Discussion welcome.

A few weeks ago the leading moderator of /r/TheRedPill posted a thread titled

The world is scared of men congregating. Red Pill state of affairs 2016

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/4467cn/the_world_is_scared_of_men_congregating_red_pill/

It's an interesting view into the mind of one who moderates the Red Pill subreddit. Interestingly, Purple Pill Debate was referenced in this spiel. Here is what was said:

It is not that we are truly misogynistic, or that we actually support rape. It's not that we're hateful, or that we are potentially abusers.

No, if you listen to each of these complaints against who we are, you will realize quickly that we are not the intended audience for these accusations. Many here participate on a subreddit dedicated to the supposed "rational" debate of these very accusations. (purplepilldebate) To argue it misses the point entirely.

There is no merit to the claims because the claims themselves are intended to shame, to ostracize, and to scare red pillers into conformity. They don't exist because of a logical, thought-out, idealistic disagreement.

Many things stand out. Firstly, it's interesting to see that this forum (PPD) wasn't hyperlinked, only parenthesized as '(purplepilldebate)', when elsewhere in the manifesto hyperlinks were happily made to a specific user, and to the Red Pill sub itself. I'll come back to this later. Back to what was said.

It is not that we are truly misogynistic, or that we actually support rape. It's not that we're hateful, or that we are potentially abusers.

I commend redpillschool for this paragraph. He very clearly sets up the tone for which dissent is to be viewed by his readers. Notice that each reasonable accusation is followed by a correspondingly extremist accusation.

It is not that we are truly misogynistic, or that we actually support rape.

It's not that we're hateful, or that we are potentially abusers.

This is very good practice in manipulative language. Before readers even get the chance to consider whether TRP is misogynistic, or hateful, they are confronted with an extremist opinion that is obviously untrue (the notions that they support rape and could be abusers). In this way the reader's mind rejects the entire statement based on the extremist portion, lumping the more reasonable parts, misogyny and hatred, in with the extremist parts which are rejected. Again, this is manipulative language done well.

Many here participate on a subreddit dedicated to the supposed "rational" debate of these very accusations. (purplepilldebate) To argue it misses the point entirely.

The heavy-handedness here is immediately obvious.

The quotations around 'rational', as if all that is argued here is anything but.

That it is even 'supposedly "rational"'.

Then the claim that to argue what is seen on Red Pill is to 'miss the point entirely'. Is nothing questionable? Should the readers of Red Pill question nothing of what they see on the sub? In redpillschool's esteemed opinion, no, they should not! It is irrationality to do so!

The next paragraph continues...

There is no merit to the claims because the claims themselves are intended to shame, to ostracize, and to scare red pillers into conformity. They don't exist because of a logical, thought-out, idealistic disagreement.

Apparently none of what is debated on this sub comes from a place of logic or rational thought.

Apparently all debate carried out here, rational or not, is merely a smokescreen to 'scare red pillers into conformity'!

Does the lead moderator of /r/TheRedPill actually believe an entire sub, dedicated to debate, is in fact merely a façade for 'scaring red pillers' and 'engaging in irrational debate'?

No.


To summarise...

The particular that PPD wasn't hyperlinked when all else was...

The manipulative tactics used when bringing up 'rape' and 'abuse' to preclude the paragraph concerning PPD...

The scare-tactics to claim PPD will 'reduce Red Pillers to conformity' and that rational debate doesn't take place on this sub.


The lead moderator of The Red Pill is noticeably afraid.

Afraid of Red Pill concepts being discussed on a forum where the Red Pill moderation team cannot swiftly remove posts and ban users who disagree with their narrow world view. Afraid of such concepts being discussed free from censorship, appealing only to rationality and not to a dictatorial panel of like-minded moderators.

The RP moderation team may claim that the world is scared of men congregating. But what is the RP moderation team scared of?

They are afraid of people discussing RP concepts outside their limited domain. Because they realise that without censorship... Red Pill concepts readily fall apart.