I swear to god, whenever redpillers rationalize their arguments, it almost always reverts back to something primitive when there were still Neanderthals and cavemen. Either that argument or they use Christianity to back up their argument. Nothing inherently wrong with being religious, but using it as a weapon? Not such a good idea.

For example: “Men don’t have to be monogamous because they have to spread their seed. They’re built to do that to keep the population going.” Okay... number one, men can obviously have some level of control over their sexualities. Number two, the world has over 7 billion people, which far outnumbers almost every species. We have plenty of people.

Another example: “Women are to be chaste because unlike men who have billions of sperm at all times, women only get one egg a month, which means she must be choosy with her partners. I don’t want a women who took 10 other guys’ sperm.” I understand that promiscuity may affect the sexes differently, but not even cavewomen were chaste, and they probably did not have many partners anyways. Until the first cities and religion were born, this was most likely not a concept. Besides, it’s not even rational to think that every sex parter a women has had she had her parter finishing inside of her. We have condoms in our modern day society...