TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

It's only creepy when men do it.

DredFX

July 17, 2017
3629 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://i.redd.it/0o6qfjpr77az.png
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title It's only creepy when men do it.
Author

DredFX

Upvotes 3629
Comments 136
Date July 17, 2017 6:55 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6nv67k/its_only_creepy_when_men_do_it/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/its-only-creepy-when-men-do-it.917848
https://theredarchive.com/post/917848
Top posts by DredFX

Just less than a month apart.

5738 upvotes
December 12, 2016
/r/MensRights

Jezebel writers are impartial and do not project their misandry into their articles.

100 upvotes
January 13, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]KaiRaiUnknown 477 points478 points479 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

"Did not apologise to the employees he allegedly groped"

Well fucking gee, care to guess why he didnt?

[–]fengpi 296 points297 points298 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Not apologizing for stuff you didn't do is proof that you dood it.

[–]candidly1 54 points55 points56 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Except in court.

[–]fengpi 116 points117 points118 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Not in the court of feminist opinion where every man is guilty until proven dead.

[–]candidly1 45 points46 points47 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I really feel bad for young guys today (and I have a 25-year-old son); there are so many caveats to perceived behavior nowadays I don't understand how anyone dates.

[–]fengpi 30 points31 points32 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

If your son is like Chad, he can grope as many asses as he pleases and he will go-on to sire legions of children with many desirable women who will fight each other tooth and nail for his companionship and treat him like a king no matter what he does. If your son wears glasses, drives an economy car or looks like he doesn't play sports, on the other hand...

[–]candidly1 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

My son is 6'2", 195, athletic and well-employed, so he is (I guess) OK. But I understand that if you aren't attractive or rich you're probably going to have a rough time.

[–]UDT22 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But I understand that if you aren't attractive or rich you're probably going to have a rough time.]

This is nothing new, this has been going on for many years

[–]fengpi 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah. As long as he doesn't piss any of the ladies off with any egregious misbehavior, I'll bet he'll be pretty much OK.

[+]Reason-and-rhyme -11 points-10 points-9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus fuck could you be any more melodramatic? Go back to /r/theredpill or /r/incels ya fink

[+][deleted] -26 points-25 points-24 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Staying away from things like /r/mensrights or /r/srs and being a normal fucking person

[–]bufedad 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's really interesting, every case where some guy was expelled after being falsely accused... they weren't MRA's before they got fucked for being men. I don't know that they are after, but it's much more likely.

[–]candidly1 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think you underestimate how touchy people are anymore. Folks used to know how to take a joke.

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That wasn't even a joke what are you on about? That was the worst excuse ever

[–]gellis12 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Canada has the apology act. It basically says that apologizing for something can't be used as evidence that you're guilty.

[–]candidly1 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't know that; I think in the Lower 48 it's admissible.

[–]Mode1961 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't believe that is true for all provinces.

https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/en/advice-publications/browse-articles/2008/apology-legislation-in-canada-what-it-means-for-physicians

[–]JAYDEA 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or on twitter.

[–]Mode1961 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Isn't that the classic Kaftka Trap

[–]spelczech 696 points697 points698 points 9 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

"Accused", "reportedly", "allegedly", yet no complaint filed. Yep, he's the creep. /s

[–]besaolli 242 points243 points244 points 9 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Of course, he's a creep; he's a dude!

Never forget "Yes, ALL men!"

[–][deleted] 128 points129 points130 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

All men are creeps unless we have:

1) Good looks 2) Six pack body 3) Lots of money 4) A large penis

I fall into at least one of those categories so I'm not viewed as a creep. But... shhhh... I'm really creepy as fuck.

[–]fengpi 36 points37 points38 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If he has 1 through 3, 4 is optional.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If he has 3, then everything else is optional. You may not get great people from just having money, but you can get 'em.

[–]fengpi 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The less of 1 and 2 he has, the more of 3 he needs. If he has a billion metric fucktons of 3, he can look like Quasimodo with a cleft upper lip and bad dandruff. No one said the items were needed in equal proportions.

[–]bufedad -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If he has a billion metric fucktons of 3, he can look like Quasimodo with a cleft upper lip and bad dandruff.

And there we have Donald Trump...

Sorry, I couldn't help it.

[–]fengpi 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The supermodel wives are a rather obvious accoutrement.

Interestingly, you don't see too many feminists deriding Melania Trump's obvious gold-digging. Brainlessness, yes, lack of ability, yes, use of her looks for financial gain, no. I can only assume they're a-ok with sexualized grifting or that they feel such an insult would self-incriminate what they wish to do themselves.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Impossterble 56 points57 points58 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

At my old job there was a guy that was "creepy" for the most part doing a bunch of awkward things and constantly trying to hit on women, even taking his break whenever the attractive girls went on break. I would try to replicate the same things he was doing and even pushing what i thought were the boundaries to try and get them to say i was "creepy". Even to the point of bringing up im doing the same things and worse but then they say oh well its just you and its funny.

If the girl thinks you're attractive or thinks you're normal and just joking you can get away with anything while someone completely innocent can be labeled a creeper. I always wondered what they thought "creepy" meant, when in reality its their way of saying that person is unattractive/undesirable.

[–]ToasterSpoodle 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

reminds me about something I read on the internet

"Once you decide you hate someone, everything they do is offensive"

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's creepy when a man's attentions make clear that his sexual expectation exceeds the benefits he can provide in exchange for granting him that desired sexual attention.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ToasterSpoodle 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

and he's not quite hip.

but in his own mind he's the dopeest trip!

[–]Mord_Fustang 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Give it to me baby ;)

[–]Blaha1138 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think that that is one of the problems that seems to affect both sexes equally. Ugly People's Rights just didn't have that great of a ring to it though I suppose...

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

An average-looking woman is given dispensation well beyond an average-looking man's wildest dreams. Ugly women, yes, are treated like average-looking men are but ugly men are basically radioactive waste.

[–]Preebus 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which one?

[–]truthenragesyou 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Money. You forgot money.

[–]ThatDamnedImp 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never forget "Yes, ALL men!"

Feminists very much want us to forget this, and that it was often paired explicitly with, 'Not all women!'.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]besaolli 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You, me, and most everyone else!

[–]ST07153902935 37 points38 points39 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

From wiki

In his response to White's lawsuit, Affleck alleged that her lawyer had previously engaged in "extortionate tactics" by refusing to hand over "key production documents" and trying to block the release of the film, in an effort to obtain more compensation for her work than she was "legally entitled to."

In response to the women's complaints, the film's associate producer Nicole Acacio and an unnamed female editor both defended Affleck's conduct on set.

[–]WikiTextBot 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Casey Affleck: 2010 lawsuits

In 2010, Affleck was sued by two former co-workers. I'm Still Here's producer, Amanda White, sued Affleck for $2 million. She detailed numerous "uninvited and unwelcome sexual advances" in the workplace, alleging that Affleck had allowed Spacehog guitarist Antony Langdon to expose himself in her presence, spoke "inappropriately" about her advancing age and fertility, discussed his "sexual exploits", referred to women as "cows", invaded her "personal space" by locking her out of her hotel room while entertaining another woman, attempted to "manipulate" her into staying with him in a hotel room and "violently" grabbed her by the arm when she refused. The film's cinematographer, Magdalena Gorka, sued Affleck for $2.


[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.24

[+]g_squidman -20 points-19 points-18 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Eh. Honestly, I'm inclined to believe the victim more in these cases, but nothing is proven, and of course that goes both ways.

[–]trapper2530 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's not the point. Let's assume both did what the articles say. They are bashing him while brushing it off for the woman to talk about her new book

[–]Cagg 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i mean it's two separate journalists, but yeah the editor if there is only one which i doubt let it through

[+]g_squidman -9 points-8 points-7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually, that's exactly my point. Yes.

[–]Luchadorgreen 147 points148 points149 points 9 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

This "referred to women as cows" line is likely weasel-wording BS. "Women" can mean two things: 1. More than one woman or 2. 'Women' as a group. The truth is probably number one, but the writer wants you to interpret the phrasing as referring to number two.

Nobody does this shit for men. For example, if Hillary Clinton referred to more than one man as a "pig" in her life (which has probably happened), Megan Kelly is not going to vaguely accuse her of calling "men", "pigs".

[–]pomegranate2012 42 points43 points44 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, it definitely a trick.

If a woman says there's a 'bitch' who works in her office, she's ok. But if she says there are 'bitches' then you can use that semantic trick to claim that she 'calls women bitches'.

"Calling women bitches" is obvious a "sexist comment" so now you can put sexist in the headline without even using scare quotes and it becomes a recorded fact.

I mean, that's never happened to a woman but people are all about equality these days so I'm sure it's going to start soon.

[–]Ginger-saurus-rex 26 points27 points28 points 9 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

I know, right? I think I remember during the primaries that Trump was called a sexist because he called Rosie ODonnell fat.

  1. She is a fucking pig

  2. This would literally never happen the other way around.

[–]dr_croctapus 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

That's way more of a problem with the standards we hold our politicians to, a president shouldn't be calling anyone a fat pig no matter how fat they are, it's unbecoming. Holding politicians and actors to different standards is ok in my book, holding men and women to different standards is not.

[–]jaheiner 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, to be fair, Trump isn't exactly trim/fit himself.

[–]Wagnerous 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

The problem with this subreddit (and really the entire Men's Right's Movement) is that while there are obviously serious issues regarding male equality in our society, there's a huge portion of the user base here that are genuinely shitty, sexist, right-wing trolls which give the rest of us a bad name.

I've read a million headlines here that make my blood boil at the injustice of it all, but I've got the basic decency (and the genuine respect for women) to understand that a presidential candidate calling a woman a fat pig is not only embarrassing for the country, it probably is sexist and that's true regardless of whether or not a female candidate would have been called out for an equivalent action.

Sorry for the wall of text, but this place frustrates me sometimes and I was happy to find someone who seems to take a more reasoned approach to things around here.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Insulting a woman =/= sexism

That's feminist attitudes you're picking up, dear. It makes you an asshole, and surprise everyone already knew Trump was an asshole. But sexist? You need more evidence than just insulting a woman to call someone sexist.

Unless you also think that insulting a man by calling him a name is sexism too? At least that's consistent in it's stupidity. But it's still too stupid to be a valid argument.

Also "huge portion"? Based on what?

[–]Wagnerous 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ok fine you're right I do need more evidence too prove Trump's sexism. Too bad there's no audio recording of the guy bragging about borderline-sexual assault against women, that would have proved my whole point!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, bragging that if you have money women will LET [thus consent] you grab them sexually and bang them even when you're hideous like he is... totally sexist. Not something everyone's known since the dawn of "wealth" as a concept.

[–]gayguyredditor 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LET [thus consent]

Yup, let. Thus, consent. Thus it's implied they were fine with it or reciprocated. But suddenly the media doesn't understand English since trump drives them crazy

[–]gayguyredditor 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Insulting a woman =/= sexism

PRECISELY!

[–]Ginger-saurus-rex 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

genuinely shitty, sexist, right-wing trolls

Are you trying to refer to me? Because I fulfill exactly zero of those descriptions. If not, apologies for the misunderstanding.

[–]Wagnerous -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I wasn't aiming at you so much in particular, but I hope you can understand why calling someone a fat pig (and by extension asserting that such language is somehow appropriate for a presidential campaign) might come across as inflammatory.

Furthermore, though I don't have any interest in getting into a political fight with you, all I had to do to affirm that you held at least some of the very ugly racist and conspiratorial opinions which have become so depressingly common among Conservatives these days.

I do understand and respect that people are complicated and so a few internet comments should hardly define you, but I'd like to think that you might understand why I got the impression I did.

[–]Ginger-saurus-rex 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What does your second paragraph even mean?

[–]ThatDamnedImp 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

genuinely shitty, sexist, right-wing trolls which give the rest of us a bad name.

No, the problem is cunts like you who think that 'right-wing' is a pejorative that belongs in that list. So anyone 'right wing' becomes evil in your eyes.

THAT is your real problem with Trump. His politics aren't your politics, and you refuse to admit that, so you drum up all of this other bullshit to justify your hatred. but none of that is real. You only oppose him because he's a Republican. 'ring-wing' as you put it.

The problem is, to you leftwingers on this site 'Right wing' is the same thing as 'evil'.

[–]Wagnerous 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

His politics aren't your politics, and you refuse to admit that

Not sure where you got that from, I'm more than comfortable stating that Trump's politics and mine are vastly different, but just to be clear let me restate it for you. Donald Trump is a national embarrassment. For the first time in modern history our foreign allies across the world are treating us like the odd man out, instead preferring to work with countries like China, something that would have been unthinkable even a year ago. The man is only president because he was the beneficiary of election fraud perpetrated by our greatest foreign adversary, who in an attempt to undermine our democracy and our place in the world worked to elect perhaps the worst major presidential candidate in history, a tactic which has been an outstanding success for the Kremlin. Furthermore, it becomes more obvious by the day that the highest echelons of the Trump campaign knowingly worked with the Russian government to steal the election, most thinking people had been aware of that for months now, but the conspiracy was all but confirmed when the President's idiot son published documents which at bare minimum confirm conspiracy to commit election fraud, if not fraud itself.

That said, despite the fact that to my great shame the United States of America is quite literally being run by traitors at the moment (and wildly incompetent ones at that) they are not the people who I most despise. After all there have always been dangerous, unstable, evil people who have lusted after power in society, the difference before was that the American electorate used to have the good sense not put those sorts of people within a hundred miles of executive power. Yes, the people in those country for whom I hold the least respect are the people like you Sir. The weak, impotent, feeble-minded ill-educated "Conservatives" (though what that term even means anymore, I could not say) who lacked even the barest critical thinking skills to see through the fumbling demagoguery an utterly incompetent, aged, billionaire who very clearly cared far more for the idea of being president than for any actual policy initiative or attempt to better the lives of his fellow Americans.

In short Sir, I don't so so much despise Donald Trump as I do the scum-sucking idiots who were dumb enough to vote for him as (I assume) you did yourself.

P.S. If you made it to the end, congratulations! I imagine this was probably the longest thing you've read in a very long time, or at the very least, the longest writing to hold the barest shred of coherency anyways. May it be the first step in a journey of self-discovery for you Sir, one which I do so very much hope, ends with your admitting to yourself that supporting a traitor to lead our country, merely because he's entertaining and because he pays brief lip-service to your pet-issues might in fact, be a very poor idea indeed.

[–]RoboFleksnes 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus Christ, fucking finally someone who can hit the nail exactly on what makes my piss boil! What a brilliant comment!

[–]dr_croctapus 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm with you completely, there are absolutely some problems with the way men are treated in our society, there are also absolutely problems with the way women are treated. I think it has become hard for people to acknowledge that it doesn't have to be one or the other, it can be both. I've been having trouble caring about any of these problems recently with all the shit from both sides so I'm glad at least someone is agreeing with me hahaha

[–]ThatDamnedImp 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

a president shouldn't be calling anyone a fat pig no matter how fat they are,

I don't agree. The office hasn't been worthy of respect at any time in my lifetime. Clinton was a fat cheat who fucked impressionable young interns. Bush was a warmongering psychopath. Obama sold us all out to Goldman Sachs.

What Trump does, just looks bad. Those other people, they were a lot worse. Trump acts like a jack-ass. They were traitors, thieves, whores and monsters. I'll take someone who calls Rosie O'donell a Fat pig, over another Obama who tells bankers, "I'm the only thing standing between you and the pitchforks".

Edit: Going back... Bush I was kind of okay, though clueless and out of touch. Reagan sold weapons to terrorists in order to fund a different group of terrorists. Carter was a corporatist dope. Ford pardoned Nixon, and if Nixon had been held to account, I don't think the rest would have been half so scummy. Nixon was Nixon, if you don't know what he did, take a history class. LBJ lied us into Vietnam by inventing a military confrontation that never happened. JFK actually said 'Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country', which is a complete inversion of democracy and emblematic of how the elite view us all as the nation's slaves.

This notion of a great and noble office is a fairy tale taught to children. It's as real as Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy. And most of you are very young, so you don't quite 'know' this yet. But that's all it is.

Edit 2: The Obama quite is verbatim, something he actually told a group of bankers during his first term. It was widely reported at the time, and can be easily verified with over a dozen sources by googling it.

[–]Wagnerous 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Well, I think that people at the time were mostly (and still are) upset with Trump's blatant lack of professionalism. The man was running for the highest office in the land, an office which he ended up winning, so Rosio O'Donnal may well be a pig but that doesn't change the fact that Trump uses language that would probably get him fired from your local Dairy Queen. People aren't wrong to criticism the man's lack of decorum or for that matter, point out his blatant lack of simple decency.

[–]Ginger-saurus-rex 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Look, I have no desire to get political, I just wanted to point out some related hypocrisy.

[–]gayguyredditor -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

While Hillary has called African Americans super predators who need to be brought to heel like they were animals. Hillary received donations from uae and Brunei, regimes which murder nonwhite lgbt people while acting like the champion of lgbt people. People voted fro trump since they wanted someone authentic. He's boorish but he doesn't pretend to be otherwise, unlike Dems who say when they go low, we go high, even if Dems go low against anyone who opposes them

[–]Wagnerous 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

There's no helping you people.

[–]gayguyredditor 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Sarah Palin sees Russia from her house but Dems see Russia everywhere.

[–]Wagnerous 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ok I admit, that was kinda funny.

[–]gayguyredditor -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's her real housewives tagline

[–]ab0rtedbabby 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nasty woman!

[–]TheJazzProphet 94 points95 points96 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

She refers to herself as "SHE-EO". Does that mean "Sexual Harasser of Employees Executive Officer"?

[–]fengpi 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Hey, she's allowed to grab a pussy or two.

[–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_CLIT 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They called it "Boundary-busting", as if it was an accomplishment...

[–]fengpi 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That. Makes. No. Sense.

[–]Hoffnungslosigkeit 72 points73 points74 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Females can never be sexist,creepy and evil.

[–]TigPlaze 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Everything men do is creepy in their eyes. You could just watch a movie and then say, "I think that actress was pretty" and they would think that's creepy.

[–]gayguyredditor 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Complimenting an actress is now considered sexist. How nuts. Isn't that why a nymag film critic had to apologize. He complimented Israeli females and gal gadot when reviewing wonder woman.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's the hair.

[–]chambertlo 84 points85 points86 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's Gawker. Failed Liberal arts majors thinking they are journalists. Do you expect anything less of them?

[–]darrenfx 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, I actually expect much less.

They did joke in court about publishing child porn, so this is nothing compared to that.

[–]thwml 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok, I'll admit to having phone conversations while taking a dump on more than one occasion, but who in the flying fuck thinks that facetiming while on the shitter is acceptable behaviour? Especially in a professional setting?

[–]UDT22 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are default creeps, because they are men

[–]Just4yourpost 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is that SHE-EO a little person? Premature birth? Big head syndrone?

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are harassed and men are controversial.

[–]PIG_CUNT 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Isn't it amazing how nowadays, accusations equals guilty?!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only if you're a man.

[–]gayguyredditor 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Meanwhile, a female molested me when I was clothed in front of some stupid people from my then neighborhood and no 1 did anything since she's female and can't really hurt me since I'm male. I ran back to our then house and washed myself. I was a little older then, but I was molested prior to that by another female when I was 6.

[–]BITCRUSHERRRR 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Remove the filters that hold them back" not sexually assaulting someone holds you back from your full potential?

[–]Vaeon 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is Jizzabelle, what were you expecting?

[–]Huligan27 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is her photo altered? For some reason her head looks big to me

[–]Joonbugger 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ya her head looks fuckin huge it's creeping me out

[–]brokedown 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She's not that weird looking, I'm sure she could have found someone she didn't work with that would have taken her nude skype calls. There are sites for the sort of thing, you don't have to harass your employees.

[–]Zoenboen 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's boundary busting when she does it. That's the sickest part to me.

[–]jimii 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women are the biggest creepy weirdos ever. They're just stealthy about it.

[–]gayguyredditor 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are the biggest creepy weirdos ever. They're just stealthy about it.

And no 1 ever calls them creepy.

[–]Cozy_Conditioning 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Different authors.

[–]ThatDamnedImp 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Same editor, and editors are the ones who make headlines. And editors are the ones who enforce editorial bias.

People who use this argument aren't honest people. They are either parrotting lies told by other people (which they haven't investigated at all), or they're trying to mislead themselves (because they have investigated it).

But the author doesn't pick the title, both articles would have been approved by the same editor, and that editor would have named both articles.

[–]Cozy_Conditioning 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where does it name the editor?

[–]p3ngwin 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Both female authors for Gawker, so what's your point again ?

[–]Cozy_Conditioning -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It is not a double standard unless the same author shows 2 standards. These are different authors.

[–]tmone 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Same editor. Are you just ignoring those who replied the same thing to You?

[–]p3ngwin 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Gawker network has double standards in all it's publications, from BuzzFeed to Jezebel, etc there's simply no denying it.

http://i.imgur.com/Ksddsvg.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/aUES3Uw.png

http://i.imgur.com/GWMyH9x.png

[–]Cozy_Conditioning 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who is the editor?

[–]oddMahnsta 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

buzzfeed?

[–]Trajer 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Worse - Jezebel

[–]Akesgeroth 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Okay, this is off-topic, but is it just me or is her head huge in relation to the rest of her?

[–]Not_Just_You 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

is it just me

Probably not

[–]Akesgeroth 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh hey, that bot again.

[–]ihatefeminazis1 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Is this surprising? The courts treat cases so differently when it comes to being male or female. Like vastly differently.. even in sentencing.. Just recently there was one girl that just got community service after falsely claiming someone raped her and he sat in prison for 4 years till she felt too bad and came out and said it.... And then everyone still didn't give her shit....

[–]gayguyredditor 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Is this surprising? The courts treat cases so differently when it comes to being male or female. Like vastly differently.. even in sentencing.. Just recently there was one girl that just got community service after falsely claiming someone raped her and he sat in prison for 4 years till she felt too bad and came out and said it.... And then everyone still didn't give her shit....

That is truly awful

[–]ihatefeminazis1 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It really is.. I mean that girl deserved the same sentence that they gave the guy... i'm sure everyone would agree with me here.. but why are the courts so skewed is beyond me..

[–]gayguyredditor 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And yet feminists claim that females are oppressed by the "toxic patriarchy"

[–]MemesterReamster 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Watch Gavin McInnes video on workplace sexual Harassment. People need to get over it.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It's not really hypocrisy when they are from two completely different authors. I mean I get the point, but this is reaching.

[–]AbattoirArnold 35 points36 points37 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Same blog, same editors, same ethics. Whatever's published on Jezebel is their responsibility.

Besides, with writers who have pretty much the same sassy diction and headlines, I don't think any hypocrisy from that craphole is reaching.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I disagree, its like saying people are guilty by association. I've seen a ton of news corps offer different opinions on the same subjects. Or writers on news.com.au favor both pro men and pro women issues, I'd know because I've written for them. ironically, Its better journalism because they don't have a political agenda and offer news for all sides of arguments.

Honestly if I took a writing job and an editor told me "Oh Scott, you can't write that because Joe already wrote about that and your opinions are different" I'd laugh in their fucking face and quit.

So as a writer I'm seeing what you're saying but the way you describe news is exactly how it shouldn't be. Uniform network opinions are dangerous and stupid

[–]KaiRaiUnknown 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think its more the publication it's written for - Jezebel definitely has a narrative. It is to anti men what the Daily Mail is to anti-immigrants

[–]AbattoirArnold 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree on the concept of opinions, but neither of these articles were opinion pieces or columns, they were news reports, detailing recent events in the world.

If Jezebel editors think it's permissible to entitle a report with something as presumptuous as 'fucking creep' which then spends the majority of its short length beating Casey a new one for harassment allegations, then I will consider a report dealing with a female harasser more delicately to be hypocrisy, even if the writers differ.

The formats the editors allow for news reporting can definitely come under scrutiny on an ethics perspective. What they choose to let slide matters.

[–]tmone 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're the one reaching, friend.

[–]Drezzzire 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Casey Affleck could get any fucking woman he wants.

HE HAS $$$$

That's all it takes

He has no reason to force himself on anyone.

In fact, he's prob fighting them off more than anything.

Bitches smh

[–]PhillyLyft 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are not going to participate in the new economy, so there is no reason to pander to them. That's why you see such a wide disparity among news coverage. They literally don't care about Male readership., only the women matter now...

You think the 70 cents on the dollar is about equal pay??? It's about economic domination. Women spend way more money than men do and it's important we put the money in their hands.

[–]jaheiner 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Woman who behaves inappropriately and creepily? Strong independant womyn!

Man who is ACCUSED of being inappropriate? OMG WHAT A FUCKIN CREEP!

[–]TigPlaze 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So Denzel Washington looked notably uncomfortable. I would feel uncomfortable too if a friend of mine were falsely accused of sexual misconduct.

[–]callmejohny 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Joanna (((Rothkopf)))

[–]CptFizz 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rothkopf

Every single time

[–]CaptainJamie -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Low quality post. If two of the same authors posted this, then yes, it's hypocrisy, but this is two completely different dumbasses.

[–]tmone 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Same editors. Same magazine. Person, it's a fair comparison.

[–]CaptainJamie -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No it isn't. Are you saying every author on a site shares the same opinion? That makes no fucking sense at all.

[–]tmone 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thought this was on point.

Same editors, and editors are the ones who make headlines. And editors are the ones who enforce editorial bias.

People who use this argument aren't honest people. They are either parrotting lies told by other people (which they haven't investigated at all), or they're trying to mislead themselves (because they have investigated it).

But the author doesn't pick the title, both articles would have been approved by the same editor, and that editor would have named both articles.

[+]ScienceAteMyKid -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He could be president, acting like that.

[–]tmone 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lame.....

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter