So, some of /r/theredpill's primary tenets are that women are insecure, crowd-followers, and overemotional. However, TRP ideology attracts extremely insecure and 'sheep-like' men by virtue of its nature. Somebody who is secure and content in themselves and their lives is not going to revise every aspect of their being because an internet forum told them to. Likewise, somebody who is secure in themselves is not going to ask for life advice from strangers on the internet, and somebody who is truly looking for advice about how to contend with reality in the context of sex and relationships is going to independently read peer-reviewed, experimental (or quasi-experimental) scientific research on sex and relationships instead of reading third-hand blog reporting with a clear agenda, or cherry-picked anecdotes and /r/relationships posts attended to through confirmation bias. Furthermore, the lack of emotion-regulation and irrationality of redpillers is clearly observed in the bitter 'i hate women' posts that reflect unwarranted anger, the massive obsesssion on getting laid (an extremely low-level impulse), and how men are unable to resist the lures of tits and ass, and the blatant lack of logical thought displayed in the clear misinterpretations of scientific data and use of basic statistical errors (even the ones that are oft-corrected by redditors trying to sound well-educated, such as correlation =/= causation, confirmation bias, low sample size, clear confounds, etc.).

My question to redpillers is:

How do you rationalize your own discontentment and clear insecurities whilst bemoaning women for being insecure? What is your pass for being irrational and overemotional (e.g. 'anger phase', no immersion in basic brain/behavioural discourse leading to objectively wrong conclusions about human cognition and behaviour) whilst claiming that women are overemotional and irrational? What allows you to make absolute claims on the nature of women when you do not know how to understand scientific research, and have likely never read a single peer-reviewed article pertaining to brain and behavioural science? How do you justify the fact that you are taking all of your social cues, beliefs, and thought processes from blogs and and internet posts whilst turning around to complain about how women follow the crowd?

Or, to boil it down: why is it okay when you do it, but not okay when women do it?

If you are downvoting this post, please provide your rationale alongside it to provide a better insight into why you think that I am wrong, or why my questions are invalid.