One key number critics of feminism often throw around is 93. As in 93% of fatal work accidents happen to men. Be it in construction, mining, frankly anything involving heavy machinery, exreme landscapes, toxic fumes and improper safety regulations.
Besides being dominated by blue-collar men and also very dangerous, these jobs have another thing in common: Most of them are threatened by the increasing automatization in their industries. Many stereotypical jobs for women with little education face the same fate (in clothing sweatshops, agriculture etc.) but in the "first world" a construction worker for instance can still get replaced by machines easier than a kindergarten teacher.
So where does that leave us? Aside from the fact that eventually we might just have to establish a form of basic income, isn't it time to ditch gender roles in the low-income sector of the job landscape as well? While it's still a problem that women in high-level positions are falsely assumed to be secretaries or nurses, that's no reason to neglect the opposite cases. There's no non-ego-related reason why a man shouldn't be a nurse, a cleaner or a kindergarten teacher. In the latter case we need to get rid of that disgusting pedophile stigma surrounding men in child care jobs first though.
Also, it's not like this wouldn't help some of the more legitimate men's rights issues in general: More male elementary school teachers would result in a more boy-friendly school environment and less "girly" stereotypes enforced on male and female pupils (really, many young girls would prefer less flowers and butterflies as well).
More male nurses and doctor's assistants could make it easier for men to see doctors about allegedly "embarrassing" injuries or health problems before they get serious. So what do you think about this? (I know that every other RP man her toootally has a PhD and works for NASA or Google, but what about the rest?)