~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Ayahuasca__
[–]Southerndude62 165 points166 points167 points 5 years ago (48 children) | Copy Link
When people go to Banks for a loan, their financial history is very relevant for a loan. But when it comes to women, their sexual history isn't relevant for a lifelong commitment. Feminist logic.
Fuck feminism.
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 30 points31 points32 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Woke guy 😎
[–]Cold_Difficulty_5298 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Here take my silver bro
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link
Works also for mens logically
[–]ravix_ridamaki 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yet the picture above promotes that bullshit for women and we don't, ever seen a man with holding that caption?
[–]IM_Pakshi 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm pretty sure...if a guy had sex with ton of girls you can easily spot him as a dick head , and most of the guys won't even get a atleast 2 gf ... only guys with money get pusssies
[–]Southerndude62 -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link
A key that opens all locks ( like men with multiple women) is called a master key. A lock that opens to all keys (like a s*ut) is called a defective lock. So no, logically doesn't work on men.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link
Women aren't a object, they are human, don't objectify them. When you find a human comparison tell me. Also this don't work with gay mens. There's a difference between anti feminism and pure misogynie. You're the latter.
[–]Southerndude62 -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link
The Bankers analogy works for people, you dumb woman. Objects don't show up for a bank loan, humans do. You are a dumb misandrist and nobody cares what you think. You are dumb: but no surprise: youre a feminist.
[–]Zamblotter 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow, I just checked this sub out from a justUnsubbed post and no surprise it is a woman hating echo chamber. Its ashame your so called key won't be fitting any locks :(
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link
Hope that no women date your sexist ass, they're much better with guys that respect them.
[–]Southerndude62 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link
I hope you stock up cat food, as you're going to be spending a lot of time with your cats but no men. Respect isn't given for free, dumb woman, it's earned. Women can't have it for free.
[–]DepressedNerd07 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link
Oh so men can?
[–]Southerndude62 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link
You think men have respect for free? LOL. Men are blamed for all evil. You stupid feminist have only misandry as your agenda.
[–]DepressedNerd07 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link
Men aren't blamed for all evil. They are blamed for the evil they have committed. All wars, started by men. All major decisions that negatively impact people, men make them.
I dont go up to one of my guy friends and blame him for WW2 because Hitler was a guy, but you cant say that women cant get respect for free just because she has had multiple sexual partners, yet men dont get any respect in general. Because that is ignorant.
And misandry is not on our "Agenda" it's really the opposite. And Mysogyny is embedded into your way of thinking, I can already tell.
Fuck off and get a life loser.
[–]MandrakeThePancake 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I highly doubt you would say the same about men, you inbred cockroach.
[–]kookie_doe 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because women aren't banks you dumb fuck
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Please specifically lay out this metaphor of loan vs sexual history. Financial history is important for a loan. It's used to factor risk and liability to fulfilling the agreement between lender and borrower. With a relationship, there isn't that sort of arrangement other than boundaries and (assumedly) being monogamous. Sexual history isn't intrinsic or inherently indicative of someone's worth as a person, nor how they behave in a relationship unless it's a trail of infidelity. You can have multiple partners without ever have been unfaithful. ...Are you worried you won't be able to fulfill a woman who's had more sexual experience than you? Is that the root of this? Or somehow you view someone as used up or not as pure because they're able to enjoy sex more openly than you can with your 1600s stance on the female body?
In OPs image, its equating women to literal possessions. Which again, doesn't make sense unless you're proud of seeing women as such. And unless you're of the incel teenage mindset that more partners = loose - if there isn't an STD issue, then someone else's sexual history has no real effect on you other than rattling your own insecurities. You may as well thrown out the "lock that opens to any key is a shitty lock" jab that really has no bearing either.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Actually based
[–]Southerndude62 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Sexual history is important to identify if a woman is a s*UT and hypergamous and in future may leave a man as she is "unhappy" with her sex life. Your useless barrage of words answered short and sweet.
[–]CompleteFacepalm 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sex isn't the only thing in a relationship.
[–]road_laya 92 points93 points94 points 5 years ago (111 children) | Copy Link
I have a nice friend, Bob, that might be interested in you, miss.
He's 59, unemployed, homeless, a midget and he is coming home to marry you in 15 minutes. But don't worry! His value isn't based on his wealth, looks or age!
[+]KristianGdG -57 points-56 points-55 points 5 years ago (109 children) | Copy Link
No one mentioned wealth, looks or age though. And no, those things shouldn't be used to evaluate a person either. Sure, their value to you as a partner might be less, but the overall respect they receive should be the same. The same applies to a girl's number of sexual partners. Would you say Bob would've had more or less value if you included the amount of sexual partners he's had?
The shoe analogy doesn't work either. Shoes depreciate in value because they get worn out, but vaginas are pretty much the same whether 5 or 50 dicks have been inside of them.
[–]road_laya 31 points32 points33 points 5 years ago (107 children) | Copy Link
Being a man is not the same as being a woman, especially not in terms of relationships. Men and women have different biology, preferences, psychology, economics, timespan for children, and different roles in a traditional marriage. So why would you expect men to be attracted to the same things as women would be attracted to? They were born this way, you know.
[+]KristianGdG -31 points-30 points-29 points 5 years ago (106 children) | Copy Link
No one ever told you to be attracted to anyone either. The keyword is "respect". You don't have to be friends with or in a relationship with promiscuous girls if you don't want to, just stop insulting and demeaning someone for liking orgasms with other people.
[–]kratbegone 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (105 children) | Copy Link
Women lose bonding when fucking that many guys. That is why divorce is initiated 85% by women. So guys have a right to know histories since the higher the count, the less likely she will stay committed and the higher chance of divorce rape. So as long as guys only date high count women everything is fine. But a man would be a fool to marry the same woman. Don't like it, reality sucks. Luckily for you there are plenty of dumb men who will not learn this until too late. Respect is earned, not just given. And our options are just as important as yours.
https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability
[+]KristianGdG -22 points-21 points-20 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
So promiscuous women tend to be less loyal in relationships. So what? Like I said, she might be less valuable to you as a partner, but her value as a person hasn't changed one bit.
And no, guys don't have a right to know histories, and the fact that a lower chance of commitment leads to higher rates of divorce rape is DEFINITELY a problem on the guy's part.
And yes, respect is earned, but there's a base level of respect you should have for a person you know nothing about. That amount can in- or decrease as you get to know the person, but the amount of sex said person has had should not be a factor.
[–]Shan_Miller 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I don't see how this is a problem for men.
In case you haven't noticed, the marriage contract almost solely benefits the woman in the relationship. It puts us at risk for loss of our finances, homes, cars, and puts a burden of responsibility for children that aren't ours in many states.
Don't worry, I'm sure half the men here will still have sex with you. We just won't respect you or have a long-term relationship with you because of your track record. The other half of us will be too worried you are disease ridden, and just like rotten meat, we won't touch you.
And don't worry if you don't tell us, your friends do. People care about people getting hurt, and bouncing from man to man does that. It hurts people. Even if you don't like to admit you've hurt people in the process.
Same goes for men. Feminists like to talk about how men are allowed to rack up numbers and just get fist bumps from their friends, but man-whores are seen as just as lowly to most of us. It isn't hard to get laid these days. Caving in to random women just shows you are weak-willed.
Sure reality can suck if you make bad choices.
Its still reality.
[–]KristianGdG 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh that's what you meant by divorce rape, I was thinking of something much worse. And I'm a guy, but even if I were a woman, I wouldn't want any member of this sub within a mile of where I am.
And no, same doesn't go for men, you can pretend, but it won't change the fact that our culture is at the very least tolerant of promiscuous men, but generally looks down on women who do the same.
But yeah, can't really argue against women being favoured in divorce courts as I have never seen evidence for the opposite, but I still believe it is a result of toxic masculinity, which feminists have tried to fight since forever.
Also didn't see you argue against women still having value despite being promiscuous, so I'm just gonna go ahead and assume we agree on that now.
[–]Shan_Miller -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Think you got me confused with someone else.
[+]daysinnroom203 -11 points-10 points-9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You’re in the wrong place if you’re trying to apply logic to this way of thinking. These people are way to emotional, and are making emotional responses.
[+]rogeliana -10 points-9 points-8 points 5 years ago (99 children) | Copy Link
That is why divorce is initiated 85% by women.
No, it's more because these men are making the women miserable, and the women are more willing to take a financial hit than stay with their husbands. The husbands must be pretty bad.
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/04/the-divorce-gap/480333/
Look, I'm quite religious and am in favor of chastity in both women and men before marriage. (Emphasis: BOTH men and women. Not just women.) But I think that study you link to (which looks like it has its own biases) is not showing the complete picture.
My theory is that women are working more, are becoming more socially aware that they don't have to put up with a man who makes them miserable.
When I was very young, the idea of "divorce" was shameful (especially in my church) so people would just suffer unhappily rather than divorce. The stigma has lessened over the years and that's another reason why divorce is on the rise. Now, when a marriage is miserable, more people are willing to end it, where before, they wouldn't.
I also suspect that the prevalence of porn in recent years has made more porn addicts, especially men (who seem more susceptible to porn), and women don't want to put up with that. (I know I wouldn't.) https://verilymag.com/2017/07/causes-of-divorce-effects-of-watching-pornography
[–]p-tittyy2 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link
Since when have women taken “financial hits” from divorce? More accurately, it’s akin to winning the lottery.
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link
https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/men-v-women-who-does-better-in-a-divorce
[–]p-tittyy2 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link
I bet you thought you proved something with that heavily researched, statistically accurate article from legalzoom.com didn’t you?
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link
There are plenty of other articles available, but you'll certainly dismiss them all, preferring the narrative that all divorced women are living high, and are gold-digging harpies. By all means, keep drinking that manosphere Kool-Aid.
[–]Shan_Miller 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (50 children) | Copy Link
Oh look a sourceless and poorly reasoned article from a woman (I'm sure you think 'theatlantic' is a great source of research) who doesn't want to have to take personal responsibility for her failures.
That anecdotal evidence surely bypasses observed trends in society.
Women have held sex over men's head for generations. I saw it with my parents, I see it in current generations. The fact men use porn as an escape from women who turn sex into a utility to get their way all the time should indicate to you that women are just as much of a problem in this situation.
Women don't like that sex can't be used to extort us as well anymore.
Boo Freckin hoo
[–]rogeliana -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (49 children) | Copy Link
LOL, you reject The Atantic but you think IFS is free of bias? You reject my source and I reject yours.
The fact men use porn as an escape
LOL, you think that's what's going on here? Do ten-year-old boys who start watching porn doing so to "escape" women? LOL. Porn is a HUGE problem, the elephant in the room, and some people don't want to address it. You think women should put up with a porn-addicted man with erectile dysfunction? Why are younger men suffering erectile dysfunction? Since porn is ubiquitous and children are sometimes exposed to it at a younger age, I seriously doubt that porn is a reaction to women refusing to give some men the sex they feel they are so richly entitled to (LOL). The odds are that the porn addiction came before these young men had that much experience with real, live women in the first place.
But if men prefer to "escape" in porn, they are free to do it, that's their business. But they can't simultaneously expect that women will tolerate their addicted, impotent selves.
LOL, is that what you think is going on? I have always objected to porn on moral grounds due to my religious background, but for a long time, I just figured that it was a thing that was common in regular society and didn't think much of it. I expected that the men in my church wouldn't indulge in it, but held no such expectations for other men.
Then I started learning about how it destroys relationships and causes the aforementioned impotence. Now I see that it is a huge problem for society, no matter whether you're conservative and religious or liberal and non-religious or anything in between. I mean I think we all can agree that young men being impotent is not a good thing.
But you go on defending porn, be my guest. Impotence, oh my gosh, lol.
[–]Shan_Miller 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (48 children) | Copy Link
When did I say anything about IFS?
I can tell I really touched a nerve. Sorry that you have such bad problems.
Also, religion is for weak people who need people to tell them how to be spiritual. That is you.
Lastly, here is an actual medical expert to tell you that your b.s. about impotence is purely that, a myth.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324068
Let me know when you have something based and intelligent to say.
If it takes you a while I'll probably have moved on. Much like the other men in your life have.
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link
That link is about masturbation, not porn.
The same site says there's a link between porn and impotence:
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/317117#:~:text=The%20use%20of%20pornography%20might,nerves%20require%20more%20physical%20stimulation.
Someone else linked to IFS (which blames women having more sexual partners on rising divorce rates) and you aren't wanting to debunk that, just the atlantic link I posted.
LOL. Oh, I'm so wounded by your disapproval of my faith.
It's funny that some men want a woman with very little sexual history, (and often that kind of woman comes from a conservative, religious background). These two things often go hand-in-hand. I am glad that most religious families will warn their daughters to stay far, far, FAR away from impotent porn addicts.
[–]kratbegone 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
Lol blame the guy, right. What a tool. Most religious types are simps I have noticed. Women are trained through social media that the grass is alwasy greener, and almost no woman divorces unless she has another guy lined up that she was cheating with. We are money and security to them, they do not have nor know the loyalty that men feel.
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Lol blame the guy, right.
In the narrative you favor, it's always blaming the woman, LOL.
Of course there are going to be times when the woman is to blame, and other times when that man is to blame. But just because she initiates the divorce, it doesn't mean it's her fault. If he's cheating or abusing her, he may not want her to leave, but her leaving isn't unreasonable, is it?
However, if women have more to lose financially in a divorce, and I see no proof that these women have another sugar daddy lined up (because if they did, they wouldn't be as financially strapped, would they?), then they really must want to leave. Which makes me wonder why (and point to the above-mentioned abuse or cheating as the reason).
[–]kratbegone 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
almost every story is the guy finding she had a man the whole time after the divorce. and women have more ot lose financially? Maybe in a few case when they rarely make more money, but otherwise that is hilarious.
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Almost every story I hear (from friends, friends of friends) is that they divorce, he quits his good-paying job to avoid paying childcare or otherwise doesn't pay child support, and she struggles to make ends meet.
Clearly, there are also anecdotal stories that show the opposite—that she was cheating all the time and takes him to the cleaners. Or, the court is grossly unfair and demands he give some outrageously high amount of his earnings for child support and/or alimony. I don't doubt that's a real thing. But the single mom with a deadbeat dad who doesn't support his kids at all is also a very common story. I personally know of several women who lived this and no, they weren't lying.
The articles I've seen (and there are many) point out that in many cases, the reason she makes less after a divorce is that she was primary caregiver of the children during the marriage and took a lower-paying job (or a job with fewer demands/advancement opportunities) in order to be more available for the kids. Husband is the higher earner (because he doesn't have to take time off to care for the kids). When she's by herself, she is still earning less, often while still taking more time for childcare, often devoting more time with the kids than him. He still has his higher-earning job, he's not responsible for the kids as much (often) and, if all other things being equal, he's simply making more money.
Sometimes child support is sufficient to help her make ends meet, sometimes it's not.
[–]Cold_Difficulty_5298 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
OK karen
[–]CompleteFacepalm -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well that's just a huge generalisation based on the women. You literally know nothing about her other than that she has had sex more tha once.
Just stop being an asshole and thinking that every women who isn't a loyal servant to all men is a slut who cares about stupid shit like that.
[–]Wingflier 62 points63 points64 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's an interesting way to advertise that you're a hoe
[–]1iioiioii1 31 points32 points33 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So don't put your feet into women with long sexual histories.
[–]osiris_89 54 points55 points56 points 5 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Your value as a human, no. But regarding your value as a partner, it's in the eye of the beholder. Learn to accept that actions have consequences.
[–]pontiflexrex -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Should men be virgins to up their value as well?
[–]Sergey32321 25 points26 points27 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
He is not talking virgin, there is difference between being passed around like an ash tray and normal people
[–]LandscapeClear1630 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Not to mention, men and women value things differently in a relationship.
[–]daysinnroom203 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You mean you have a different way of thinking. Please don’t speak for all men. You don’t.
[–]LandscapeClear1630 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hm.. no dude.
I meant literally what I wrote: " men and women value things differently in a relationship".
[–]Early_Cup6480 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
no, because women generally place a higher value on promiscuous men as their promiscuity is a sign that they have been pre-approved by the womens peers. men simply don't think that way.
[–]back_againx13 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm a female, and this does not match my experience at all - to the extent that I'm surprised that this is "a thing." I'm trying to go back through my memory, and I'm fairly certain that I've never had an acquaintance that holds the opinion that promiscuous men are preferable. If the topic comes up, guys who are known players are spoken negatively about. An example is a scenario where, say, two friends are having a drink somewhere, one of them says a certain guy is hot, her friend says something like "ya, but he's a player," and the first woman says something like "Oh/ew, fuck that/gross/etc." We warn each other about shit like that all the time. This is not to say that no women are attracted to promiscuous men, because I'm sure plenty are, but that goes against everything I've lived through.
I'm saying this because it speaks to a bigger issue - guys being shamed for being less sexually experienced. Whereas I've heard a million comments about who's a player and who to avoid, I've never heard a woman complain because a guy was a virgin in my company. I've heard plenty of women say that a guy didn't know what the hell he was doing, but that isn't specific to virgins. I hope that helps a bit. Shaming guys for not having had sex is ridiculous and hypocritical.
[–]LTBR1955 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
NO cz women don't prefer that do they ? That's on them :))
That's like asking should women become good financial providers to attract men as well ? NO cz men don't ask for that do they ?
[–]PM_ME_DNA 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
There are plenty of women who don’t want fuckboys and want a virgin man for marriage.
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Your plenty doesn't apply to the western world
[–]back_againx13 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm a woman, and I cannot count the number of times I've heard other women warn me or warn each other about players. It happens all the time. It's so common that I'm surprised this belief is a thing.
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You are not there are 72 genders
[–]LandscapeClear1630 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Unless she's extremely religious, I'd never heard a woman list "virginity" as one of her wished traits in a partner.
[–]Lonystal 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
you know damn well that a hoe's response to this is going to be "here we go again with men treating women like objects"
100% sure
[–]SomethingRand00m998 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So? Fuck 'em. Let 'em get mad.
Men really really need stop giving a shit about women getting mad. Let 'em protest. Let 'em riot. Let 'em bitch and complain like they always will.
Just don't cave to them. Tell them to fuck off and offer them no help. If you see a homeless woman, don't give her money. Donate that to a pro-male charity. Men need to stop heling other men and only men.
[–]Lonystal 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't necessarily agree. I mean yes you're right, we need to stop giving a fuck about these fucking feminists. But they keep ruining my favourite shows and movies man. With all that woke bullshit they've ruined almost everything I loved.
Also not giving money to a homeless woman..that's kinda bad because a homeless woman won't give a shit about all the feminism. She would just want to eat.
[–]FukinDEAD 29 points30 points31 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
If women can judge men over stupid shit how high status their job is compared to their own, men can judge women for their sexual history.
[–]WeirdSign7297 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
yes especially if he has to marry her and your finances are connected
[+]KristianGdG -14 points-13 points-12 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This isn't about what you can do, it's what you should do. Sure, you CAN burn down your ex's house, and some people do, but that doesn't mean you should do it. Just because you CAN judge a woman based on how much sex she's had, that doesn't mean you should, just as she shouldn't judge you over how high status your job is compared to her own. And no, the fact that women are doing something shitty doesn't give men an excuse to be shitty in return, just discourage the behaviour FFS, don't replicate it.
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If women can and are actually promoting highly sexualized behavior like this, men can do it too.
[–]KristianGdG 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, I completely agree! Don't know what part of my comment you are disagreeing with though?
[–]kampfy3 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
OP's post history is just agitation based off of zero commonality. If you agree with him, congratulations, you're an idiot. If you disagree with him, you're also an idiot.
The point is to be controversial. That's it.
[–]xndpxs 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This is bullshit, her value is subjective, I have ALL the right to value a person not only for his/her sexual history but also other variables. For example, there's a woman that doesn't like bald people, so balds will say "my value is not based on my hair" but for that person yes, that directly interferes with other people's choices. This is not a static rule that should be applied in all cases, there are some couples that enjoy open relationships.
Woman here, and I agree with this. We all have our own preferences, and there's nothing wrong with that. I think the woman in the picture is referring to the message that women receive from society, which says that women must guard/value/preserve their virginity, and that those women who don't are defiled/used or damaged goods/sluts, etc.
Truth.
[–]Nago31 23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
“I aM nOt A pAiR oF sHoEs!”
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
😂😂😂😎
[–]daysinnroom203 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Are women a pair of shoes to you?
[–]Nago31 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No but I’ve used an analogy before
[+]OnyxsWorkshop -12 points-11 points-10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This but unironically. We can have conversations about this without dehumanizing like a troglodyte would.
[–]Diomil 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This applies to men too.
[–]uac_redhound -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
As a man I approve.
[–]KoalaAccomplished395 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
So guys who have had 50 partners aren't worth anything any more either?
[–][deleted] 31 points32 points33 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Value depends on the buyer. You should ask women why they don’t seem to care.
[–]rogeliana 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I've witnessed women rejecting fuckboys for being fuckboys, and I know I certainly will do that, and the men are all shocked Pikachu faced that they might be rejected for their sexual history lol. The audacity and entitlement...
I'm from a sheltered church environment where both women and men don't fuck around. I read sometimes that men who want a "nice" girl should go to a church (like my church) to find a wife. I find that repulsive. Nice church girls are much better off marrying nice church boys who have been raised with the same values as they (the girls) have. Not some entitled fuckboy who has "sowed his wild oats" and now wants a woman who hasn't sowed as many oats as he has. Begone, fuckboy. Stay in your own lane and leave the "nice" girls alone.
I cannot stomach the hypocrisy of men judging women for their "numbers" while the men's own numbers are shamefully high (or they would be if the men had the opportunity). Disgusting.
[–]InfiniteDimensions 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yep
[–]Mewster1818 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It was a deal breaker for me.
Just because some people might not care, doesn't mean you can try and force someone who does care to be fine with it. I didn't sleep around, and I didn't want a guy with those values either. Likewise I knew guys who didn't want a girl with limited experience.
[–]tw1nm3t30r 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Uhhhhh yes it is. Nobody wants to stick their dick in the endless void.
[+]LandscapeClear1630 -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
lmao
[–]Lord_Asmodeus93 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Once a cheater, always a cheater. You can have a ONS with a cheater, as it does not affect you. You just don't build a family with one.
Which is just one example of how your value is relevant to your sexual history.
Who says they are a cheater?
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Since i decide what your value is, it can be based on anything at all. What she means is "i don't want my value in the mind of the men I'm attacted to to be influenced by my body count".
[–]Early_Cup6480 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
she could also mean "until I find Mr. #91, I want Mr. #90 to think he's Mr. #5, my 'forever person', like I told him he was."
[–]No_Calligrapher2974 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well you chose to do sexual things to have a sexual history so too bad, you could did something more cool and productive, nope you wanted to become a whore.
[–]daysinnroom203 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s a good thing women aren’t objects so this is irrelevant
[–]Whisper 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
If her value is based on something other than sex, why is she posting naked pictures?
😎
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
😎😎
[–]kampfy3 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The incels are far more entertaining, though. Cheerz bruv
[–]paradeqia -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
That isn't basic economics.
The number of previous owners doesn't necessarily affect the value of a product. A pair of mint OG Jordans will continue to appreciate in value irrespective of the number of owners until demand within the market changes.
The actual value of the product is determined by what people are willing to pay for it, not by any inherent value - you could spend 100 hours making something but if no-one is willing to pay for it then it's worthless. On the flip side Banksy could shit in a cup and earn more than your annual salary by selling it.
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Nobody will want to buy some OG Jordan's that has been a history of more than 50 owners in the past stop dreaming
[–]paradeqia 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Mint OG Jordans are a collectors item ( some more than others obviously). I chose Jordan's because they fit with the shoe analogy and collectors do routinely pay far over retail pricing for a pair. The number if owners also doesn't impact their appreciation.
If you want other examples that aren't based on collectibles, art or antiques - look at housing. If you're buying a house then you're not asking how many people have lived there before. Same for cars (mileage, age and service history trump number of owners), shares, both crypto and fiat currency and all variety of services if we're assuming that one can "own" a person based off your interactions with them.
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
A car who had a history of 50 owners, WILL LOGICALLY, have a high kilometric number.
[–]paradeqia -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Even for this hypothetical car it's not the # of owners that depreciates the asset it's the mileage. A car that drives 10,000 km a year for 10 years is worth the same irrespective of whether it has had 5 or 50 owners.
[–]shadilvers 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Very mature of OP to copy paste soyjacks under people they disagree with instead of trying to understand their viewpoint. Women are not objects and this analogy doesn't work. I subbed thinking I'd get posts about people putting down "feminism" not outright misogyny. If you soyjack me you prove me right and that you're no better than those FDS pieces of shit.
[–]SomethingRand00m998 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Except Feminist have massive social power and men have none.
[–]yourmomgetsthebullet 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thats just straight up not true like anywhere https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-government/
[–]Rainbow_Flying_LLAMA -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Since when do men not have power?
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
⠀⠀⠘⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠑⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡔⠁⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠢⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⠴⠊⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⡀⠤⠄⠒⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣀⠄⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡠⠔⠒⠒⠒⠒⠒⠢⠤⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠑⢄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠃⠀⢠⠂⠀⠀⠘⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢤⡀⢂⠀⢨⠀⢀⡠⠈⢣⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⢀⡖⠒⠶⠤⠭⢽⣟⣗⠲⠖⠺⣖⣴⣆⡤⠤⠤⠼⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡈⠃⠀⠀⠀⠘⣺⡟⢻⠻⡆⠀⡏⠀⡸⣿⢿⢞⠄⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢣⡀⠤⡀⡀⡔⠉⣏⡿⠛⠓⠊⠁⠀⢎⠛⡗⡗⢳⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢱⠀⠨⡇⠃⠀⢻⠁⡔⢡⠒⢀⠀⠀⡅⢹⣿⢨⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠠⢼⠀⠀⡎⡜⠒⢀⠭⡖⡤⢭⣱⢸⢙⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡸⠀⠀⠸⢁⡀⠿⠈⠂⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⡍⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⢢⣫⢀⠘⣿⣿⡿⠏⣼⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣠⠊⠀⣀⠎⠁⠀⠀⠀⠙⠳⢴⡦⡴⢶⣞⣁⣀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠐⠒⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⠀⢀⠤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀
[–]pigsevulis 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yikes
[–]zoeyx13 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
So you would pay more for someone who's never fixed a car to fix your car than for someone with 20 years experience?
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]yourmomgetsthebullet -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
« I put the soyjack on your opinion and the chadjack on my opinion, i win the argument »
All of you are fuckin virgins
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Your opinion is very important for me, I'm literally crying right now 😢😢😢😭
Dude you’re so fuckin hilarious im sure all the girls love it
[–]who_said_it_was_mE -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
So are we supposed to judge people based off their sexual history?
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You don't have to hate people who judge woman on their past. You have a brain, use it. (liberal).
[–]who_said_it_was_mE 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don’t on hate people who make decisions based on consistent and empirical evidence, I hate liberals. I’m looking for a comparative and qualifying threshold between people who make generalized and dividing statements about a certain sex. I get that feminists are bad, but what’s the point if y’all are gonna be just as bad in a similar way? You have a brain, I’m trying to understand why you use it the way you do. (Progressive Libertarian)
[+]steelbyter -15 points-14 points-13 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Ummm, women arent exactly 'owned' sooooo.
I mean this sorta shit is what drives people against anti feminists. Sure, a woman who has slept with 60 other dudes can probably have a higher chance of carrying diseases and if she has broken up with 30 other people there is probably something wrong with her but that does not mean she is worthless.
[–]Wingflier 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
There's really no denying that a woman's value to men or their ability to pairbond dramatically decreases the more partners they've had.
Perhaps her value as a person doesn't change based on her body count, but her sexual market value absolutely does.
[–]steelbyter 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
True, however that should not be called owning or buying lol
[–]Wingflier 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I agree, I don't think I would have used that particular analogy myself.
[–]goingfullham 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
I do understand were the morality comes from logically. But people also have to understand that value depends on the people willing to spend it. If we are talking about monetary value than I bet that her sexual history definitely does play a role. If it's a private matter or if it SHOULD play a role is something people are willing to debate but there is not doubt it does matter.
And some people give it more value than others.
And if you consider competitive nature or men, I think there are loads of men who prefer to be the first.
[+]steelbyter -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Yes that is the case but these men need not be celebrated for their idiotic actions
[–]goingfullham 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
There was no council of men who got together and decided the value of woman. That's literally how the natural order of value is decided by default. There are no MEN who are responsible for this. When supply goes up then demand goes naturally down. Thus "easy" woman are in less demand aka lower value.
Being a virgin is rare and it's hard to achieve thus the supply is really low and naturally the demand will be higher, thus the VALUE goes up.
It's literally the same as 1 + 1 = 2 but with supply economics.
It could have been the same for men if woman valued sexual history but they don't. They value different things.
[–]daysinnroom203 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Just because you value “ different” things doesn’t mean “men” do. Logistically, it doesn’t even make sense to Prefer someone who has no experience and does not know what they are doing. We tell those people to reapply when they have more experience. They ONLY reason it matters to a man is his fear of being inadequate and being compared unfavorably. If You are comfy in your own performance, you have no worries, and may in fact, enjoying learning something new.
[–]goingfullham 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think it has to do more about biological need to reproduce rather than receiving positive stimuli from sexual acts. Because if you just wanted sex it would make sense to choose the most experienced partner. But that's not what's happening when men are choosing partners but there are exceptions of course.
Fear of being inadequate does not make any sense.
[–]steelbyter -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Dude I never said ALL MEN in fact i used this same arguement on r/feminism. All I'm saying is that men who feel that they own a woman need not be celebrated. Chill
[–]sneakpeekbot 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Here's a sneak peek of /r/Feminism using the top posts of the year!
#1: Word. | 80 comments #2: It's called consent. | 116 comments #3: Heterosexual marriage 💍 | 767 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out
[–]goingfullham -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
All I'm saying is that men who feel that they own a woman need not be celebrated
Yes but that's obvious. I hope everybody agree to this. But it's not what we are discussing here. We are not discussing ownership as if women were shoes, we are discussing how many different people came inside her pussy. The value drops because rarity drops, not because men are assholes. I doubt you would want a used PCR test. Some men are more picky than others and it has nothing to do with them being assholes.
[–]steelbyter 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Well I'm sorry but men who feel that a woman needs to be a virgin to have him is being idiotic. Relationships don't work out many times and yes, sometimes a woman who has had like 40 bfs may have a problem but a man who disqualifies a woman solely based off her history is not doing the right thing.
I think that people are free to make their own choices and set their own criteria's on what suits them. Forcing people into a moral alley because YOU think something should be is also wrong.
And I still don't think you understand how value system works in a society.
[–]goingfullham 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Complaining about why men prefer sexual partners with short sexual history is like complaining about why woman like taller men.
[–]steelbyter 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm not complaining I'm just saying it isn't right. That is entirely my opinion and I may be incorrect but that is what I think.
[–]Sergey32321 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It does not mean she is worthless, of course, its just not worth to build relationship with people like that
[–]DepressedNerd07 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
That couldn't be more wrong.
You went from Anti-Feminist to Anti-Women.
Give me a fucking break.
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I don't care what you are thinking about me 🤔
[–]DepressedNerd07 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
And?
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DepressedNerd07 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dumbass
[–]pteranodon_YT -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But yet white ppl are racist because of something that happened 1 million years ago
[–]Generic-Degenerate 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What?
[–]Lyynt -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Congratulations, you admitted you compare women to objects.
[+]Lyynt -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ah yes. A copy paste...very original. Very enlightening
[+]emma_watson_forever -53 points-52 points-51 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
women are not objects you dumb cunt
[–]Southerndude62 44 points45 points46 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Men are not ATMs for women you dumb can't.
[–]steelbyter 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I agree, and yes a woman's worth is not defined by her sexual history but it is affected by her relationship history. If I know that this woman has broken up with 30 other people then there is a high chance something is wrong with her.
Also if she has a long sexual history like 50 60 people then there is a chance she is carrying something.
[–]h1tlerwasanOKpainter 36 points37 points38 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
True, because some objects are irreplaceable
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LMAOOOOOOOO 😂😂
[–]lethatsinkin 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
You're right, because objects can actually be useful.
[–]NohoTwoPointOh 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I have a pair of mountain boots that have never failed me. Can't say the same for a number of other things.
[+]emma_watson_forever -35 points-34 points-33 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
report88% Upvoted Comment as emma_watson_forever
report88% Upvoted
Comment as emma_watson_forever
lol
[–]emma_watson_forever -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
holy shit
i was joking
why take that seriously
isnt my line said by pseudofeminists
[–]FlyPaperButtHole -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I love that this sub just comes out and says “we treat women like objects”. The honesty is fantastic, keep it real fellas.
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]FlyPaperButtHole -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Say again?
....so your whole argument is that u hate women........ that's anti feminists for ya
[–]CableConscious5982 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I have 16 divorces, am I as date able as a never married person
[–]epicppman69 -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I mean I guess if y’all think a woman is comparable to a pair of shoes?
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]epicppman69 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good talk.
my whole argument after someone puts me as a soy jwojak
[–]freenon -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Women are not commodities. Shoes are. You can't compare your mother, sister, aunts and girlfriend to a pair of shoes.
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]uac_redhound 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I love it, added to clipboard lmao
[–]freenon 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Haha, that's funny. xD Comparing women to a commodity you wear on your feet isn't.
[–]uac_redhound -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Would you date a woman who fucked 50 guys before dating you?
Sexual history does affect your value in dating.
[–]yourmomgetsthebullet 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I mean, if they’re a good person and wont cheat on you, why not lmfao? Whats the worst that can happen? You have a pressumably attractive girlfriend who is extremely experienced
[–]uac_redhound 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They have a higher chance of having an sti. That's my main problem.
Thats true but if they get tested and they dont have any, is there an issue?
Yeah, if your partner thinks you're a person who would sleep with anyone then your value in their eyes does go down. Yes, I would continue to date a person who has a significant body count, if the person really matters and I see something worthwhile in them.
However to compare women to shoes is downright insulting, I hope you get that.
[+]TitsClitsTaylorSwift -26 points-25 points-24 points 5 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link
Men want women with a low number of partners so they have less experience to recognize how awful said dude is in bed.
I've been with women who have had 3 partners, and 100.
You can't tell the difference if they don't tell you. Vaginas push out babies and go back, they're not changing from dicks. Quit being dumb.
Dunno what you are doing here Simp..
[–]steelbyter -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why are you getting so angry? You think women are like the devil or something? Fuck is wrong with you. Anti-feminist doesn't mean 'dick'
[+]TitsClitsTaylorSwift -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Treat women like garbage, or you're a simp."
You must need a lifeguard to keep you from drowning in all that pussy.
[–]PM_ME_DNA 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link
People with more partners has commitment issues and it’s a sign that she sees sex very casually.
[+]TitsClitsTaylorSwift -8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
That's not even remotely true.
[–]steelbyter 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
It kinda is ngl.
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Then it would be the same for men, too.
Yes a 'stud' who bangs 'hoes' all day everyday does view sex casually. That being said women sometimes like men like that, idk why but that is how it is. IRL women and men tend to have different standards and so since their values are determined by each other, different factors apply. I myself would think that a man who views relationships as a burden and sex as nothing more than a way of showing off is not a good person to be with but many do.
[–]reflex2010 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Psst... I have a secret... Men and Women are different and naturally hold different values.
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Sure, but not in that aspect.
A high number of partners is either ok for everyone or no one. Simple as that.
[–]reflex2010 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You can believe what you want but its not what is experienced in the real world.
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So what values do men have that make it more ok for them to have a high number of partners.
That's like saying it's ok for men to curb stomp babies, but not for women.
That's what you're saying.
[–]reflex2010 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No I am not. Who puts value on curb stomping babies?
Majority of men put more value on looks/care/femininity then women. Majority of women put more value on men's income/drive/strength for security.
Is a difference in value so hard to understand that you have to make unrealistic comparisons?
[–]steelbyter -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not just that but nice.
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Bet you losers can't even get this comment 10,000 downvotes.
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Where the fuck are my 10,000 downvotes?
Give me my fucking downvotes. Punk ass losers can't even do that right.
[–]Karboniss -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
so they have less experience to recognize how awful said dude is in bed
huge fucking projection you got there cuck
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I call it how i see it.
[+]Generic-Degenerate -8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I don't agree with you on this, this is quite literally objectifying women
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Sorry, I don't care about what you are thinking 🤔😎
[–]Generic-Degenerate -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not as much as I you dont care about your mom
HURRY THE FUCK UP. NOW.
Virgins in this comment section mad. Fr y’all badly need to watch something else than ben shapiro rekt feminist compliations and like expand your horizons Heres some https://youtu.be/rc24YtUslCU
https://youtu.be/1pTPuoGjQsI
Please get out of this circle jerk
[–]haaind -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Ok, so I wrote this the last time I saw this image (6 or so months back on a different page)
"To use the same argument but with a different object
imagine a painting, say "Mona Lisa", there's only one of this painting and that number can only go down, there's fake ones out there but its not the painting. the owner of "Mona Lisa" does not care how many has owned her before, if its 1, 10 or 50 as it is currently in his/her possession, even though he/she has it now, doesn't reduce the value of the painting, other people may be willing to put more on the line to get their hand on that painting even though they know that someone else has had it before."
This was however a comment to an even worse comment, who still didn't understand the point that used doesn't mean valueless
[–]leebeebee -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Unfortunately, these dudes think that all women are interchangeable, and that they’re just tools that function as sexual objects, incubators, and housekeepers
[–]haaind -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, I agree, their take is complete bs. My intention with the comment was rather that no matter how many times a woman has been "used" doesn't devalue her.
Even just saying that a person is "used" is bloody awful.
[–]thenerj47 -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This sub is just awful. Take a hard look at yourselves. Hypocrisy is a bad look.
[–]blergflergflurgen -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
First visit to this sub. So this is where all the virgins hang out, eh?
[–]PutinsBabushka69 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Virgins and incels
[–]uac_redhound -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It kinda does affect the value of you as a partner.
Let's say if I get a brand new nice car, like idk, a new Porsche cayenne or something, a $100,000 car, and I beat the crap out of it, lets say I put 30,000 miles on it for the first year if ownership, and I sell the car, some other guy will get it and also beat the crap out of the same car, resell it and it keeps going down in value because it has many, many previous owners who racked up a ton of miles on it, the car isn't that valuable and desirable anymore because of how much people had owned it and used it.
Basic economics.
[–]uac_redhound 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Whoever downvoted me, explain how I'm wrong?
[–]mcove97 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
Women aren't objects, and thus it's wrong to measure their value by how objects gets measured. Of course value is very subjective, but it's really just not comparable, or I suppose, more like comparing apples and oranges. Apples are not oranges. Objects are not human beings, and their value should be measured for what they are, not for what they're not?
Like a shoe will get worn out if used by a bunch of different people for long enough, and thus loses its value as it becomes unusable of unwearable. Humans on the other hand don't become unusable or worn out by having lots of sex with different partners, and thus don't lose their value in the same way an object does. Whoever thinks women lose their value due to sex or a long sexual history needs to go to r/badwomansatonomy for a reality check.
However, people still value different things, as values are subjective, and it's perfectly fine to not have sexual promiscuity on your list of values in a woman, but just cause that's not what you value in a woman for instance, doesn't mean they're inherently invaluable as women or human beings, or invaluable to other people. They still have inherent value in just being a human being whetter you yourself value them or not.
There's a ton of people I've never met in my entire life that I don't care about for instance, and they hold no value to me, but that doesn't mean they aren't valuable as human beings or to other people.
[–]uac_redhound 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's not physical value I'm talking about. Also sex doesn't decrease your value as a human but it decreases your dating value because because they're more likely to have an STI (same goes for a man), it's nasty to have a high body count, and they're less desirable than someone who has a much smaller body count.
[–]mcove97 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh okay. Yeah you have a point, a higher body count does mean higher chances for an STI. However, you can get tested for STIs so I don't really see the problem in dating someone who's had a lot of sex with different partners if they have been tested and they're clean of any STIs.
High body counts are just nasty to me.
[–]Soulhunter_290 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Actually her value is a maximum of 160 dollars
Not even a Syrian minimum monthly salary
[–]Soulhunter_290 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
On the dark web i meant
[–]mercinarary -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
https://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstHateSubreddits/comments/n8imu7/rantifeminists_are_antiwomen/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Southerndude62 165 points166 points167 points
(48 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 30 points31 points32 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cold_Difficulty_5298 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (39 children) | Copy Link
[–]ravix_ridamaki 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IM_Pakshi 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Southerndude62 -3 points-2 points-1 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (35 children) | Copy Link
[–]Southerndude62 -2 points-1 points0 points (34 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zamblotter 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (32 children) | Copy Link
[–]Southerndude62 0 points1 point2 points (31 children) | Copy Link
[–]DepressedNerd07 0 points1 point2 points (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]Southerndude62 -1 points0 points1 point (29 children) | Copy Link
[–]DepressedNerd07 1 point2 points3 points (28 children) | Copy Link
[–]MandrakeThePancake 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kookie_doe 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Southerndude62 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CompleteFacepalm 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]road_laya 92 points93 points94 points (111 children) | Copy Link
[+]KristianGdG -57 points-56 points-55 points (109 children) | Copy Link
[–]road_laya 31 points32 points33 points (107 children) | Copy Link
[+]KristianGdG -31 points-30 points-29 points (106 children) | Copy Link
[–]kratbegone 16 points17 points18 points (105 children) | Copy Link
[+]KristianGdG -22 points-21 points-20 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shan_Miller 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]KristianGdG 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Shan_Miller -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]daysinnroom203 -11 points-10 points-9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]rogeliana -10 points-9 points-8 points (99 children) | Copy Link
[–]p-tittyy2 7 points8 points9 points (39 children) | Copy Link
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points (38 children) | Copy Link
[–]p-tittyy2 0 points1 point2 points (37 children) | Copy Link
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shan_Miller 3 points4 points5 points (50 children) | Copy Link
[–]rogeliana -3 points-2 points-1 points (49 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shan_Miller 2 points3 points4 points (48 children) | Copy Link
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points (47 children) | Copy Link
[–]kratbegone 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]kratbegone 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]rogeliana 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cold_Difficulty_5298 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CompleteFacepalm -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Wingflier 62 points63 points64 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]1iioiioii1 31 points32 points33 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]osiris_89 54 points55 points56 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]pontiflexrex -1 points0 points1 point (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sergey32321 25 points26 points27 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]LandscapeClear1630 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]daysinnroom203 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LandscapeClear1630 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Early_Cup6480 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]back_againx13 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LTBR1955 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_DNA 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 10 points11 points12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]back_againx13 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LandscapeClear1630 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lonystal 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SomethingRand00m998 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lonystal 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FukinDEAD 29 points30 points31 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]WeirdSign7297 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]KristianGdG -14 points-13 points-12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]KristianGdG 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kampfy3 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xndpxs 9 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]back_againx13 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nago31 23 points24 points25 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]daysinnroom203 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Nago31 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]OnyxsWorkshop -12 points-11 points-10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Diomil 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]uac_redhound -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KoalaAccomplished395 16 points17 points18 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 31 points32 points33 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]rogeliana 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InfiniteDimensions 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mewster1818 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tw1nm3t30r 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]LandscapeClear1630 -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_Asmodeus93 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CompleteFacepalm 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Early_Cup6480 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]No_Calligrapher2974 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]daysinnroom203 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Whisper 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kampfy3 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]paradeqia -3 points-2 points-1 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 5 points6 points7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]paradeqia 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]paradeqia -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shadilvers 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SomethingRand00m998 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]yourmomgetsthebullet 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rainbow_Flying_LLAMA -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pigsevulis 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zoeyx13 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]yourmomgetsthebullet -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]yourmomgetsthebullet 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]who_said_it_was_mE -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]who_said_it_was_mE 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]steelbyter -15 points-14 points-13 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]Wingflier 19 points20 points21 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]steelbyter 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Wingflier 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]goingfullham 11 points12 points13 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[+]steelbyter -7 points-6 points-5 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]goingfullham 5 points6 points7 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]daysinnroom203 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]goingfullham 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]steelbyter -4 points-3 points-2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]sneakpeekbot 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]goingfullham -2 points-1 points0 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]steelbyter 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]goingfullham 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]goingfullham 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]steelbyter 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sergey32321 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DepressedNerd07 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]DepressedNerd07 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DepressedNerd07 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pteranodon_YT -5 points-4 points-3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Generic-Degenerate 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lyynt -5 points-4 points-3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]Lyynt -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]emma_watson_forever -53 points-52 points-51 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Southerndude62 44 points45 points46 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]steelbyter 21 points22 points23 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]h1tlerwasanOKpainter 36 points37 points38 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lethatsinkin 17 points18 points19 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NohoTwoPointOh 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]emma_watson_forever -35 points-34 points-33 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]emma_watson_forever -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FlyPaperButtHole -4 points-3 points-2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]FlyPaperButtHole -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rainbow_Flying_LLAMA -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CableConscious5982 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]epicppman69 -4 points-3 points-2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]epicppman69 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]freenon -3 points-2 points-1 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]uac_redhound 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]freenon 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]uac_redhound -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]yourmomgetsthebullet 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]uac_redhound 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]yourmomgetsthebullet 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]freenon 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]TitsClitsTaylorSwift -26 points-25 points-24 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]steelbyter -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]TitsClitsTaylorSwift -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_DNA 6 points7 points8 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]TitsClitsTaylorSwift -8 points-7 points-6 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]steelbyter 5 points6 points7 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]steelbyter 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]reflex2010 -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]reflex2010 -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]reflex2010 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]steelbyter -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Karboniss -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Generic-Degenerate -8 points-7 points-6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Generic-Degenerate -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TitsClitsTaylorSwift 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]yourmomgetsthebullet 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]haaind -3 points-2 points-1 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]leebeebee -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]haaind -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thenerj47 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]blergflergflurgen -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PutinsBabushka69 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]uac_redhound -2 points-1 points0 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]uac_redhound 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]mcove97 -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]uac_redhound 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]mcove97 -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]uac_redhound -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulhunter_290 -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ayahuasca__[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Soulhunter_290 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mercinarary -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link