Commenters are posting blatant sexist stereotypes and generalizing all men without even trying to answer the question. It's so disheartening to see sexism against men receive so much support. Am I the only one seeing this??

Mycroft033 · 2021-07-07T13:54:13+00:00

I noticed, interestingly, that the mods locked it because of sexist comments.

But no, guess what, it was locked because they said men were generalizing women in the comments.

Like why

DavidByron2 · 2021-07-07T01:36:01+00:00

Ask them why they think there are so few female Chess grand masters next.

Or so few female Nobel prize winners for science (not "peace" or "literature", ha).

Suddenly they'll say you can't generalize to all men based on some.

GivePuppiesBazookas · 2021-07-07T12:53:03+00:00

Women can't stand when men generalize women, but it's all hands on deck for generalizing men smfh

quietlurk10 · 2021-07-07T01:41:11+00:00

Idk, why are nearly all serial killers are raised by single mothers?

Drayenn · 2021-07-07T14:41:25+00:00

Thst first comment about orgasm with 50 awards 7.5k upvotes.. jesus

friendofalltehworld · 2021-07-07T15:10:56+00:00

Thread locked due to "the unfortunate presence of men in the comments using this post to gracelessly generalize women."

While practically every other comment gracelessly generalises men.

TheBlueGhost21 · 2021-07-07T11:23:27+00:00

Imagine asking “why are there very few females who’ve contributed to great inventions ?” And see how you get on

who_dis_bichh · 2021-07-07T22:28:48+00:00

What does that top comment even supposed to mean??

DizzyDeezler · 2021-07-07T15:09:30+00:00

Did anyone read the mods response to locking the post? "Too many men in here generalizing women".

The entire comment chain is literally a bunch ofnwomen generalizing men.

Those people are so dense.

Women_Hate_Short_Men · 2021-07-07T01:11:54+00:00

because women aren’t good enough to get away with it more than once!

acting like them aside,

women are embraced by every aspect of society and accepted no matter what

men are shamed and treated as disposable by every aspect of society, and told to man up no matter what

with the way men are treated is it really a shock some lose total connection with reality and have no empathy or emotion left?

these traits don’t lead to becoming a serial killer, but all serial killers have them for a reason. it leads to a passion for revenge against others, or a passion for feeling in power for once when they have been denied it all their lives but told by every aspect of society they should have it.

of course those threads just bottle it down to “men think they are more important than others”, does everyone not think this of themselves? and “testosterone”, which doesn’t cause violence but allows men to pursue goals far more than women and if a mans goal has been shaped by the world around him to get revenge or to feel accepted by force, you now have a serial killer.

of course there is outliers such as psychopaths and sociopaths but i wouldn’t base everything around an outlier group.

Yaspis · 2021-07-07T03:28:59+00:00

Also for thousands of years men were forced to fight and die at wars, while women lived in comfort, selected 'the winners' for their sexual life, and started wars just because society conditioned women to value their orgasms more than men's lives.

ApprehensiveMail8 · 2021-07-07T15:33:47+00:00

Since when is serial killing a male dominated occupation?

There are at least 66 known female serial killers infamous enough to warrant their own wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_female_serial_killers

This list is incomplete, it only includes serial killers from one country.

Which means it misses one of the most prolific serial killers of all time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vera_Renczi

It is worth pointing out that many serial killers, such as Jack the Ripper and the Zodiac killer, also MIGHT have been female since we don't know who they were.

Clemicus · 2021-07-07T02:00:54+00:00

Probably due to different targets (relatives, children, the old or ill -- in comparison to strangers), different methods which made it possible for the crimes to be overlooked, different hunting grounds and, a huge blind spot (the myth that women aren't capable of such crimes)

*Edit: I get your point and I agree. Even the assertions are wrong (externalise vs internalise, not being able to handle aggression or the misconceptions about testosterone, or the one that went on a long tangent about dudes). So much sexism

funkynotorious · 2021-07-07T10:09:23+00:00

Well atleast some comments are good. Someone pointed out that its because women are less likely to be seen as criminals so they aren't caught. Also method of violence is different women use poison and men use lethal weapon.

2021-07-07T01:06:02+00:00

Some of them also say that women probably get away with it more often, which is correct.

Sad_Quote_3415 · 2021-07-07T19:21:24+00:00

Generalization is bad all around. No matter the subject. What's your opinion on how to approach a subject like gender based discrimination, and the social impact of gender roles, without using any kind of generalizing?

wanthonio31 · 2021-07-07T20:24:27+00:00

At first I thought, 'good call by the mods' when the thread got locked, and then I looked at their reason for it

reddut_gang · 2021-07-07T03:54:42+00:00

You want to know why? It's a combination of things. Upringing, education, social expectations, media, environment and many more. It's the same reason why the 13/52 statistic is, while true, ignorant of environmental and socioeconomic factors that cause it to be like that. Not going to open that cesspool of toxicity and uneducated takes. But the gist is basically, the environment around an untouched child as he grows up with a touch of genetics is what shapes him into what he becomes. I would say the environment part holds the majority of the mold that makes a serial killer. It's not a hard conclusion to come by if you just do a bit of critical thinking. Clearly that is something the crossposted sub lacks, though.

wombot500 · 2021-07-07T05:46:40+00:00

I think they've argued pretty persuasively that men are inherently violent, and women are inherently peaceful. As far as I can see, the only practical solution to this has already been provided by Feminists - "Kill all men". (I probably better put the /s here).

TheDwiin · 2021-07-07T17:26:16+00:00

I find it ironic that the mod locked it due to the "graceless generalization of women."

allmyghtt · 2021-07-07T09:58:24+00:00

Yeah go look at that threads moderator rules that should tell you enough that it's not a place of good people who actually have any idea of what it means to be eqaul ...... jaded views and in no way prepared to see others

Vanriel · 2021-07-07T16:21:59+00:00

Got to admit I laughed at the comment that said "men have access to the same outlets as women for anger"

Really? Could of fooled me.

justarandomtrol · 2021-07-07T17:13:19+00:00

To answer there question, men get less mental health help and get ignored when they reach out for help leading to serial murderers

Romanian_TVee · 2021-07-07T21:04:35+00:00

Its reddit. If you are cis, white, straight, Christian and/or male- expect it to despise you

LastRounder · 2021-07-07T07:04:34+00:00

Why there are so little number of female serial killers? Because pussy pass let's em be spared.

Good_Stuff11 · 2021-07-07T05:59:25+00:00

The irony of this is that if we assume the take that they claim to say they believe in, aka “equality” we can say more or less that at least mentally men and women at birth are pretty similar. Which then goes to nurture aspect, if there are more serial killers that are men that means society as a whole is doing men a disservice whereas woman have privilege. The patriarchy affects men just as much as it affects women, hell even more imo

DangerousEstimate610 · 2021-07-07T09:08:33+00:00

Nah ur not the only one it's everyone decision is if that man becomes a white knight or a meninist

Papa_Goulash · 2021-07-07T09:27:05+00:00

Shit rolls downhill. I would argue that a male serial killer is typically going to choose victims who are substantially weaker than he. Therefore he has his pick of smaller men, the entire female population and children. Women could only choose weaker women (and that would still be a huge fight risk) and children.

I would further argue female serial killers are most likely satisfied, caught and thus weeded out when they start having children.

Actually_Viirin · 2021-07-07T16:37:01+00:00

I think there aren't as many female serial killers as male because many women prefer to manipulate others into doing their bidding, instead of doing it themselves.

Think no Queen or Empress is a serial killer? Convince your husband that taking over X country gets him Y, but you don't actually care about that. You care that you now have peasants to get silk from. Or spices. Or incense. Etcetera.

A lot less hassle than international trade. FOR HER. No this isn't a great example, but I think you get my point.

Edit: Forgot to mention something. "The most powerful person in a kingdom isn't the king, it's the one whispering in his ear."

Alex-xoxo666 · 2021-07-07T23:09:16+00:00

Tbh I think all the bad comments you saw got removed because I looked now and those comments aren’t that bad

Comments