuse me. But thats so sexist! Fire wymyn? For what? Having boobs? Im sorry you cant handle someone as perfect and beautiful as me, you pathetic fukboi. I wish you and your little-finger sized dick have a long and lasting relationship, alone. Cause no grill will ever talk to someone like you!

/s

[–]dynamite1985 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

when are they going to figure out that a 250 lb person is going to weigh the same whether or not you're a man or woman?

[–]Dnile1000BC 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Weight is a social construct you shitlord!

[–]ThePedanticCynic 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a Transfat and this triggered me!

[–]Insula92 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And the fire insurance rates in New York rose.

[–]sweezey 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Raise your hands if you want the person who "almost" passed the training test to come rescue you from a burning building.

Not it!

[–]Your_Time_Has_Come 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Way to go FDNY officials for placing the public in greater danger that will inevitably cause more property damage, injury and deaths.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

NY is, apparently, a shithole nowadays. Cops killing and being dicks at will, and now you can't even count on the Firefighters to save you because some frothing feminist shrieked her harpy lies until a listening ear just fucking couldn't take it anymore and gave in.

I think feminists keep getting their way because they're so persistent and people just get fed up listening to how strong a woman who can't lift something really is. Anyone with half a brain can tell they're full of shit.

[–]whatyearisthisagain 24 points25 points26 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You know those feel-good publicity stunts sportsteams sometimes do? Those where they get a retard onto the field and have him completely unchallenged score a touchdown? "Good job, buddy!" High-five. Hugs all around.

This is what this is like.

[–]Sigbi 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

nah, 1 is feel good for everyone, the other is feel good for the 1 women and potential death for her future co-workers and citizens.

[–]Sigul 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure that's the same thing. I only watched one of those videos, but it's just a game, and in the one I watched both teams agreed to the play beforehand. It's not like it was some dirty trick.

This is no game, putting a physically unfit firefighter on duty risks many people's lives.

[–]Havikz 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly I would be really angry if I found out I was handed a free win like that. As long as they're happy, I guess there's nothing wrong with it.

[–]Hamakua 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Very long but very good and very related in-depth article from 7 years ago. It's worth the time to read as the vast majority of it is objective accounts and citations and itself is a fantastic resource to cut through "equality of outcome" political pandering.

Women Firefighters: The Gender Boondoggle

Excerpt:

To prove its point, Los Angeles City Hall — just like Seattle, Miami, San Francisco, San Diego and other major cities, together with state governments — spent millions to recruit, train and house women. Los Angeles outfitted most of its 106 fire stations with costly women's lockers and women's showers, while politicians as well as fire chiefs Donald Manning and William Bamattre engaged in years of lip service, conjuring up an image of a new, professional class of woman firefighters.

[–]Grubnar 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for that link.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't like this.

[–]wrez 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think this is an open invitation to lowered physical standards for men as well.

Men will be able to sue for unfair standards, starting a chain reaction of standards lowering.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

starting a chain reaction of standards lowering.

Welcome to America.

[–]ChaosOpen 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She had a good GPA, because book smarts are what is needed when fighting fires. /sarcasm

The next article will be about how several qualified firefighters were fired for "bullying" when they refused to give the girl who failed FF school the proper respect.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Woman/Man passes the test: Welcome on board! Its awesome that you join the Fire Fighters! We're all glad to have you in the family

Woman/Man does NOT pass the test: Try again or do something elese. This is not against you. We know you really, really want this. But you're responsible for human lifes. We can't just let you in because we like you, even if we wanted.

Bang: Equality.

[–]PerniciousOne 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Remember to hire an additional male firefighter to do the physical tasks for her, or she can direct traffic.

All this does is ensure that the other successful female firefighters will get treated worse and only are there because they have a vagina.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, I hope she dies in a fire. Not because I want people to die. But to make sure that more don't die. Fire's don't make exemptions based on genders and neither should the department.

[–]8088XT8BIT 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Go figure .. Not surprised. Isn't this like working really hard to achieve something (some goal) and then cheating on the finale exams? Isn't taking a free (pussy) pass the same thing?

[–]ROUS_Do_Exist 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They have already been promoting minorities that didn't pass the academic test for years (remember that lawsuit a year ago)?

Plus, look at all of the older fire fighters that no longer could pass the physical test either.

City either lets women that can't pass the standards in or pays out millions in discrimination lawsuits against women and minorities.

She already got a break by being too old to join. Next up she'll sue when she finds out she makes less money than another person in her precinct and then demand 3mths maternity.

Equality!

[–]Sigbi 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If they are really worried about being sued etc then why not just split the fire departments responcibilities into 2. 1 Basic Fire & Community Support (this is for small basic fires, checking hydrants, cats in trees, jaws of life etc) and 2 Heavy Fire Support (Which is all the full hardcore tested fire people that do the big dangerous stuff). Allow both men and women to join whichever one they want (as long as they pass the test for the one they want) and grade the danger pay accordingly.

[–]ChaosOpen 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

All good except the last sentence, you forget, women want to be paid the same as men, reguardless of whether or not they are ACTUALLY doing the "same job as men."

[–]Sigbi 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

they would be doing the same job as men, the men in the 1st group of light work. both men and women in the first group get 1 set of pay, the men and women in the 2nd group get the separate higher pay because the job is harder and more dangerous.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And you circled right back to where things were, women being excluded from better paying jobs because they can't do them.

[–]Sigbi 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

no, because both men and women can do EITHER the easy or the hard one. You will have both men and women in BOTH professions just like the article said 2 women did pass the tests in those classes. this just lets those who don't want the extra danger or can't pass the tests to still be in the department in a meaningful way.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You aren't paying attention to the fact that the idiots argue that traditionally-female "cushy" jobs should be paid the same as those dangerous traditionally-male jobs. Idiots don't see that putting your life at risk means you should be paid more.

[–]Sigbi 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

just wait for all those families to sue after she gets her firefighter team killed or civilians killed. equality means equality damn it, if you can't do the job you don't get it. The equality part means the gender doesn't even get mentioned.

[–]cymrich 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

gotta ask... how do you pronounce that fire commissioners last name?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kara_Hultgreen

[–]autowikibot 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kara Hultgreen:


Kara Spears Hultgreen (5 October 1965 – 25 October 1994), was a lieutenant and Naval Aviator in the United States Navy and the first female carrier-based fighter pilot in the U.S. Navy. She died just months after she was certified for combat, when she crashed her F-14 Tomcat into the sea on final approach to USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72).

Image i


Interesting: Aviator call sign | Dagny Hultgreen | October 25 | Hultgreen

Parent commenter can toggle NSFW or delete. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Magic Words

[–]Wargame4life 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Center for Military Readiness (CMR) suggests that Hultgreen "may have been the victim of a flawed policy" which overlooked her mistakes in training, two of which were similar to those that caused her death.[2] The Navy conceded that the material on which the CMR based its report was "largely accurate".

[–]autotldr 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)


Wax's graduation comes as the city celebrates the FDNY's 150th anniversary and as the department is under pressure by the de Blasio administration to hire more women.

Wax had previously received another break to join the FDNY after pleading in June 2011 for a City Council bill that raised the age limit from 29 to 35 for applicants like her who first took the entrance exam in 2007.

Nigro, questioned by The Post during an FDNY anniversary celebration at a Midtown firehouse Saturday, refused to comment on Wax's fitness failure.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Theory | Feedback | Top five keywords: Wax#1 FDNY#2 FST#3 firefighter#4 pass#5

Post found in /r/PussyPass, /r/rage, /r/Feminism, /r/TumblrInAction, /r/MensRights, /r/Firefighting, /r/ProtectAndServe, /r/inthenews, /r/nyc, /r/Libertarian, /r/fatpeoplehate, /r/NewsFlip, /r/TwoXChromosomes, /r/AdamCarolla, /r/WorldNewsRevenge, /r/news and /r/nottheonion.

[–]abcIDontKnowTheRest 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I am a 300 lb man. Now, I may not live in NY, but if my house ever caught fire and she was one of the responders I'd be dead. Think about that for a second, "feminists". There are physical job requirements for a reason; I'm not miraculously going to lose weight if my house lights aflame so that she can carry me. My home won't miraculously stop flaming and smoking because she's too slow and running out of air.

Oh but wait, as a man, that would be my fault for being too heavy for her to carry. I should have been in better shape and she wouldn't have any trouble... /s

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]abcIDontKnowTheRest 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was merely to illustrate a point. I didn't say a man wouldn't have trouble carrying me on his own, just that she in particular would have no chance in hell. Someone who is physically fit and can pass the test that illustrates the real-world physical demands of the job would have a much easier time than someone who can't.

This document seems to indicate under the prep for Rescue section that they need to be able to do 4 reps, with a 2 minute rest interval between each, with a 165 lb "victim" which one could argue might be a standard representative of the average weight of an average person. Granted, I am heavier than 165 lb (as are many Americans), I wholly understand that and lay no blame on anyone else.

That being said, this woman cannot even meet the physical demands of carrying/dragging an average person. For a larger person, such as myself, they would likely do a two person lift or drag...she wouldn't even be able to help and the bulk would fall to the other person. Either way, she's not capable of performing the job and is endangering lives.

I have no problems with women in any sort of position: policing, firefighting, military, whatever. If you want to do it, go for it; but don't bitch and complain if you can't meet the physical demands of the job. Don't risk other peoples' lives just so that you can have your "dream job".

[+]gangstaman9000the2nd -7 points-6 points-5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

she blowjobbed it

[–]gsettle -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lowering the standard...it's a Democratic thing!

[+]GenderNeutralLanguag -14 points-13 points-12 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

When ever I see stuff like this I just think "Tuskegee Airmen". It's possible that these physical tests aren't important. Highly unlikely, but possible. If a bunch of people that can't pass the physical tests want in the FDNY, let them. Form a special all women fire house with what ever restrictions the women themselves deam reasonable. Send this group of figherfighters to burning buildings and see if any survive.

Most people thought that the Tuskegee Airmen would be little more than a distraction for enemy fighters so the "real" pilots, the white pilots would take less fire and have an easier time shooting at the enemy. At the time the expectation of an all black fighter wing was worse than the expectation of an all female Fire house.

My stance is preform the experiment and see what happens. Keep preforming the experiment until people are convinced of the results.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

who the fucks performs an experiment at the expense of risking someones life. that shit is unethical.

[–]GenderNeutralLanguag -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Every medical experiment ever performed has been at the expense of risking someone's life. Every experiment involving chemicals or flammables or explosives is at the expense of risking someone's life. Damn near every experiment ever preformed has been at the expense of risking someone's life.

The difference between an unethical experiment and an ethical one isn't risk. It is the informed consent of the people involved. I would never advocate repeating the "Tuskegee Experiments" that infected black people with Syphalus against their will, then lied to them about giving them treatment just to see if the illness took a different path in black men.

All individuals in the "Women Fire House" experiment would be properly informed as to what was really going on and properly equipped for the situation. The women wouldn't be abducted off of the streets and experimented on, but selected from volunteers that know what they are getting into.

[–]Revoran 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What about the people in burning buildings? Do they get to consent to having a bunch of untrained women come and save them?

[–]GenderNeutralLanguag -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We would need to send real firefighters as well.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I get the impression that you think the Tuskeegee airmen outperformed other units, as the historical narrative suggests. That's a proven falsehood.

[–]GenderNeutralLanguag -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It is indisputable that the Tuskegee airmen outperformed the expectation. They may not have outperformed other units to the extent of the historical narrative. They did do much better than the "not a single kill" and "They won't make it though one day" expectations of the unit.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ofcorce they did, because they're freaking Pilots. There's a far jump between "not immediately getting slaughtered" and outperforming other units of equal qualification.

[–]GenderNeutralLanguag -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The expectation was immediately getting slaughtered. About the same expectation I have of an all female Fire house.

An all female fire house wouldn't need to be "Hands down the single best fire house to ever operate". The morality rate of the fire fighters in that house would need to be low enough that more women would be willing to join and replenish losses. I expect that either the mortality rate would be so high no one would be willing to join it or the success rate for saving people so low that New Yorkers calling 911 start telling dispatch to not send the women because we are better off with out them responding.

[–]IShouldNotTalk 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter