TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Many countries still practice male only conscription, included so-called "gender equal" countries such as Austria and Finland

Vista_Seagrape

October 13, 2021
171 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription
Archived from /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is a place for the discussion of men's issues from a left wing perspective.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Many countries still practice male only conscription, included so-called "gender equal" countries such as Austria and Finland
Author

Vista_Seagrape

Upvotes 171
Comments 42
Date October 13, 2021 2:35 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/q7cibg/many_countries_still_practice_male_only/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/many-countries-still-practice-male-only.1079775
https://theredarchive.com/post/1079775
Top posts by Vista_Seagrape

Reminder, a feminist organization is currently pushing the UK government to eliminate funding for male victims of domestic violence

438 upvotes
May 8, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Many countries still practice male only conscription, included so-called "gender equal" countries such as Austria and Finland

425 upvotes
October 13, 2021
/r/MensRights

Dear Menslib - we tried to tell you.

360 upvotes
September 19, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Homeless men in Los Angeles will be de-prioritized in shelter mandate.

326 upvotes
April 22, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

In the US, only 41% of college scholarships go to men. Men are already a minority of college students.

311 upvotes
May 17, 2021
/r/MensRights

Why are American men shamed for being angry about circumcision?

284 upvotes
June 23, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Judge rules that Biden's restaurant relief plan discriminates against male owners.

263 upvotes
May 21, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Dear Menslib- we've been trying to tell you.

248 upvotes
September 19, 2021
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Vista_Seagrape[S] 49 points50 points51 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This is an example of major and blatant discrimination against men/boys. It illustrates how society often ignores male issues, and doesn't even recognize when discrimination against men/boys occurs.

[–]animesainthilare 36 points37 points38 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Nah man we need to think about the only victims here: the women sitting at home while their husbands, brothers and sons sign up their lives to become cannon fodder against their will /s.

[–]Vegetable_Ad6969 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's really discrimination towards women because society thinks they are too weak to fight /s

[–]gabrielcoronel_ 39 points40 points41 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is clearly an example of misogyny, since it implies women aren't as capable as men of being soldiers. How dare you say it's discrimination against men? It's clearly a side effect of the patriarchy. Also, all those wars these men are sent to were caused by other men, therefore it's men harming other men. So basically, it doesn't fucking matter. By the way, women have it worse. /s

[–]xsplizzle 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have literally had that argument used against me without sarcasm

[–]dartymallet 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

To be fair, if you consider male-only conscription an example of misogyny you'd wonder why feminists aren't outspoken against it.

[–]gabrielcoronel_ 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Because misogyny is only bad when it affects women, duh! /s

[–]Shmockyy 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be honest I see it as both misandry and misogyny, because that's kinda what it is. I call it "schrodinger's sexism"

[–]Deadlocked02 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Most people just take what they hear at face value and never really stop to think deeper about it, specially the perspectives that are missing. Like, I was just thinking about how blatantly female-centric the term “benevolent sexism” is, as it completely disregards the perspective of a guy who gets the short end of the stick because of this kind of sexism. Why not just call it sexism from the get go?

It’s the same thing with the concept of equality. It’s very clear that it only means equality when it’s beneficial and that the male perspective is missing, but it’s as if there’s a barrier preventing people from realizing such an obvious reality. I look back and it baffles how the hell I didn’t realize this inconsistency sooner. Was I sleepwalking?

I can only think about how frustrating it must be to be a man in countries like Finland, South Korea or Singapore, with high rates of conscription and where most men are pretty much guaranteed to go through military or civil service, and hearing that it is your duty to help in the fight for equality, except that no one lifted a finger to fight for equality for you. Not only that, but they outright deny your issues. That’s why it’s so hard to blame men in places like South Korea for their hostility towards feminism.

[–]throwra_coolname209 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This has been my frustration for a good long while. For whatever reasons, probably a lot of social priming, people aren't willing to look at things men experience in a lens of sexism. Their brain short circuits to some less-offensive interpretation. Hell, I'm a guy and I catch myself doing it a lot.

For men, the outrage just isn't there, and any attempt to view men as victims is met with cries about "oh you're just trying to be oppressed" like... what? I know women have it bad but this isn't a competition, the short truth of it all is that I spent the entire Trump presidency wondering if he'd get us into WWIII and had to face the existential threat of being drafted that women did not. End of story. Why is it so hard to tackle clear cut sexism?

[–]peanutbutterjams 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hell, I'm a guy and I catch myself doing it a lot.

Same. I think I'm done and then a year passes and I realize how much rot I still had to tear out of my mind.

I genuinely feel like I'm de-programming myself from a cult. The pathways run that deep.

I can only imagine how hard it is for the Zoomers. They grew up with a much more strident, and much more hate-based, version of feminism than I did.

[–]Effective_Secret3664 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Many ?, the majority of countries with a draft, is male only, is not the majority, is nearly all.

[–]omegaphallic 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Conscription is a form of slavery. As much as other NRA love to bash my country as if America is a bastion of MAAS compared to Canandian feminists, at least Canada has no conscription in my life time nor select service crap.

[–]LZmiljoona 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm from Austria, and yes, it sucks/sucked. Should be either abolished or made mandatory for everyone. A few years ago, there was even a poll/referendum where people could vote whether it should be abolished or kept. Guess who could vote? That's right, everyone. Granted, there are a lot of men here as well that are pro conscription, and I haven't researched whether it would have made a difference or not to only let men vote.

[–]Deadlocked02 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A few years ago, there was even a poll/referendum where people could vote whether it should be abolished or kept. Guess who could vote? That's right, everyone.

Same thing with Switzerland. I can only imagine the outrage if it were men being allowed to have a say in female issues.

[–]GltyUntlPrvnInncnt 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Finland is a feminist hell hole these days. Source, a Finn.

[–]Deadlocked02 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, it surprises me how incredibly accepting men are of feminism in your country. It is my understanding that Finland has one of the highest rates of conscriptions, meaning most men will end up serving. How on Earth do most men ignore the huge institutional discrimination that is being the only ones required to lose months of their lives, specially in a time where people talk about equality ad nauseam?

[–]GltyUntlPrvnInncnt 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

I know. I was told by my parents that a real man goes to the army willingly, they'll make men out of boys. Of course we have Russia right next to us, so it sort of made sense. We have had very bad experience with those guys.
Nevertheless, the fact that military service is mandatory for Finnish men and voluntary for Finnish women, just adds insult to the injury.
And then the authorities have the guts to publish studies that show a higher rate of motivation among women that complete the voluntary service compared to men that face jail time for refusing to do it.
Well, no shit Sherlock!

[–]gratis_eekhoorn 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

If Russia is so much of a threat to Finland then why don't Finnish government make military service mandatory for both men and women?

[–]GltyUntlPrvnInncnt 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Beats me to be honest. Male disposability and gynocentrism?

[–]Is_This_Safe_To_Eat 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Practical talk? It’s easy to repopulate your nation with more women and fewer men, it’s much harder with fewer women.

Of course that’s not the conscious reason, but from an evolutionary impulse it makes sense.

[–]funnystor 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except that never happens in modern times. Even after a bunch of men died in the World Wars, all that happened was a bunch of women went unmarried and childless. They even published papers calling it the "marriage gap".

So in that case it would actually have been better for the population if half the people who died in war were women.

[–]peanutbutterjams 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sexism. True sexism, one that goes both ways.

Men are probably still thought of as the toughest, strongest and those most responsible for society.

The inverse to this is that women are weaker and less brave.

Neither of these assumptions are true but since it benefits women, the negative assumptions about women don't matter in this case whereas the assumptions about men never matter.

[–]Uppmas -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Because that would go over the army's capacity and needs for conscripts.

The reason it is as it is because if both were conscripted, then we'd have to sort by physical ability, which basically leads to mostly male and few female conscripts situation anyway and adds costs to an already strained defence budget.

The defence forces operate purely on pragmatism. That's the reason.

Source: Am a Finn with the rank of corporal

[–]gratis_eekhoorn 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Because that would go over the army's capacity and needs for conscripts.

You don't have to conscript all of them then or you can always lower the service time.

The reason it is as it is because if both were conscripted, then we'd have to sort by physical ability, which basically leads to mostly male and few female conscripts situation anyway and adds costs to an already strained defence budget.

Well maybe it will be 85:15 or 90:10 instead of 99:1 still a win for me and it won't be a literal discrimination based on sex.

[–]Uppmas -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

You don't have to conscript all of them or you can always lower the service time.

It has already been lowered, many times. But as it stands the half-year service is about as condensed as you can get without sacrificing effectiveness.

And not everyone is conscripted, a lot just straight up get denied and realistically if you don't want to be there, getting denied is not hard to do.

Well maybe it will be 85:15 or 90:10 instead of 99:1 still a win for me and it won't be literal discimination based on sex.

It's already like 94:6. And even from the volunteers, many end up quitting or having major troubles finishing the hardest exercises.

I just don't see a national defence issue being the place where you need to flex 'equality'. National defence is about providing the most credible defence forces with the least amount of money. It's just realpolitik, men and women are not made equal in physique.

[–]gratis_eekhoorn 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I love how everytime a male disadvantage is brought up it's just "it makes sense" and "it's not a place we need equality" but whenever a female disadvantage is brought up something has to be done immediatly. Also let's be real if a war breaks out Finland won't be able to resist Russia with their 21.000 active military personnel so it wouldn't make much difference to abolish mandatory military service completelly.

[+]Uppmas -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I could talk about male disadvantages in Finland, but its not the topic so w/e. They're also talked about in our mass media so idk what that one person who said "Finland is a feminist hellhole". I mean frankly we're really conservative in many ways if anything, and thats one reason why conscription persists.

Dunno what beliefs you're ascribing to me. I'm generally one to point out inequalities, but this is one issue where I'm not sure its worth caring about. Call me conservative on this issue if you will.

Also, we know we would lose to Russia in an all out war. The point is to make it appear so costly its not worth it.

[–]Deadlocked02 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Also, we know we would lose to Russia in an all out war

So what’s the point of exempting women because of “effectiveness”? You sure make a lot excuses for a men’s rights advocate.

[–]Uppmas1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I already told the 'official' reason for it. You can disagree with if you want but that's how it is.

The real reason is that we're still mostly led by old geezers who like the old ways, and it's no really on anyone's agenda to change it, and asking around my friends people don't really find it a noteworthy equality issue.

[–]Deadlocked023 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The real reason is that we're still mostly led by old geezers who like the old ways,

You’re not old and you certainly seem very appreciative of the old ways.

and it's no really on anyone's agenda to change it, and asking around my friends people don't really find it a noteworthy equality issue.

That’s a very lame excuse, tbh. Public apathy and lack of awareness doesn’t make an issue less of an issue. If that’s the case, then we should also stop fighting against MGM, given that most people are perfectly fine with it. The statement also doesn’t seem representative of the entire population. I’ve seen several Finnish men complaining about the military service on men’s rights subreddits. One of the links you provided in other comment of yours also talks about the issue. So it’s not like everyone is happy with the current situation.

[–]Uppmas1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You’re not old and you certainly seem very appreciative of the old ways.

Well I may be an exception. But I have no power to change legislation besides voting, and my votes go to the parties most likely to address this anyway.

That’s a very lame excuse, tbh. Public apathy and lack of awareness doesn’t make an issue less of an issue.

Well I mean, if people generally don't find it an issue it's unlikely to go anywhere. There's articles about it here and there. Some politicians have proposed legislative changes but nothing major so far.

I’ve seen several Finnish men complaining about the military service on men’s rights subreddits.

Those that have a problem with it are the most likely to talk about it, especially here. Most just don't really care from what I find.

More power to those who want to change it. But I must presume not a lot of people would be ready to argue in favor of it here, since it seemingly is not received well.

[–]gratis_eekhoorn 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They're also talked about in our mass media

Really? can you provide some examples? I'm genuinely curious.

idk what that one person who said "Finland is a feminist hellhole".

Your country is literally being ruled by an all female cabinet who are self proclaimed feminists while there is male only mandatory military service it's almost like a reverse version of some middle eastern countries in terms of equality.

I mean frankly we're really conservative in many ways if anything,

If finland is "really conservative" I don't know which country isn't

and thats one reason why conscription persists.

Yes keeping conservative ideas that disadvantages men and boys is one of the pillars of feminism.

[–]Uppmas1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Really? can you provide some examples? I'm genuinely curious.

Well the articles are in Finnish, hopefully the translations do some justice.

About boys not doing well in schools: https://yle-fi.translate.goog/uutiset/3-7990073?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fi&_x_tr_pto=nui

Men's (and women's) right's advocates were asked to list their worst equality problems: https://kioski-yle-fi.translate.goog/omat/pahimmat-tasa-arvo-ongelmat-miesten-vai-naisten-suomi?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fi&_x_tr_pto=nui

And those are both on the national Finnish broadcast company.

A lot of articles are behind paywalls unfortunately. I found some about how it's the more leftist and feminist parties that are championing for equal conscription for example.

Your country is literally being ruled by an all female cabinet who are self proclaimed feminists while there is male only mandatory military service it's almost like a reverse version of some middle eastern countries in terms of equality.

I mean the male only mandatory military service predates our current cabinet by far, and it's mainly upheld by dedidedly non-feminist politicians.

Yes keeping conservative ideas that disadvantages men and boys is one of the pillars of feminism.

Well I don't consider myself as a feminist. Besides the feminists here are more likely than the average to be against unequal conscription.

[–]revente -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Because even if Finlad is conquered and most men die, next generations may still seek freedom.

If most women die, it would be next to impossible to restore the nation.

Sorry but this is an old law, true not only to humans but most ‚tribal’ mammals.

[–]peanutbutterjams 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Following this logic, most of the women would be impregnated by men of the conquering nation and so the nation can never be restored again anyways.

[–]revente -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well this isn’t ‚my logic’ but how things have always been.

Conquerers usually aren’t interested in claiming the kids as theirs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_occupation_of_Germany

[–]peanutbutterjams 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If it's not a logical position, why advocate for it?

Whether or not they're claimed, they're still the children of a different nation. From the nationalist argument you presented, you can't rebuild a nation made up of half-foreign children.

[–]revente 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Tribalist not nationalist. Children become whoever their mothers brought up them to.

Post WWII there was a wave of births by german mothers raped by spviet soldiers. None of the kids has been brought up as a russian.

Also who are we kidding if there is another Russian-Finnish war it wont look like WWII. There won’t be marching armies raping and pillaging. More like gain air superiority, destroy infrastructure, maybe use some tactical nukes and accept surrender. Russia doesn’t have demographics for a full scale invasion on the west. If they try to do it, they are getting raped out of syberia by Chinese.

[–]echonianleft-wing male advocate 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is the cultural outcome of thousands of years of stricter gender roles being utilized throughout human history. Even if - in modern warfare - women are equally as capable as men in military service (even if that means you need to just place them mostly in support roles, rather than direct combat roles), good luck convincing people who have been conditioned over thousands of years and through our evolution itself to prioritize women over men when in danger.

Women are seen as in need of protection, shelter, and additional care by society. This is true even in supposedly more egalitarian countries in the "West" and in a few other places around the world. This means that any idea of forcing them to fight in a war will be met with disapproval, while men on the other hand are expected to just shut up and accept being forced into things like conscription due to historical precedent.

If society wants to protect women over men in terms of military service, then society needs to admit that some gender roles are important for society to maintain - meaning that men need to be given additional authority or other incentives to risk their lives.

Personally though, I dislike that idea. I would much prefer it that men and women both be treated equally, at least as much as is possible given our biological differences.

It's sad to see this trend continuing into the 21st century, but it is what it is.

All we can do is point out the absurdity of those who think women should be treated as weak and in need of protection from society, yet then act as though men are the ones being discriminated against in societies which give no legal or cultural advantage to men any longer in any reasonable way.

[–]peanutbutterjams 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would much prefer it that men and women both be treated equally, at least as much as is possible given our biological differences.

Our biological differences mean there'd still be a wild gender imbalance in military service.

In countries where it's required, I agree that men should get a benefit for that service. Like free education, for those places without it.

[–]revente 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Well while i don’t think we should pretend a woman has rhe same combat value as a man. Maybe they should work for the same amount of time in administration. Or pay some tax. Like if man spends a year conscribed, she should pay her yearly earnings.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter