This was not written by me but by a blog commenter named Passerby and I thought TRP would be the right place to re-post this:

TL;DR: IQ drops as high IQ women (and also high IQ beta males) have no kids anymore. Women are also friendly towards outsiders as they go with whoever has the most resources or shows high dominance which was a good predictor of whether someone was able to protect her and acquire resources in stone age times.

There is very high birth rate in Africa and in muslim countries, average TFR is 4 in Africa and 3,1 in muslim countries. Africa is projected to have 4 billion people, and the Middle East 1 billion people. Nigeria alone is projected to have 400 million people. In most latino countries, there is positive birth rate, with the exception of Brasil. Birth rate is positive in India as well. White TFR in the US is 1.75, in Europe 1,5, in Canada 1,5. The replacement rate is 2.1, so white TFR is negative in all western countries. Therefore white people will disappear if they do not change their behavior.

In all feminist countries, you have negative birth rates, that could lead to the disappearance of the native population, if birth rates are not raised. Whites in the US are projected to disappear in 200 years. Feminism is decadent behavior, something that could only happen in a country that is already rich, not something progressive or modernizing. Just like in decadent Rome, where they were ultimately forced to tax single people in order to get them to marry and have kids. In all feminist societies you have massive third-worldization, lowering of IQ, race mixing with blacks, conversions to Islam, etc. The most feminist country in the world – Sweden, is dying right now due to third world/muslim immigration. Muslims are outbreeding europeans in almost all european countries. Barbarism is the last stage of feminism.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=316_1455411063

https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2014/02/06/pew-fertility-rate-for-muslims-and-non-muslims-in-europe/

Western feminized societies are dysgenic. Do you know that successful women in the West are also dysgenic women (genetically unsuccessful)? Do you know that the women with the highest education and those in managerial positions are also those women most likely to be childless?

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2015/04/07/more-u-s-women-are-going-child...

Do you know that dumb women are those with the highest birth rate? Do you know that all western countries have negative birth rates and can not survive without immigration? And who is going to send those migrants? Most high fertility countries are also low IQ countries.

When i saw the Economist’s cover for 2016, http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SmwpzySiiUc/0.jpg

i saw 3 western women on it: Angela Merkel (0 kids), Hillary Clinton (1 kid), and Janet Yellen (1 kid). Do you know what this means? It means that those women are dysgenic. That the future women are not going to look or behave like them. Future women will be probably brown or muslim, and will be dumber than them. That’s quite ironic. The most successful women today are those with the weakest genes. Therefore they are not successful from evolutionary point of view, and the women of the future are not going to look or behave as them.

Right now IQ is dropping in western countries due to third world immigration and dysgenic behavior.

Evidence suggests that the IQs of people in the UK, Denmark, Norway and Australia have declined in the last decade.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2730791/Are-STUPID-Britons-people-IQ-decline.html

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/mind/iq-in-decline-across-the-world-as-scientists-say-were-getting-dumber/news-story/f08cbe3b4ab62c500e28d4a4e3b64780

Data for the US also suggests possible IQ decline.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-03/americans-have-never-been-dumber

http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/brookings-now/posts/2015/07/decline-in-average-intelligence-marine-corps-officers

East Asian students are now outperforming western students according to PISA surveys, which wasn’t the case before 15 years:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment

So in virtually all western feminized countries, you will see those things happening: 1. Economic decline – as share of world GDP. For example Western Europe accounted for 28% of global economic output in 1950 and in 1970. By 1990, this had fallen to 24% and stands at 19% today. A Citigroup forecast suggests it will shrink to 11% by 2030 and 7% by 2050. 2. Older and declining native population. 3. Massive third-worldization and foreign (jewish) infiltration (that infiltration happens easily because females are significantly less xenophobic than males, hence a feminized society will be less xenophobic and more friendly towards foreigners).

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1982.tb00546.x/ab...

IQ decline.

So it is clear, that feminism is decadent behavior that only happens in rich, decadent white countries, and further contributes to their decline. It is quite interesting that jews, who are supposed to be smart, are not willing to implement feminism in Israel, and have higher birth rate, few single moms, higher marriage rate and lower divorse rate compared to the average american. A jewish woman in Israel is not allowed to marry a muslim (while 75 percent of converts to islam in the US and UK are local women). I wonder why is that? Maybe because feminism is not good for the jews (but is good for the destruction of white people of european descent)?

There are numerous studies indicating that women are less xenophobic, less racist, and more accepting of foreigners, including more willing to help foreigners/refugees in need. 75 percent of converts to Islam in the US and the UK are women, as well as the majority of whites who mix with blacks. It follows that a feminized society will be more tolerant and accepting society, while a masculinized society will be more nationalist society. There are plenty of studies showing that women have more liberal voting patterns, are more supportive of affirmitive action in order to fight “racial inequality”, are less willing to support deportation of illegal immigrants, etc.

Suffrage coincided with immediate increases in government expenditures and revenue and more liberal voting patterns for MPs. It is not a coincidence that Sweden, the most feminized country on the planet, took more refugees per capita than anyone else. There is only one anti-immigration party there and women were only 36 percent of its voters, same for most anti-immigration parties in Europe.

So women are not going to fix the islamization/third-worldization problems, since, in many ways, they caused those problems, via “child-free” behavior causing negative birth rate (below population replacement rate), political support for “tolerance”, “multiculturalism”, the welfare state, and dysgenic behavior (highly educated women are more likely to be childless compared to less educated women).

The more nationalist countries are those with more male influence (Russia, China, Muslim countries, Japan, Israel, Eastern Europe, etc.), while the more liberal countries are those with more female influence, such as those from Western Europe and North America.

Men evolved to protect the perimeter against males from other (mainly patriarchal) tribes (chimps do the same). Having women involved in decisions about the perimeter results in what we see – open borders, multiculture, diversity, “tolerance”.

Women, for the most part, care about resources and smoothing conflict over. They evolved to fill that role. Stockholm Syndrome is far more pronounced in female captives. Women were frequently taken captive by (or in some cases traded to) other groups, and so they evolved to smooth things over with distant groups (whereas their male kinfolk were simply killed). The survival of their genes, unless they were exceptionally ugly, was more or less guaranteed – whichever tribe they end up being with. That is why they are more accepting of foreigners and foreign rule.

So, women tend to vote for resource redistribution and being nice to everybody (including those who aren’t in their group), and for helping everybody in need, regardless of their group (say hello to refugee crisis).

Lessons learned: A society where women have a lot of say will ultimately collapse.