I have trouble believing that it's just a coincidence that so many men with power, in western countries no less which are supposed to be the home for progressive ideas are rampantly sexually harassing people. I'm not just talking about the Harvey Weinstein level ones. A lot of the men that have been exposed lately for sexual in appropriateness are people who are actually somewhat productive pillars of society e.g. George Takei and Charlie Rose. I don't think it's a matter of culture or of us somehow managing to find only the most sexually uninhibitted men and putting them in positions of power. I think those men are a representative sample of the men in the larger population. I do not believe that these men had any ill intent, I believe that like most other men, they genuinely thought there was something there and that they didn't mean to hurt anyone. There's a push for women to be able to sexually express themselves which is great but I think we are assuming that men have always complete sexual freedom. What we used to have was an uneven and oppressive sexual dynamic. We never really bothered to discover exactly what is the normal for men. Whenever this is brought up, people get defensive saying they refuse to believe men can't control themselves. This is not what I am saying, I am saying we don't understand the healthy and normal expression of sexuality for men and how the dynamic is supposed to work with that of their sexual preference but what I can say with fair certainty is that men cannot be expected to be perfectly sexually sterile at work.