TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Claim: College tells suicidal male student accused of sexual assault he can't have counseling--because his accuser was using those resources

PierceHarlan

January 14, 2016
2959 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.cotwa.info/2016/01/claim-college-tells-suicidal-male.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Claim: College tells suicidal male student accused of sexual assault he can't have counseling--because his accuser was using those resources
Author

PierceHarlan

Upvotes 2959
Comments 89
Date January 14, 2016 12:19 PM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/40xcf7/claim_college_tells_suicidal_male_student_accused/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/claim-college-tells-suicidal-male-student-accused.963194
https://theredarchive.com/post/963194
Top posts by PierceHarlan

Boy and girl, both 16, have consensual sex--only the boy faces statutory rape charges

2498 upvotes
March 17, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman falsely accused boy of rape because 'she requires attention, even if it's negative'--but she won't go to jail

1414 upvotes
January 22, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman falsely accuses man she barely knew of rape in order to reconcile with her mother, turns his life into a living hell

1379 upvotes
February 24, 2015
/r/MensRights

When rape charges are dropped, it's not appropriate to call the accuser 'the victim'

1211 upvotes
September 17, 2013
/r/MensRights

Hillary Clinton hires woman who thinks it's much better to falsely accuse a man of rape than to disbelieve an accuser

1175 upvotes
February 15, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman had sex with underage boys, falsely accused them of rape, but the DA says the BOYS' conduct was 'reprehensible and wrong'

1163 upvotes
February 25, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman lied she was raped by soldiers to hide a threesome from her boyfriend

1105 upvotes
March 27, 2015
/r/MensRights

Angry protest: Ohio University students declare that due process for college men is "bullshit"

1025 upvotes
February 17, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Tmomp 251 points252 points253 points 10 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

a school must give the complainant options to avoid contact with the accused and "should minimize the burden on the complainant," not the accused.

What if male students pre-emptively but honestly complained about female partners to give them a chance at fairness? Not enough to get them in trouble, but to establish themselves as the complainant legally.

For example, after a sexual encounter, to go to the counseling center, Title 9 office, or whomever, and describe any honest source of discomfort with her. It would establish him as a complainant. For example, if truthful, he could say "I had sex with a woman but I never verbally said yes. I'm not sure if I truly consented."

What downside is there to a guy doing that? I see the downside to not doing it.

[–]nickiter 221 points222 points223 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like a good way to get an investigation opened... By a panel which is fundamentally biased against men. Risky move.

[–]omnicidial 58 points59 points60 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

A woman had sex with me while I was drunk and never asked my consent and I don't want to file any charges but I'd like counseling would be a better move maybe. You'd be asking for rape victim counciling in that case.

[–]TheHumanite 68 points69 points70 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No way. If she was drunk too, you raped her. That'll get you jammed up.

[–]Prof_Acorn 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I wonder how the agency balances if the guy was wasted drunk but the woman was slightly buzzed. Whose consent can be retroactively taken away due to inebriation?

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Prof_Acorn 33 points34 points35 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

... this must be the rape culture everyone always talks about.

[–]Jukeboxhero91 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Amhurst has a fairly consistent track record of not giving people due process and simply expelling male students after rape accusations.

[–]AppleBottomApples 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you know the answer.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They would respond by acting like a robot in an old cartoon when somebody throws water on it.

[–]zulu127 73 points74 points75 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes, especially since women rarely, if ever, ask for consent.

[–]whatsazipper 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The whole explicitly 'ask for consent' nonsense reeks of either trolls or virgins. It's literally not how humans lead up to sex at all, and it will particularly hinder success with women.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"May I introduce myself?"

[–]such-a-mensch 17 points18 points19 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's pretty much like going to HR.... they're not there to help you with your problems, they're there to protect the company/school etc.

Be wary of this plan.

[–]Endless_Summer 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I've never given a verbal yes in my life, does that mean I've been raped hundreds of times?

Fucking feminists, always shitting on actual victims. Every time they call something rape that isn't, or call something non consensual that is, it's a slap in the face of all the women that have actually been raped and are legitimately traumatized.

Feminism is a political movement that doesn't give half a fuck about women.

[–]doinggreat 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For example, if truthful, he could say "I had sex with a woman but I never verbally said yes. I'm not sure if I truly consented." What downside is there to a guy doing that?

It's a dick move if you know in your mind that you consented. The way to deal with an unjust institution isn't to abuse how unjust it is, but to change the system.

Also, if word ever gets out that you make a Title IX complaint after every time you have sex... Well, good luck getting sex again.

I don't think we should be advocating things that make sex more complicated and risky. We should be advocating that people have safe consensual sex, or no sex if they aren't into it. But trying to turn every sexual encounter into a potential legal battle seems like a pretty bleak future.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ideally yes I agree with you. However things aren't getting better or even staying where they are at, it is getting worse and worse.

I think it's pretty clear that people don't really care until it affects women. How do you show the system is broken? Abuse it and break it like they are currently doing. What you are saying we shouldn't do is already happening but to only one side.

I don't like it but it seems fighting fire with fire is the only way to fix the problems in the first place.

[–]Hugo_Erectus 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? Stories like this are exactly why a smart guy has to seriously reflect on the risk of any romantic activity with any women at social gatherings involving alcohol.

[–]SilencingNarrative 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What if male students pre-emptively but honestly complained about female partners to give them a chance at fairness? Not enough to get them in trouble, but to establish themselves as the complainant legally.

I don't think you realize the depth of societal special pleading on women's behalf.

If a man did that, all sorts of alarm bells would go off and he would find himself surrounded by hostility on all sides.

[–]TrimHer 26 points27 points28 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So, you're telling me a college can't figure out how to schedule their appointments so they don't have to see each other?

[–]Lethn 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Institutional incompetence of the highest order.

[–][deleted] 110 points111 points112 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Well yeah. What are the "rape remembrance councillors" going to help him with? They're helping her remember everytime that someone brushed up against her as being rape.

They can't help him because he's a guy he can't be raped, he can only be a perp.

[–]Slaviner 93 points94 points95 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Im a counselor in school and you cant imagine the cases I hear in supervision meetings. There really are some mental health professionals that do exactly what you described, helping the student remember weird sexual experiences as rape.

[–]TheGDBatman 38 points39 points40 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you not legally required to file complaints with their regulatory bodies? That kind of shit should not fly.

[–]hashtagwindbag 36 points37 points38 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

mental health professionals

I'm now parsing this as health professionals who are fucking mental.

[–]TrimHer 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Some people get into the field because they are psychologically disturbed themselves.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As someone going into that field, I have to say you are correct.

[–]cjackc 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Notice how eye doctors almost always have glasses or contacts? Mental health professionals almost always have mental health problems.

[–]FruitierGnome 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The inmates took over the asylum.

[–]ratchetthunderstud 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Scary thing about it is that those people are in positions of authority and trust, guiding people at their most vulnerable, and shaping their memories, reactions, recall, future handling of anything related to the event, and insisting that a weird sexual experience constitutes rape.

[–]the-tominator 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds a bit like 'repressed memories' of UFO encounters to me. A counsellor should not lead people on in that way.

Repressed memories of early childhood sexual abuse are very common though, because the brain (especially memory) isn't very developed. It's hard to remember much at all from when you're under 10, so a traumatic memory that's likely to be repressed by defence mechanisms is going to be very hard to remember when it's hard enough remembering what happened on a normal holiday when you were 6.

But somehow I'm sceptical of this happening to adults (although I'm no psychological expert so don't take this as proven fact). Especially if the event happened in the last 5 years, you'd almost certainly remember it.

But of course, the accuracy of memories from, say 5 years ago, will be poor, they'll probably be foggy and confused. So someone else (e.g. a counsellor) could easily alter these memories accidently by asking leading questions.

So they should try hard not to do that, as it doesn't help anyone (especially not the person receiving the counselling). Questions should always be open, not closed. E.g. 'where were you on the 19th October?' rather that 'were you at school on the 19th October?'. The second style of question can cause people to believe they were at school on that day (as an example) when they actually weren't. Human memory can easily be altered, and the longer ago it was, the easier it will change.

[–]Glassclose 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

well its unfortunate but true, you don't want to put yourself out of business, no matter what your business is. 'your dad used to kiss you on the head before he put you to bed? holy shit, your dad was grooming you for rape!"

[–]bertreapot 20 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So let's put it bluntly: why should we be surprised if a college, in effect, tells a suicidal male student who was accused of sexual assault to go drop dead?

I think that is the point. Most colleges will put the accused man on suspension until there is a hearing, anyway. Meaning, pack up your shit and move out of the dorms, ASAP. It doesn't matter if you're suicidal and the school won't help you, because the school presumes you are guilty.

[–]CJL13 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In fact the school would prefer you commit suicide so they can just call you guilty and move on.

[–]Leno405 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately it's true. :(

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (20 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]307Smash 80 points81 points82 points 10 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Given that this story was broken by an open letter from the feminist girlfriend of the male student, and another feminist was quoted in the article as saying that colleges have gone too far in favour of believing accusations of sexual assault without evidence, and neither of these two said that it was the man's fault or that the problem was toxic masculinity, this comment doesn't make sense to me.

[–]the-tominator 28 points29 points30 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

OP isn't blaming the girlfriend or all feminists. It's the actions of those in power at the college that are wrong, as you know. And it's quite likely, although I'll admit not certain, that these people will have a certain ideological leaning like how the OP described (but less exaggerated obviously).

In all honesty, problems like this are often caused by blindly following 'policy', when a policy is badly thought out and wrought with unforeseen consequences. But you can't blame people for blindly following policy when they are under force (risk of losing job) to do so. So the blame must lie with the creators of the policy, who didn't think it through properly. In the case of the current rape hysteria, the policies enacted by colleges have been reactionary and 'something MUST be done!' type things. Such reactionary actions without sufficient thought never work out well. I've never known a knee-jerk 'do something!' law or policy actually be good in the long term.

The people fuelling the hysteria and demanding 'something be done!' are responsible, and so are the policy-makers enacting bad policies to keep the hystericals happy, boost their own popularity, feel and look like heroes for 'doing something'. They should thoroughly think what the consequences are likely to be, and they should spend a time on this stage before moving forward. Rushed decisions are rarely good ones.

[–]307Smash 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Imagine the original comment ended with "but in all seriousness, some feminists are pretty alright" - wouldn't that seem pretty jarring and inconsistent with the rest of the comment? So, I think you're being too fair to the original comment.

I agree with a lot of the other stuff you said though.

[–]the-tominator 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I agree that that would sound weird. However, saying that is unnecessary when you're talking about feminists as an ideology because you're not talking about individuals. As an ideology, it doesn't matter whether the followers are saints, nice, alright, bad, intolerable or even evil. That would be ad hominem attacks or ad hominem support. However, it isn't clear that OP was talking about feminism as an ideology or as individuals. I expect he/she was talking about the ideology given that his/her post was mainly about the ideology of 'toxic masculinity' etc (third/forth wave feminism).

Indeed, not all feminists think this way. In fact I think the majority of self-described feminists don't really have any gender-war element at all, they are the laypeople who just identify with the label but don't really subscribe to the ideology. These aren't the active ones, in fact, it's hard to even tell that these people are 'feminists' unless you ask them. Generally, when referring to any ideology (incl. Feminism), people are talking about the more vocal, active subscribers to the ideology. 'Communists' often would not include edgy teenagers who wear a Che T-shirt. It would refer to actual communist activists, theorists, politicians etc. The majority of self-described feminists are of the 'T-shirt' type.

And OP was exaggerating for effect.

[–]307Smash 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think you're nitpicking here - sure it's possible to criticize an ideology without criticizing the people who believe it but that is clearly not what's happening here. You can definitely tell from his original comment that he has an extremely negative view of most or all feminists, and he confirms this in later comments.

[–]Lanoir97 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

From what I read he was criticizing feminism as an idea, the stuff you see on YouTube with those women sipping on their male tears cups. Either that or he's misinformed, or covering a hatred of women.

[–]dungone 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a false dichotomy. Not only was I criticizing mainstream feminist ideology, but I was also criticizing the knuckleheads who pretend like they don't know any better. Yes, feminism is actually like that, and I have very little patience for feminists who claim ignorance of the very things they actively support. Like I said, it's all fun and games until it's your own son/brother/boyfriend/father who has his life destroyed. It's too little, too late, for a feminist to wake the hell up and claim "well maybe feminism has gone a little too far" once she herself has been personally inconvenienced, hoisted by her own petard.

Where the hell do you get this idea that this has anything to do with women as a whole? Did you not hear? Less than 20% of Americans consider themselves feminists. Fewer than 50% of Millennial women, too. Feminists are a minority fringe group that happens to have a very firm death grip over politics and policy.

[–]bufedad 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In my experience, many feminists come to their senses when it affects men they love.

[–]25russianbear25 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

she did that because it was her friend not because she a feminist

want to know why? because there were other feminists in that school who didnt give a shit. Any small injustice to a feminist and its national news... dont pretend like youre and i clueless

[–]Endless_Summer 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like they shouldn't be identifying as feminists, then.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]307Smash 24 points25 points26 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Haha, come on man. This is literally an article that was written because a feminist called out discrimination against a man and stood up for him. If she hadn't done that the article couldn't have been written. And your comment says that feminism doesn't care about men's issues, blames men for their own suicide, and wants to "reduce the male population by 90%". Do you not see the irony?

No, I'm not saying that no feminists discriminate against men. But it seems like you're making the opposite mistake and saying that no feminist can stand up against discrimination against men even when we have a case of that right in the article.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

The person who wrote the letter says:

As a feminist, I am often critical of men who suggest the possibility of “reverse sexism” and I do still believe that it does not actually exist.

If you write something like that in a defense of your partner's rights, you can be pretty well certain they've drank all the koolaid and yet they still had to speak up.

[–]beatlesfanatic64 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think the people that argue sexism=prejudice+power still view prejudice as a bad thing, they just call it prejudice instead of sexism. That's my understanding at least, and honestly I don't really see what the big deal is about what the labels are. If you can see something that's wrong and speak out against it, I'm not going to complain about what you labeled that wrong thing as, I'll just be happy someone did something about it.

[–]dungone 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh right, that "power" word that seems to mean whatever the fuck that you want it to mean when it comes to denying that feminism is sexist as fuck against men. In this case, I suppose the accused man is the one who had all the power. Maybe he's the one who drove the poor girl to contemplate suicide and blocked her from accessing mental health services. Wow, that's some awesome power right there.

[–]Vandechoz 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

still view prejudice as a bad thing

...but not as bad. I mean, it's just men, amirite?

[–]307Smash -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like beatlesfan says, I think it's just an issue of pepole using different terms. After all, she also said:

"In this case, my partner engaged in mutually consensual and sober intercourse with the claimant and was assaulted by the claimant, but responsibility lies with my partner because of their gender. That is simply horrifying. "

and

"I write to you because this case has taught me that gender discrimination does exist."

So she is still definitely saying that he was discriminated against because of his gender.

[–]dungone 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, hate to break this to you, but feminists aren't actually on the forefront of calling out jack shit or standing up for men. They're literally last in line to call out anything at all; time after time we have examples of feminists pulling their heads out of their asses only when their own men have their lives destroyed and they personally suffer as a result.

All you've got going for you here is a selfish hypocrite of a feminist who doesn't have the intellectual integrity to admit that she has been wrong all along and renounce her feminist ideology. I see absolutely nothing that reflects well on feminism here. Just a fucking moron struggling with the cognitive dissonance of it all. She still doesn't believe that discrimination against men is possible. The only thing that she seems to have a problem with is that she was personally inconvenienced.

[–]cjackc 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So basically only "credentialed feminists" are allowed to speak?

[–]Slaviner 41 points42 points43 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Im a college counselor and have never heard of a case like this. Worst case scenario the counseling services center would just have to assign them to two different clinicians.

[–]bufedad 54 points55 points56 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Colleges have been pushed (Dear Colleague letter) to prevent accusers from having to see their accused.

The very sight of him is enough for the college to potentially get in trouble, so they have to keep the two separated.

Now, considering he's suicidal, the college could have arranged for treatment in another location, but that would only happen if they really cared about this young man.

[–]The_Def_Of_Is_Is 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, Obama vicariously wrote a dumb letter. Do you know what happened to the institutions that ignored it (and continued policy of handoff to the police)? Nothing. Do you know what happened to those who did follow it? They are getting sued out the ass and the DoJ refuses to help them (other than advise them to settle so it doesn't reach a real court and end the insanity universally). In other words, the DCL only empowered already existing psychos by letting them know the highest level approved.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And which institutions ignored it? Source?

[–]The_Def_Of_Is_Is 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The big schools in my state did not, because it was already law that they had to pass on criminal complaints to the police. I don't particularly care to specify though. I will turn the question around though - have you heard of anyone getting sued for noncompliance?

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Name one school

[–]PierceHarlan[S] 22 points23 points24 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As someone who follows the issue very closely for COTWA, I am not at all surprised by the allegation. The fact that it doesn't happen at your school is good for your students, but bad things are happening to male students at schools all over the country.

[–]cuteman 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As someone who follows the issue very closely for COTWA, I am not at all surprised by the allegation. The fact that it doesn't happen at your school is good for your students, but bad things are happening to male students at schools all over the country.

They do it all the time for legal services. They won't assist you often since you're both students

[–]IronJohnMRA 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This far from being a worse case scenario, in the minds of the administrators who made this happen. It's possible that the, "rape victim" might see, or even interact with her "attacker" during the course of receiving services at this counseling center. The solution is to prevent this from ever happening by barring him from any place she might go. At least to the misandric, gynocentric, feminists running this hell hole for male students.

[–]MAX1948 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Basically they want men to kill themselves, its like women cant do anything themselves

[–]apullin 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And yet if you proposed establishing an all-male college, you would be excoriated, and accused of supporting "segregation". And those lambasting you would then turn around, and support racially segregated programs and women's-only spaces.

[–]pintocat 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Guilty until proven innocent

[–]TheSOMT 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The real story is that the college administrator never refuted the charge. If, on the other hand, some woman claimed she was sexually assaulted, the school's administrators would have been tripping over each other to say that the school takes all such claims seriously and that the school provides all sorts of resources for victims, etc.

[–]teddtbhoy 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is so awful, I really feel for this guy and hope he pulls through.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PierceHarlan[S] 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Pres. Firefly, how are Chicolini and Pinky? Upvoted for the name alone.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PierceHarlan[S] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

HA!

[–]pnw_diver 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Misandry on parade.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Feminists keep claiming men don't reach out for help and that should be addressed, but they also dissuade men even moreso from reaching out by having them not taken seriously.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men who reach out for help are treated like losers anyway.

[–]seeellayewhy 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

No sources mentioned anywhere in this article. No credible reason to believe it. Sure, if true its a terrible story. But the writer starts the story with those words: "if true".

There's no point in getting riled up about this story because there's no story there. No facts presented whatsoever.

[–]SkyGuppy 35 points36 points37 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

http://statenews.com/article/2015/12/an-open-letter-to-denise-maybank

Hi all. There's been a lot of discussion here about the validity of this article. The State News has verified the student status of this letter's author, and has obtained a few official letters and emails from the author proving there was a case. In one letter from the Office of Student Affairs and Services, it states that "certain applicable procedures stated in University policies may not have been followed" in the case.

That doesn't prove everything in this letter to be fact — but does clear up some questions.

[–]seeellayewhy 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough! Thanks for the source. What you provided is much better than the OP, which as its written comes across as an editorial based on a rumor.

[–]ARedthorn 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some of the embedded links in the article are helpful, too... If you're willing to rabbit-trail a bit.

Example-

First link contains an email interview with a legal expert who reviewed MSU.

The university now uses “a modified version of the single-investigator model – in which one person serves as the equivalent of police, prosecutor, jury, and judge, subject only to oversight from a MSU panel,” Johnson wrote in an email to The Fix. That model also keeps the accused from confronting the accuser, questioning other witnesses and seeing evidence against the accused, he said.

That alone is terrifying... Circumstantial to the claim he was refused counseling, but terrifying.

COTWA is usually pretty good about sources, you just may have to check all the links.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PierceHarlan[S] 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks, but no need for name calling. S/he is allowed to disagree with one of my posts--an incredible number of people seem to disagree with her/him based on the upvotes.

[–]altxatu 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nothing wrong with being curious and thinking critically.

[–]doinggreat 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pierce, you've been writing great pieces for many many years and I appreciate all your hard work and time spent in fighting for justice. God save the Queen and God save Pierce Harlan.

[–]Rethgil 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair if there was only one counsellor available who was already counselling the woman they wouldnt be able to help anyone related to her at all, be that a sister, best friend or brother. Sadly its a case of first come first served if seeing someone. But they should still have secured them alternative help. And that's only IF there was just one counselor. Which is a big if. If not? They should be fired.

[–]Bikesandkittens -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Of course he can't, that's a conflict of interest for the counselor and a boundary he can't cross. He's just following the rules, yo.

[–]derpylord143 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only if there was 1 counselor which means that this institution I woefully under prepared

[+][deleted] -9 points-8 points-7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A) conflict of interests

B) restraining order prevents the restrained from contacting people who are associated with the protected party

[–]ARedthorn 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Both only apply if MSU employs a single counselor for their entire student body.

Also- schools can't give out restraining orders.

Assuming the student got a judge to issue a restraining order (or the school did so on her behalf)... Where can the student go?

They probably share a professor or two. They probably get their meals from the same places. They probably both pass through the student union from time to time.

Messy.

So, sure. Assuming there's a restraining order, he can't go to the counseling offices while she's there.

But when a student is suicidal... Maybe the counselor can schedule around that... Or, maybe... Since a school with thousands of students will have more than one counselor... One can go to him.

No excuses justify this.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter