Hello Winners,

Today, I came up with this question whilst I was watching the The Gender Equality Paradox documentary. It states that in modern countries, under equal opportunity, there are some occupations that women are still biased to as hell. Of course, engineering is the top. Let's suppose there is an engineer (not a typical IT guy or an average coder, but suppose some engineer actualizing new projects, taking risks, accomplishing, conquering new staff). This guy is doing a manly thing. He has analytical skills and intelligence and this should supposedly be manly (since that is what women are lacking, and what keeps them out of this area). This should have a similar effect (I do not mean a substitute) to building muscles and getting stronger (again women lack and thus find aspiring). You might say "Yeah, but how would she benefit from those skills?", but again; those skills are as important as muscles for evolutionary survival, if this is the case.
Then, how is it that engineers are the best suckers in sexual market. They do not have social skills, they fail with women, they do not even know how to approach and so on... I study electrical engineering in a world wide top 10 technical university. My friends are so blue pill and cringy that even I, as a man, get disgusted from them. I am a smart man and I put so much effort to my career. I do not want to bet on a losing one. Is it really that engineering is for losers and has a bad fame for women? Or what is it?