There is a concept in programming called “The Uncanny Valley” regarding the push toward making an artificial model of a human passably realistic. Although programmers can come very close, they find that without the absolute congruency of perfection the almost-perfect CG model makes people more uncomfortable than a cartoonish unrealistic model. To put this in perspective, a man would be more aroused by the cartoonish Jessica Rabbit than by a modern-day CG model of a sexy woman, which is theoretically more realistic in comparison but would only serve to revolt him.

There is a similar Uncanny Valley between beta and Alpha, an uncomfortable middle point where the half-Alpha, or near-Alpha, will be perceived as an Alpha-impostor and receive intense rejection despite whatever Alpha traits he may have on his resume. In this regard a passive beta will have an easier time fitting into any social framework over what is perceived as an Alpha-impostor.

Despite speaking with confidence, if a man doesn’t speak with social acuity his confidence will only inspire resentment and mockery. If he speaks with confidence without possessing a masculine appearance, his congruency will be endlessly tested.

Essentially, a man must either fully embody every single Alpha trait or be content to remain a beta doofus; in the middle he’ll get treated like dog shit.

Full version: www.killtoparty.com

Edit: The first thing people notice about you is what you look like and your social acumen no matter how smart you are, how well you speak, how confident you feel, and how many impressive hobbies you have. If you do not present congruently, as a total package, you will not receive the same treatment as someone who does; ask an ugly motherfucker with zero game and lots of cash if he's getting laid frequently; part of the equation is not enough for consistent success.

Edit 2: As a bizarre coincidence, RSDTodd uses "The Uncanny Valley" as a self-development analogy in his latest video blog, so here is a link to that: https://youtu.be/u5TNIrP8vTk